- Iraq and weapons of mass destruction
This article concerns the
Iraqi government's use, possession, and alleged intention of acquiring more types of weapons of mass destruction(WMD) during the presidency of Saddam Hussein. During his reign of several decades, he was internationally known for his use of chemical weapons in the 1980s against civilians and in the Iran–Iraq War. Following the 1991 Gulf Warhe also engaged in a decade-long confrontation with the United Nationsand its weapons inspectors, which ended in the 2003 invasion by the United States.
The United Nations located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi WMD throughout the early 1990s, with varying degrees of Iraqi cooperation and obstruction. [Cleminson, Ronald. [http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_09/Cleminson_09 What Happened to Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction?] Arms Control Association. September 2003] Washington withdrew weapons inspectors in 1998, resulting in
Operation Desert Fox. The United States and the UK, along with other countries and intelligence experts, asserted that Saddam Hussein still possessed large hidden stockpiles of WMD in 2003, and that he must be prevented from building any more. Inspections by the U.N. restarted from November 2002 until March 2003, [cite web |url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-03-02-un-wmd_x.htm |title=U.N. - Iraq had no WMD after 1994 |publisher= USA Today|date=March 2, 2004 |accessdate=2008-03-21 |first=Bill |last=Nichols] but hadn't turned up any evidence of actual WMDs when the United States and the " Coalition of the Willing" invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein in March 2003.
Great controversy emerged when no stockpiles of WMDs were found, leading to accusations that the United States, its President
George W. Bushin particular, had deliberately inflated intelligence or lied about Iraq's weapons in order to justify an invasion of the country. The non-profit and non-partisan Center for Public Integrityasserted President Bush's administration made a total of 935 false statements between 2001 and 2003 about Iraq's alleged threat to the United States. [ [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080123/ap_on_go_pr_wh/misinformation_study Yahoo! news] . Retrieved on Jan 2008] While various leftover weaponized WMDs and weapons components from the 1980s and 1990s have been found, most weapons inspectors now believe that Iraq's chemical weapons program did indeed cease production after 1991. The U.S.-led Iraq Survey Groupasserted in 2004 that Saddam "never abandoned his intentions to resume a CW effort when sanctions were lifted and conditions were judged favorable". [cite web | title=Iraq Survey Group Final Report Key Findings | url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm | accessdate=2006-08-04]
The first use of chemical weapons in Iraq was in 1919, when Britain's
Royal Air Forcedropped vesicant mustard gason Bolshevik troops. [ [http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,939608,00.html Our last occupation] The GuardianApril 19, 2003] Winston Churchill, secretary of state for war and air, suggested the RAF use "poisonous gas" the succeeding year, during a major revolt there, though historians are divided as to whether or not gas was in fact used. [ [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/03/18/widip218.xml Meddling in Mesopotamia was always risky] The Telegraph March 18, 2003] [ [http://web.archive.org/web/20040310223316/http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/iraq/britain_iraq_07.shtml British Relations with Iraq] BBCFebruary 10, 2003]
Program development 1960s - 1980s
1959 — August 17
USSRand Iraqwrote an agreement about building an atomic power station. 1968 — a Soviet supplied IRT-2000 research reactor atomic power station together with a number of other facilities that could be used for radioisotope production was built close to Baghdad. [http://www.isis-online.org/publications/iraq/tuwaitha.html Power of this station was 2 MW.] [ [http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol2_nuclear-01.htm Iraq Survey Group Final Report ] ]
Saddam Husseinarrived in Moscow in April. He asked about building an advanced model of an atomic power station. Moscow would approve, but only if the station was regulated by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iraq refused.Fact|date=March 2008
After 6 months Paris agreed to sell 72 kg of 93% Uranium [ [http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/facility/osiraq.htm Osiraq - Iraq Special Weapons Facilities ] ] and built the atomic power station without
International Atomic Energy Agencycontrol at a price of $3 billion.
In the early 1970s, Saddam Hussein ordered the creation of a clandestine
nuclear weapons program. [cite web | author=Hamza, Khidhir | date=September/October 1998| title=Inside Saddam's secret nuclear program | format= | work=The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists | url=http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=so98hamza | accessdate=2006-06-10] Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs were assisted by a wide variety of firms and governments in the 1970s and 1980s. [cite web| url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/suppliers/nyt-041303.gif| title=What Iraq Admitted About its Chemical Weapons Program| format=GIF| accessdate=2006-04-28] [cite journal| url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/suppliers/whoarmediraq.pdf| title=Iraq's Purchases in the A-Bomb Supermarket| month=July 18| year=1993| pages=E5| journal=The New York Times| format=PDF| accessdate=2006-04-28] [cite web| url=https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/iraq_wmd_2004/chap4.html| title=Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD, Chapter 4 - Nuclear| date=September 30, 2004| accessdate=2007-09-13] cite web| url=https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/iraq_wmd_2004/chap5.html| title=Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD, Chapter 5 - Iraq’s Chemical Warfare Program| date=September 30, 2004| accessdate=2007-09-13] [cite journal | url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1218-06.htm | title = Leaked Report Says German and US Firms Supplied Arms to Saddam | author = Tony Paterson | journal = "The Independent (UK) | month=December 18 | year=2002] As part of Project 922, German firms such as Karl Kobe helped build Iraqi chemical weapons facilities such as laboratories, bunkers, an administrative building, and first production buildings in the early 1980s under the cover of a pesticide plant. Other German firms sent 1,027 tons of precursors of mustard gas, sarin, tabun, and tear gasses in all. This work allowed Iraq to produce 150 tons of mustard agent and 60 tons of Tabun in 1983 and 1984 respectively, continuing throughout the decade. Five other German firms supplied equipment to manufacture botulintoxin and mycotoxinfor germ warfare. In 1988, German engineers presented centrifugedata that helped Iraq expand its nuclear weapons program. Laboratory equipment and other information was provided, involving many German engineers. All told, 52% of Iraq's international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin. The State Establishment for Pesticide Production (SEPP) ordered culture media and incubators from Germany's Water Engineering Trading. [cite news | first=Maggie | last=McGee | pages=1148-152 | title=We Have Surprises | date=October 10, 1990| publisher=Der Spiegel| url=http://cns.miis.edu/research/wmdme/flow/iraq/seed.htm ]
France built Iraq’s
Osiraknuclear reactor in the late 1970s. Israel claimed that Iraq was getting close to building nuclear weapons, and so bombed it in 1981. Later, a French company built a turnkeyfactory which helped make nuclear fuel. France also provided glass-lined reactors, tanks, vessels, and columns used for the production of chemical weapons. Around 21% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was French. Strains of dual-use biological material also helped advance Iraq’s biological warfare program.
Italy gave Iraq plutonium extraction facilities that advanced Iraq’s nuclear weapon program. 75,000 shells and rockets designed for chemical weapon use also came from Italy. Between 1979 and 1982 Italy gave depleted, natural, and low-enriched uranium. Swiss companies aided in Iraq’s nuclear weapons development in the form of specialized presses, milling machines, grinding machines, electrical discharge machines, and equipment for processing uranium to nuclear weapon grade.
Brazilsecretly aided the Iraqi nuclear weapon program by supplying natural uranium dioxide between 1981 and 1982 without notifying the IAEA. About 100 tons of mustard gas also came from Brazil.
The United States exported $500 million of dual use exports to
Iraqthat were approved by the Commerce department. Among them were advanced computers, some of which were used in Iraq’s nuclear program. The non-profit American Type Culture Collectionand the Centers for Disease Control sold or sent biological samples to Iraq under Saddam Hussein up until 1989, which Iraq claimed it needed for medical research. These materials included anthrax, West Nile virusand botulism, as well as Brucella melitensis, which damages major organs, and clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene. Some of these materials were used for Iraq's biological weapons research program, while others were used for vaccine development. [cite web | author=Associated Press| date=October 1, 2002| title=Iraq got seeds for bioweapons from U.S. | format= | work=Baltimore Sun | url=http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal-te.bioweapons01oct01,0,4635016.story?coll=bal%2Dhome%2Dheadlines| accessdate=2006-06-09]
The United Kingdom paid for a chlorine factory that was intended to be used for manufacturing mustard gas. [cite web | author=The Guardian| date=March 6, 2003| title=Britain's dirty secret | url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,,908301,00.html| accessdate=2006-07-04] The government secretly gave the arms company
Matrix Churchillpermission to supply parts for the Iraqi supergun, precipitating the Arms-to-Iraqaffair when it became known.
