The Dacians (Latin: Daci, Ancient Greek: Δάκοι Dakoi, Δάοι Daoi, Δάκες "Dakes"; Medieval Greek Δάκαι Dákai) were an Indo-European people, very close or part of the Thracians. Dacians were the ancient inhabitants of Dacia (located in the area in and around the Carpathian Mountains and east of there to the Black Sea). This area includes the present-day countries of Romania and Moldova, as well as parts of Sarmatia (mostly in eastern Ukraine), Moesia (Eastern Serbia, Northern Bulgaria), Slovakia and Poland. They spoke the Dacian language, believed to have been closely related to Thracian, but were culturally influenced by the neighbouring Scythians and by the Celtic invaders of the 4th century BC.
Name and etymology
The Dacians (tribe) were known as Geta (plural Getae) in Ancient Greek writings, and as Dacus (plural Daci) and also Getae in Roman documents ; also as Dagae and Gaete—see the late Roman map Tabula Peutingeriana. It was Herodotus who first used the ethnonym Getae; in Greek and Latin, in the writings of Caesar, Strabo and Pliny the Elder, this people becomes ‘the Dacians’. There is no doubt that Getae and Dacians were interchangeable terms or used with some confusion by the Greeks. Latin poets for designating the Daci often used the name Getae.. Virgilius named them four times Getae and one time Daci, Lucain three times Getae and two times Daci, Horace cited two times Getae and five times Daci, Juvenal one time Daci and two times Daci etc.  In AD 113, Hadrian used the poetic term Getae for the Dacians.Contemporary historians are more prudent and prefer to use the name Geto-Dacians . Strabo, who describes Getae and Dacians as distinct, though cognate tribes, states that they spoke the same language . This distinction refers to the regions they occupied. Strabo and Pliny the Elder state they spoke the same language . Probably the name of Getae, by which they were originally known to the Greeks on the Euxine, was always retained by the latter in common usage: while that of Dacians, whatever be its origin, was that by which the more western tribes, adjoining the Pannonians, first became known to the Romans. According to Strabo's Geographica, the original name of the Dacians was Δάοι "Daoi", . The name Daoi (one of the ancient Geto-Dacian tribes) was certainly adopted by foreign observers to designate all the inhabitants of the as yet unconquered countries north of Danube.
The ethnographic name Daci is found under various forms within ancient sources. Greeks used the forms Δάκοι Dakoi (Strabo, Dio Cassius and Dioscorides) and Δάοι "Daoi" (pl. Daoi, sg. Daos). The form Δάοι "Daoi" was frequently used according to Stephan of Byzantium  Latins used the forms Davus, Dacus and a derived form Dacisci (Vopiscus and inscriptions, , ). The same name is often used in the geographical vocabulary of the Ancient Persia .where Pliny names among the people of Sogdians the Dahae (Greek Δάσαι, Δάαι; Latin Daci).
By the end of the first century AD, all the inhabitants of the lands which now form Romania were known to the Romans as Daci, with the exception of some Celtic and Germanic tribes who infiltrated from the west and of Sarmatian and related people from the east.
The name Getae probably originates in the Indo-European *guet- ‘to utter, to talk’. As far as the origins of the name Daci are concerned, opinions are divided. Some scholars consider it to originate in the Indo-European *dha-k-, with the stem *dhe- "to put, to place," others think that the name Daci originates in *daca — "knife, dagger" or in a word similar to daos, meaning "wolf in the related language of the Phrygians. 
Other hypothesis was that "Getae" and "Daci" are two Iranian names of two Scythian groups, Iranian- speaking, that had been assimilated into the large Thracian-speaking population of the later known "Dacia".  
Early history of etymological approaches
- In the 1st century AD, Strabo suggested that its stem formed a name previously borne by slaves: Greek Daos, Latin Davus (-k- is a known suffix in Indo-European ethnic names).
- In the 18th century, Grimm proposed the Gothic dags "day" that would give the meaning of "light, brilliant". Yet, dags belongs to the Sanskrit word-root dah- and a derivation from Dah to Δάσαι "Daci", is difficult to be explained.
- In the 19th century, Tomaschek (1883) proposed for the form "Dak" those who understand and can speak, by considering "Dak" as a derivation of the root da("k" being a suffix) cf. Sanskrit dasa, Bactrian daonha. Also, Tomaschek (1883) proposed for the name's form "Davus" the meaning of 'members of the clan/countryman' cf. Bactrian daqyu, danhu "canton".
- The PIE *dhe-, ‘to set, place’ from where dheua > dava ‘settlement’ and Dhe-k > Daci 'Dacian' is supported by Russu (1967).
- "Daos" 'wolf' was suggested in 1957 by Decev as a possible connection with the Phrygian daos, meaning "wolf" . (Phrygian "daos" 'wolf' is attested by Hesychius's gloss, , ). This hypothesis has had a large diffusion due to the late Mircea Eliade. The identification or connection with wolves is not unique to Dacians but also present to other ancient Indo-European tribes, including Luvians, Lycians, Lucanians, Hyrcanians, Dahae etc., . The assumption of Daoi (wolf?) may be supported also by the fact that one of the Dacian standards, the Dacian Draco, had a wolf's head on it. Phrygii was another name used within the region, and in later times, some Roman auxiliaries recruited from the area were referred to as Phrygi.The German linguist Paul Kretschmer explained “daos” with the root dhau, meaning to press, to gather, to strangle (as the wolves use the neck bite to kill their prey).[Full citation needed]. According to Romanian historian and archaeologist Alexandru Vulpe, the Dacian etymology explained by daos 'wolf' has little plausibility, as the draco was not unique to Dacians, while the transformation of daos into dakos phonetically improbable. He thus dismisses it as folk etymology.
