Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism

Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism (CR) is a polytheistic, animistic, religious and cultural movement. It is an effort to reconstruct and revive, in a modern Celtic cultural context, pre-Christian Celtic religions. Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism originated in discussions among amateur scholars and Neopagans in the mid 1980s, and evolved into an independent tradition by the early 1990s. CR represents a polytheistic reconstructionist approach to Celtic Neopaganism, emphasising historical accuracy over eclecticism such as is found in Neo-druidry. Currently, "Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism" (CR) is an umbrella term, with a number of recognized sub-traditions or denominations.Bonewits (2006) p.137: "There are, by the way, groups of people who call themselves "Gaelic Traditionalists" who have a great deal in common with the Celtic Recons. Some of these GTs started off as CRs, but consider themselves different for some reason or another (usually political). Others are Catholics looking to restore old (but Christian) Gaelic customs. ... The key with understanding these terms, or others such as Celtic Restorationism, Neo-Celtism, "Senistrognata", "Seandagnatha," "Ildiachas/Iol-Diadhachas", etc. is to find out what each person using them intends them to mean."]

Origins

Many of the people who went on to establish CR were involved in Pagan groups in the seventies and eighties. Often these groups contained many Celtic elements that eventually found their way into core CR practice. Much of the dialogue in the 1980s took place at workshops and discussions at Neopagan festivals and gatherings, as well as in the pages of Neopagan publications.cite web | last =Laurie | first =Erynn | authorlink = | coauthors = Kathryn NicDhàna, Aedh Rua Ó Mórríghan, Kym ní Dhoireann, John Machate | title = "Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism" | work = | publisher = WitchVox |month=August | year=2003 | url = http://www.witchvox.com/va/dt_va.html?a=usma&c=trads&id=6645 | format = HTML | doi = | accessdate = 2007-11-05 ] This period, and these groups, are often referred to in retrospect as "Proto-CR".cite web | last = Varn | first =C. Derick | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = "An Interview with Kathryn Price NicDhàna: Celtic Reconstructionism" | work = | publisher = The Green Triangle | month = December | year = 2006 | url = http://www.thegreentriangle.com/Dec%2006/Interview%20with%20Kathryn%20Price%20NicDhana.htm | format = HTML | doi = | accessdate = 2006-12-09 ] Later, with the establishment of the Internet in the late eighties and early nineties, many of these Proto-CR, or early CR, groups and individuals came together online. This began a fruitful period of sharing of information and experiences, and led to a rapid growth of the movement.Bonewits (2006) p.131, "The Celtic Reconstructionist (CR) movement among Pagans began in the 1980s, with discussions among amateur scholars in the pages of Pagan publications or on the computer bulletin boards of the pre-Internet days. In the early 1990s, the term began to be used for those interested in seriously researching and recreating authentic Celtic beliefs and practices for modern Pagans."]

The first appearance in print of the term "Celtic Reconstructionist", used to describe a specific religious movement and not just a style of Celtic Studies, was by Kym Lambert ní Dhoireann in the Spring, 1992 issue of Harvest Magazine.Lambert, Kym [K.L. ní Dhoireann] (1992) "Celtic God/Goddess Names", "Harvest", Southboro, MA, Vol. 12, No. 4, Spring Equinox 1992, pp. 11-12. First use of "Celtic Reconstructionist" as tradition name.] [Lambert, Kym [K.L. ní Dhoireann] (1992) Book Reviews, Bio Blurbs, "Harvest", Southboro, MA, Vol. 12, No. 5, Beltane 1992, pp. 6,8. Continued use of "Celtic Reconstructionist" and "Celtic Reconstructionism". Use of term continued in succeeding issues for full publication run of magazine.] Ní Dhoireann credits Kathryn Price NicDhàna with originating the term “Celtic Reconstructionist”;cite web | last = Varn | first =C. D. | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = "An Interview with Kym Lambert" | publisher = The Green Triangle |month=February | year=2007 | url = http://www.thegreentriangle.com/2007_01/Interview_Lambert.html | format = HTML | doi = | accessdate = 2007-02-04] however, NicDhàna credits her early use of the term to a simple extrapolation of Margot Adler's use of the term "Pagan Reconstructionists" in the original, 1979 edition of '.Theatana, Kathryn [K.P. NicDhàna] (1992) "More on Names", "Harvest", Southboro, MA, Vol. 12, No. 3, Imbolc 1992, pp. 11-12. On need to reconstruct traditions of ancestral [Celtic] deities and avoid cultural appropriation.] Though Adler devotes space to a handful of Reconstructionist traditions, none of those mentioned are specifically Celtic.Adler, Margot (1979) '. Boston, Beacon Press ISBN 0-8070-3237-9. Chapter 9: Religions from the Past--The Pagan Reconstructionists.] In chapter eleven, while describing his Neo-druidic group, New Reformed Druids of North America (NRDNA), Isaac Bonewits uses the phrase "Eclectic Reconstructionist." [Adler (1979) Chapter 11: Religions of Paradox and Play, p.303, Bonewits on New Reformed Druids of North America (NRDNA) as "Eclectic Reconstructionist".] However, by the time CR became a recognized tradition, this pairing of terms had become oxymoronic, as "Reconstructionism" in the Pagan/polytheist sense had now been defined specifically to exclude "Eclecticism". [McColman (2003) p.51: "Such reconstructionists are attempting, through both spiritual and scholarly means, to create as purely Celtic a spirituality as possible."]