Many other countries contributed as well; since Iraq's nuclear program in the early 1980s was officially viewed internationally as for power production, not weapons, there were no UN prohibitions against it. An
Austrian company gave Iraq calutronsfor enriching uranium. The nation also provided heat exchangers, tanks, condensers, and columns for the Iraqi chemical weapons infrastructure, 16% of the international sales. Singaporegave 4,515 tons of precursors for VX, sarin, tabun, and mustard gasses to Iraq. The Dutch gave 4,261 tons of precursors for sarin, tabun, mustard, and tear gasses to Iraq. Egyptgave 2,400 tons of tabun and sarin precursors to Iraq and 28,500 tons of weapons designed for carrying chemical munitions. India gave 2,343 tons of precursors to VX, tabun, Sarin, and mustard gasses. Luxembourggave Iraq 650 tons of mustard gas precursors. Spain gave Iraq 57,500 munitions designed for carrying chemical weapons. In addition, they provided reactors, condensers, columns and tanks for Iraq’s chemical warfare program, 4.4% of the international sales. China provided 45,000 munitions designed for chemical warfare. Portugalprovided yellowcake between 1980 and 1982. Nigerprovided yellowcake in 1981. [cite web | author= Copley, Gregory R. | date=September 8, 2004| title=Reports of French Involvement in Niger-Iraq Uranium Case Not Reliable | format= | work=GIS Special Topical Studies | url=http://184.108.40.206/ISSA/reports/Iraq/Sep0804.htm| accessdate=2006-06-09]
In 1980 the
U.S. Defense Intelligence Agencyfiled a report stating that Iraq had been actively acquiring chemical weapons capacities for several years, which later proved to be accurate. [cite book |author=Mark Phythian |title=Arming Iraq: How the U.S. and Britain Secretly Built Saddam's War Machine |publisher= Northeastern University Press|year=1997 |pages=73-74] In November 1980, two months into the Iran–Iraq War, the first reported use of chemical weapons took place when Tehran radio reported a poison gas attack on Susangerd by Iraqi forces. [cite journal |author=Julian Perry Robinson |coauthors=Jozef Goldblat |title=Chemical Welfare in the Iraq-Iran War |journal=SIPRI Fact Sheet, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute |month=May |year=1984] The United Nations reported many similar attacks occurred the following year, leading Iran to develop and deploy a mustard gascapability. By 1984, Iraq was using poison gas with great effectiveness against Iranian "human wave" attacks.Verify source|date=March 2008 Chemical weapons were used extensively against Iranby Iraq. [cite web |url=http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/cw/program.htm |title=Chemical Weapons Programs History - Iraq Special Weapons Facilities |date=February 28, 2008 |accessdate=2008-03-21 |publisher= Federation of American Scientists] [cite web |author=Fassihi, Farnaz |date=October 27, 2002 |title=In Iran, grim reminders of Saddam's arsenal |work=The Star-Ledger |url=http://www.nj.com/specialprojects/index.ssf?/specialprojects/mideaststories/me1209.html| accessdate=2006-06-09] On January 14, 1991, the Defense Intelligence Agency said an Iraqi agent described, in medically accurate terms, military smallpox casualties he said he saw in 1985 or 1986. Two weeks after, the Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center reported that eight of 69 Iraqi prisoners of war whose blood was tested showed a current immunity to smallpox, which had not occurred naturally in Iraq since 1971; the same prisoners had also been inoculated for anthrax.cite web |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/12/AR2006061200704_pf.html |title=4 Nations Thought To Possess Smallpox| publisher=Washington Post| first=Barton | last=Gellman| accessdate=2006-04-28| date=November 5, 2002] All of this occurring while Iraq was a party to the Geneva Protocolon September 8, 1931, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treatyon October 29, 1969, signed the Biological Weapons Conventionin 1972, but did not ratify until June 11, 1991. Iraq has not signed to the Chemical Weapons Convention.
The "Washington Post" reported that in 1984 the CIA secretly started providing intelligence to the Iraqi army. This included information that was used by the Iraqis in targeting chemical weapons strikes. The same year it was confirmed beyond doubt by European doctors and U.N. expert missions that Iraq was employing chemical weapons against the Iranians. [cite book |author=Bruce W. Jentleson |title=With Friends Like These: Reagan, Bush, and Saddam, 1982-1990 |publisher=W.W. Norton |year=1994 |pages=76] Most of these occurred during the Iran–Iraq War, but WMDs were used at least once to crush the popular uprisings of 1991.Fact|date=September 2007 Chemical weapons were used extensively, with more than 100,000 Iranian soldiers as victims of Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons during the eight-year war with Iraq, [cite web | author=Hughes, Paul| date=January 21, 2003| title='It's like a knife stabbing into me'| format= | work= The Star | url=http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=39470 |accessdate=2006-06-10] Iran today is the world's second-most afflicted country by
weapons of mass destruction, only after Japan. The official estimate does not include the civilian population contaminated in bordering towns or the children and relatives of veterans, many of whom have developed blood, lung and skin complications, according to the Organization for Veterans. Nerve gas agents killed about 20,000 Iranian soldiers immediately, according to official reports. Of the 90,000 survivors, some 5,000 seek medical treatment regularly and about 1,000 are still hospitalized with severe, chronic conditions. Many others were hit by mustard gas. Despite the removal of Saddam and his regime by American forces, there is deep resentment and anger in Iran that it was Western nations that helped Iraq develop and direct its chemical weapons arsenal in the first place and that the world did nothing to punish Iraq for its use of chemical weapons throughout the war.Fact|date=March 2008 For example, the US and UK blocked condemnation of Iraq's known chemical weapons attacks at the UN Security Council. No resolution was passed during the war that specifically criticized Iraq's use of chemical weapons, despite the wishes of the majority to condemn this use. On March 21, 1986 the United Nation Security Council recognized that "chemical weapons on many occasions have been used by Iraqi forces against Iranian forces"; this statement was opposed by the United States, the sole country to vote against it in the Security Council (the UK abstained). [cite web |url=http://www.traprockpeace.org/counter-dossier.html |title=The dishonest case for war on Iraq |date=November 15, 2007 |accessdate=2008-03-21]
On March 23, 1988 western media sources reported from
Halabjain Iraqi Kurdistan, that several days before Iraq had launched a large scale chemical assault on the town. Later estimates were that 7,000 people had been killed and 20,000 wounded. The Halabja poison gas attackcaused an international outcry against the Iraqis. Later that year the U.S. Senate unanimously passed the "Prevention of Genocide Act", cutting off all U.S. assistance to Iraq and stopping U.S. imports of Iraqi oil. The Reagan administration opposed the bill, calling it premature, and eventually prevented it from taking effect, partly due to a mistaken DIA assessment which blamed Iranfor the attack. At the time of the attack the town was held by Iranian troops and Iraqi Kurdish guerrillas allied with Tehran. [cite web |author=Hirst, David| date=March 22, 1988| title=The Kurdish victims caught unaware by cyanide |work=The Guardian |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1251881,00.html |accessdate=2006-06-09] The Iraqis blamed the Halabja attack on Iranian forces. This was still the position of Saddam Hussein in his December 2003 captivity.Fact|date=February 2007 On August 21, 2006, the trial of Saddam Hussein and six codefendants, including Hassan al-Majid ("Chemical Ali"), opened on charges of genocide against the Kurds. While this trial does not cover the Halabja attack, it does cover attacks on other villages during the Iraqi "Anfal" operation alleged to have included bombing with chemical weapons. [cite web |date=August 21, 2006 |title=Saddam Hussein is defiant as his second trial begins in high-profile Anfal case |work=SignOnSanDiego.com (Union Tribune) |url=http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/iraq/20060821-1246-saddamtrial.html |accessdate=2006-09-04]
Chemical weapon attacks
The 1991 Gulf War
On August 2, 1990
