Faster-than-light (also superluminal or FTL) communications and travel refer to the propagation of
informationor matterfaster than the speed of light. Science-fiction-style space travel, dubbed "true" FTL, defies known physics.
special theory of relativity, a particle (that has mass) with subluminal velocity needs infinite energy to accelerate to the speed of light, although special relativity does not forbid the existence of particles that travel faster than light at all times ( tachyons).
On the other hand, what some physicists refer to as "apparent" or "effective" FTL [cite journal | last = Gonzalez-Diaz | first = Pedro F. | title = Warp drive space-time | journal = Physical Review D | volume = 62 | year = 2000 | pages = 044005–1–044005–7 | url = http://omnis.if.ufrj.br/~mbr/warp/etc/PRD62_44005.pdf | doi = 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.044005 |format=PDF arxiv | archive = gr-qc | id = 9907026] [http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0107097] [ [http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9810026 PDF for gr-qc/9810026 ] ] [ [http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9908023 PDF for gr-qc/9908023 ] ] is the hypothesis that unusually distorted regions of
spacetimemight permit matter to reach distant locations faster than what it would take light in the "normal" route (though still moving subluminally through the distorted region).
Apparent FTL is not excluded by
general relativity. Examples of apparent FTL proposals are the Alcubierre driveand the traversable wormhole, although the physical plausibility of these solutions is uncertain.
Outside of mainstream physics, others (often without traditional physics training) have speculated on mechanisms that might allow FTL travel to be achieved, often relying on new conjectures of physics of their own invention, but their ideas have not gained significant acceptance in the physics research community. Fictional depictions of superluminal travel and the mechanisms of achieving it are also a staple of the
Faster than light travel
In the context of this article, FTL is transmitting information or matter faster than "c", a constant equal to the
speed of lightin a vacuum, 299,792,458 meters per second, or about 186,282 miles per second. This is not quite the same as travelling faster than light, since:
* Some processes propagate faster than "c", but cannot carry information (See below).
* Light travels at speed "c/n" when not in a vacuum but travelling through a medium with
refractive index= "n" (causing refraction), and in some materials other particles can travel faster than "c/n" (but still slower than "c"), leading to Cherenkov radiation.Neither of these phenomena violates special relativityor creates problems with causality, and thus neither qualifies as "FTL" as described here.
Possibility of FTL
Faster-than-light communication is, by
Einstein's theory of relativity, equivalent to time travel. According to Einstein's theory of special relativity, what we measure as the speed of lightin a vacuum is actually the fundamental physical constant "c". This means that all observers, regardless of their relative velocity, will always measure zero-mass particles such as photons traveling at "c" in a vacuum. This result means that measurements of time and velocity in different frames are no longer related simply by constant shifts, but are instead related by Poincaré transformations. These transformations have important implications:
* The relativistic momentum of a particle would increase with speed in such a way that at the speed of light an object would have infinite momentum.
* To accelerate an object of non-zero rest mass to "c" would require infinite time with any finite acceleration, or infinite acceleration for a finite amount of time.
* Either way, such acceleration requires infinite energy. Going beyond the speed of light in a homogeneous space would hence require more than infinite energy, which is not generally considered to be a sensible notion.
* Some observers with sub-light relative motion will disagree about which occurs first of any two events that are separated by a space-like interval. [Einstein, A, "Relativity:the special and the general theory", pp25-27, Methuen & Co, 1927.] In other words, any travel that is faster-than-light will be seen as traveling backwards in time in some other, equally valid, frames of reference, or need to assume the speculative hypothesis of possible Lorentz violations at a presently unobserved scale (for instance the Planck scale). Therefore any theory which permits "true" FTL also has to cope with
time traveland all its associated paradoxes, [cite journal | first = J. Richard | last = Gott | title = Time Travel in Einstein's Universe | year = 2002 pp82-83] or else to assume the Lorentz invariance to be a symmetry of thermodynamical statistical nature (hence a symmetry broken at some presently unobserved scale).
