Munn v. Illinois


Munn v. Illinois
Munn v. Illinois
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 14–18, 1876
Decided March 1, 1877
Full case name Munn v. State of Illinois
Citations 94 U.S. 113 (more)
24 L. Ed. 77; 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1842; 4 Otto 113
Holding
The Fourteenth Amendment does not prevent the State of Illinois from regulating charges for use of a business' grain elevators.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Waite, joined by Clifford, Swayne, Miller, Davis, Bradley, Hunt
Dissent Field, joined by Strong
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1877),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with corporate rates and agriculture. The Munn case allowed states to regulate certain businesses within their borders, including railroads, and is commonly regarded as a milestone in the growth of federal government regulation.

This case was decided 7 to 2 and involved the famous opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morrison Remick Waite (1816–1888). In it, he upheld legislation proposed by the National Grange to regulate the rates of railroad owned grain elevators, declaring that business interests (private property) used for public good be regulated by government. This decision also affected similar laws governing railroad rates; as they were also deemed private utilities serving the public interest, the laws governing their rates were constitutional as well. Both applications were considerably narrowed and weakened by the decision in Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois (also known as the Wabash Case). The other judges presiding on the case were Nathan Clifford, Noah Swayne, Samuel Miller, David Davis, Joseph Bradley, and Ward Hunt with the majority opinion, and Stephen Field and William Strong with the dissenting opinion.

In Munn v. Illinois, the Supreme Court decided that the Fourteenth Amendment (because Munn asserted his due process right to property was being violated) did not prevent the State of Illinois from regulating charges for use of a business' grain elevators. Instead, the decision focused on the question of whether or not a private company could be regulated in the public interest. The court's decision was that it could, if the private company could be seen as a utility operating in the public interest.

See also

References

  1. ^ Text of Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1876) is available from: Justia · Findlaw

Further reading

  • Kitch, Edmund W.; Bowler, Clara Ann (1978). "The Facts of Munn v. Illinois". Supreme Court Review 1978: 313–343. JSTOR 3109535. 

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Munn v. Illinois — ▪ law case       (1877), case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the power of government to regulate private industries.       The case developed as a result of the Illinois legislature s responding in 1871 to pressure from the National… …   Universalium

  • Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Wabash, St. Louis Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois ArgueDateA=April 14 ArgueDateB=15 ArgueYear=1886 DecideDate=October 25 DecideYear=1886 FullName=Wabash, St. L. P. RY. Co. v. People of State of Illinois USVol=118… …   Wikipedia

  • Clarence Munn — Sport(s) Football Biographical details Born September 11, 1908(1908 09 11) Place of birth …   Wikipedia

  • Biggie Munn — Clarence Lester Biggie Munn (September 11, 1908 ndash;March 18, 1975) was a college football player and coach. He is most notable for coaching Michigan State University (MSU) from 1947 1953. He retired from coaching with a 28 game winning streak… …   Wikipedia

  • Angus Munn Cannon — (May 17, 1834 ndash; June 7, 1915) served as mayor of St. George, Utah Territory in 1861. Angus was 50 years old when he married 27 year old physician and suffragist Martha Maria Hughes on October 6, 1884.Cannon was born in Liverpool, Lancashire …   Wikipedia

  • The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry — Grange Hall in Maine, circa 1910 Grange Hall redirects here. For other uses including individual Grange Hall buildings, see The Grange (disambiguation) The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry, also simply styled the Grange, is a… …   Wikipedia

  • Corporate personhood debate — The corporate personhood debate refers to the controversy (primarily in the United States) over the question of what subset of rights afforded under the law to natural persons should also be afforded to corporations as legal persons.Opponents of… …   Wikipedia

  • Morrison Waite — Justice Waite redirects here. For other uses, see Justice Waite (disambiguation). Morrison Remick Waite 7th Chief Justice of the United States In office January 21, 1874 …   Wikipedia

  • Waite, Morrison Remick — ▪ chief justice of United States born Nov. 29, 1816, Lyme, Conn., U.S. died March 23, 1888, Washington, D.C.  seventh chief justice of the United States (1874–88), who frequently spoke for the Supreme Court in interpreting the post Civil War… …   Universalium

  • Corporate personhood — refers to the question about which subset of rights that are afforded under the law to natural persons should also be afforded to corporations as legal persons. In Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819), corporations were recognized as having the… …   Wikipedia