- The form "Daus" or "Davus" could be also compared to a similar ethnikon in Old Persian "Daos" and to a Phrygian deity also called "Daos". 
Romanian historian of religions Mircea Eliade attempted, in his book "From Zalmoxis to Genghis Khan", to give a mythological foundation to an alleged special relation between "Dacians and the wolves":
- Dacians might have called themselves "wolves" or "ones the same with wolves", a fact with religious significance
- Dacians draw their name from a god or a legendary ancestor who came forward as a wolf 
- Dacians had taken their name from a group of fugitive immigrants arrived from other regions or from their own Dacian young outlaws, who acted in similar manner as the wolves circling around villages and living from looting. As it was the case in other societies, those young members of the community needed to go through an initiation, maybe up to a year, during which they were required to live as a "wolf". Comparatively, Hittite laws referred to the fugitive outlaws as "wolves". 
- The existence of a ritual that provides one with the ability to turn into a wolf. Such a transformation may be related either with lycanthropy itself, a widespread phenomenon, but attested especially in the Balkans-Carpathian region, or a ritual imitation of the behavior and appearance of the wolf. Such a ritual was presumably a military initiation, potentially reserved to a secret brotherhood of warriors (or Männerbünde). To become formidable warriors they would magically assimilate the beast behavior of the wolf, by wearing wolf skins during the ritual. Traces related to wolves as a cult or as totems were found in this area since the Neolithic period as is the case with Vinča culture artifacts: wolves statues and fairly rudimentary figurines representing dancers with a wolf mask. The items could indicate warrior initiation rites or ceremonies in which young people put their seasonal wolf masks. The element of unity of beliefs about werewolves and lycanthropy consists in the magical-religious experience of mystical solidarity with the wolf by whatever means used to obtain it. But all have one original myth, a primary event.
Origins and ethnogenesis
In absence of written historical records, the origins of the Dacians (and Thracians) remain obscure. Evidence of proto-Thracians or proto-Dacians in the prehistoric period depends on remains of material culture. It is generally proposed that a proto-Dacian or proto-Thracian people developed from a mixture of indigenous peoples and Indo-Europeans from the time of Proto-Indo-European expansion in the Early Bronze Age(3,300–3,000 BCE) when the latter, around 1500 BC, conquered the indigenous peoples. The indigenous people were the Danubian farmers and the invading people of the BC 3rd millennium were the Kurgan warrior-herders from Ukraine-Russian steppes .
Indo-Europeanization was certainly complete by the beginning of the Bronze Age. It is safer to name the people of that time proto-Thracians, from whom there developed in the Iron Age Danubian-Carpathian Geto-Dacians on the one hand and Thracians of the eastern Balkan Peninsula on the other .
The eastern branch who were settled between the Isker, Yantra and Danube rivers were called the Getae and the western group of the culture became known as the Dacian. They all spoke a Thracian dialect (Indo-European) and were mainly sedentary grain farmers who also worked mines of gold, silver and later iron. The tribes were headed by chieftains with religious responsibilities and practice similar to the Brahmins of India, the magi of the Persians and the druids of Ireland.
Between BC 15th-12th century, the Dacian-Getae culture was influenced by the Bronze Age Tumulus-Urnfield warriors who were on their way through the Balkans to Anatolia.
When the La Tene Celts arrived in BC 4th century, the Dacians were under the influence of the Scythians.
Alexander of Macedonia attacked the Getae in BC 335 on the lower Danube but by BC 300 they had formed a state, founded on a military democracy and began a period of conquest.
More Celts arrived during the BC 3rd century and in BC 1st Century the fearsome Boii made the mistake of trying to take away some of the Dacians’ territory, on east side of the Teiss river. The Dacians drove the Boii south across the Danube and out of their territory at which point the Boii gave up and went away. .
Identity and distribution
At the North of Danube, Dacians occupied a larger territory than Ptolemaic Dacia, stretching between Bohemia in the West and Dnepr cataracts in the East, and up to the Pripyat, Vistula and Oder rivers in the North and North West .
In BC 53, Caesar stated that the Dacian territory was on the eastern border of the Hercynian forest. According to Strabo's Geografica (written around AD 20), the Getes (Geto-Dacians) bordered with the Suevi, who lived in the Hercynian Forest, which some locates somewhere in the vicinity of the river Duria, the present-day Vah (Waag). Dacians lived on both sides of the Danube , . According to Strabo when speaking of the Getae, Moesians also “lived on both sides of the Danube .
According to Agrippa, Dacia was limited by the Baltic Ocean in the North and by the Vistula in the West . People’s names and settlements confirms the Dacia’s borders given by Agrippa ,. Dacian people were living also South of Danube.
The Dacians and Getae were always considered as Thracians by the ancients (Dio Cassius, Trogus Pompeius, Appian, Strabo and Pliny the Elder), and were both said to speak the same Thracian language.
The linguistic affiliation of Dacian is uncertain since the ancient Indo-European language in question became extinct and left very limited traces (in the form of place-names, plant names and personal names). Thraco-Dacian (or Thracian and Daco-Mysian) seems to belong to the eastern (satem) group of Indo- European languages .There are two contradictory theories:
- Some scholars (such as Tomaschek 1883; Russu 1967; Solta 1980; Crossland 1982; Vraciu 1980) consider Dacian was a Thracian language, or it was a dialect (idiom) of the Thracian language. This view is supported by R.G. Solta who says that Thracian and Dacian are very closely related languages.  
- Other scholars (such as Georgiev 1965 Duridanov 1976) consider that Thracian and Dacian are two different and specific Indo- European languages which cannot be reduced to a common language
Linguists such as Polome and Katičić expressed reserves to both theories.