Albert Einstein elaborated that faster-than-light travel is impossible. Taking for granted the causality principle (causes happen before their consequences) this impossibility stems from the physical assumption that all physical phenomena satisfy, at any scale, the symmetries of the restricted Poincaré Group. This assumption has stood the test of time and has confirmed its efficiency with a high level of precision and reliability according to any presently known physics experiment.
Justifications for FTL travel
Despite the established conclusion that relativity precludes FTL travel, some have proposed ways to justify FTL behavior:
Ignore special relativity
This option is popular particularly in
science fiction. However, empirical and theoretical evidence strongly supports Einstein's theory of special relativityas the correct description of high-speed motion, [ [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?] ] which generalizes the more familiar Galilean relativity, which is actually an approximation at conventional (much less than "c") speeds. Similarly, general relativityis an overwhelmingly supported and experimentally verified theory of gravitation, except in the regime of very high energy densities over very short distances, where an as-yet-undeveloped theory of quantum gravityis necessary. Special relativity, however, is incorporated easily into quantum field theories. Therefore, even in the broader contexts of general relativity and quantum mechanics, conventional acceleration from subluminal to superluminal speeds is not possible.
=Get light to go faster (Casimir vacuum and
Einstein's equations of
special relativitypostulate that the speed of light is invariant in inertial frames. That is, it will be the same from any frame of reference moving at a constant speed. The equations do not specify any particular value for the speed of the light, which is an experimentally determined quantity for a fixed unit of length. Since 1983, the unit of length (the meter) has been defined using the speed of light.
The experimental determination has been made in vacuum. However, the vacuum we know is not the only possible vacuum which can exist. The vacuum has energy associated with it, called the
vacuum energy. This vacuum energy can perhaps be changed in certain cases. When vacuum energy is lowered, light itself has been predicted to go faster than the standard value 'c'. This is known as the Scharnhorst effect. Such a vacuum can be produced by bringing two perfectly smooth metal plates together at near atomic diameter spacing. It is called a Casimir vacuum. Calculations imply that light will go faster in such a vacuum by a minuscule amount: a photon travelling between two plates that are 1 micrometer apart would increase the photon's speed by only about one part in 1036. [http://www.nat.vu.nl/~scharnh/m16scine.htm Science News: Secret of the vacuum: Speedier light] Accordingly there has as yet been no experimental verification of the prediction. A recent analysisS. Liberati, S. Sonego and M. Visser, "Faster-than-c signals, special relativity, and causality", Annals Phys. 298, 167-185 (2002) [http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0107091 preprint] .] argued out that the Scharnhorst effect cannot be used to send information backwards in time with a single set of plates since the plates' rest frame would define a "preferred frame" for FTL signalling. However, with multiple pairs of plates in motion relative to one another the authors noted that they had no arguments that could "guarantee the total absence of causality violations", and invoked Hawking's speculative chronology protection conjecturewhich suggests that feedback loops of virtual particles would create "uncontrollable singularities in the renormalized quantum stress-energy" on the boundary of any potential time machine, and thus would require a theory of quantum gravity to fully analyze (with the hope that such a theory would guarantee the impossibility of a true time machine ever forming). Other authors argue that Scharnhorst's original analysis which seemed to show the possibility of faster-than-c signals involved approximations which may be incorrect, so that it is not clear whether this effect could actually increase signal speed at all. [ [http://www.arxiv.org/abs/0706.0553 [0706.0553 Can Light Signals Travel Faster than c in Nontrivial Vacuua in Flat space-time? Relativistic Causality II ] ]
Günter Nimtzand Alfons Stahlhofen, of the University of Koblenz, claim to have violated relativity experimentally by transmitting photons faster than the speed of light. [ [http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0681 Macroscopic experiments with virtual photons ] ] They say they have conducted an experiment in which microwave photons - relatively low energy packets of light - travelled "instantaneously" between a pair of prisms that had been moved up to 3 ft apart, using a phenomenon known as quantum tunnelling. Nimtz told New Scientist magazine: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of." However, other physicists say that this phenomenon does not allow information to be transmitted faster than light. Aephraim Steinberg, a quantum optics expert at the University of Toronto, Canada, uses the analogy of a train traveling from Chicago to New York, but dropping off train cars at each station along the way, so that the center of the train moves forward at each stop; in this way, the center of the train exceeds the speed of any of the individual cars.Citation | last = Anderson | first = Mark | title=Light seems to defy its own speed limit | magazine = New Scientist| volume = 195 | issue = 2617 | pages= 10 | year = 2007 | date = August 18-24, 2007 | url = http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-08/ns-lst081607.php ]
Give up causality
Another approach is to accept
special relativity, but to posit that mechanisms allowed by general relativity(e.g., wormholes) will allow traveling between two points without going through the intervening space. While this gets around the infinite acceleration problem, it still would lead to closed timelike curves (i.e., time travel) and causality violations. Causality is not required by special or general relativity, but is nonetheless generally considered a basic property of the universe that should not be abandoned. Because of this, most physicists expect (or perhaps hope) that quantum gravityeffects will preclude this option.Fact|date=February 2007 An alternative is to conjecture that, while time travel is possible, it never leads to paradoxes; this is the Novikov self-consistency principle.