Iraqinvaded Kuwaitand was widely condemned internationally. [cite web | author=| date=August 2, 1990| title= 1990: Iraq invades Kuwait | format= | work=BBC | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/2/newsid_2526000/2526937.stm | accessdate=2006-06-10] The policy of the United States on Hussein's government changed rapidly, as it was feared Saddam intended to attack other oil-rich nations in the region such as Saudi Arabia.Fact|date=February 2007 As stories of atrocities from the occupation of Kuwait spread, several of which later proved false, older atrocities and his WMD arsenal were also given attention.Fact|date=February 2007 Iraq's nuclear weapons program suffered a serious setback in 1981 when the reactor used to generate source material for its bomb was bombed by Israel[http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/facility/osiraq.htm] . The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists concurs with this view: there were far too many technological challenges unsolved, they say. [cite journal| url=http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/1991/m91/m91albright1.html| title= Iraq and the bomb: Were they even close?| first=David| last=Albright| coauthors=Mark Hibbs| month=March| year=1991| pages=16–25| volume=47| issue=2| journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists| accessdate=2006-04-28| format= dead link|date=June 2008 – [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3AAlbright+intitle%3AIraq+and+the+bomb%3A+Were+they+even+close%3F&as_publication=Bulletin+of+the+Atomic+Scientists&as_ylo=1991&as_yhi=1991&btnG=Search Scholar search] ] An international coalition of nations, led by the United States, liberated Kuwait in 1991. [cite web | author=| month=November | year=2005| title= Kuwait (11/05) | format= | work=US State Department | url=http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35876.htm | accessdate=2006-06-10]
In the terms of the
UNceasefire set out in Security Council Resolution 686, and in Resolution 687, Iraq was forbidden from developing, possessing or using chemical, biological and nuclear weapons by resolution 686. Also proscribed by the treaty were missiles with a range of more than 150 kilometres. The UN Special Commission on weapons (UNSCOM) was created to carry out weapons inspections in Iraq, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was to verify the destruction of Iraq's nuclear program. [cite web | author=| date=March 2, 1991| title= Security Council Resolution 686 | format=PDF | work=The United Nations | url=http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/596/22/IMG/NR059622.pdf?OpenElement | accessdate=2006-06-10] [cite web | author=| date=April 3, 1991| title= Security Council Resolution 687 | format=PDF | work=The United Nations | url=http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/596/23/IMG/NR059623.pdf?OpenElement | accessdate=2006-06-10]
Between Gulf Wars
UNSCOM inspections 1991-1998
United Nations Special Commission on Iraq(UNSCOM) was set up after the 1990 invasion of Kuwait to inspect Iraqi weapons facilities. It was headed first by Rolf Ekéusand later by Richard Butler. During several visits to Iraq by UNSCOM, weapons inspectors interviewed British-educated Iraqi biologist Rihab Rashid Taha. According to a 1999 report from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, the normally mild-mannered Taha exploded into violent rages whenever UNSCOM questioned her about al-Hakam, shouting, screaming and, on one occasion, smashing a chair, while insisting that al-Hakam was a chicken-feed plant. [cite news| title=The Inspections Maze| publisher=Christian Science Monitor| url=http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/inspections/suspicions.html| accessdate=2006-04-28| year=2002] "There were a few things that were peculiar about this animal-feed production plant", Charles Duelfer, UNSCOM's deputy executive chairman, later told reporters, "beginning with the extensive air defenses surrounding it." The facility was destroyed by UNSCOM in 1996. [cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap6_annxB.html|title=Biological Warfare Annex B|accessdate=2006-09-05]
In 1995, UNSCOM's principal weapons inspector, Dr. Rod Barton from Australia, showed Taha documents obtained by UNSCOM that showed the Iraqi government had just purchased 10 tons of
growth mediumfrom a British company called Oxoid. Growth media is a mixture of sugars, proteins and minerals that provides nutrients for microorganisms to grow. It can be used in hospitals and microbiology/ molecular biologyresearch laboratories. In hospitals, swabs from patients are placed in dishes containing growth medium for diagnostic purposes. Iraq's hospital consumption of growth medium was just 200 kg a year; yet in 1988, Iraq imported 39 tons of it. Shown this evidence by UNSCOM, Taha admitted to the inspectors that she had grown 19,000 litres of botulismtoxin; [cite web| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/2734305.stm| title=Iraqi bio-scientist breaks silence| publisher=BBC One Panorama| first=Jane| last=Corbin| accessdate=2006-04-28| date=February 9, 2003] 8,000 litres of anthrax; 2,000 litres of aflatoxins, which can cause liver failure; " Clostridium perfringens", a bacterium that can cause gas gangrene; and ricin, a castor-bean derivative which can kill by impeding circulation. She also admitted conducting research into cholera, salmonella, foot and mouth disease, and camel pox, a disease that uses the same growth techniques as smallpox, but which is safer for researchers to work with. It was because of the discovery of Taha's work with camel pox that the U.S. and British intelligence services feared Saddam Hussein may have been planning to weaponize the smallpox virus. Iraq had a smallpox outbreak in 1971 and the Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control Center (WINPAC) believed the Iraqi government retained contaminated material.cite web| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/12/AR2006061200704_pf.html| title=4 Nations Thought To Possess Smallpox| publisher=Washington Post| first=Barton | last=Gellman| accessdate=2006-04-28| date=November 5, 2002]
UNSCOM also learned that, in August 1990, after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, Taha's team was ordered to set up a program to weaponize the biological agents. By January 1991, a team of 100 scientists and support staff had filled 157 bombs and 16 missile warheads with botulin toxin, and 50 bombs and five missile warheads with anthrax. In an interview with the BBC, Taha denied the Iraqi government had weaponized the bacteria. "We never intended to use it", she told journalist Jane Corbin of the BBC's Panorama program. "We never wanted to cause harm or damage to anybody." However, UNSCOM found the munitions dumped in a river near al-Hakam. UNSCOM also discovered that Taha's team had conducted inhalation experiments on donkeys from England and on beagles from Germany. The inspectors seized photographs showing beagles having convulsions inside sealed containers.Fact|date=February 2007
The inspectors feared that Taha's team had experimented on human beings. During one inspection, they discovered two primate-sized inhalation chambers, one measuring 5 cubic meters, though there was no evidence the Iraqis had used large primates in their experiments. According to former weapons inspector
Scott Ritterin his 1999 book Endgame: Solving the Iraq Crisis, UNSCOM learned that, between July 1 and August 15, 1995, 50 prisoners from the Abu Ghraib prison were transferred to a military post in al-Haditha, in the northwest of Iraq.Fact|date=February 2007 Iraqi opposition groups say that scientists sprayed the prisoners with anthrax, though no evidence was produced to support these allegations. During one experiment, the inspectors were told, 12 prisoners were tied to posts while shells loaded with anthrax were blown up nearby. Ritter's team demanded to see documents from Abu Ghraib prison showing a prisoner count. Ritter writes that they discovered the records for July and August 1995 were missing. Asked to explain the missing documents, the Iraqi government charged that Ritter was working for the CIA and refused UNSCOM access to certain sites like Baath Party headquarters. [cite web| url=http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/981211/1998121109.html| publisher=Arabic News.com| title=Baghdad prevents inspections at Baath party headquarters| year=12/11/1998| accessdate=2006-04-28] Although Ekéus has said that he resisted attempts at such espionage, many allegations have since been made against the agency commission under Butler, charges which Butler has denied [http://www.ipacademy.org/Publications/Articles/Malone/PublArtiMaloUNNS_Print.htm] [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,208440,00.html] .
In April 1991 Iraq provided its first of what would be several declarations of its chemical weapons programs.cite web | author=| year=| title=UNMOVIC Chronology of Events| work=The United Nations | url= http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm| accessdate=2008-07-06] Subsequent declarations submitted by Iraq in June 1992 , March 1995, June 1996 came only after pressure from UNSCOM. In February of 1998 , UNSCOM unanimously determined that after seven years of attempts to establish the extent of Iraq’s chemical weapons programs, that Iraq had still not given the Commission sufficient information for them to conclude that Iraq had undertaken all the disarmament steps required by the UNSC resolutions concerning chemical weapons.
