- K–T boundary
The K-T boundary is a geological signature, usually a thin band, dated to 65.5 ± 0.3 (mya). [ [http://www.stratigraphy.org/cheu.pdf International commission for Stratigraphy] ] "K" is the traditional abbreviation for the
CretaceousPeriod, and "T" is the abbreviation for the TertiaryPeriod. The boundary marks the end of the MesozoicEra, and the beginning of the CenozoicEra, and is associated with the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event, a mass extinction.cite book|author=Fortey, R|title=Life: A Natural History of the First Four Billion Years of Life on Earth|publisher=Vintage|date=1999|pages=238–260|isbn=978-0375702617]
Alvarez impact hypothesis
In 1980, a team of researchers consisting of
Nobel prize-winning physicist Luis Alvarez, his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, and chemists Frank Asaro and Helen Michels discovered that sedimentarylayers found all over the world at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary contain a concentrationof iridiummany times greater than normal (30 times and 130 times background in the two sections originally studied). Iridium is extremely rare in the earth's crust because it is a siderophile, and therefore most of it travelled with the ironas it sank into the earth's core during planetary differentiation. As iridium remains abundant in most asteroids and comets, the Alvarez team suggested that an asteroidstruck the earth at the time of the K–T boundary.cite journal|title=Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction|author=Alvarez, LW, Alvarez, W, Asaro, F, and Michel, HV|date=1980|journal=Science|volume=208|issue=4448|pages=1095–1108|doi=10.1126/science.208.4448.1095] There were other earlier speculations on the possibility of an impact event, but no evidence had been uncovered at that time. [cite journal|author=De Laubenfels, MW|title=Dinosaur Extinctions: One More Hypothesis|journal=Journal of Paleontology|volume= 30|issue=1|pages=207–218|date=1956|url=http://www.norwebster.com/astrohit/|accessdate=2007-05-22]
The evidence for the Alvarez impact theory is supported by chondritic
meteorites and asteroids which have an iridium concentration of ~455 parts per billion, [cite journal|author=W. F. McDonough and S.-s. Sun|title=The composition of the Earth|journal=Chemical Geology|volume=120|issue=3-4|pages=223–253|year=1995|doi=10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4] much higher than ~0.3 parts per billion typical of the earth's crust. Chromiumisotopic anomalies found in Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary sediments are similar to that of an asteroid or a comet composed of carbonaceous chondrites. Shocked quartzgranules and tektiteglass spherules, indicative of an impact event, are also common in the K–T boundary, especially in deposits from around the Caribbean. All of these constituents are embedded in a layer of clay, which the Alvarez team interpreted as the debris spread all over the world by the impact.
Using estimates of the total amount of iridium in the K–T layer, and assuming that the asteroid contained the normal percentage of iridium found in
chondrites, the Alvarez team went on to calculate the size of the asteroid. The answer was about km to mi|10 in diameter, about the size of Manhattan. Such a large impact would have had approximately the energy of 100 trillion tons of TNT, or about 2 million times greater than the most powerful thermonuclear bombever tested.
The obvious consequence of an impact would be a dust cloud which would block
sunlightand inhibit photosynthesis for a few years. This would account for the extinction of plantsand phytoplanktonand of organismsdependent on them (including predatory animals as well as herbivores). However, small creatures whose food chains were based on detritusmight have still had a reasonable chance of survival. It is estimated that sulfuric acid aerosols were injected into the stratosphere, leading to a 10–20% reduction in sunlight reaching the earth's surface. It would have taken at least ten years for those aerosols to dissipate. [cite book|author=Ocampo, A, Vajda, V & Buffetaut, E|title=Unravelling the Cretaceous–Paleogene (KT) Turnover, Evidence from Flora, Fauna and Geology in Biological Processes Associated with Impact Events (Cockell, C, Gilmour, I & Koeberl, C, editors)|publisher=SpringerLink |date=2006|pages=197–219|isbn=978-3-540-25735-6|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/vw75014157p2p278/|accessdate=2007-06-17]
Global firestorms may have resulted as incendiary fragments from the blast fell back to Earth. Analyses of
