- Israeli Security Zone
The Israeli Security Zone in southern
Lebanonwas a strip of territory of varying width, 5 to 25km, from the Israeli border and the occupied Golan Heights, occupied by Israeli forces from 1985 to 2000. Additional regions controlled by the South Lebanon Armyare sometimes included under the term. The stated purpose of this zone was to put Israel's border towns out of range of small arms and mortar fire.
Following the Israeli Government's 1985 decision to pull back its positions in Lebanon, thus seemingly ending Operation Peace in Galilee (or the
1982 Lebanon War), a follow-up decision ordered the Israeli Defense Forceto maintain a buffer zone inside Lebanon. A jointly-patrolled zone formed part of a tentive agreement, never ratified, between Israel and Lebanon in 1983.
A small contingent of IDF units were left to patrol the Security Zone in order to prevent infiltration into Northern Israel, and to provide a deterrent force against any attempt by
Palestinianor other militia groups to fire longer range weapons into Israel proper.
Over the following decade, the IDF expanded and institutionalized its presence in the Security Zone as commanders on the ground established better fortified posts and more troops. This presence was a direct response to the rise of
Hezbollah(or Party of God) as a serious political force throughout Lebanon and a potent guerrilla army in the south.Facts|date=February 2008
Hezbollah fighters engaged in steady low-level confrontations with the IDF. Operations included attacks on convoys and routine patrols; placement of roadside bombs and remote control activated devices; occasional attempts to storm IDF outposts (most famously the attack on the
D'lat outpost, in which a Hezbollah fighter succeeded in breaching the walls of the outpost and planting a Hezbollah flag before the attack was repelled); launching ground-to-ground missiles, particularly AT-3 Saggermissiles at IDF tanks and outposts; and occasional shelling of Israeli border towns with Katyusharockets.
Over the course of the conflict a set of unwritten but widely recognized "
Rules of Engagement" developed between the sides. It was broadly understood that any Israeli killing of a Lebanese civiliansin pro-active anti-Hezbollah operations would be met with a Katyusha barrage on the northern towns of Israel. It was understood that Katyusha fire would be met with proportional if unequal responses, including the use of IDF war planes and heavy artillery. Both sides also captured and exchanged prisoners.
Strategically, the conflict was a long-standing
stalemate. Hezbollah was unable to inflict sufficient damage on either the IDF presence in Lebanon or on the quality of life in Israel's northern towns to force Israeli concessions. Israel was unwilling to either expand its control of Lebanon or to take the war to those countries that armed, funded and trained Hezbollah.
By the late 1990s a change in the political dynamic of the conflict was becoming more apparent. While Israel was strategically able to sustain its losses (normally around two to three soldiers killed each month), the will of the Israeli public to accept what were seen as pointless deaths began to fade. The security zone eventually failed to provide security as Hezbollah teams could still fire rockets into Northern Israel. With each loss, Hezbollah assumed ever more heroic proportions in the eyes of the Lebanese public and the rest of the
Arabworld as one of the first Arab armed forces to ever successfully match swords with the Jewish State. Through constant low-level combat, Hezbollah became an ever more effective and better trained force.
A number of other questionable activities occurred within the zone. For example, Israel cooperated with right-wing American Christian personality
Pat Robertsonin setting up a television network inside the security zone called Middle East Televisionthat broadcast Christian religious programming to both Lebanon and northern Israel. The security zone also played host to the so-called Government of Free Lebanon which claimed to be the true government of Lebanon. Also in the security zone, Lebanese militias ran prisons with very bad reputations and conscripted the local population. While Israel ran the zone, it said it had no control over the actions of Lebanese militias within the zone.
Change in Israeli mood
In February 1997, two Israeli military helicopters ferrying troops into the Security Zone collided, killing over 70 soldiers on board. (See
1997 Israeli helicopter disaster.) The event sparked days of national mourning. Out of this trauma, a number of women living on the northern border with sons serving in Lebanon came together and drafted an open letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahucalling on him to bring the boys home. The women's letter would, over the coming weeks, evolve into The Four Mothers Movement.