In August 1991 Iraq had declared to the UNSCOM biological inspection team that it did indeed have a biological weapons program but that it was for defensive purposes. Iraq then provided its first biological weapons declaration shortly after. After UNSCOM determined such declarations to be incomplete, more pressure was placed on Iraq to declare fully and completely. A second disclosure of the biological weapons came in March 1995 however after UNSCOM's investigations and the discovery of inreffutable evidence, Iraq was now forced to admit for the fist time the existence of an offensive biological weapons program. But Iraq still denied weaponization. Further UNSCOM pressure resulted in a third prohibited biological weapons disclosure from Iraq in August 1995. Only after General Hussein Kamel, Minister of Industry and Minerals and former Director of Iraq's Military Industrialization Corporation, with responsibility for all of Iraq's weapons programs, fled Iraq for Jordan, Iraq was forced to reveal that its biological warfare program was much more extensive than was previously admitted and that the program included weaponization. At this time Iraq admitted that it had achieved the ability to produce longer-range missiles than had previously been admitted to. At this point Iraq provides
UNSCOMand IAEAwith more documentation that turns out Hussein Kamel had hidden on chicken farm. These documents gave futher revelation to Iraq’s development of VX gas and its attempts to develop and nuclear weapon. More declarations would follow in June 1996 and September 1997. However, in April and July 1998, the biological weapons team and UNSCOM Executive Chairman assessed that Iraq’s declarations were as of yet “unverifiable” and “incomplete and inadequate”, seven years after the first declarations were given in 1991.
In August 1998, Ritter resigned his position as UN weapons inspector and sharply criticized the Clinton administration and the
U.N. Security Councilfor not being vigorous enough about insisting that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction be destroyed. Ritter also accused U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annanof assisting Iraqi efforts at impeding UNSCOM's work. "Iraq is not disarming", Ritter said on August 27, 1998, and in a second statement, "Iraq retains the capability to launch a chemical strike." In 1998 the UNSCOM weapons inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq. They were not expelled from the country by Iraq as has often been reported (and as George W. Bush alleged in his "axis of evil" speech). Rather, according to Butler himself in his book Saddam Defiant, it was U.S. Ambassador Peter Burleigh, acting on instructions from Washington, who suggested Butler pull his team from Iraq in order to protect them from the forthcoming U.S. and British airstrikes which eventually took place from December December 16-19 1998.
Between inspections: 1998-2002
In August, 1998, absent effective monitoring, Scott Ritter remarked that Iraq could "reconstitute chemical biological weapons, long-range ballistic missiles to deliver these weapons, and even certain aspects of their nuclear weaponization program." [cite web| url=http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec98/ritter_8-31.html| title=PBS Interview August 31, 1998| publisher=Public Broadcasting System| year=01/20/2003| accessdate=2006-08-07]
Ritter later accused some UNSCOM personnel of spying, and he strongly criticized the Bill Clinton administration for misusing the commission's resources to eavesdrop on the Iraqi military. [cite web| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/301168.stm| date=March 23, 1999| title=Unscom 'infiltrated by spies'| publisher=BBC News| accessdate=2006-04-28]
In June, 1999, Ritter responded to an interviewer, saying: "When you ask the question, 'Does Iraq possess militarily viable biological or chemical weapons?' the answer is no! It is a resounding NO. Can Iraq produce today chemical weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Can Iraq produce biological weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Ballistic missiles? No! It is 'no' across the board. So from a qualitative standpoint, Iraq has been disarmed. Iraq today possesses no meaningful weapons of mass destruction capability." [cite web|author= Arons, Nicholas |url=http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1999/07/990712-for.htm| title=Interview with Scott Ritter| publisher=Fellowship of Reconciliation | date=June 24, 1999| accessdate=2006-04-28]
In June 2000, he penned a piece for Arms Control Today entiled "The Case for Iraq's Qualitative Disarmament". [ [http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2000_06/iraqjun.asp The Case for Iraq's Qualitative Disarmament]
Arms Control AssociationJune 2000] 2001 saw the theatrical release of his documentary on the UNSCOM weapons inspections in Iraq, "". The film was funded by an Iraqi-American businessman who, unknown to Ritter, had received Oil-for-Food coupons from the Iraqi regime. [ [http://www.northcountrypublicradio.org/news/ritter.html The Iraqi Threat: How Real Is It?] North Country Public Radio October 7, 2002]
In 2002, Scott Ritter stated that, as of 1998, 90–95% of Iraq's nuclear, biological and chemical capabilities, and long-range ballistic missiles capable of delivering such weapons, had been verified as destroyed. Technical 100% verification was not possible, said Ritter, not because Iraq still had any hidden weapons, but because Iraq had preemptively destroyed some stockpiles and claimed they had never existed. Many people were surprised by Ritter's turnaround in his view of Iraq during a period when no inspections were made. [cite journal| url=http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/rittrdoc.htm|title=Ex-U.N. Inspector Ritter to Tour Iraq, Make Documentary| first=Colum| last=Lynch| journal=The Washington Post| month=July 27| year=2000| pages=A18| accessdate=2006-04-28|format=dead link|date=June 2008 – [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3ALynch+intitle%3AEx-U.N.+Inspector+Ritter+to+Tour+Iraq%2C+Make+Documentary&as_publication=The+Washington+Post&as_ylo=2000&as_yhi=2000&btnG=Search Scholar search] ] During the 2002–2003 build-up to war Ritter criticized the Bush administration and maintained that it had provided no credible evidence that Iraq had reconstituted a significant WMD capability. In an interview with "Time" in September 2002 Ritter said there were attempts to use UNSCOM for spying on Iraq. [cite web | author=Calabresi, Massimo | date=September 12, 2002| title=Exclusive: Scott Ritter in His Own Words | format= | work=Time Magazine | url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,351165,00.html | accessdate=2006-06-09] In doing so, he was merely confirming what had been known since 1999: according to the New York Times for Jan. 8, 1999, , "In March  , in a last-ditch attempt to uncover Saddam Hussein's covert weapons and intelligence networks, the United States used the United Nations inspection team to send an American spy intoBaghdad to install a highly sophisticated electronic eavesdropping system." [cite web| url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E7DB113EF93BA35752C0A96F958260| date=January 8, 1999| title=U.S. Used U.N. Team to Place Spy Device in Iraq, Aides Say| publisher=New York Times| accessdate=2008-07-15] [cite web| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/09/AR2006060900940.html| date=January 8, 1999| title=U.S. Spied On Iraqi Military Via U.N.; Arms Control Team Had No Knowledge Of Eavesdropping| publisher=Washington Post| accessdate=2008-07-15]
UNSCOM encountered various difficulties and a lack of cooperation by the Iraqi government. In 1998, UNSCOM was withdrawn at the request of the United States before
Operation Desert Fox. Despite this, UNSCOM's own estimate was that 90-95% of Iraqi WMDs had been successfully destroyed before its 1998 withdrawal. After that Iraq remained without any outside weapons inspectors for four years. During this time speculations arose that Iraq had actively resumed its WMD programmes. In particular, various figures in the George W. Bush administration as well as Congress went so far as to express concern about nuclear weapons.
There is dispute about whether Iraq still had WMD programs after 1998 and whether its cooperation with the
United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission(UNMOVIC) was complete. Chief weapons inspector Hans Blixsaid in January 2003 that "access has been provided to all sites we have wanted to inspect" and Iraq had "cooperated rather well" in that regard, although "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance of the disarmament." [cite web | url=http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/Bx27.htm | title=An Update on Inspection | year=2003|] On March 7, in an address to the Security Council, Hans Blix stated: "Against this background, the question is now asked whether Iraq has cooperated "immediately, unconditionally and actively" with UNMOVIC, as is required under paragraph 9 of resolution 1441 (2002)..... while the numerous initiatives, which are now taken by the Iraqi side with a view to resolving some long-standing open disarmament issues, can be seen as "active", or even "proactive", these initiatives 3-4 months into the new resolution cannot be said to constitute "immediate" cooperation. Nor do they necessarily cover all areas of relevance." Some US officials understood this contradictory statement as a declaration of noncompliance.