An important point to note is that in general relativity it is possible for objects to be moving apart faster than light because of the expansion of the universe, in some reasonable choice of cosmological coordinates. This is understood to be due to the expansion of the space between the objects, and general relativity still reduces to special relativity in a "local" sense, meaning that two objects passing each other in a small local region of spacetime cannot have a relative velocity greater than c, and will move more slowly than a light beam passing through the region. (See Option F below)
Give up (absolute) relativity
Because of the strong empirical support for
special relativity, any modifications to it must necessarily be quite subtle and difficult to measure. The best-known attempt is doubly-special relativity, which posits that the Planck lengthis also the same in all reference frames, and is associated with the work of Giovanni Amelino-Cameliaand João Magueijo. One consequence of this theory is a variable speed of light, where photon speed would vary with energy, and some zero-mass particles might possibly travel faster than "c". While recent evidenceFact|date=April 2008 casts doubt on this theory, some physicists still consider it viable.Fact|date=February 2007 However, even if this theory is accurate, it is still very unclear whether it would allow information to be communicated, and appears not in any case to allow massive particles to exceed "c".
There are speculative theories that claim inertia is produced by the combined mass of the universe (e.g.,
Mach's principle), which implies that the rest frame of the universe might be "preferred" by conventional measurements of natural law. If confirmed, this would imply special relativityis an approximation to a more general theory, but since the relevant comparison would (by definition) be outside the observable universe, it is difficult to imagine (much less construct) experiments to test this hypothesis.
Go somewhere where the speed of light is not the limit
A very popular option in
science fictionis to assume the existence of some other realm (typically called hyperspace, subspace, or slipspace) which is accessible from this universe, in which the laws of relativity are usually distorted, bent, or nonexistent, facilitating rapid transport between distant points in this universe, sometimes with acceleration differences - that is, not requiring as much energy or thrustto go faster. To accomplish rapid transport between points in hyperspace/subspace, special relativity is often assumed not to apply in this other realm, or that the speed of light is higher. Another solution is to posit that distant points in the mundane universe correspond to points that are close together in hyperspace.
This method of faster-than-light travel does not correspond to anything seriously proposed by mainstream science.
Distort the space-time fabric
Although the theory of
special relativityforbids objects to have a relative velocity greater than light speed, and general relativityreduces to special relativity in a local sense (in small regions of spacetime where curvature is negligible), general relativity does allow the space between distant objects to expand in such a way that they have a "recession velocity" which exceeds the speed of light, and it is thought that galaxies which are at a distance of more than about 14 billion light years from us today have a recession velocity which is faster than light.cite news | author = Charles H. Lineweaver and Tamara M. Davis | title = Misconceptions about the Big Bang | publisher = Scientific American | date = March 2005 | url = http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0009F0CA-C523-1213-852383414B7F0147&pageNumber=3&catID=2 ] Miguel Alcubierre[http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0264-9381/11/5/001 theorized] that it would be possible to create an Alcubierre drive, in which a ship would be enclosed in a "warp bubble" where the space at the front of the bubble is rapidly contracting and the space at the back is rapidly expanding, with the result that the bubble can reach a distant destination much faster than a light beam moving outside the bubble, but without objects inside the bubble locally travelling faster than light. However, several objections raised against the Alcubierre drive appear to rule out the possibility of actually using it in any practical fashion. Another possibility predicted by general relativity is the traversable wormhole, which could create a shortcut between arbitrarily distant points in space. As with the Alcubierre drive, travelers moving through the wormhole would not "locally" move faster than light which travels through the wormhole alongside them, but they would be able to reach their destination (and return to their starting location) faster than light traveling outside the wormhole.