Initially only a few dozen people were involved on the Proto-CR and CR listserves. These included the PODS:CELTIC Echo on PODnet (a FidoNet network "othernet"), the Celtic and Occult forums on networks like GEnie and CompuServe, and later Nemeton-L in 1994 (founded and initially moderated by Erynn Rowan Laurie). But over the 1990s many hundreds of individuals and groups gradually joined the discussions online and in print, and the movement became more of an umbrella group, with a number of recognized sub-traditions.

Practices

Though some CRs do have survivals of Irish or Scottish folkloric customs in their families of origin, CR does not make any claim to being a linear or direct descendant of any intact, completely polytheistic, ancient Celtic religion. The polytheistic religions of the ancient Celts were lost or subsumed by Christianity. However, CRs believe there is much to be found in the living Celtic cultures, the archaeological record, and the early manuscripts. Many folkloric practices never completely died out, and all that is needed in some areas, such as community celebrations, is a bit of dusting off and "back-engineering". Other aspects of ancient Celtic religion are more difficult to reconstruct. [McColman, Carl (2003) "Complete Idiot's Guide to Celtic Wisdom". Alpha Press ISBN 0-02-864417-4. p.12: "Some groups have gone even further, trying to use archaeology, religious history, comparative mythology, and even the study of non-Celtic Indo-European religions in an effort to create a well-researched and scholarly "reconstruction" of the ancient Celts."]

CRs openly acknowledge that some aspects of their religious practice are, by necessity, modern creations. However, they state that, as much as possible, these practices are based on and inspired by early Celtic beliefs found in early texts and the work of scholars and archaeologists, and are rooted in an understanding of, and participation in, the living Celtic cultures. Any innovations or elaborations are based upon sound historical precedents. Feedback from other scholars and experienced practitioners is sought before a new practice is accepted as part of the tradition.Bonewits, Isaac (2006) "Bonewits's Essential Guide to Druidism". New York, Kensington Publishing Group ISBN 0-8065-2710-2. p.132]

CRs believe it is important to lay aside elements of some ancient Celtic cultures which would be clearly inappropriate practices for a modern society. It is clear that some of those early Celtic societies practiced human sacrifice, slavery, and had strong patriarchal elements. CRs strive to find ethical ways of integrating their historical findings and research with their daily lives.

CR is not only about scholarly research. The founders and elders of CR believe that mystical, ecstatic practices are a necessary balance to scholarship, and that this balance is a vital component in determining whether a tradition is CR. Erynn Rowan Laurie, Aedh Rua O'Morrighu, John Machate, Kathryn Price Theatana, Kym Lambert ní Dhoireann, "Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism", in: Telesco, Patricia [editor] (2005) "Which Witch is Which?" Franklin Lakes, NJ, New Page Books / The Career Press ISBN 1-56414-754-1, p. 85-9.] They also believe that participation in, and respect for, the living Celtic cultures is a vital part of the tradition. Language study and preservation, and participation in other cultural activities such as Celtic music, dance and martial arts forms, are seen as a core part of the tradition. [McColman (2003) p.51: "Many Celtic reconstructionists stress the importance of learning a Celtic language, like Irish or Welsh,"]

Celtic Reconstructionists focus their religious reconstruction efforts on a particular Celtic culture, such as the Gaelic, Welsh or Gaulish. While they believe it is helpful to "study" a wide variety of Celtic cultures as an aid to religious reconstruction, and to have a broad understanding of religion in general, in "practice" these cultures are not lumped together.