fluid inclusionsin ancient ambersuggest that the oxygencontent of the atmosphere was very high (30–35%) during the late Cretaceous. This high O2 level would have supported intense combustion. The level of atmospheric O2 plummeted in the early Tertiary Period. If widespread fires occurred, they would have increased the CO2 content of the atmosphere and caused a temporary greenhouse effectonce the dust cloud settled, and this would have exterminated the most vulnerable survivors of the "long winter".cite journal|title=Energy, volatile production, and climatic effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary impact|author=Pope, KO, Baines, KH, Ocampo, AC, & Ivanov, BA|date=1997|journal=Journal of Geophysical Research|volume=102|issue=E9|pages=21645–21664|url=http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1997/97JE01743.shtml|accessdate=2007-07-18|doi=10.1029/97JE01743]
The impact may also have produced
acid rain, depending on what type of rock the asteroid struck. However, recent research suggests this effect was relatively minor. Chemical buffers would have limited the changes, and the survival of animals vulnerable to acid raineffects (such as frogs) indicate this was not a major contributor to extinction. Impact theories can only explain very rapid extinctions, since the dust clouds and possible sulphuric aerosols would wash out of the atmosphere in a fairly short time—possibly under ten years. [cite journal|author=Kring, DA|date=2003|title=Environmental consequences of impact cratering events as a function of ambient conditions on Earth|journal=Astrobiology|volume=3|issue=1|pages=133–152|pmid=12809133|doi=10.1089/153110703321632471]
When it was originally proposed, one issue with the "
Alvarez hypothesis" (as it came to be known) had been that no documented crater matched the event. This was not a lethal blow to the theory; since although the crater resulting from the impact would have been larger than km to mi|250 in diameter, Earth's geological processes hide or destroy craters over time.cite journal|author=Keller, G, Adatte, T, Stinnesbeck, W, Rebolledo-Vieyra, Fucugauchi, JU, Kramar,U, & Stüben, D|date=2004|title=Chicxulub impact predates the K-T boundary mass extinction|journal=PNAS|volume=101|pages=3753–3758|doi=10.1073/pnas.0400396101 ]
Subsequent research, however, identified the
Chicxulub Craterburied under Chicxulub on the coast of Yucatan, Mexicoas the impact crater which matched the Alvarez hypothesis dating. Identified in 1990 based on the work of Glen Penfield done in 1978, this crater is oval, with an average diameter of about km to mi|180, about the size calculated by the Alvarez team. [cite journal | author=Pope KO, Ocampo AC, Kinsland GL, Smith R | title=Surface expression of the Chicxulub crater | journal=Geology | volume=24 | issue=6 | year=1996 | pages=527–30 | pmid=11539331 | doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0527:SEOTCC>2.3.CO;2 | doilabel=10.1130/0091-7613(1996)0240527:SEOTCC2.3.CO;2]
The shape and location of the crater indicate further causes of devastation in addition to the dust cloud. The asteroid landed right on the coast and would have caused gigantic
tsunamis, for which evidence has been found all round the coast of the Caribbean and eastern United States—marine sand in locations which were then inland, and vegetation debris and terrestrial rocks in marine sediments dated to the time of the impact. The asteroid landed in a bed of gypsum(calcium sulphate), which would have produced a vast sulphur dioxide aerosol. This would have further reduced the sunlight reaching the earth's surface and then precipitated as acid rain, killing vegetation, plankton and organisms which build shells from calcium carbonate ( coccolithophoridsand molluscs). The crater's shape suggests that the asteroid landed at an angle of 20° to 30° from horizontal and traveling north-west. This would have directed most of the blast and solid debris into the central part of what is now the United States. Most paleontologists now agree that an asteroid did hit the Earth about 65 mya, but there is an ongoing dispute whether the impact was the sole cause of the extinctions.cite journal|title=Analyses of shocked quartz at the global K-P boundary indicate an origin from a single, high-angle, oblique impact at Chicxulub|author=Morgan, J, Lana, C, Kersley, A, Coles, B, Belcher, C, Montanari, S, Diaz-Martinez, E, Barbosa, A & Neumann, V|journal=Earth and Planetary Science Letters|volume=251|issue=3-4|date=2006|pages=264–279|doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.009] Gerta Kellersuggests that the Chicxulub impact occurred approximately 300,000 years before the K–T boundary. This dating is based on evidence collected in Northeast Mexico, detailing multiple stratigraphic layers containing impact spherules, the earliest of which occurs approximately m to ft|10 below the K–T boundary. This chronostratigraphic sequence of rock is thought to represent 300,000 years. This finding supports the theory that one or many impacts were contributory, but not causal, to the K–T boundary mass extinction. However, many scientists reject Keller's analysis, some arguing that the 10 meter (32.8 ft) layer on top of the impact spherules should be attributed to tsunami activity resulting from impact. Few researchers support Keller's dating of the impact crater.