- 1) The Dacians are generally considered to have been Thracian speakers, representing a cultural continuity from earlier Iron Age communities loosely termed Getic. Since on one interpretation, Dacian is a variety of Thracian, for the reasons of convenience, it is adopted the generic term ‘Daco-Thracian” and reserved the term ‘Dacian’ for the language or dialect spoken north of Danube, in present-day Romania and eastern Hungary, and ‘Thracian’ for the variety spoken south of Danube . It is no doubt that Thracian language was related to the Dacian language which was spoken in what is today Romania before that area was occupied by the Romans.. Also, both Thracian and Dacian have one of the main satem characteristic change of Indo-European language *k and *g to *s and *z .
With regard to the term ‘Getic’ (Getae) even though attempts have been made to distinguish between Dacian and Getic, there seems no compelling reason to disregard the view of the Greek geographer Strabo that the Daci and the Getae, Thracian tribes dwelling north of the Danube (the Daci in the west of the area and the Getae further east), were one and the same people and spoke the same language.
Another variety that has sometimes been recognized is that of Moesian (or Mysian) for the language of an intermediate area immediately to the south of Danube in Serbia, Bulgaria and Romanian Dobruja: this and the dialects north of the Danube have been grouped together as Daco-Moesian. The language of the indigenous population has hardly left any trace in the anthroponomy of Moesia, but the toponymy indicates that the Moesii on the south bank of the Danube, north of the Haemus Mountains, and the Triballi on the valley of the Morava, shared a number of characteristic linguistic features with the Dacii south of the Carpathians and the Getae in the Wallachian plain, which sets them apart from the Thracian though their languages are undoubtedly related.
- 2) Vladimir Georgiev disputes that Dacian and Thracian were closely related for various reasons, most notably that Dacian and Moesian town names commonly end with the suffix -DAVA, while towns in Thrace proper (i.e. South of the Balkan mountains) generally end in -PARA. (see Dacian language)According to Georgiev, the language spoken by the ethnic Dacians should be classified as "Daco-Moesian" and regarded as distinct from Thracian.
Georgiev also claimed that names from approximately Roman Dacia and Moesia show different and generally less extensive changes in Indo-European consonants and vowels than those found in Thrace itself. However, the evidence seems to indicate divergence of a Thraco-Dacian language into northern and southern groups of dialects, not as different as to rank as separate languages.
Polome consider that such lexical differentiation ( -dava vs. para) would, however, be hardly enough evidence to separate Daco-Moesian from Thracian .
An extensive reference to the native tribes in Dacia can be found in the ninth tabula of Europe of Ptolemy’s Geography . The Geography was probably written in the period AD 140-150, but the sources were often earlier i.e. Roman Britain is shown before the building of Hadrian’s Wall in the AD 120s . Geography of Ptolemy contains also a physical map probably designed before the Roman conquest, and containing no detailed nomenclature. Some refers to Tabula peutingeriana, yet it is evident at any rate that the Dacian map of the Tabula has been completed after the final triumph of Roman nationality . Ptolemy's list includes no fewer than twelve tribes with Geto-Dacian names
The 15 tribes of Dacia named by Ptolemy, starting from the northernmost ones are the followings : the Anartes, the Teurisci and the Coertoboci /Costoboci. To the south of them the Buredeense (Buri / Burs), the Cotense / Cotini and in a next row the Albocense, the Potulatense and the Sense, while the southernmost were the Saldense, the Ciaginsi and the Piephigi. To the south of them were Predasense / Predavensi, the Rhadacense / Rhatacenses, the Caucoense (Cauci) and Biephi . Twelve out of these fifteen tribes listed by Ptolemy are ethnic-Dacians  and three are Celt Anarti, Teurisci, Cotense
There are also previous brief mentions of other Getae or Dacian tribes on the left and right banks of the Danube, or even in Transylvania to be added to the list of Ptolemy. Among these other tribes are Trixae, Crobidae and Appuli.
Some peoples inhabiting the region generally described in Roman times as "Dacia" were not ethnic-Dacians. The true Dacians were a people of Thracian descent. German elements (Daco-Germans ), Celtic elements(Daco-Celtic ) and Iranian elements (Daco-Sarmatian) occupied territories in the north-western and north eastern of Dacia. This region covered roughly the same area as modern Romania plus Bessarabia (Rep. of Moldova) and eastern Galicia (SW. Ukraine) (although Ptolemy places Moldavia and Bessarabia in Sarmatia Europaea, rather than Dacia). After the Dacian Wars (AD 101-6), the Romans occupied only about half the wider Dacian region. The Roman province of Dacia covered just western Wallachia as far as the Limes Transalutanus (East of the river Aluta, or Olt) and Transylvania, as bordered by the Carpathians.
The impact of the Roman conquest on these people is uncertain.
- One hypothesis was that they were effectively eliminated, through war casualties. An important clue to the character of Dacian losses / casualties is offered with the descriptions provided by ancient sources, Eutropius and Crito. Both speak about men when they describe the losses suffered by the Dacians in the wars. This suggests that both refer to losses due to fighting, not due to a process of extermination of the whole population  A strong component of the Dacian army, including the Celtic Bastarnae and the Germans, rather than submit to Trajan, had withdrawn. Some scenes on Trajan’s Column represent acts of obedience of the Dacian population and other scenes show the refugee Dacians returning to their own places . Dacians trying to buy amnesty (i.e. one offers to Trajan a tray of three gold ingots) are depicted on the Trajan's Column..
- Alternatively, a substantial number may have survived in the province, although probably outnumbered by the Romanised immigrants. Cultural life in Dacia became very mixed and decidedly cosmopolitan because of the colonial communities. The Dacians retained their names and their own ways in the midst of the newcomers, and the region continued to exhibit Dacian characteristics. The Dacians who survived the war are attested as revolting against the Roman domination in Dacia at least twice, in the period of time right after Dacian wars, in a more determined manner in 117 AD . In 158 AD, they revolted again and were put down by M. Statius Priscus .