There were no weapon inspections in Iraq for nearly four years after the U.N. departed from Iraq in 1998, and
Iraqasserted that they would never be invited back. [cite web | author=King, Kyle| date=December 20, 1998| title=U-S OFFICIALS SAY THEY UNDERSTAND THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN MAY NEVER ALLOW U-N WEAPONS INSPECTORS BACK IN THE COUNTRY | format= | work=Voice of America| url=http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1998/12/20/981220-usg.htm | accessdate=2006-06-10] In addition, Saddam had issued a secret order that Iraq did not have to abide by any U.N. Resolution since in his view the U.S. had broken international law. [cite web| url=https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap1.html#sect7| title= Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD Chapter 1: Regime Strategic Intent - Section 7: Realizing Saddam’s Veiled WMD Intent| date=September 30, 2004| accessdate=2006-04-28]
In 2001 Saddam stated that "we are not at all seeking to build up weapons or look for the most harmful weapons . . . however, we will never hesitate to possess the weapons to defend Iraq and the Arab nation". [cite web| url=https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap1.html| title= Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD Chapter 1: Regime Strategic Intent| date=September 30, 2004| accessdate=2006-04-28] The
International Institute for Strategic Studiesin Britain published in September 2002 a review of Iraq's military capability, and concluded that Iraq could assemble nuclear weapons within months if fissile material from foreign sources were obtained. [cite web | author=| date=September 9, 2002| title=Iraq Dossier:Director's press statement | format= PDF| work=The International Institute for Strategic Studies| url=http://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-dossiers/iraqs-wmd-dossier| accessdate=2006-06-10] However, it concluded that without such foreign sources, it would take years at a bare minimum. The numbers were viewed as overly optimistic by many critics (such as the Federation of American Scientists and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists).Fact|date=February 2007
In late 2002 Saddam Hussein, in a letter to Hans Blix, invited UN weapons inspectors back into the country. Subsequently the Security Council issued
resolution 1441authorizing new inspections in Iraq. The carefully-worded U.N. resolution put the burden on Iraq, not U.N. inspectors, to prove that they no longer had weapons of mass destruction. The US claimed that Iraq's weapons report which was filed with the U.N. leaves weapons and materials unaccounted for; the Iraqis claimed that it was destroyed, something that had been confirmed years earlier by Iraq's highest profile defector, Hussein Kamel. According to reports from the previous U.N. inspection agency, UNSCOM, Iraq produced 600 metric tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, VX and sarin, and nearly 25,000 rockets and 15,000 artillery shells, with chemical agents, that are still unaccounted for. In fact, in 1995, Iraq told the United Nations that it had produced at least 30,000 liters of biological agents, including anthrax and other toxins it could put on missiles, but that all of it had been destroyed.Fact|date=February 2007
In January 2003, United Nations weapons inspectors reported that they had found no indication that Iraq possessed nuclear weapons or an active program. Some former UNSCOM inspectors disagree about whether the United States could know for certain whether or not Iraq had renewed production of weapons of mass destruction.
Robert Galluccisaid, "If Iraq had [uranium or plutonium] , a fair assessment would be they could fabricate a nuclear weapon, and there's no reason for us to assume we'd find out if they had." Similarly, former inspector Jonathan Tucker said, "Nobody really knows what Iraq has. You really can't tell from a satellite image what's going on inside a factory." However, Hans Blixsaid in late January 2003 that Iraq had "not genuinely accepted U.N. resolutions demanding that it disarm." [cite web| url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/27/sprj.irq.blix.report/index.html| title=Blix: Iraq can't account for deadly gas, germs| publisher=CNN.com| date=January 27, 2003| accessdate=2006-04-28] He claimed there were some materials which had not been accounted for. Since sites had been found which evidenced the destruction of chemical weaponry, UNSCOM was actively working with Iraq on methods to ascertain for certain whether the amounts destroyed matched up with the amounts that Iraq had produced. [cite web|last=Blix| first=Hans| date=February 28, 2003| url=http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/2003-232.pdf| title=Twelfth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission| publisher=UNMOVIC| accessdate=2006-04-28| format=PDF] [cite web| url=http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,426244,00.html| title=Why Saddam Might Destroy His Missiles| publisher=Time.com| first=Tony| last=Karon| date=February 24, 2003| accessdate=2006-04-28] In the next quarterly report, after the war, the total amount of proscribed items destroyed by UNMOVIC in Iraq can be gathered. [cite web| last=Blix| first=Hans| date= May 30, 2003| url=http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/S-2003-580.pdf| title=Thirteenth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission| publisher=UNMOVIC| format=PDF| accessdate=2006-04-28] Those include:
* 50 deployed
* Various equipment, including vehicles, engines and warheads, related to the AS2 missiles
* 2 large propellant casting chambers
* 14 155 mm shells filled with mustard gas, the mustard gas totaling approximately 49 litres and still at high purity
* Approximately 500 ml of
* Some 122 mm chemical warheads
* Some chemical equipment
* 224.6 kg of expired growth media
Scott Ritterstated that the WMDs Saddam had in his possession all those years ago has long since turned to harmless substances. Sarin and tabun have a shelf life of five years, VX lasts a bit longer (but not much longer), and finally botulinum toxin and liquid anthrax last about three years. [cite web| url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,794771,00.html| title='Even if Iraq managed to hide these weapons, what they are now hiding is harmless goo'| date=September 19, 2002| publisher=The Guardian| accessdate=2006-04-28] On March 7, 2003, Hans Blix's last report to the UN security Council prior to the US led invasion of Iraq, described Iraq as actively and proactively cooperating with UNMOVIC, though not necessarily in all areas of relevance and had been frequently uncooperative in the past, but that it was within months of resolving key remaining disarmament tasks.cite web| url=http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/SC7asdelivered.htm| date=March 7, 2003| title= Oral introduction of the 12th quarterly report of UNMOVIC| first=Hans| last=Blix| accessdate=2006-04-28]
On March 17, 2003, Peter Goldsmith, Attorney General of the UK, set out his government's legal justification for an invasion of Iraq. He said that Security Council resolution 678 authorised force against Iraq, which was suspended but not terminated by resolution 687, which imposed continuing obligations on Iraq to eliminate its weapons of mass destruction. A material breach of resolution 687 would revive the authority to use force under resolution 678. In resolution 1441 the Security Council determined that Iraq was in material breach of resolution 687 because it had not fully carried out its obligations to disarm. Although resolution 1441 had given Iraq a final chance to comply, UK Attorney General Goldsmith wrote "it is plain that Iraq has failed so to comply". Most member governments of the United Nations Security Council made clear that after resolution 1441 there still was no authorization for the use of force. Indeed, at the time 1441 was passed, both the US and UK representatives stated explicitly that 1441 contained no provision for military action. As the New York Times noted about the negotiations,
'There's no 'automaticity' and this is a two-stage process, and in that regard we have met the principal concerns that have been expressed for the resolution,’ [stated US ambassador Negroponte at the time] ‘Whatever violation there is, or is judged to exist, will be dealt with in the council, and the council will have an opportunity to consider the matter before any other action is taken.’ [cite news|author=Maggie Farley and Maura Reynolds|title=The World; U.N. Measure on Iraqi Arms Nears Passage; Every Security Council member except Syria is expected today to adopt the much- disputed resolution, a diluted version of a U.S. draft.| date=November 8, 2002| publisher=Los Angeles Times]
The British ambassador to the UN, Sir Jeremy Greenstock concurred,
We heard loud and clear during the negotiations the concerns about "automaticity" and "hidden triggers" - the concern that on a decision so crucial we should not rush into military action; that on a decision so crucial any Iraqi violations should be discussed by the Council. Let me be equally clear in response, as one of. the co-sponsors of the text we have adopted. There is no "automaticity" in this Resolution. [cite web| url=http://www.un.org/webcast/unitedkingdom110802.htm|author=Sir Jeremy Greenstock|title=Explanation of Vote by Sir Jeremy Greenstock KCMG,United Kingdom Permanent Representative| date=November 8, 2002| publisher=United Nations Secretariat]
The UN itself never had the chance to declare that Iraq had failed to take its "final opportunity" to comply as the US invasion made it a moot point. American President George W. Bush stated that Saddam Hussein had 48 hours to step down and leave Iraq. [cite web | author=Bush, George W.| date=May 13, 2003| title=President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48 Hour| format= | work=whitehouse.gov | url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030317-7.html| accessdate=2006-06-10] As the deadline approached, the US announced that forces would be sent to verify his disarmament and a transition to a new government.Fact|date=February 2007
Coalition expanded intelligence
On May 30, 2003,
Paul Wolfowitzstated in an interview with "Vanity Fair" magazine that the issue of weapons of mass destruction was the point of greatest agreement among Bush's team among the reasons to remove Saddam Hussein from power. He said, "The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason, but, there have always been three fundamental concerns. One is weapons of mass destruction, the second is support for terrorism, the third is the criminal treatment of the Iraqi people. Actually I guess you could say there's a fourth overriding one which is the connection between the first two." [cite web| url=http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030509-depsecdef0223.html| date=May 9, 2003| title=Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz Interview with Sam Tannenhaus, Vanity Fair| accessdate=2006-04-28] The same day, General James T. Conway, senior Marine commander in Iraq, expressed similar thoughts in a satellite interview with reporters at the Pentagon. "It was to do with information management. The intention was to dramatise it." [cite web| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3469821.stm| date=February 8, 2004| title=Blix doubts on Iraq intelligence| accessdate=2006-04-29| publisher=BBC News]
In an interview with BBC in June 2004,
David Kay, former head of the Iraq Survey Group, made the following comment:
:"Anyone out there holding — as I gather Prime Minister Blair has recently said — the prospect that, in fact, the Iraq Survey Group is going to unmask actual weapons of mass destruction, [is] really delusional."