Before 2000, arguments that the
Deccan Traps flood basalts caused the extinction were usually linked to the view that the extinction was gradual, as the flood basalt events were thought to have started around 68 mya and lasted for over 2 million years. However, there is evidence that two-thirds of the Deccan Traps were created in 1 million years about 65.5 mya, so these eruptions would have caused a fairly rapid extinction, possibly a period of thousands of years, but still a longer period than what would be expected from a single impact event. [cite journal|author=Hofman, C, Féraud, G & Courtillot, V|date=2000|title=40Ar/39Ar dating of mineral separates and whole rocks from the Western Ghats lava pile: further constraints on duration and age of the Deccan traps|journal=Earth and Planetary Science Letters|volume=180|pages=13–27|doi=10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00159-X] cite journal|title=Rapid eruption of the Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary|author=Duncan, RA & Pyle, DG|date=1988|journal=Nature|volume=333|pages=841–843|doi=10.1038/333841a0]
The Deccan Traps could have caused extinction through several mechanisms, including the release of dust and sulphuric aerosols into the air which might have blocked sunlight and thereby reducing photosynthesis in plants. In addition, Deccan Trap volcanism might have resulted in carbon dioxide emissions which would have increased the
greenhouse effectwhen the dust and aerosols cleared from the atmosphere.
In the years when the Deccan Traps theory was linked to a slower extinction, Luis Alvarez (who died in 1988) replied that
paleontologistswere being misled by sparse data. While his assertion was not initially well-received, later intensive field studies of fossil beds lent weight to his claim. Eventually, most paleontologists began to accept the idea that the mass extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous were largely or at least partly due to a massive Earth impact. However, even Walter Alvarez has acknowledged that there were other major changes on Earth even before the impact, such as a drop in sea leveland massive volcanic eruptions that produced the Indian Deccan Traps, and these may have contributed to the extinctions. [cite book|author=Alvarez, W|title=T. rex and the Crater of Doom|date=1997|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0691016306|pages=130-146]
Multiple impact event
Several other craters also appear to have been formed about the time of the K–T boundary. This suggests the possibility of near simultaneous multiple impacts, perhaps from a fragmented asteroidal object, similar to the Shoemaker-Levy 9 cometary impact with Jupiter. Among these are the
Boltysh crater, a km to mi|24 diameter impact crater in the Ukrainenowrap|(65.17 ± 0.64 mya); and the Silverpit crater, a km to mi|20 diameter impact crater in the North Seanowrap|(60–65 mya). Any other craters that might have formed in the Tethys Oceanwould have been obscured by tectonic events like the relentless northward drift of Africa and India. [cite journal|author=Mullen, L|date= October 13 2004|title= Debating the Dinosaur Extinction| url= http://www.astrobio.net/news/article1243.html|journal=Astrobiology Magazine|accessdate=2007-07-11] [cite journal|author=Mullen, L| date= October 20, 2004| title=Multiple impacts|url=http://www.astrobio.net/news/article1253.html|journal=Astrobiology Magazine|accessdate=2007-07-11] cite journal|author=Mullen, L|date= November 03 2004|title=Shiva: Another K–T impact?|url=http://www.astrobio.net/news/article1281.html|journal=Astrobiology Magazine|accessdate=2007-07-11]
A very large structure in the sea floor off the west coast of India has recently been interpreted as a crater by some researchers. [cite journal|author=Chatterjee, S, Guven, N, Yoshinobu, A, & Donofrio, R|date=2006|title=Shiva structure: a possible KT boundary impact crater on the western shelf of India|journal=Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University|issue=50|url=http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/publications/opapers/specpubs/SP50.pdf|format=PDF |accessdate=2007-06-15] The potential
Shiva crater, km to mi|450 to km to mi|600 in diameter, would substantially exceed Chicxulub in size and has also been dated at about 65 mya, an age consistent with the K–T boundary. An impact at this site could have been the triggering event for the nearby Deccan Traps. [cite journal|title=The Shiva Crater: Implications for Deccan Volcanism, India-Seychelles rifting, dinosaur extinction, and petroleum entrapment at the KT Boundary|url=http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/finalprogram/abstract_58126.htm|author=Chatterjee, S, Guven, N, Yoshinobu, A, & Donofrio, R|date=2003|journal=Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs|volume=35|issue=6|pages=168|accessdate=2007-08-02] However, this feature has not yet been accepted by the geologic community as an impact crater and may just be a sinkhole depression caused by salt withdrawal.