- Some Dacians were apparently expelled from the occupied zone at the end of each of the two Dacian Wars, or emigrated. It is uncertain where these refugees found a home. Some of these people might have mingled with the existing ethnic-Dacian tribes beyond the Carpathians (the Costoboci and Carpi)
Since Traian’s conquest of Dacia there had been recurring trouble involving Dacian groups excluded from the Roman province, as finally defined by Hadrian. By the early third century the “Free Dacians’’ as they were earlier known, were significantly troublesome group, then identified as the Carpi, requiring imperial intervention on more than one occasion . In 214 Caracalla dealt with their attacks. Later, Philip had come in person to deal with them, he assumed the triumphal title Carpicus Maximus and inaugurated a new era for the province of Dacia (July 20, 246) Later both Decius and Gallienus assumed the titles Dacicus maximus. In 272, Aurelian assumed the same title as Philip 
In about 140 AD, Ptolemy lists the names of several tribes residing on the fringes of the Roman Dacia (West, East and North of the Carpathian range) and the ethnic picture seems to be a mixed one. North of the Carpathians are recorded the Anarti, Teurisci and Costoboci. The Anarti (or Anartes) and the Teurisci were originally probably Celtic peoples or possible mixed Dacian-Celtic . The Anarti, together with the Celtic Cotini are described by Tacitus as vassals of the powerful Quadi Germanic people; Teurisci was probably a group of Celtic Taurisci from the eastern Alps). However, regarding to these groups, the archaeology has revealed that the Celtic tribes had originally spread from west to east as far as Transylvania before being absorbed by the Dacians in the 1st century BC. 
The main view is that Costoboci were ethnic-Dacian. Others considered them a Slavic or Sarmatian tribe. There was also a Celtic influence, so that some consider them as a mixed Celtic and Thracian group that appear after Trajan conquest as a Dacian with Celtic superstratum. Costoboci inhabited the southern slopes of the Carpathians. Ptolemy, named the Coestoboci (Costoboci in Roman sources) twice, showing them divided by the Dniester and the Peucinian (Carpathian) Mountains. That would suggest that they lived on both sides of the Carpathians but it is also possible that two accounts about the same people were combined.
There was also a group Transmontani that some modern scholars identified them as Dacian Transmontani Costoboci of the extreme north, . The Transmontani (that is a name from the Latin of the Dacians , literally "people over the mountains"). Mullenhoff identified these with the Transiugitani, other Dacian tribe north of the Carpathian mountains 
Based on the account of Dio Cassius, Heather (2010)considers that Hasding Vandals, around 171 AD, attempted to take control of lands which previously belonged to the free Dacian group called the Costoboci.  Hrushevskyi (1997) mentions that, the rather widespread view, held earlier, that these Carpathian tribes were Slavic has no basis. This would be contradicted by the Coestobocan names themselves that we know from the inscriptions, which were written by a Coestobocan and therefore presumably accurately. These names sound quite unlike anything Slavic.  Scholars such as Tomaschek (1883), Shutte (1917), Russu (1969) consider these Costobocian names are Thraco-Dacian    This inscription also indicate the Dacian background of the wife of the Costobocian king "Ziais Tiati filia Daca". This indication of the socio-familial line of descent seen also in other inscriptions (i.e. Diurpaneus qui Euprepes Sterissae f(ilius) Dacus) is a custom attested since the historical period (beginning with 5th century BC) when Thracians were under the Greek’s influence. It doesn’t necessarily mean it originated from Thracians since it could be just a fashion borrowed from Greeks for specifying the ancestry and for distinguishing homonymous individuals within the tribe Shutte (1917), Parvan and Florescu (1982) pointed also to the Dacian characteristic place-names in '–dava' given by Ptolemy in the Costoboci’s country  
Carpi was a sizeable Dacian (North Thracian) group of tribes living outside of Roman Dacia . The majority view is that they were a Thracian tribe, a subgroup of the Dacians Some historians classify them as Slavs. According to Heather (2010), Carpi were the Dacians from the eastern foothills of the Carpathian range – modern Moldavia and Wallachia – who had not been brought under direct Roman rule at the time of Trajan conquest of Transylvania Dacia. Since they generated a new degree of political unity among themselves (in the course of third century), these Dacian groups came to be known collectively as the Carpi 
The ancient sources about Carpi, before 104 AD, located them on a territory situated between the western side of Eastern European Galicia and the mouth of Danube  The name of the historically well-known Dacian tribe Carpi is homonymous with the Carpathian mountains Carpi and Carpathian are Dacian words derived from root (s)ker- "cut" cf. Albanian Karp "stone" and Sanskrit kar- "cut"  As for the Carpi, a quote from the 6th-century Byzantine chronicler Zosimus referring to the Καρποδάκαι (Latin: Carpo-Dacae or "Carpo-Dacians"), who attacked the Romans in the late 4th century, is seen as evidence of their Dacian ethnicity. In fact, Carpi /Carpodaces is the term used for Dacians outside Dacia. However, that the Carpi were Dacians is shown not so much by the form Καρποδάκαι (Latin: Carpo-Dacae) of Zosimus as by their characteristic place-names in –dava given by Ptolemy in their country. . The origin and ethnic affiliations of the Carpi have been debated over the years; in our period they are closely associated with the Carpathian Mountains, and a good case has been made for attributing to the Carpi a distinct material culture “a developed form of the Geto-Dacian La Tene culture” often known as the Poienesti culture which is characteristic of this area.
Dacians are represented in the statues surmounting the Arch of Constantine  and Trajan's Column. The artist of the Column took some care to depict, in his purview, a variety of Dacian people — from high-ranking men, women, and children to the near-savage. Although the artist looked to models in Hellenistic art for some body types and compositions, he does not represent the Dacians as generic barbarians. 