On June 4, 2003, U.S. Senator
Pat Robertsannounced that the U.S. Select Committee on Intelligence that he chaired would, as a part of its ongoing oversight of the intelligence community, conduct a Review of intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. On July 9, 2004, the Committee released the Senate Report of Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq. On July 17, 2003, the British Prime Minister Tony Blairsaid in an address to the US congress, that history would forgive the United States and United Kingdom, even if they were wrong about weapons of mass destruction. He still maintained that "with every fiber of instinct and conviction" Iraq did have weapons of mass destruction.
On February 3, 2004, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw announced an independent inquiry, to be chaired by Lord Butler of Brockwell, to examine the reliability of British intelligence relating to alleged
weapons of mass destructionin Iraq. [cite web| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3453305.stm| title=Iraq WMD inquiry details unveiled| date=February 3, 2004| publisher=BBC News| accessdate=2006-04-28] The Butler Reviewwas published July 14, 2004.
In the build up to the 2003 war the "
New York Times" published a number of stories claiming to prove that Iraq possessed WMD. One story in particular, written by Judith Miller helped persuade the American public that Iraq had WMD: in September 2002 she wrote about an intercepted shipment of aluminum tubes which the NYT said were to be used to develop nuclear material. It is now clear that they could not be used for that purpose. The story was followed up with television appearances by Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeldand Condoleezza Riceall pointing to the story as part of the basis for taking military action against Iraq. Miller's sources were introduced to her by Ahmed Chalabi, an Iraqi exile favourable to a US invasion of Iraq. Miller is also listed as a speaker for The Middle East Forum, an organization which openly declared support for an invasion. In May 2004 the New York Times published an editorial which stated that its journalism in the build up to war had sometimes been lax. It appears that in the cases where Iraqi exiles were used for the stories about WMD were either ignorant as to the real status of Iraq's WMD or lied to journalists to achieve their own ends.
Despite the intelligence lapse, Bush stood by his decision to invade Iraq stating: :"But what wasn't wrong was Saddam Hussein had invaded a country, he had used weapons of mass destruction, he had the capability of making weapons of mass destruction, he was firing at our pilots. He was a state sponsor of terror. Removing Saddam Hussein was the right thing for world peace and the security of our country."
In a speech before the World Affairs Council of Charlotte, NC, on April 7, 2006, President Bush stated that he "fully understood that the intelligence was wrong, and [he was] just as disappointed as everybody else" when U.S. troops failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. [cite web| url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060406-112119-5897r.htm| title=Bush 'disappointed' data on prewar Iraq were wrong| first=Joseph| last=Curl| publisher=The Washington Times| date=April 7, 2006| accessdate=2006-04-29]
Intelligence shortly before the 2003 invasion of Iraq was heavily used as support arguments in favor of military intervention with the October 2002 C.I.A. report on Iraqi WMDs considered to be the most reliable one available at that time. [cite web| url=https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm|title= Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs| month=October | year=2002| accessdate=2006-04-28| publisher=CIA]
"According to the CIA's report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that Saddam Hussein wants to develop nuclear weapons." Senator
John Kerry(D-Mass.) - Congressional Record, October 9, 2002 [cite web| url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/11/20051114-1.html| title=Setting the Record Straight: Sen. Levin On Iraq | date=November 14, 2005| publisher=White House| accessdate=2006-04-28]
On May 29, 2003,
Andrew Gilliganappears on the "BBC's Today" program early in the morning. Among the contentions he makes in his report are that the government "ordered (the September Dossier, a British Government dossier on WMD) to be sexed up, to be made more exciting, and ordered more facts to be...discovered." The broadcast is not repeated. [cite web| url=http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/bbctimeline.html| title=BBC/Blair Battle Timeline| accessdate=2006-04-28| publisher=PBS.org]
On May 27, 2003, a secret
Defense Intelligence Agencyfact-finding mission in Iraq reported unanimously to intelligence officials in Washington that two trailers captured in Iraq by Kurdish troops "had nothing to do with biological weapons." The trailers had been a key part of the argument for the 2003 invasion; Secretary of State Colin Powell had told the United Nations Security Council, "We have firsthand descriptions of biological weapons factories on wheels and on rails. We know what the fermenters look like. We know what the tanks, pumps, compressors and other parts look like." The Pentagon team had been sent to investigate the trailers after the invasion. The team of experts unanimously found "no connection to anything biological"; one of the experts told reporters that they privately called the trailers "the biggest sand toilets in the world." The report was classified, and the next day, the CIA publicly released the assessment of its Washington analysts that the trailers were "mobile biological weapons production." The White House continued to refer to the trailers as mobile biological laboratories throughout the year, and the Pentagon field report remained classified. It is still classified, but a "Washington Post" report of April 12, 2006 disclosed some of the details of the report. According to the "Post"::"A spokesman for the DIA asserted that the team's findings were neither ignored nor suppressed, but were incorporated in the work of the Iraqi Survey Group, which led the official search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The survey group's final report in September 2004 -- 15 months after the technical report was written -- said the trailers were "impractical" for biological weapons production and were "almost certainly intended" for manufacturing hydrogen for weather balloons." [Cite journal| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/11/AR2006041101888_pf.html| title=Lacking Biolabs, Trailers Carried Case for War| first=Joby| last=Warrick| journal=Washington Post| month=April 12| year=2006| pages=A01| accessdate=2006-04-28
] "No one was more surprised than I that we didn't find (WMDs)." General
Tommy FranksDecember 2, 2005. [Cite web| url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200408/s1177570.htm| title=Retired general 'surprised' no WMD found| first=Joby| last=Warrick|word=CNN|date= August 16, 2004| pages=| accessdate=2006-04-28]
On February 6, 2004, U.S. President
George W. Bushnamed an Iraq Intelligence Commission, chaired by Charles Robband Laurence Silberman, to investigate United States intelligence, specifically regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraqand Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. On February 8, 2004, Dr Hans Blix, in an interview on BBC TV, accused the US and British governments of dramatising the threat of weapons of mass destructionin Iraq, in order to strengthen the case for the 2003 war against the government of Saddam Hussein.
Iraq Survey Group
On May 30, 2003, The U.S. Department of Defense briefed the media that it was ready to formally begin the work of the
Iraq Survey Group(ISG), a fact finding mission from the coalition of the Iraq occupation into the WMD programs developed by Iraq, taking over from the British-American 75th Exploitation Task Force.