Maastrichtian sea-level regression
There is clear evidence that sea levels fell in the final stage of the Cretaceous by more than at any other time in the
Mesozoicera. In some Maastrichtianstage rock layers from various parts of the world, the later ones are terrestrial; earlier ones represent shorelines and the earliest represent seabeds. These layers do not show the tilting and distortion associated with mountain building; therefore, the likeliest explanation is a regression", that is, a drop in sea level. There is no direct evidence for the cause of the regression, but the explanation which is currently accepted as the most likely is that the mid-ocean ridges became less active and therefore sank under their own weight.cite journal|author=MacLeod, N, Rawson, PF, Forey, PL, Banner, FT, Boudagher-Fadel, MK, Bown, PR, Burnett, JA, Chambers, P, Culver, S, Evans, SE, Jeffery, C, Kaminski, MA, Lord, AR, Milner, AC, Milner, AR, Morris, N, Owen, E, Rosen, BR, Smith, AB, Taylor, PD, Urquhart, E & Young, JR|title=The Cretaceous–Tertiary biotic transition|date=1997|journal=Journal of the Geological Society|volume=154|issue=2|pages=265–292|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3721/is_199703/ai_n8738406/print|doi=10.1144/gsjgs.154.2.0265] [ cite journal|title=Abrupt deep-sea warming at the end of the Cretaceous|journal=Geology|date=1998|first=L|last=Liangquan|coauthors=Keller, G|volume=26|issue=|pages=995–998|id= |url=http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/11/995|format=|accessdate=2007-08-01|doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0995:ADSWAT>2.3.CO;2|doilabel=10.1130/0091-7613(1998)0260995:ADSWAT2.3.CO;2]
A severe regression would have greatly reduced the
continental shelfarea, which is the most species-rich part of the sea, and therefore could have been enough to cause a "marine" mass extinction. However, research concludes that this change would have been insufficient to cause the observed level of ammonite extinction. The regression would also have caused climate changes, partly by disrupting winds and ocean currents and partly by reducing the earth's albedoand therefore increasing global temperatures.cite journal|author=Marshall, C. R. & Ward, PD|date=1996|title=Sudden and Gradual Molluscan Extinctions in the Latest Cretaceous of Western European Tethys|journal=Science|volume=274|issue=5291|pages=1360–1363|doi=10.1126/science.274.5291.1360]
Marine regression also resulted in the loss of
epeiric seas, such as the Western Interior Seawayof North America. The loss of these seas greatly altered habitats, removing coastal plains that ten million years before had been host to diverse communities such as are found in rocks of the Dinosaur Park Formation. Another consequence was an expansion of freshwaterenvironments, since continental runoff now had longer distances to travel before reaching oceans. While this change was favorable to freshwater vertebrates, those that prefer marine environments, such as sharks, suffered.cite book |last=Archibald |first=J. David |coauthors=and Fastovsky, David E. |editor=Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; and Osmólska, Halszka (eds.)|title=The Dinosauria |edition=2nd |year=2004|publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=0-520-24209-2 |pages=672–684 |chapter=Dinosaur Extinction]
Another proposed cause for the K–T extinction event was cosmic radiation from a nearby
supernovaexplosion. The iridium anomaly at the boundary could support this hypothesis. The fallout from a supernova explosion should contain 244Pu, the longest-lived plutoniumisotope with a half-lifeof 81 million years. If this hypothesis were correct, detectable traces of 244Pu should then be detected from rocks deposited at the time. However, analysis of the boundary layer sediments revealed the absence of 244Pu, disproving this hypothesis. [cite journal|title=Could a Nearby Supernova Explosion have Caused a Mass Extinction?|author=Ellis, J & Schramm, DN|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|date=1995|volume=92|pages=235–238|pmid=11607506|doi=10.1073/pnas.92.1.235]
Disease carrying insect hypothesis
Recently, research by George and Roberta Poinar has led to a hypothesis that outbreaks of new contagious diseases, spread by insects, may have been the cause, or at least a key factor, in the extinction event. This hypothesis is based in part on the conclusion that the K-T extinction occurred over an extended period of time, perhaps thousands of years, while an impact-based extinction should occur very rapidly. Their research relies heavily on biting insect specimens, such as ticks or mites, that have been preserved in amber. They also examined petrified feces from dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous. In both types of specimens, the researchers found multiple types of parasites or pathogens known to cause fatal diseases, including
malaria, dysentary, and leishmania. According to their research, this close link between blood-feeding insects and contagious pathogens was just emerging around the time of the K-T boundary. This would have been especially damaging to populations already isolated or weakened by the other catastrophic events known to occur at that period. A secondary effect, the proliferation of new insect species would likely have affected plant life, again possibly destroying already weakened populations. [cite journal|title=Insect Attack May Have Finished Off Dinosaurs.|author=Oregon State University|journal=ScienceDaily|date=2008-01-04|accessdate=2008-09-04|url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080103090702.htm]
In a review article, J. David Archibald and David E. Fastovsky discussed a scenario combining three major postulated causes: volcanism,
marine regression, and extraterrestrial impact. In this scenario, terrestrial and marine communities were stressed by the changes in and loss of habitats. Dinosaurs, as the largest vertebrates, were the first to be affected by environmental changes, and their diversity declined. At the same time, particulatematerials from volcanism cooled and dried areas of the globe. Then, an impact event occurred, causing collapses in photosynthesis-based food chains, both in the already-stressed terrestrial food chains and in the marine food chains. The major difference between this hypothesis and the single-cause hypotheses is that its proponents view the suggested single causes as either not sufficient in strength to cause the extinctions or not likely to produce the taxonomic pattern of the extinction.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.