Dr. Gerald Cleaver, associate professor of physics at
Baylor University, and Richard Obousy, a Baylor graduate student, theorize that by manipulating the extra spatial dimensions of string theoryaround a spaceship with an extremely large amount of energy, it would create a “bubble” that could cause the ship to travel faster than the speed of light. To create this bubble, the physicists believe manipulating the 10th spatial dimension would alter the dark energyin three large spatial dimensions: height, width and length. Cleaver said positive dark energy is currently responsible for speeding up the expansion rate of our universe as time moves on, just like it did after the Big Bang, when the universe expanded much faster than the speed of light for a very brief time. [ [http://newswise.com/articles/view/543391/ Traveling Faster Than the Speed of Light: A New Idea That Could Make It Happen] Newswise, Retrieved on August 24, 2008.]
Make use of the fact that space and time are quantized
As given by the
planck length, there is a minimum amount of 'space' that can exist in this universe (1.616×10−35 meters). This limit can be used to determine a minimum time quantisation of 1.078×10−43 seconds, which corresponds to a beam of light with a wavelength approaching the planck length. This means that there is a physical limit to how much blue shifta beam of light can endure. According to general relativity there is no limit to this shift, and an infinitesimally small space can exist, but according to well accepted quantum theorythese limits "do" exist.
This is precisely what happens towards the center of a
black hole; the incoming light becomes blue shifted past the planck lengthas it approaches the region of discontinuity within our universe. The argument is: if a black hole with finite mass can create such a discontinuity in the fabric of space and time, why would people be unable to do the same thing using a finite amount of energy and acceleration? (According to general relativity, the space-time distortions caused by gravity are fundamentally identical to space-time distortions caused simply by accelerating your reference frame).
In special relativity, while it is impossible to accelerate an object "to" the
speed of light, or for a massive object to move "at" the speed of light, it is not impossible for an object to exist which always moves faster than light. The hypothetical elementary particles that have this property are called tachyons. Their existence has neither been proven nor disproven, but even so, attempts to quantise them show that they may not be used for faster-than-light communication. [cite journal | first = Gerald | last = Feinberg | authorlink = Gerald Feinberg | title = Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles | journal = Physical Review | volume = 159 | year = 1967 | pages = 1089–1105 | doi = 10.1103/PhysRev.159.1089] Physicists sometimes regard the existence of mathematical structures similar to Tachyons arising from theoretical models and theories as signs of an inconsistency or that the theory needs further refining. [cite journal | first = S. James | last = Gates | authorlink = S. James Gates | title = Superstring Theory: The DNA of Reality]
General relativitywas developed after special relativityto include concepts like gravity. It maintains the principle that no object can accelerate to the speed of light in the reference frame of any coincident observer. However, it permits distortions in spacetimethat allow an object to move faster than light from the point of view of a distant observer. One such distortionis the Alcubierre drive, which can be thought of as producing a ripplein spacetimethat carries an object along with it. Another possible system is the wormhole, which connects two distant locations as though by a shortcut. Both distortions would need to create a very strong curvature in a highly localized region of space-time and their gravity fields would be immense. To counteract the unstable nature, and prevent the distortions from collapsing under their own 'weight', one would need to introduce hypothetical exotic matteror negative energy. General relativityalso agrees that any technique for faster-than-light travelcould also be used for time travel.Fact|date=February 2007 This raises problems with causality. Many physicists believe that the above phenomena are in fact impossible, and that future theories of gravitywill prohibit them. One theory states that stable wormholes are possible, but that any attempt to use a network of wormholes to violate causality would result in their decay. In string theoryEric Gimon and Petr Hořavahave argued [cite web| url=http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0405019| title=Over-rotating black holes, Gödel holography and the hypertube| first=Eric G.| last=Gimon| coauthors=Petr Horava| accessdate=2006-06-05| month=May | year=2004| id=hep-th/0405019] that in a supersymmetricfive-dimensional Gödel universe quantum corrections to general relativity effectively cut off regions of spacetimes with causality-violating closed timelike curves. In particular, in the quantum theory a smeared supertube is present that cuts the spacetime in such a way that, although in the full spacetime a closed timelike curve passed through every point, no complete curves exist on the interior region bounded by the tube.