Many CRs view each act of daily life as a form of ritual, accompanying daily acts of purification and protection with traditional, or slightly re-Paganized, prayers, chants and songs from sources such as the Scottish Gaelic "Carmina Gadelica" or manuscript collections of ancient Irish or Welsh poetry. Celebratory, community rituals are usually based on traditional community celebrations as recorded in folkloric collections by authors such as Marian McNeill, Kevin Danaher or John Gregorson Campbell. These celebrations often involve bonfires, dances, songs, divination and children's games. More formal or mystical CR rituals are often based on traditional techniques of interacting with the Otherworld, such as the act of making offerings of food, drink and art to the spirits of the land, ancestral spirits, and the Celtic deities. CR ritual structures are based on the ancient Celtic cosmology of the "Three Realms" - Land, Sea and SkyMac Mathúna, Liam (1999) [http://www.celt.dias.ie/publications/celtica/c23/c23-174.pdf "Irish Perceptions of the Cosmos"] "Celtica" vol. 23 (1999), pp.174-187] - with the fire of inspiration seen as a central force that unites the realms. These more formal rituals may also involve traditional songs and prayers from the living Celtic cultures as well as ceremonies and visionary techniques reconstructed from older, Polytheistic sources. Mystical practices are usually reconstructions based on accounts in the older manuscripts. Many CRs maintain altars and shrines to their patron spirits and deities, often choosing to place them at outdoor, natural locations such as wells, streams, and special trees. Some CRs practice divination. Ogham is a favored method, as are folkloric customs such as the taking of omens from the shapes of clouds or the behaviour of birds and animals.

Terminology

NicDhàna and ní Dhoireann have stated that they coined the term "Celtic Reconstructionist / Celtic Reconstructionism (CR)" specifically to distinguish their practices and beliefs from those of eclectic traditions like Wicca and the Neo-Druidry of the time. [McColman (2003) p.51: "While Celtic shamanism and Celtic Wicca are popular, not all people interested in finding a nature-based expression of Celtic spirituality feel comfortable with these multicultural forms of spirituality. A small but dedicated group of people, mostly neopagans, have formed a vibrant community in recent years devoted to reconstructing ancient Celtic pagan spirituality for the modern world."] With ní Dhoireann’s popularization of Celtic Reconstructionism in the Pagan press, and then the use of the term by these individuals and others on the Internet, “Celtic Reconstructionism” began to be adopted as the name for this developing spiritual tradition.Darcie (1992) "Book Review", "Harvest", Southboro, MA, Vol. 12, No. 5, Beltane 1992, p. 8. Use of term by another writer: "I showed the Appendix to a Celtic reconstructionist friend..."] Hinds, Kathryn (1992) "Letters", "Harvest", Southboro, MA, Vol. 12, No. 6, Summer 1992, p. 11. Use of term by a letter writer: "I am very curious about Kym Lambert's experiences, and I hope she will write more about her path of Celtic reconstructionism."] Lambert, Kym [K.L. ní Dhoireann] (1992) "Reviewers' Biographies", "Harvest", Southboro, MA, Vol. 12, No. 8, Fall/Autumn Equinox 1992, p. 10. Use of term in bio blurb: "Kym Lambert is...now practicing Celtic Reconstructionism..."]

While Celtic Reconstructionism was the earliest term in use, and still remains the most widespread, as the movement progressed other names for a Celtic Reconstructionist approach were also popularized, with varying degrees of success.

