Enforcement of European patents

Enforcement of European patents

European patents are granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) under the legal provisions of the European Patent Convention (EPC). However, European patents are enforced at a national level, i.e. on a per-country basis. Under EPC Article|64|2, "any infringement of a European patent shall be dealt with by national law," with the European Patent Office having no legal competence to deal with and to decide on patent infringements in the Contracting States to the EPC. A few, limited aspects relating to the infringement of European patents are however prescribed in the EPC.

Proposals have been long discussed to create a true unitary European patent system across Europe and especially across the European Union (EU), i.e. a European patent system wherein the enforcement of European-wide patents would be dealt at a supranational level rather than at a national level. These projects include the Community patent and the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA). None of these projects have yet come to fruition.

Extent of protection

A first aspect relating to the infringement of European patents which is prescribed in the EPC is the extent of protection conferred by a European patent. EPC Article|69|1 reads:

:"The extent of the protection conferred by a European patent or a European patent application shall be determined by the claims. Nevertheless, the description and drawings shall be used to interpret the claims."

In other words, the "extent of the protection" conferred by a European patent is determined primarily by reference to the claims of the European patent (rather than by the disclosure of the specification and drawings, as in some older patent systems), though the description and drawings are to be used as interpretive aids in determining the meaning of the claims. [ EPC Article|69|1 ] A "Protocol on the Interpretation of Article 69 EPC" [ [http://www.epo.org/patents/law/legal-texts/html/epc/2000/e/ma2a.html "Protocol on the Interpretation of Article 69 EPC"] ] provides further guidance, that claims are to be construed using a "fair" middle position, neither "strict, literal" nor as mere guidelines to considering the description and drawings, though of course even the protocol is subject to national interpretation. [ "E.g.", "Southco Inc v Dzus", [1992] R.P.C. 299 CA; "Improver Corp. v Remington Products Inc" [1990] FSR 181. ] The authentic text of a European patent application and of a European patent are the documents in the language of the proceedings. [ EPC Article|70 ] Singer/Stauder, "The European Patent Convention, A Commentary", Munich, 2003, under Article 2, section "EPC provisions on European patents that take precedence over national law" ]

Products directly obtained by a process

A second aspect relating to the infringement of European patents is prescribed in EPC Article|64|2. The EPC requires that national courts must consider the "direct product of a patented process" to be an infringement. EPC Article|64|2 reads: :"If the subject-matter of the European patent is a process, the protection conferred by the patent shall extend to the products directly obtained by such process."

Other aspects

All other substantive rights attached to a European patent in a Contracting State, such as what acts constitute infringement (indirect and divided infringement, infringement by equivalents, extraterritorial infringement, infringement outside the term of the patent with economic effect during the term of the patent, infringement of product claims by processes for making or using, exports, assembly of parts into an infringing whole, etc.), the effect of prosecution history on interpretation of the claims, remedies for infringement or bad faith enforcement (injunction, damages, attorney fees, other civil penalties for willful infringement, etc.), equitable defenses, coexistence of an EP national daughter and a national patent for identical subject matter, ownership and assignment, extensions to patent term for regulatory approval, etc., are expressly remitted to national law. [ EPC Article|2|2 ]

Cross-border injunctions

For a period in the late-1990's, national courts issued cross-border injunctions covering all EP jurisdictions, but this has been limited by the European Court of Justice. In two cases in July 2006 interpreting Articles 6.1 and 16.4 of the Brussels Convention, the European Court of Justice held that European patents are national rights that must be enforced nationally, that it was "unavoidable" that infringements of the same European patent have to be litigated in each relevant national court, even if the lawsuit is against the same group of companies, and that cross-border injunctions are not available. [ [http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=EN&Submit=Rechercher$docrequire=alldocs&numaff=C-4/03&datefs=&datefe=&nomusuel=&domaine=&mots=&resmax=100 Case C-4/03, "Gesellschaft für Antriebstechnik v Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG", (European Ct. of Justice 13 July 2006)] ; [http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=EN&Submit=Rechercher$docrequire=alldocs&numaff=C-539/03&datefs=&datefe=&nomusuel=&domaine=&mots=&resmax=100 Case C-539/03, "Roche Nederland BV v Primus", (European Ct. of Justice 13 July 2006)] ]

References

ee also

* Brussels regime
* European patent law
* Spider in the web doctrine


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • European patent law — covers a wide range of legislations including national patent laws, the Strasbourg Convention of 1963, the European Patent Convention of 1973, and a number of European Union directives and regulations. Patents having effect in European states may …   Wikipedia

  • European Patent Convention — European patent law …   Wikipedia

  • European Patent Office — The European Patent Office (EPO) is one of the two organs of the European Patent Organisation (EPOrg), the other being the Administrative Council. [EPC Article|4|2] The EPO acts as executive body for the OrganisationEPC Article|4|3]… …   Wikipedia

  • Enforcement Directive — European Union directive: Directive 2004/48/EC Directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights Made by European Parliament Council Made under …   Wikipedia

  • Patent law of the European Union — European Union patent law is a subset of European patent law. It also serves as the superset of the patent laws of the individual states of the European Union (EU). The most recent (proposed) addition to the range of measures currently in place… …   Wikipedia

  • European Patent Litigation Agreement — The draft European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), or formally the Draft Agreement on the establishment of a European patent litigation system, is a proposed patent law agreement aimed at creating an optional protocol to the European Patent… …   Wikipedia

  • Software patents under the European Patent Convention — Computer programs, software and patent law Topics …   Wikipedia

  • Grant procedure before the European Patent Office — Graph of European patent applications filed and granted between 1998 and 2007. Note that the average time from filing to grant in 2007 was 43.7 months (3.6 years) The grant procedure before the European Patent Office (EPO) is an ex parte,… …   Wikipedia

  • Inventive step under the European Patent Convention — Legal requirements applicable to European patent applications and patents …   Wikipedia

  • Opposition procedure before the European Patent Office — The opposition procedure before the European Patent Office (EPO) is a post grant, contentious, inter partes, administrative [1] procedure intended to allow any European patent to be centrally opposed. European patents granted by the EPO under the …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”