uperficially FTL phenomena which do not carry information
An observer may conclude that two objects are moving faster than the speed of light relative to each other, by adding their velocities according to the principle of Galilean relativity.
For example, two fast-moving particles approaching each other from opposite sides of a
particle acceleratorwill appear to be moving at slightly less than twice the speed of light, relative to each other, from the point of view of an observer standing at rest relative to the accelerator. This correctly reflects the rate at which the distance between the two particles is decreasing, from the observer's point of view and is called the closing speed. However, it is not the same as the velocity of one of the particles as would be measured by a hypothetical fast-moving observer travelling alongside the other particle. To obtain this, the calculation must be done according to the principle of special relativity. If the two particles are moving at velocities v and -v, or expressed in units of "c", and , where:then this relative velocity (again in units of the speed of light "c") is:,which is less than the speed of light.
Phase velocities above "c"
phase velocityof an electromagnetic wave, when traveling through a medium, can routinely exceed "c", the vacuum velocity of light. For example, this occurs in most glasses at X-rayfrequencies [cite book | first=Eugene|last=Hecht|year=1987|title=Optics|edition=2nd ed.|publisher=Addison Wesley|id=ISBN 0-201-11609-X|pages=p. 62] . However, the phase velocity of a wave corresponds to the propagation speed of a theoretical single-frequency (purely monochromatic) component of the wave at that frequency. Such a wave component must be infinite in extent and of constant amplitude (otherwise it is not truly monochromatic), and so cannot convey any informationcite web | title = MathPages - Phase, Group, and Signal Velocity | url = http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath210/kmath210.htm | accessdate = 2007-04-30] . Thus a phase velocity above "c" does not imply the propagation of signals with a velocity above "c".
Group velocities above "c"
group velocityof a wave (e.g. a light beam) may also exceed "c" in some circumstances. In such cases, which typically at the same time involve rapid attenuation of the intensity, the maximum of the envelope of a pulse may travel with a velocity above "c". However, even this situation does not imply the propagation of signals with a velocity above "c", even though one may be tempted to associate pulse maxima with signals. The latter association has been shown to be misleading, basically because the information on the arrival of a pulse can be obtained before the pulse maximum arrives. For example, if some mechanism allows the full transmission of the leading part of a pulse while strongly attenuating the pulse maximum and everything behind, the pulse maximum is effectively shifted forward in time, while the information on the pulse does not come faster than without this effect.