Physically, the Dacians and the Getae had similar characteristics to other barbarians around them (Thracians, Celts, Scythians). Unlike the Greeks, Dacians are generally described as taller, their skin whiter and with less hair with straight, light-coloured (red?) hair and blue eyes . On Trajan’s column, Dacian soldiers are shown with relatively short hair (although not as short as the Romans') and trimmed beards .
Painting of the body was customary among the Dacians. It is probable that the tattooing had originally a magical significance . They practiced symbolic-ritual tattooing or body painting for both men and women, with hereditary symbols transmitted up to the fourth generation.
In absence of written historical records, the origins of the Dacians (and Thracians) depends on remains of material culture. On the whole the Bronze Age witnessed the evolution of the ethnic groups which emerged during the Eneolithic period and eventual the syncretism of autochthonous elements and Indo-European elements from the steppes and the Pontic regions . Various groups of Thracian population had not separated out in the 1200 BC  but there are strong similarities between the ceramic types found at Troy and the ceramic types from the Carpathian area. . About the year 1000 BC, the Carpatho-Danubian countries were inhabited by a northern branch of the Thracians . At the time of the arrival of the Scythians (ca. 700 BC) the Carpatho-Danubian Thracians, were moving rapidly towards the Iron Age civilization of the West. Moreover, the whole of the fourth period of the Carpathian Bronze Age had already been profoundly influenced by the forms of the first Iron Age as it developed in Italy and the Alpine lands. The Scythians, arriving with their own type of Iron Age civilization, put a stop to these relations with the West. From roughly 500 BC (the second Iron Age), the Dacians developed a distinctive civilization capable of supporting large centralized kingdoms in 1st BC and 1st AD.
Since the very first detailed account by Herodotus, Getae / Dacians are acknowledged as belonging to the Thracians. Still, they distinguished from the other Thracians by particularities of religion and customs .
The first written mention of the name Dacians is in Roman sources, but classical authors are unanimous in considering them a branch of the Getae, a Thracian people known from Greek writings. Strabo specified that the Daci are the Getae who lived in the area towards the Pannonian plain (Transylvania), while the Getae proper gravitated towards the Black Sea coast (Scythia Minor).
Relations with Thracians
Since Herodotus writings (5th century BC), Getae / Dacians are acknowledged as belonging to the Thracians, Yet, they distinguished from the other Thracians by particularities of religion and customs .Geto-Dacians and Thracians were kin people but they were not the same. . The differences from the Southern Thracians or from the neighboring Scythians were probably faint, as several ancient authors make confusions of identification with either one or other .
In 19th century, Tomaschek considered a close affinity between Besso-Thracians and Getae-Dacians, an original kinship of both people with Iranian . They are Aryan tribes who, several centuries before Scolotes of the Pont and Sauromatae still located at East, left the Aryan homeland and settled in the Carpathian chain, Haemus (Balkan) and Rhodope mountains. Besso-Thracians and Getae-Dacians separated very early from Aryans since their language still maintains roots that are missing from Iranian and it shows non-Iranian phonetic characteristics (i.e. replacing the Iranian l'’ with r’') . He considered that Geto-Dacians and Besso-Thracians would represent a new layer of people that extended in the autochthonous fund, probably Illyrian or Armenian-Phrygian.
Relations with Celts
Geto-Dacians inhabited both sides of the Tisa River prior to the rise of the Celtic Boii and again after the latter were defeated by the Dacians under the king Burebista. During the second half of the 4th century BC, Celtic cultural influence appears in the archaeological records of the middle Danube, Alpine region, and north-western Balkans, where it figured the Middle La Tène material culture. This material appears in north-western and central Dacia and is reflected especially in burials . The Dacians absorbed the Celtic influence that came down from the northwest in the early third century BC . Archaeological investigation of this period has highlighted several Celtic warrior graves with military equipment. It suggests the forceful penetration of a military Celtic elite within the region of Dacia, now known as Transylvania, bounded on the east by Carpathian range. The archaeological sites of the third and second centuries BC from Transylvania revealed a pattern of co-existence and fusion between the bearers of La Tène culture and indigenous Dacians. These were domestic dwellings with a mixture of Celtic and Dacian pottery and several graves of the Celtic type containing vessels of Dacian type. There are some seventy Celtic sites in Transylvania but in most, if not all of these sites (they are usually cemeteries; there were very few settlements) the finds show that the native population imitated Celtic art forms that took their fancy, but remained obstinately and fundamentally Dacian in their culture .
Around 150 BC, La Tène material disappears from the area. This coincides with the ancient writings which mention the rise of the Dacian authority. It ended the Celtic domination and it is possible Celts were thrust out of Dacia. Alternatively, some scholars have proposed that the Transylvanian Celts remained but merged into the local culture and thus ceased to be distinctive.
Archaeological discoveries in the settlements and the fortifications of the Dacians in the period of their kingdoms (1st century BC and 1st century AD) i.e. some imported Celtic vessels others made by Dacian potters imitating Celtic prototypes show that relations between the Dacians and the Celts from the regions north and west of Dacia continued.
After Dacians subdued the Celtic tribes, the remaining Cotini stayed in the mountains of Central Slovakia where they took up mining and the working of metals. Together with the original domestic population, they created Puchov culture that spread into central and northern Slovakia, including Spis, and penetrated northeastern Moravia and southern Poland. Along the Bodorog River in Zemplin they created Celtic-Dacian settlements which were known for the production of painted ceramics.
Relations with Greeks
Relations with Macedonians
Greek and Roman chroniclers record the defeat and capture of Lysimachus in the 3rd century BC by the Getae (Dacians) ruled by Dromihete, their military strategy, and the release of Lysimachus following a debate in the assembly of the Getae.