Within days of the letter being published in the nation's newspapers, hundreds of people around the country, mainly mothers, were openly expressing their solidarity with the view expressed by the Four Mothers. While the issue of withdrawal from Lebanon had long been
tabooin mainstream political circles, the Four Mothers appeal to core Israeli values opened up a flood gate of pent up frustration.
Over the course of the coming two years, the Movement grew from its original core band to a national organization with several hundred active members. The Four Mothers held protests, sponsored advertisements in newspapers, and, perhaps most effectively, held vigils outside the Defense Ministry in
Tel Avivthe day after an IDF soldier was killed in Lebanon.
The persistence of the movement sparked a national re-evaluation of the policy guiding Israel's continued presence in the Security Zone. Polls quickly began to shift. By the time the 1999 election rolled around, a majority of Israelis now supported unilateral withdrawal from the Security Zone.
Recognizing the shift in public sentiment,
Ehud Barak, the Labor Party's candidate for Prime Minister, announced that if elected he would move to bring the IDF back to the blue line.
Barak was elected in a landslide. The IDF announced that it would hand over the security zone to the
South Lebanon Armyby July 2000. As the IDF started to hand positions in the security zone over to the South Lebanon Army, the Lebanese milita forces suddenly surrendered. The first to surrender were Shite Muslim units conscripted from the security zone. A day later, the majority of the SLA positions had collapsed. The IDF then began to withdraw from the zone under fire from Hezbollah. Over the course of two days in May 2000, the IDF fully withdrew from the Security Zone. The following month, the UNconfirmed that Israel's force deployment was now entirely consistent with the various security council resolutions with regard to Lebanon.
1982-2000 South Lebanon conflict
South Lebanon Army
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Security Zone — A narrow strip (3 to 9 miles wide) of land north of the Israel Lebanon border retained by Israel following the unilateral withdrawal of most of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) from Lebanon in the spring of 1985. The area was patrolled by small … Historical Dictionary of Israel
Israeli–Lebanese conflict — The Israeli Lebanese conflict describes a series of related military clashes involving Israel, Lebanon, and various non state militias acting from within Lebanon.The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) recruited militants in Lebanon from… … Wikipedia
Israeli West Bank barrier — The Israeli West Bank barrier is a barrier being constructed by Israel consisting of a network of fences with vehicle barrier trenches surrounded by an on average 60 meters wide exclusion area (90%) and up to 8 meters high concrete walls… … Wikipedia
Israeli land and property laws — Land and property laws in Israel provide a legal framework which governs land and property issues in Israel. At its establishment, Israel continued to apply the pre existing Ottoman and British land law. Over time, these laws were amended or… … Wikipedia
Israeli-Palestinian conflict in Hebron — The Israeli Palestinian conflict in Hebron is a microcosm of the wider Israeli Palestinian conflict. The conflict in Hebron is being played out in a city of 160,000 Palestinians and a Israeli settler population of 500 800 living in close… … Wikipedia
Israeli Supreme Court Opinions on the West Bank Barrier — On two occasions the Israeli government has been instructed by the Supreme Court of Israel to alter the route of the barrier to ensure that negative impacts on Palestinians would be minimized and proportional [http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files… … Wikipedia
Israeli-occupied territories — The Israeli occupied territories are the territories which have been designated as occupied territory by the United Nations and other international organizations, governments and others to refer to the territory seized by Israel during the Six… … Wikipedia
Israeli passport — The Israeli passport ( he. דרכון) is issued to citizens of the State of Israel for the purpose of international travel [ [http://www.israelemb.org/ConsularTravelDoc.html Embassy of Israel in the US. Consular Section] ] and entitles the bearer to… … Wikipedia
History of the Arab–Israeli conflict — The Arab Israeli conflict is a modern phenomenon, which takes its roots back in the end of the 19th century. The conflict became a major international issue with the birth of Israel in 1948. The Arab Israeli conflict has resulted in at least five … Wikipedia
Violence in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict 2007 — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Israeli Palestinian conflict 2007 caption= partof=al Aqsa Intifada date= place=Israel, Gaza Strip, West Bank casus= combatant1=flagcountry|Israel Defense Forces (Israeli Security Forces) combatant2= Islamic… … Wikipedia