The expansion of the
universecauses distant galaxies to recede from us faster than the speed of light, if comoving distanceand cosmological time are used to calculate the speeds of these galaxies. However, in general relativity, velocity is a local notion, so velocity calculated using comoving coordinates does not have any simple relation to velocity calculated locally. [ [http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_02.htm#MD Cosmology Tutorial - Part 2 ] ] Rules that apply to relative velocities in special relativity, such as the rule that relative velocities cannot increase past the speed of light, do not apply to relative velocities in comoving coordinates, which are often described in terms of the "expansion of space" between galaxies. This expansion rate is thought to have been at its peak during the inflationary epochthought to have occurred in a tiny fraction of the second after the Big Bang(models suggest the period would have been from around 10-36 seconds after the Big Bang to around 10-33 seconds), when the universe may have rapidly expanded by a factor of around 1020 - 1030. [ [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/planck.html#c5 Inflationary Period from HyperPhysics] ]
superluminal motionis observed in many radio galaxies, blazars, quasars and recently also in microquasars. The effect was predicted before it was observed by Martin Reesand can be explained as an optical illusioncaused by the object partly moving in the direction of the observer, [Rees, M. J., "Appearance of relativistically expanding radio sources", "Nature" 211, 468, 1966.] when the speed calculations assume it does not. The phenomenon does not contradict the theory of special relativity. Interestingly, corrected calculations show these objects have velocities close to the speed of light (relative to our reference frame). They are the first examples of large amounts of mass moving at close to the speed of light. [R. D. Blandford, C. F. McKee and M. J. Rees, "Super-luminal expansion in extragalactic radio sources", "Nature" 267, 211, 1977.] Earth-bound laboratories have only been able to accelerate small numbers of elementary particles to such speeds.
Certain phenomena in
quantum mechanics, such as quantum entanglement, appear to transmit information faster than light. According to the No-communication theoremthese phenomena do not allow true communication; they only let two observers in different locations see the same event simultaneously, without any way of controlling what either sees. Wavefunction collapsecan be viewed as an epiphenomenon of quantum decoherence, which in turn is nothing more than an effect of the underlying local time evolution of the wavefunction of a system and "all" of its environment. Since the "underlying" behaviour doesn't violate local causality or allow FTL it follows that neither does the additional effect of wavefunction collapse, whether real "or" apparent.
uncertainty principleimplies that individual photons may travel for short distances at speeds somewhat faster (or slower) than "c", even in a vacuum; this possibility must be taken into account when enumerating Feynman diagrams for a particle interaction. To quote Richard Feynman:
However, macroscopically these fluctuations average out, so that photons do travel in straight lines over long (i.e. non-quantum) distances, and they do travel at the speed of light on average. Therefore, this does not imply the possibility of superluminal information transmission.
There have been various reports in the popular press of experiments on faster-than-light transmission in optics — most often in the context of a kind of quantum tunneling phenomenon. Usually, such reports deal with a
phase velocityor group velocityfaster than the vacuum velocity of light. But, recall from above, that a superluminal "phase velocity" cannot be used for faster-than-light transmission of information. There has sometimes been confusion concerning the latter point. Quantum teleportationtransmits quantum information at whatever speed is used to transmit the same amount of classical information, likely the speed of light. This quantum information may theoretically be used in ways that classical information can not, such as in quantum computations involving quantum information only available to the recipient. In science fiction, quantum teleportation is either used as a basis for teleportation of physical objects at the speed of light, presumably preserving some important aspect of the entanglement between the particles of the object, or else is misrepresented as allowing faster-than-light communication.
The Hartman effect is the tunnelling effect through a barrier where the tunnelling time tends to a constant for large barriers. [J.C. Martinez, and E. Polatdemir, "Origin of the Hartman effect", "Physics Letters A", Vol 351, Iss 1-2, 20 February 2006, pp31-36.] This was first described by
Thomas Hartmanin 1962. [T. E. Hartman, "Tunneling of a wave packet", "J. Appl. Phys." 33, 3427 (1962).] This could, for instance, be the gap between two prisms. When the prisms are in contact, the light passes straight through, but when there is a gap, the light is refracted. There is a finite probability that the photon will tunnel across the gap rather than follow the refracted path. For large gaps between the prisms the tunnelling time approaches a constant and thus the photons appear to have crossed with a superluminal speed. [G. Nimtz, A. A. Stahlhofen, "Macroscopic violation of special relativity", 5 Aug 2007 available as eprint [http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0681] ]
However, an analysis by Herbert Winful from the University of Michigan suggests that the Hartman effect cannot actually be used to violate relativity by transmitting signals faster than c, because the tunnelling time "should not be linked to a velocity since evanescent waves do not propagate". [Winful, H, "Tunneling time, the Hartman effect, and superluminality: A proposed resolution of an old paradox", "Physics Reports", Vol 436, Iss 1-2, December 2006, pp1-69.] Winful means by this that the photons crossing the barrier are virtual photons only existing in the interaction and could not be propagated into the outside world.