Relations with Persians
Herodotus says:”before [Darius] reached the Danube, the first people he subdued were the Getae who believed that they never die” However, it is possible that the Persian expedition and the subsequent occupation may have altered the way in which the Getae expressed the immortality belief. The formative influence of thirty years of Achaemenid presence may be detected in the emergence of an explicit iconography of the “Royal Hunt” that influenced Dacian and Thracian metalworkers and of the hawking practiced by their upper-class.
Relations with Scythians
The Scythians arrival in Carpathians is dated 700 BC . The Agathyrsi of Transylvania had been mentioned by Herodotus (fifth century BC ) who regards them as not a Scythian people, but as closely related to the Scythians. In other respects their customs approach nearly to those of the Thracians  This is to say that Agathyrsi were completely denationalized at the time of Herodotus, absorbed by the native Thracians , .
The opinion that Agathyrsi were almost certainly Thracians, results also from the gloss preserved by Stephen of Byzantium who explains that the Greeks called the Trausi the Agathyrsi and we know that the Trausi lived in the Rhodope Mountains. Certain details from their way of life, such as tattooing, for example also suggest that the Agathyrsi were Thracians. Their place was later taken by the Dacians.  That the Dacians were of Thracian stock is not in doubt, and it is quite safe to assume that this new name also encompassed the Agathyrsi, and perhaps other neighboring Thracian people as well, as a result of some political upheaval. 
Relations with Sarmatians
Relations with Germanic tribes
The Goths (confederation of east German people) arrived in the southern Ukraine no later than 230. During the next decade a large section of them moved down the Black Sea coast and occupied much of the territory north of the lower Danube . The Goths' advancement towards North of the Black Sea involved a competing against the indigenous populations of the Dacian-speaking Carpi besides competing against the indigenous Iranian-speaking Sarmatians and against Roman garrison forces . The Carpi, often called “Free Dacians” continued to dominate the anti-Roman coalition consisting of themselves, Taifali, Astringi, Vandals, Peucini and Goths until 248, when the Goths assumed the hegemony of the loose coalition. The first lands taken over by the Thervingi Goths were in Moldavia, and only during the fourth century did they move in strength down to the Danubian plain. Free Dacians Carpi found themselves squeezed between the advancing Goths and the Roman province of Dacia. In 275 AD, Aurelian surrendered the Dacian territory to the Carpi and the Goths . Over time, Gothic power in the region grew directly at the Carpi’s expense. The Germanic-speaking Goths replaced native Dacian-speakers as the dominant force around the Carpathian system. . Large numbers of Carpi, but not all of them, were admitted into the Roman empire in the twenty-five years or so after 290 AD . Despite the evacuation of the Carpi around 300 AD, substantial elements of the old indigenous populations (Dacians, Sarmatians and others) remained in place under Gothic domination . The Goths, either the Greuthungi or Thervingi never settled all Dacia .
There is some reason for thinking that Dacians were not reduced to slavery but that the Goths learned to respect the superior civilization of their neighbours and that the native inhabitants and the new settlers gradually became united into one people. If this were so, we can understand how it came to pass that, as we have already seen, the Gothic historian of the sixth century could reckon the heroes and sages of ancient Dacia among the ancestral glories of his own nation. . Goths mingled at some extent with the native inhabitants but they were different peoples .
In the 330 the Gothic Thervingi contemplated moving to the Middle Danubian region and from 370 relocated with their fellow Gothic Greuthungi to new homes in the Roman Empire . The Ostrogoths were still more isolated, but even the Visigoths preferred to live among their own kind. As a result, the Goths settled in pockets. Finally, although Roman towns continued on a reduced level, there is no question as to their survival.
In 336 AD, Constantine took the title Dacicus Maximus (“The great victory over Dacians) ; that implies at least partial reconquest of the Trajan Dacia . In an inscription of 337, Constantin was commemorated officially as Germanicus Maximus, Sarmaticus, Gothicus Maximus and Dacicus Maximus meaning he had defeated the Germans, Sarmatians, Goths and Dacians .
One historical source refers to “Carpo-Dacians” north of the Danube after 378, when the Thervingi who dominated the Carpathian region had already left and there is no sign that all Chernyakhov culture settlements and cemeteries came to a grinding halt at that date. Alongside this world of the Goths ‘proper’ as it were, also existed many communities descended from the older indigenous populations of the region. They had certainly been subdued by the Goths and may well have paid various kinds of tributes but were probably largely autonomous .
Dacian states arose as an unstable tribal confederacy that included the Getae, the Daci, the Buri, and the Carpi (cf. Bichir 1976, Shchukin 1989) and that was united only periodically by the leadership of Dacian kings such as Burebista and Decebal. This union comprised the military-political and ideological-religious domains. The following are some of the attested Dacian kingdoms:
Gaius Scribonius Curio (proconsul 75-3 BC) campaigned successfully against the Dardani and the Moesi, becoming the first Roman general to reach the river Danube with his army. His successor, Marcus Licinius Lucullus (brother of the famous Lucius Lucullus), campaigned against the Thracian Bessi tribe and the Moesi, ravaging the whole of Moesia, the region between the Haemus (Balkan) mountain range and the Danube. In 72 BC, his troops occupied the Greek coastal cities of Scythia Minor (modern Dobruja region, Romania/Bulgaria), which had sided with Rome's Hellenistic arch-enemy, king Mithridates VI of Pontus, in the Third Mithridatic War (73-63 BC). Greek geographer Strabo claimed that the Dacians and Getae once had been able to muster a combined army of 200,000 men during Strabo's era (i.e. the time of Roman emperor Augustus, sole rule 30 BC - 14 AD).