Pàganachd / Págánacht

Some CR groups have looked to Celtic languages for a more culturally specific name for the tradition, or for their branch of the tradition. There are groups who now described their traditions as "Pàganachd" ("Paganism, Heathenism" in Scottish Gaelic) or the Irish version, "Págánacht".cite web | last = NicDhàna| first = Kathryn | coauthors = Raven nic Rhóisín | title = "I Stand with Tara: A Celtic Reconstructionist (Págánacht) ritual for the protection of the sacred center: the Tara-Skryne Valley in Ireland." | publisher = paganachd.com agus paganacht.com | month = October | year = 2007 | url = http://www.paganachd.com/tara | format = HTML | doi = | accessdate = 2007-10-26 ] cite web |url=http://www.gaolnaofa.org/index.html |title=Gaol Naofa: Gaelic Reconstructionist Polytheism |publisher=www.gaolnaofa.org |accessdate=2008-05-05 |last= |first= ] Some Gaelic-oriented groups use the two terms somewhat interchangeably,cite web | title = Pàganachd/Págánacht | publisher = paganachd.com agus paganacht.com | year = 2006 | url = http://paganacht.com | format = HTML | accessdate = 2007-10-26 ] or further modify these terms to describe the CR sub-tradition practiced by their particular group, such as "Pàganachd Allaidh" (“Wild Paganism”)cite web | last = ní Dhoireann | first = Kym | authorlink = | title = Our Scottish Reconstructionist Path v. 3.0: Pàganachd Allaidh | publisher = cyberpict.net | year = 2007 | url = http://cyberpict.net/tns/what.htm | format = HTML | accessdate = 2007-10-26 ] or "Pàganachd Bhandia" (“Paganism of Goddesses”),both used by Gaelic Reconstructionist groups on the East Coast of the US.

Gaelic Traditionalism

Some groups that take a Celtic Reconstructionist approach to Gaelic polytheism call themselves "Gaelic Traditionalists". While there is agreement that a priority of Celtic Reconstructionism is to preserve the living traditions in Gaelic (and other Modern Celtic) communities, there has been some controversy around the use of the term "Gaelic Traditionalists" by groups outside of the Gaeltacht and Gàidhealtachd areas of Ireland, Scotland and Nova Scotia.cite book |last= NicDhàna |first= Kathryn Price |authorlink= |coauthors= Erynn Rowan Laurie, C. Lee Vermeers, Kym Lambert ní Dhoireann, "et al" |title= The CR FAQ - An Introduction to Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism |origyear= 2007 |origmonth= August |edition= first |publisher= River House Publishing |isbn= 978-0-6151-5800-6 |page= pp.134-6] Part of this is due to the fact that most "Gaelic Traditionalists" are actually Christians. As one of the founders of the Celtic Reconstructionist movement put it, "Gaelic Traditionalists" means "those living and raised in the living cultures and [who] are keeping their culture, language and music alive, not any of the American polytheistic groups that have been using it lately." Due to those in the Gaelic-speaking areas having a prior claim to the term, some CRs have been uncomfortable with the choice of other reconstructionists to call themselves "traditionalists". While this disagreement over terminology has at times led to heated discussion, the polytheistic “traditionalists” and the “reconstructionists” are taking the same approach to their religion, and there are generally good relations between the founders of both movements.

enistrognata / Sinnsreachd

In the late 1990s, members of Imbas, a Celtic Reconstructionist organisation based in Seattle, began promoting the name "Senistrognata",Bonewits, Isaac (2006) "Bonewits's Essential Guide to Druidism". New York, Kensington Publishing Group ISBN 0-8065-2710-2. p.137] which they say means "the ancestral customs of the Celtic peoples" in reconstructed Old Celtic.cite web | title = "Imbas" | publisher = imbas.org | year = 2000 | url = http://www.imbas.org/imbas/index.html | format = HTML | accessdate = 2007-10-26 ]

