- Gregorio Conrado Álvarez
Infobox_President|name= Gregorio Álvarez
order= 27° De Facto President President of Uruguay
term_start=September 1 ,1981
term_end=February 12 ,1985
predecessor=Aparicio Méndez
successor=Rafael Addiego
birth_date=November 26 ,1926
birth_place=Montevideo ,Uruguay Gregorio Conrado Álvarez Armelino (born
November 26 ,1926 inMontevideo ) is aUruguay angeneral andpolitical figure . He served as thepresident of Uruguay from 1981 until 1985, in the period of civilian-military rule widely described as a dictatorship.Background
Álvarez entered the Uruguayan military academy in 1940. He became chief of the mounted police in Montevideo in 1962. In 1971 he was promoted to general and then named chief of Esmaco, the Combined Armed Forces Command that ran the counterinsurgency operation against the
Tupamaros (urban guerrillas). Reportedly, he used information obtained from captured guerrillas to crack down on corruption in the administration of PresidentJuan María Bordaberry .Civilian-military administration
When the military seized power in 1973, Álvarez became permanent secretary of the new Consejo de Seguridad Nacional (National Security Council). In February 1978 he became commander in chief of the army.
President of Uruguay
After Uruguay voted for a return to democracy in a referendum in 1980, General Álvarez forced the Consejo de Seguridad Nacional to name him president on
September 1 ,1981 . Continuing the repression, not only against the Tupamaros but also against labor unions, he lost more popular support and also the support of the majority of the military. He agreed to the holding of legislative and presidential elections in November, 1984, which had been preceeded by internal party elections in 1982. WhenJulio María Sanguinetti of the Colorado Party won the presidential election, Álvarez resigned (onFebruary 12 ,1985 ). Rafael Addiego, president of the Supreme Court, then took office as interim president until Sanguinetti was sworn in on March 1. It might be added that while Alvarez did not look favourably uponSanguinetti 's candidacy in 1984, he has in recent years found a slightly unlikely defender inSanguinetti , who has argued that the amnesty relating to the civilian-military rule of 1973-1985 should not be set aside to prosecute even the more overtly military and unpalatable figures such as Álvarez, who were prominent during that period.Álvarez's loss of support from the (relatively) more moderate members of the National Security Council in the run-up to the 1984 elections and his subsequent resignation invites scrutiny of the relationship between the Council, the military, and the constitutional party leaders. Some would argue that Álvarez's accession to the office of president in 1981 marked a high point of his power, which continued until his resignation. Others would argue that Álvarez's assumption of the permanent secretaryship of the National Security Council in 1973 marked the real point at which he gained what amounted to substantial executive powers. From whichever perspective, however, the fact remains that General Álvarez's public role as a military figure was set against the background of sizeable civilian participation in government in the 1973-1985. It is also the case that Álvarez was to some extent sidelined even during his Presidency. In a country such as Uruguay which had some tradition of civilian rule by decree (e.g., during the Presidency of
Gabriel Terra , whose Interior MinisterAlberto Demichelli later became President in 1976), it is arguably not accurate to equate rule by decree with military rule, although these may at times coincide.Among the five individuals who became
President of Uruguay in the civilian-military administration that lasted from 1973 to 1985, Álvarez, was, in fact, the only one to carry a military title. These five individuals were:Juan María Bordaberry ,Alberto Demichelli ,Aparicio Méndez , Álvarez, and Rafael Addiego. Some would argue that this fact is significant when assessing the degree of civilian participation in the administration. Others would argue that an unelected president backed by the military may sometimes merely constitute a cosmetic figurehead.Retirement
Although he was covered by a 1986 amnesty, since the election to the presidency of
Tabaré Vázquez of theFrente Amplio in November 2004, there have been renewed calls for the prosecution of Álvarez forhuman rights abuses, for his part in Bordaberry's 1973 coup, and subsequent events. Some would argue that the widely substantiated crimes committed during that period justify the setting aside of the amnesty. Others would point to lack of good faith by those who were willing to seeTupamaro guerrillas covered by the amnesty, but subsequently wished for it to be set aside only partially.In July 2006 Álvarez's residence in
Montevideo became the focal point for demonstrators protesting the disappearance of opponents of the 1973-1985 civilian-military administration. Defenders of such protests could argue that Álvarez symbolizes some of the least attractive aspects of the civilian-military administration of 1973-1985. On the other hand it may be accurately asserted that since Álvarez was the only serving military individual to serve as President in the five Presidencies of that period, such protests, whether justified or not, may serve to obscure the substantial civilian support for that administration byColorado andBlanco politicians. From the point of view of those parties, therefore, such protests serve to deflect any focus upon the role exercised by prominent individuals in those parties during that administration.Indictment
In December 2007 Álvarez was indicted for alleged human rights abuses during the period of civilian-military rule in which he played a prominent role.
External links
*es icon [http://www.pvp.org.uy/goyo.htm]
* [http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/12/former-uruguay-military-dictator.php]
* [http://rulers.org/indexa2.html Short biography and a photo]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.