The kingdom of Burebista
- The Dacian kingdom reached its maximum extent under king Burebista (ruled 82 - 44 BC). The capital of the kingdom was possibly the city of Argedava (also called Sargedava in some historical writings) situated close to the river Danube. The kingdom of Burebista extended south of the Danube in what is today Bulgaria that the Greeks believed their king was the greatest of all Thracians.
- During his reign, Burebista transferred Geto-Dacians capital from Argedava to Sarmizegetusa ,. For at least one and a half century, Sarmizegethusa was the Dacians' capital and reached its acme under King Decebal.
- Burebista annexed the Greek cities (55-48 BC).
- Augustus wanted to avenge the defeat of C. Antonius at Histria (Sinoe) 32 years before and to recover the lost standards. These were held in a powerful fortress called Genucla (Isaccea, near modern Tulcea, Rom., in the Danube delta region), controlled by Zyraxes, the local Getan petty king. The man selected for the task was Marcus Licinius Crassus, grandson of Crassus the triumvir and an experienced general at 33 years of age, who was appointed proconsul of Macedonia in 29 BC.
By the year A.D. 100, more than 400,000 square kilometers/154,400 square miles were dominated by the Dacians who numbered two million
Decebalus was the last king of the Dacians and despite his fierce resistance against the Romans, faced defeat and committed suicide rather than being marched through Rome as a captured foreign leader.
Conflict with Rome
The Burebista's Dacian state was powerful enough to threaten Rome and Caesar contemplated war campaigns against Dacians  Yet, the Dacian formidable power under Burebista that gathered no less than 200,000 warriors lasted only until his death, 44 BC. The subsequent division of Dacia continued for about 100 years until the reign of Scorylo / Scorillo, period of only singular attacks on the Roman Empire’s border with some local significance.
The unifying actions of the King Scorylo / Scorillo (27 BC - AD 14) and of the last King Decebalus (ruled 87 AD–106 AD) might have been perceived as dangerous by Rome, despite the fact that now Dacian army could gather only some 40,000 soldiers. In Romans’ eyes, the situation at the border with Dacia became out of control since Emperor Domitian who ruled between 81 to 96 AD tried desperately to deal with the danger through war campaigns. But the outcome of the Roman Empire’s disastrous campaigns into Dacia AD 86 and AD 88 pushed Domitian to settle the situation through diplomacy.
The Roman Emperor Trajan (ruled 97 - 117 AD) opted for a different approach and decided to conquer the Dacian kingdom, partly in order to seize its vast gold mines. But it took him two major wars (the Dacian Wars), one in 101-102 AD and the other one in 105-106 AD.
Only fragmentary details survive of the Dacian war: a single sentence of Trajan’s own Dacica: little more of the Getica written by his doctor, T. Statilius Crito: nothing whatsoever of the poem proposed by Caninius Rufus (if it was ever written), Dio Chrysostom’s Getica or Appian’s Dacica. Nonetheless, a reasonable account can be pieced together. 
In the first war, Trajan invaded Dacia by crossing the river Danube by means of a boat-bridge and inflicted a crushing defeat on the Dacians at the Second Battle of Tapae (101 AD). The Dacian king, Decebalus, was forced to sue for peace. Trajan and Decebalus then concluded a peace which was highly favourable to the Romans. The peace agreement required the Dacians to cede some territory to the Romans and to demolish their fortifications. Decebalus' foreign policy was also restricted, as he was prohibited from entering into alliances with other tribes.
However, both Trajan and Decebalus considered this peace only a temporary truce, and readied themselves for renewed war. Trajan had Greek engineer Apollodorus of Damascus construct a stone bridge over the Danube river, while Decebalus secretly plotted alliances against the Romans. In 105, Trajan crossed the Danube river and besieged Decebalus' capital, Sarmizegetusa, but the siege failed because of Decebalus' allied tribes. However, Trajan was an optimist. He returned with a newly constituted army and took Sarmizegetusa by assault. Decebalus fled into the mountains hoping to assemble a new army, but he was cornered by pursuing Roman cavalry troopers and committed suicide. The Romans took his head and right hand to Trajan, who had them displayed in the Forum at Rome. Trajan's Column in Rome was constructed to celebrate the conquest of Dacia.
The Roman people hailed Trajan's triumph in Dacia with the longest and most expensive celebration in their history.  For his triumph, Trajan gave a 123 day festival ludi of celebration in which approximately 11,000 animals were slaughtered and 11,000 gladiators fought in combats comparable to Emperor Titus's celebration from AD 70 who gave a 100 day festival involving 3,000 gladiators and 5,000-9,000 wild animals). 
A large part of Dacia then became a Roman province with a newly-built capital at Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa (40 km away from the site of Old Sarmizegetusa, now razed to the ground). The name of Dacians' homeland, Dacia, became the name of a Roman province, and the name Dacians was used to designate peoples of varying ancestry in the region.
Roman Dacia, also Dacia Traiana or Dacia Felix, was a province of the Roman Empire (106-271/275 AD). Its territory consisted of eastern and southeastern Transylvania, the Banat, and Oltenia (regions of modern Romania). Dacia was from the very beginning organized as an imperial province and remained so throughout the Roman occupation. It was one of the empire’s Latin provinces; official epigraphs attest that the language of administration was Latin. Historians’ estimates of the population of Roman Dacia range from 650,000 to 1,200,000.
Dacians that remained outside the Roman empire after Dacian wars of AD 101-106 had been named Dakoi prosoroi (Latin meaning Daci limitanei) ‘neighbouring Dacians’. Modern historians use the generic name ‘’Free Dacians “ or Independent Dacians,
The tribes Daci Magni (Great Dacians), Costoboci ( The Costoboci are generally considered Dacian subtribes) and Carpi remained outside the Roman empire in what the Romans called Dacia Libera (Free Dacia).