On October 6, 2004, the head of the
Iraq Survey Group(ISG), Charles Duelfer, announced to the United States Senate Armed Services Committee that the group found no evidence that Iraq under Saddam Hussein had produced and stockpiled any weapons of mass destruction since 1991, when UN sanctions were imposed. [cite web| url=https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap4.html#sect1| title=Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD - Chapter 1: Nuclear - Key Findings| accessdate=2006-04-29]
Various nuclear facilities, including the
Baghdad Nuclear Research Facilityand Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center, were found looted in the month following the invasion. (Gellman, May 3, 2003) On June 20, 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that tons of uranium, as well as other radioactive materials such as thorium, had been recovered, and that the vast majority had remained on site. There were several reports of radiation sickness in the area. It has been suggested that the documents and suspected weapons sites were looted and burned in Iraq by looters in the final days of the war. [cite web| url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030621.html| date=June 21, 2003| publisher=Whitehouse.gov| title=President's Radio Address| accessdate=2006-04-28]
On May 2, 2004 a shell containing
mustard gas, was found in the middle of street west of Baghdad. The Iraq Survey Groupinvestigation reported that it had been previously "stored improperly", and thus the gas was "ineffective" as a useful chemical agent. Officials from the Defense Department commented that they were not certain if use was to be made of the device as a bomb.cite web| url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120268,00.html| title=Tests Confirm Sarin in Iraqi Artillery Shell| date=May 19, 2004| first=Liza| last=Porteus| publisher=FOX News| accessdate=2006-04-29]
On May 16, 2004 a 152 mm artillery shell was used as an improvised bomb.(cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap5_annxF.html |title=Iraq's Chemical Warfare Program Annex F |accessdate=2005-06-29) The shell exploded and two U.S. soldiers were treated for minor exposure to a nerve agent (nausea and dilated pupils). On May 18 it was reported by U.S. Department of Defense intelligence officials that tests showed the two-chambered shell contained the chemical agent
sarin, the shell being "likely" to have contained three to four liters of the substance (in the form of its two unmixed precursor chemicals prior to the aforementioned explosion that had not effectively mixed them). Former U.S. weapons inspector David Kaytold the Associated Pressthat "he doubted the shell or the nerve agent came from a hidden stockpile, although he didn't rule out that possibility." Kay also considered it possible that the shell was "an old relic overlooked when Saddam said he had destroyed such weapons in the mid-1990s."cite web| url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/06/iraq/main627580.shtml| title=Iraq Sarin Find Worries U.S.| date=May 17, 2004| publisher=CBS News| accessdate=2006-04-29] It is likely that the insurgents who planted the bomb did not know it contained sarin, according to Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, and another U.S. official confirmed that the shell did not have the markings of a chemical agent. The Iraq Survey Grouplater concluded that the shell "probably originated with a batch that was stored in a Al Muthanna CW complex basement during the late 1980s for the purpose of leakage testing." (cite web|url=https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap5_annxF.html |title=Iraq's Chemical Warfare Program Annex F |accessdate=2005-06-29)
On October 29 U.S. intelligence spokesmen claimed that Iraqi WMDs and programs had been comprehensively hidden before or immediately after the fall of Baghdad, with some elements of the programs being shipped out of the country.
In a July 2, 2004 article published by
The Associated Pressand reported by Fox Newsthat more WMD not destroyed by the Iraqi Regime were discovered in South Central Iraq by Polish Allies. Sarin Gas warheads dating back to the last Iran–Iraq War were trying to be purchased by terrorists for $5000 a warhead. The Polish troops secured munitions on June 23, 2004. [cite web| url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124576,00.html| title=Polish Troops Find Sarin Warheads| date=July 2, 2004| accessdate=2006-04-29| publisher=FOX News] After being tested, it turned out that the warheads did not in fact contain sarin gas. The Coalition Press Information Centerin Baghdad announced that the munitions "were all empty and tested negative for any type of chemicals." [cite journal| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24403-2004Jul2.html| title=Chemicals Not Found in Iraq Warheads| first=Walter| last=Pincus| journal=Washington Post| month=July 3| year=2004| pages=A21| accessdate=2006-04-29] The US abandoned its search for WMDs in Iraq on January 12, 2005.
On September 30, 2004, the U.S. Iraq Survey Group Final Report concluded that, "ISG has not found evidence that Saddam Husayn (sic) possessed WMD stocks in 2003, but the available evidence from its investigation—including detainee interviews and document exploitation—leaves open the possibility that some weapons existed in Iraq although not of a militarily significant capability." [cite web| url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol1_rsi-06.htm| title=Iraq Survey Group Final Report| publisher=Global Security.org| accessdate=2006-04-29] Among the key findings of the final ISG report were:
# Evidence of the maturity and significance of the pre-1991 Iraqi Nuclear Program but found that Iraq's ability to reconstitute a nuclear weapons program progressively decayed after that date;
# Concealment of nuclear program in its entirety, as with Iraq's BW program. Aggressive UN inspections after Desert Storm forced Saddam to admit the existence of the program and destroy or surrender components of the program;
# After Desert Storm, Iraq concealed key elements of its program and preserved what it could of the professional capabilities of its nuclear scientific community;
# Saddam's ambitions in the nuclear area were secondary to his prime objective of ending UN sanctions; and
# A limited number of post-1995 activities would have aided the reconstitution of the nuclear weapons program once sanctions were lifted.
The report found that "The ISG has not found evidence that Saddam possessed WMD stocks in 2003, but [there is] the possibility that some weapons existed in Iraq, although not of a militarily significant capability." It also concluded that there was a possible intent to restart all banned weapons programs as soon as multilateral sanctions against it had been dropped, with Hussein pursuing WMD proliferation in the future: "There is an extensive, yet fragmentary and circumstantial, body of evidence suggesting that Saddam pursued a strategy to maintain a capability to return to WMD after sanctions were lifted..." [cite web| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3718150.stm| date=October 7, 2004| publisher=BBC News| title=Report concludes no WMD in Iraq| accessdate=2006-04-28] No senior Iraqi official interviewed by the ISG believed that Saddam had forsaken WMD forever.
After he was captured by U.S. forces in Baghdad in 2003, Dr. Mahdi Obeidi, who ran Saddam's nuclear centrifuge program until 1997, handed over blueprints for a nuclear centrifuge along with some actual centrifuge components, stored at his home — buried in the front yard — awaiting orders from Baghdad to proceed. He said, "I had to maintain the program to the bitter end." In his book, "The Bomb in My Garden", the Iraqi physicist explains that his nuclear stash was the key that could have unlocked and restarted Saddam's bombmaking program. However, it would require a massive investment and a re-creation of thousands of centrifuges in order to reconstitute a full centrifugal enrichment program.
On October 3, 2003, the world digests
David Kay's Iraq Survey Groupreport that finds no stockpiles of WMD in Iraq, although it states the government intended to develop more weapons with additional capabilities. Weapons inspectors in Iraq do find some "biological laboratories" and a collection of "reference strains", including a strain of botulinumbacteria, "ought to have been declared to the UN." Kay testifies that Iraq had not fully complied with UN inspections. In some cases, equipment and materials subject to UN monitoring had been kept hidden from UN inspectors. "So there was a WMD program. It was going ahead. It was rudimentary in many areas", Kay would say in a later interview.cite web| url=http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/articles/040209/9john.htm| title=Kay's say and the CIA| first=John| last=Leo| year=2/9/2004| accessdate=2006-04-28| publisher=USNews.com] In other cases, Iraq had simply lied to the UN in its weapons programs. [cite web| url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/02/kay.report/| title=Text of David Kay's unclassified statement| publisher=CNN.com| accessdate=2006-04-28| date=October 2, 2003] The US-sponsored search for WMD had at this point cost $300 million and was projected to cost around $600 million more.
In David Kay's statement on the interim report of the ISG [cite web| last=Kay| first=David| date=October 2, 2003| url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/kay-20031008.html| title=Statement by David Kay on the interim progress report on the activities of the Iraq Survey Group| publisher=The White House| accessdate=2006-04-28] the following paragraphs are found:
"We have not yet found stocks of weapons, but we are not yet at the point where we can say definitively either that such weapon stocks do not exist or that they existed before the war and our only task is to find where they have gone. We are actively engaged in searching for such weapons based on information being supplied to us by Iraqis."
"With regard to delivery systems, the ISG team has discovered sufficient evidence to date to conclude that the Iraqi regime was committed to delivery system improvements that would have, if OIF had not occurred, dramatically breached UN restrictions placed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War."
"ISG has gathered testimony from missile designers at Al Kindi State Company that Iraq has reinitiated work on converting SA-2 Surface-to-Air Missiles into ballistic missiles with a range goal of about 250 km. Engineering work was reportedly underway in early 2003, despite the presence of UNMOVIC. This program was not declared to the UN."
"ISG has developed multiple sources of testimony, which is corroborated in part by a captured document, that Iraq undertook a program aimed at increasing the HY-2's range and permitting its use as a land-attack missile. These efforts extended the HY-2's range from its original 100 km to 150-180km. Ten modified missiles were delivered to the military prior to OIF and two of these were fired from Umm Qasr during OIF -- one was shot down and one hit Kuwait."
Another notable statement is the following:
"We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002."
The phrase 'WMD-related program activities' was later used in George Bush's state of the union speech. Bush's critics, often not realizing the origin of the statement, derided Bush for unclear wording and trying to "lower the bar" on confirming his pre-war WMD-claims.