In physics, the
Casimir effector Casimir-Polder force is a physical force exerted between separate objects due to resonance of vacuum energyin the intervening space between the objects. This is sometimes described in terms of virtual particles interacting with the objects, due to the mathematical form of one possible way of calculating the strength of the effect. Because the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance, it is only measurable when the distance between the objects is extremely small. Energy appears suddenly as if it came from the vacuum. See above for a discussion of whether or not this effect could actually be used to send signals faster than c or violate causality.
We can also quote the spectacular case of the
thought experimentof Einstein, Podolski and Rosen ( EPR paradox) which could be realized in experiments for the first time by Alain Aspect in 1981 and 1982.In this case, the measurement of the state on one of the quantum systems of an entangled pair forces the other system to be measured in the complementary state. Thus functions quantum teleportation.
An experiment performed in 1997 by Nicolas Gisin at the University of Geneva has demonstrated nonlocal quantum correlations between particles separated by over 10 kilometers. [ [http://www.quantumphil.org/history.htm History ] ] But as noted earlier, the nonlocal correlations seen in entanglement cannot actually be used to transmit classical information faster than light, so that relativistic causality is preserved; see
no-communication theoremfor further information.
Delayed choice quantum eraser
Delayed choice quantum eraser(The experiment of Marlan Scully) is an alternative of the EPR paradox in which the observation or not of interference after the passage of a photon through a double slit experimentdepends on the conditions of observation of a second photon entangled with the first. The characteristic of this experiment is that the observation of the second photon can take place at a later time than the observation of the first photon, [ [http://www.bottomlayer.com/bottom/kim-scully/kim-scully-web.htm Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser ] ] which may give the impression that the measurement of the later photons "retroactively" determines whether the earlier photons show interference or not, although the interference pattern can only be seen by correlating the measurements of both members of every pair and so it can't be observed until both photons have been measured, ensuring that an experimenter watching only the photons going through the slit does not obtain information about the other photons in an FTL or backwards-in-time manner (see the delayed choice quantum eraserarticle for further information).
Variable speed of light
physics, the speed of light in a vacuumis assumed to be a constant. There exist theorieswhich postulate that the speed of lightis not a constant. The interpretation of this statement is as follows.
The speed of light is a dimensionful quantity and so, as has been emphasized in this context by
João Magueijo, it cannot be measured. [cite web| authorlink=João Magueijo| first=João| last=Magueijo| url=http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9811018| title=A time varying speed of light as a solutionto cosmologicalpuzzles| year=1999| accessdate=2006-06-05] Measurable quantities in physics are, without exception, dimensionless, although they are often constructed as ratios of dimensional quantities. For example, when you measure the height of a mountain you really measure the ratio of its height to the length of a meterstick. The conventional SI system of units is based on seven basic dimensional quantities, namely distance, mass, time, electric current, thermodynamic temperature, amount of substance, and luminous intensity[cite web| url=http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html| title=SI base units] . These unitsare defined to be independent and so cannot be described in terms of each other. As an alternative to using a particular system of units, one can reduce all measurements to dimensionless quantities expressed in terms of ratios between the quantities being measured and various fundamental constants such as Newton's constant, the speed of lightand Planck's constant; physicists can define at least 26 dimensionless constants which can be expressed in terms of these sorts of ratios and which are currently thought to be independent of one another. [cite web| url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html| title=constants] By manipulating the basic dimensional constants one can also construct the Planck time, Planck lengthand Planck energywhich make a good system of units for expressing dimensional measurements, known as Planck units.
Magueijo's proposal used a different set of
units, a choice which he justifies with the claim that some equations will be simpler in these new units. In the new units he fixes the fine structure constant, a quantity which some people, using units in which the speed of light is fixed, have claimed is time dependent. Thus in the system of units in which the fine structure constant is fixed, the observational claim is that the speed of light is time-dependent.
While it may be
mathematically possible to construct such a system, it is not clear what additional explanatory power or physical insight such a system would provide, assuming that it does indeed accord with existing empirical data.