In 2006, "An Cónaidhm na dTuath Gaelach", an American group that does not call themselves CR, began promoting the name "Sinnsreachd" (Scottish Gaelic) or "Sinsearacht" (Irish), which they say is the modern Gaelic equivalent of the term. However, "Sinnsreachd" and "Sinsearacht" actually mean "ancestry",cite book |last= Robertson |first= Boyd |authorlink= |coauthors= Ian McDonald |title= Gaelic Dictionary |origyear= 2004 | publisher= Hodder Education, Teach Yourself Series |isbn= 0-07-142667-1 |page= p.106] cite book |last= MacLennan |first= Malcolm |authorlink= |title= A Pronouncing and Etymological Dictionary of the Gaelic Language |origyear= 1991 | publisher= Edinburgh: Acair/Aberdeen University Press |isbn= 0-08-025712-7 |page= p.300] cite book |last= MacBain |first= Alexander |authorlink= |title= Etymological Dictionary of Scottish-Gaelic |origyear= 1998 | publisher= Hippocrene Books, Inc. New York, NY |isbn= 0-7818-0632-1 |page= p.323] "seniority",cite book |last= Ó Dónaill |first= Niall |authorlink= |title= Foclóir Gaeilge-Béarla |origyear= 1992 | publisher= Éireann: Mount Salus Press |isbn= 1-85791-037-0 |page= p.1096] or "genealogy".

Other

*The Irish word for “polytheism”, "Ildiachas", is in use by at least one group on the West Coast of the US as "Ildiachas Atógtha" (“reconstructed polytheism”).NicDhàna "et al." [August 2007] p.177]
*"Aurrad", which came into use among members of the Nemeton mailing list in the mid 1990s,cite web | last = Machate | first =John | title = Aurrad: Old Faith in a Modern World | publisher = thunderpaw.com | year = 1995 | url = http://www.thunderpaw.com/neocelt/aurrad.htm | format = HTML | accessdate = 2007-10-26 ] means "person of legal standing in the "túath"Kelly, Fergus (1988) "A Guide to Early Irish Law". Dublin, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies ISBN 0-901282-95-2. p.304] in Old Irish.Kelly, Fergus (1988) "A Guide to Early Irish Law". Dublin, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies ISBN 0-901282-95-2. p.323 "petty kingdom, territory, tribe; the laity"]

Celtic Reconstructionism and Neo-druidism

Though there has been quite a bit of cross-pollination between Neo-druid and Celtic Reconstructionist groups, and there is significant crossover of membership between the two movements, the two have somewhat distinct methodologies and goals in their approach to Celtic religious forms. CR practitioners tend to look to the whole cultural matrix in which the religious ideas were formed, while Neo-druids tend to prefer to focus on the specifically druidic functions. Some Neo-druidic groups claim to be non-religious in nature, which is not the case with most CR groups. There are some CR philosophies which downplay the role of the druidic office specifically in preference to a more general view of Indo-European priesthood (making the argument that the druids may simply have been a very successful school of priest-craft, and possibly not even completely pan-Celtic), or to the successors of druids such as the filí and seanachies.

This is not to say that there is no connection between Neo-druid groups and CR. Some Neo-druid groups (notably, Ár nDraíocht Féin (ADF), the Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids (OBOD), and Keltria) have similar methodologies of reconstruction, at least some of the time, or have taken up CR methodologies recently. ADF, in particular, has long used CR-type techniques, but many CRs criticize them for their pan-Indo-European scope, which may result in unusual combinations such as "Vedic druids" and "Roman druids". [Bonewits (2006) Chapter 9, "Solitary Druids and Celtic Reconstructionists" pp.128-140.]

Some philosophical differences exist as well, especially in terms of what "druid" means. Some Neo-druidic groups call anyone with an interest in Celtic Spirituality a "druid", and refer to the practice of Celtic spirituality as "druidry", while CR groups usually use the older definition, seeing it as an office that requires decades of training and experience, which is only attained by a small number of practitioners, and which must be conferred and confirmed by the community the druid serves. [Bonewits (2006) p.135: "But because the word druid is used by so many people for so many different purposes, Celtic Recons, even those who get called druids by their own communities, are reluctant to use the title for fear that others will equate them with folks they consider flakes, frauds or fools."] Greer, John Michael (2003) "The New Encyclopedia of the Occult". St. Paul, Llewellyn Worldwide. ISBN 1-5671-8336-0. pp.139,140,410.]