In a January 26, 2004 interview with
Tom Brokawof NBCnews, Mr. Kay described Iraq's nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs as being in a "rudimentary" stage. He also stated that "What we did find, and as others are investigating it, we found a lot of terrorist groups and individuals that passed through Iraq." [cite web| url=http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4066462| title= David Kay: Exclusive interview - Chemical, biological, nuclear programs ‘rudimentary’| first=Tom| last=Brokaw| publisher=NBC News| date=January 26, 2004| accessdate=2006-04-29] In responding to a question by Mr. Brokaw as to whether Iraq was a "gathering threat" as President Bush had asserted before the invasion, Mr. Kay answered::"Tom, an imminent threat is a political judgment. It’s not a technical judgment. I think Baghdad was actually becoming more dangerous in the last two years than even we realized. Saddam was not controlling the society any longer. In the marketplace of terrorism and of WMD, Iraq well could have been that supplier if the war had not intervened."
In June 2004, the United States removed 2 tons of low-enriched uranium from Iraq, sufficient raw material for a single nuclear weapon. [cite web| url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124924,00.html| title=U.S. Removes Two Tons of Uranium From Iraq| date=July 7, 2004| publisher=FOXNews.com| accessdate=2006-04-28]
Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, several reported finds of chemical weapons were announced. During the invasion itself, there were half a dozen incidents in which the US military announced that it had found chemical weapons. All of these claims were based on field reports, and were later retracted. After the war, many cases — most notably on April 7, 2003 when several large drums tested positive — continued to be reported in the same way.
Another such post-war case occurred on January 9, 2004, when Icelandic munitions experts and Danish military engineers discovered 36 120-mm mortar rounds containing liquid buried in Southern Iraq. While initial tests suggested that the rounds contained a
blister agent, a chemical weapon banned by the Geneva Convention,Fact|date=February 2007 subsequent analysis by American and Danish experts showed that no chemical agent was present. [cite web| url=http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_19-1-2004_pg7_45| date=January 19, 2004| title=Mortar shells from Iraq had no chemical agents| accessdate=2006-04-29] It appears that the rounds have been buried, and most probably forgotten, since the Iran–Iraq War. Some of the munitions were in an advanced state of decay and most of the weaponry would likely have been unusable.
Demetrius Perricos, then head of UNMOVIC, stated that the Kay report contained little information not already known by UNMOVIC. [cite web| last=Pincus| first=Walter| date=December 14, 2003| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A62518-2003Dec13?language=printer| title=U.N. inspector: Little new in U.S. probe for Iraq arms| accessdate=2006-04-28] Many organizations, such as the journal "Biosecurity and Bioterrorism", have claimed that Kay's report is a "worst case analysis" [cite journal| doi= 10.1089/153871303771861432| journal=Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science| title=The Kay Report to Congress on the Activities of the Iraq Survey Group: Former Bioweapons Inspectors Comment| month=Dec| year=2003| volume=1| issue=4| pages=239–246| first=Patrice| last=Binder| coauthors=David Franz, Roque Monteleone-Neto, Richard Spertzel, Raymond A. Zilinskas| accessdate=2006-04-28]
Beginning in 2003, the ISG had uncovered remnants of Iraq's 1980s-era WMD programs. On June 21, 2006
Rick Santorumclaimed that "we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons", citing a declassified June 6 letter to Pete Hoekstrasaying that since the 2003 invasion, a total of "approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent" had been found scattered throughout the country. [cite web| url=http://intelligence.house.gov/Media/PDFS/DNILetter.pdf| author= |title=De-classified Report| format=|date= June 21, 2006|work=House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence | accessdate=2006-04-29] [cite web| url=http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/14879499.htm| author= Warren Stroebel|title=New report offers no evidence that Iraq stockpiled WMD| format=|date= June 22, 2006|work=Knight-Ridder Newspapers| accessdate=2006-08-09]
The Washington Post reported that "the U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active." It said the shells "had been buried near the Iranian border, and then long forgotten, by Iraqi troops during their eight-year war with Iran, which ended in 1988." [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101837.html]
On July 2008, 550 metric tonnes of "yellowcake" the last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program, a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium, arrived in Montreal as part of a top-secret U.S. operation. This transport of the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment, included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a voyage across two oceans. The Iraqi government sold the yellowcake to a Canadian uranium producer, Cameco Corp., in a transaction the official described as worth "tens of millions of dollars." [cite web| url=http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/07/05/saddam-uranium.html| author= The Associated Press |title=Uranium shipped to Montreal from Iraq in top secret mission| format=|date= July 5, 2008| accessdate=2008-07-05]
Operation Iraqi Freedom documents refers to some 48,000 boxes of documents, audiotapes and videotapes that were captured by the U.S. military during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Many of these documents seem to make clear that Saddam's regime had given up on seeking a WMD capability by the mid-1990s. Associated Press reported, "Repeatedly in the transcripts, Saddam and his lieutenants remind each other that Iraq destroyed its chemical and biological weapons in the early 1990s, and shut down those programs and the nuclear-bomb program, which had never produced a weapon." At one 1996 presidential meeting, top weapons program official Amer Mohammed Rashid, describes his conversation with U.N. weapons inspector Rolf Ekeus: "We don't have anything to hide, so we're giving you all the details." At another meeting Saddam told his deputies, "We cooperated with the resolutions 100 percent and you all know that, and the 5 percent they claim we have not executed could take them 10 years to (verify). Don't think for a minute that we still have WMD. We have nothing." [ [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/03/21/international/i110439S02.DTL Documents Show Saddam's WMD Frustrations]
Associated PressMarch 21, 2006] U.S. Congressman Peter Hoekstracalled for the U.S. government to put the remaining documents on the Internet so Arabic speakers around the world can help translate the documents. [cite web| url=http://www.intelligencesummit.org/news/PeteHoekstra/Hoekstra021106-2.wmv| title=Pete Hoekstra on MSNBC| format=WMV| accessdate=2006-04-29]
Theories in the aftermath of the 2003 war
Given the absence of illicit stockpiles and the heavy volume of traffic leaving Iraq shortly before invasion, some analysts and politicians believe Saddam Hussein may have transferred illicit material out of the country during this period. Other individuals suspect WMD may still be hidden in the country, although there is currently no evidence of this. Mainstream opinion, however, is that there were no significant WMDs in Iraq at the time of the invasion. Fact|date=March 2008
Office of Special Plans
Mobile weapons laboratory
Iraqi aluminum tubes order
* [http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs/search.tkl?q=iraq&search_crit=subject&search=Search&date1=Anytime&date2=Anytime&type=form Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports regarding Iraq]
* [http://search.looksmart.com/p/browse/us1/us317836/us317911/us53828/us56177/us70842/us527912/us10101686/us290330/us10151623/us10152821/ LookSmart - "Iraq WMD Controversy"] directory category
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/07/AR2007120701619_pf.html Washington Post article by Arthur Keller a former CIA case worker who worked on trying to find WMDs in Iraq]
* [http://www.zerechakfilms.com Teaser of upcoming documentary film "Land of Confusion"] featuring Pennsylvania Army National Guard Soldiers assigned to the Iraq Survey Group in 2004-05.
* [http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10101 Tom Chatfield examines WMD theories and conspiracies for Prospect magazine]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Netherlands and weapons of mass destruction — Weapons of mass destruction … Wikipedia
Canada and weapons of mass destruction — Weapons of mass destruction … Wikipedia
Russia and weapons of mass destruction — Weapons of mass destruction … Wikipedia
Iran and weapons of mass destruction — This article is about Iran and weapons of mass destruction. For Iran s nuclear power program, see Nuclear program of Iran. Weapons of mass destruction … Wikipedia
France and weapons of mass destruction — France First nuclear weapon test February 13, 1960 First fusion weapon test August 24, 1968 Last nuclear test December … Wikipedia
Burma and weapons of mass destruction — Weapons of mass destruction … Wikipedia
Mexico and weapons of mass destruction — Weapons of mass destruction … Wikipedia
Germany and weapons of mass destruction — Though Germany is one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world, since World War II it has generally refrained from using this technology to outfit its own armed forces with weapons of mass destruction (WMD), although it… … Wikipedia
Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction — Pakistan Nuclear program start date January 20, 1972 First nuclear weapon test May 28, 1998 First fusion weap … Wikipedia
India and weapons of mass destruction — India Nuclear program start date 1967 First nuclear weapon test 18 May 1974 (Smiling Buddha) … Wikipedia