* Warp drive
Infinite Improbability Drive
* Mass Effect Relay
* Space Fold
*D F Falla and M J Floyd, "Superluminal motion in astronomy", "Eur. J. Phys." 23 69-81, 2002
* [http://www.rp-photonics.com/superluminal_transmission.html Encyclopedia of laser physics and technology on "superluminal transmission"] , with more details on phase and group velocity, and on causality
* [http://dustbunny.physics.indiana.edu/~dzierba/HonorsF97/Week1/NYTJuly22.html July 22, 1997, The New York Times Company: Signal Travels Farther and Faster Than Light] Quote: "..."We find," [http://physics.berkeley.edu/research/faculty/Chiao.html Chiao] said, "that a barrier placed in the path of a tunneling particle does not slow it down. In fact, we detect particles on the other side of the barrier that have made the trip in less time than it would take the particle to traverse an equal distance without a barrier -- in other words, the tunneling speed apparently greatly exceeds the speed of light. Moreover, if you increase the thickness of the barrier the tunneling speed increases, as high as you please..."
* [http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/~mpoessel/Physik/FTL/tunnelingftl.html Markus Pössel: Faster-than-light (FTL) speeds in tunneling experiments: an annotated bibliography] Quote: "...An experiment of theirs, where a single
photontunnelled through a barrier and its tunneling speed (not a signal speed!) was 1.7 times light speed, is described in Steinberg, A.M., Kwiat, P.G. & R.Y. Chiao 1993: "Measurement of the Single-Photon Tunneling Time" in Physical Review Letter 71, S. 708--711..."
* [http://www.physicsguy.com/ftl/ Relativity and FTL (=Superluminal motion) Travel Homepage]
* [http://www.yellowknife.com/warp/ The Warp Drive: Hyper-Fast Travel Within General Relativity, Miguel Alcubierre Class. Quantum Grav. 11 (1994), L73-L77] Quote: "...It is shown how, within the framework of
general relativityand without the introduction of wormholes, it is possible to modify a spacetimein a way that allows a spaceship to travel with an arbitrarily large speed..."
* [http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/research/warp/warpstat.html NASA: Status of "Warp Drive" Maturity - speculation]
* [http://www.scientificblogging.com/mansouryar/some_geometrical_points_of_a_stargate Some Geometrical Points of a Stargate, by Mohammad Mansouryar]
* [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html Usenet Physics FAQ: is FTL travel or communication Possible?]
* [http://www.halplotkin.com/SFGate048.htm Faster Than Light Travel: Will We Ever Travel to the Stars?] by Hal Plotkin, SFGate.com, October 18, 2000. Suggestion for space-based rod spinning experiment to test limits.
* [http://www.mth.kcl.ac.uk/~streater/GS.html Critique of Geometro-Stochastic Theory]
* [http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Superluminal.html Superluminal]
* [http://www.theculture.org/rich/sharpblue/archives/000089.html Relativity, FTL and causality]
* [http://www.safalra.com/science/relativity/tachyons.html Tachyon Theory] - the mathematics of tachyon theory. Quote: "To send a message faster than light using tachyons, we would have to encode the message on a localised tachyon field, and then send it off at superluminal speed. But this is impossible as local tachyon disturbances are subluminal, and superluminal tachyon disturbances cannot be localised."
** [http://www.netspace.net.au/~gregegan/APPLETS/20/20.html Subluminal] - "Java applet demonstrating group velocity information limits"
* [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0504/p14s01-stss.html Not-so-constants?] in Christian Science Monitor: The implications of changeable fundamental "constants" are so profound that any hint that this might be proved true makes news. But the real news is the dramatic increase in precision of the relevant measurements. That is going on in laboratories around the world right now.
* [http://www.ovalecotech.ca Advanced Interstellar Propulsion] How to Travel Extreme Distances in Space. Past, Present and Proposed ideas of interstellar travel.
* [http://www.petar-bosnic-petrus.com/science-articles/ conical-and-paraboloidal-superluminal-particle-accelerators/]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.