Despite these differences, there are generally good relations between Neo-druid and CR groups, with, as noted previously, a great deal of sharing of ideas and even memberships.Bonewits, Isaac (2006) "Bonewits's Essential Guide to Druidism". New York, Kensington Publishing Group ISBN 0-8065-2710-2. pp.118,120,125,130,131] Failed verification|date=September 2008

ee also

*Celt
*Celtic mythology
*Celtic polytheism
*Modern Celts
*Polytheistic Reconstructionism; Festivals
*Imbolc
*Beltane
*Lughnasadh
*Samhain

References

Further reading

Celtic Reconstructionism

*Adler, Margot (1979) "Drawing Down the Moon: Witches, Druids, Goddess-Worshippers, and Other Pagans in America Today"
*Bonewits, Isaac (2006) "Bonewits's Essential Guide to Druidism". New York, Kensington Publishing Group ISBN 0-8065-2710-2 Chapter 9: "Celtic Reconstructionists and other Nondruidic Druids"
*Fairgrove, Rowan (1994) "What we don't know about the ancient Celts". Originally printed in "The Pomegranate", 2. Now [http://www.conjure.com/whocelts.html available online]
*Kondratiev, Alexei (1998) "The Apple Branch: A Path to Celtic Ritual". San Francisco, Collins. ISBN 1-898256-42-X (1st edition), ISBN 0-806-52502-9 (2nd edition) [also reprinted without revision under the title Celtic Rituals]
*Laurie, Erynn Rowan (1995) "A Circle of Stones: Journeys and Meditations for Modern Celts". Chicago, Eschaton. ISBN 1-57353-106-5
*Laurie, Erynn Rowan (2007) "Ogam: Weaving Word Wisdom". Megalithica Books. ISBN 1905713029
*McColman, Carl (2003) "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Celtic Wisdom." Alpha Press ISBN 0-02-864417-4
*NicDhàna, Kathryn Price; Erynn Rowan Laurie, C. Lee Vermeers, Kym Lambert ní Dhoireann, "et al." (2007) "The CR FAQ - An Introduction to Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism". River House Publishing. ISBN 978-0-6151-5800-6
*Telesco, Patricia [editor] (2005) "Which Witch is Which?" Franklin Lakes, NJ, New Page Books / The Career Press ISBN 1-56414-754-1, p. 85-9: "Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism"

Celtic polytheism and folklore

Celtic Reconstructionists rely on primary mythological texts, as well as surviving folklore, for the basis of their religious practices. No list can completely cover all the recommended works, but this is a small sample of sources used.

External links

* [http://www.paganachd.com/faq/ The CR FAQ - An Introduction to Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism] : Written by a collective of long-term members of the CR community and representatives of diverse CR sub-traditions - including some of the founders of the tradition - the FAQ is only the second document to present a consensus view that speaks for more than one group's vision.
* [http://www.witchvox.com/va/dt_va.html?a=usma&c=trads&id=6645 Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism] : The much-briefer consensus tradition statement from 2003. Contains unclear bits that were later cleared up in the FAQ, but a much quicker read than the FAQ.
* [http://www.imbas.org/imbas/what_we_mean.html What we mean by Celtic Reconstructionism] : Statement from Imbas

;Organisations
* [http://www.clannada.org/ Clannada na Gadelica] : Gaelic Polytheism Organisation (Tennessee)
* [http://cyberpict.net/ Dùn Sgàthan] (New Hampshire)
* [http://www.gaolnaofa.org/index.html Gaol Naofa] : Gaelic Polytheism Organisation (Florida)
* [http://www.imbas.org/imbas/index.html IMBAS] (Seattle, Washington)
* [http://www.newtara.org/ New Tara] : Diverse Celtic group which includes Reconstructionists (Toronto)
* [http://macalla.bravehost.com/ Macalla] : Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas Celtas (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)
* [http://www.delawarevalleyceltic.org Celtic Reconstructionists of the Delaware Valley] : Celtic Reconstructionists of the Delaware Valley and greater Philadelphia area (Pennsylvania)

;Online portals
* [http://www.bandia.net/caorann/ CAORANN] : Celts Against Oppression, Racism and Neo-Nazism
* [http://www.paganachd.com/ Pàganachd / Págánacht] : Home of the CR FAQ and other CR resources.
* [http://www.cyberpict.net/mph/ Multicultural Polytheistic Hearth] : Discussion board for Reconstructionists, with a large CR presence
* [http://br.geocities.com/sitetresmundos/ Tres Mundos] : Paganismo Reconstrucionista Celta (Portuguese)
* [http://www.celtoi.net/ Celtoi Net] (German)