By the early third century the ‘Free Dacians’ as they were earlier known, were significantly troublesome group, then identified as the Carpi . After reviewing the available evidence, Bichir argues that the Carpi were the most powerful of the Dacian tribes who had become the principal enemy of the Romans in the region.
Roman Dacia was evacuated by the Romans under emperor Aurelian (ruled 271-5 AD). Lucius Domitius Aurelianus (Aurelian) made this decision on account of barbarian pressures on the Empire there (Carpi, Visigoths, Sarmatians, Asding Vandals) - the lines of defense needed to be shortened, and Dacia was deemed not important enough to Rome to remain militarized with the current resources available.
Roman authority of Thracia rested mainly with the legions stationed in Moesia. The rural nature of Thracia's populations, and distance from Roman authority, certainly inspired the presence of local troops to support Moesia's legions. Over the next few centuries, the province was periodically and increasingly attacked by migrating Germanic tribes. The reign of Justinian saw the construction of over 100 legionary fortresses to supplement the defense.
After the Aurelian Retreat
Dacia was never a uniformly Romanized area. Post-Aurelianic Dacia fell into three divisions: the area along the river, usually under some type of Roman administration even if in a highly barbarized form; the zone beyond this area, from which Roman military personnel had withdrawn, leaving a sizable population behind that was heavily Romanized; and finally what is now the northern parts of Moldavia, Crisana, and Maramures. This final area was always peripheral to the Roman province, not militarily occupied but nonetheless controlled by the Rome and part of the Roman economic sphere. Here lived the Carpi, often called “Free Dacians” .
Aurelian retreat was a purely military decision to withdraw the Roman troops to defend the Danube. The inhabitants of the old province of Dacia displayed no awareness of impeding disaster. There were no sudden flights and destruction of property.  It is not possible to discern how many civilians followed the army out of Dacia; it is clear that there was no mass emigration, since there is evidence of continuity of settlement in Dacian villages and farms; the evacuation may not at first have been intended to be a permanent measure . The Roman left the province, but they didn’t consider they lost it .Aurelian didn’t abandon Dobrogea at all. It continued as part of Roman Empire for over 350 years. .
As recently as AD 300, the tetrarchic emperors had resettled tens of thousands of Dacian Carpi inside the empire, dispersing them in communities the length of the Danube, from Hungary to Black Sea .
Dacians were divided into two classes: the aristocracy (tarabostes) and the common people (comati). The aristocracy alone had the right to cover their heads and wore a felt hat. The second class, who comprised the rank and file of the army, the peasants and artisans, might have been called capillati (in Latin). Their appearance and clothing can be seen on Trajan's Column.
The chief occupations of Dacians were agriculture, apiculture, viticulture, livestock, ceramics and metal working. They also worked the gold and silver mines of Transylvania. They carried on a considerable outside trade, as is shown by the number of foreign coins found in the country (see also Decebalus Treasure). At Pecica, Arad had been found a Dacian atelier with equipment for minting coins along with evidence of bronze-, silver-, and iron working that suggests a broad-spectrum of metal-smithing. Nevertheless evidence for the mass production of iron is found on many Dacian sites, indicating guild-like specialization.
Dacian ceramic manufacturing traditions continue from the pre-Roman to the Roman period, both in provincial and unoccupied Dacia and well into the fourth and even early fifth centuries 
On the northernmost frontier of ‘free Dacia’, coin circulation steadily grew in the first and second centuries with a decline in the third and a rise again in the fourth century – the same frequency pattern as observed for the Banat region to the southwest. What is remarkable is the extent and increase in coin circulation even after Roman withdrawal from Dacia and as far north as Transcarpathia .
The first coins produced by the Geto-Dacians were imitations of silver coins of the Macedonian kings Philip II and Alexander III (the Great). Early in the 1st century BC, the Dacians replaced these with silver denarii of the Roman Republic, both official coins of Rome exported to Dacia and locally made imitations of them.
The Roman province Dacia is represented on Roman Sestertius (coin) as a woman seated on a rock, holding aquila, a small child on her knee holding ears of grain, and a small child seated before her holding grapes.
Dacians had developed the Murus dacicus (double-skinned ashlar-masonry with rubble fill and tie beams) characteristic to their complexes of fortified cities, like their capital Sarmizegetusa in what is today Hunedoara County, Romania. This type of wall has been discovered not only in the Dacian citadel of the Orastie mountains, but also in those at Breaza near Fagaras, Tilisca near Sibiu, Capalna in the Sebes valley, Banita not far from Petrosani and Piatra Craivii to the north of Alba Iulia 
The degree of their urban development can be seen on Trajan's Column and in the account of how Sarmizegetusa was defeated by the Romans. The Romans identified and destroyed the water aqueducts or pipelines of the Dacian capital, only thus being able to end the long siege of Sarmizegetusa.
According to archaeological findings, the cradle of the Dacian culture is considered to be north of the Danube towards the Carpathian mountains, in the modern-day historical Romanian province of Muntenia. It is identified as an evolution of the Iron Age Basarabi culture. The earlier Iron Age Basarabi in the northern lower Danube connects to the iron-using Ferigile-Birsesti group. This is an archaeological manifestation of the historical Getae who, along with Agathyrsae are one of a number of tribal formations recorded by Herodotus 
Specific Dacian material culture includes: wheel-turned pottery that is generally plain but with distinctive elite wares, massive silver dress fibulae (clasped pin fasteners) precious metal plate, ashlar-masonry, fortifications, upland sanctuaries with horsehoe-shaped precincts, decorated clay heart altars on settlement sites 
There are difficulties correlating funerary monuments chronologically with Dacian settlements, a small number of inhumations are known, along with cremation pits and isolated rich burials as at Cugir 
From the point of view of archaeology free Dacians are attested by the Puchov culture (in which there are Celtic elements) and Lipiţa culture to the east of the Carpathians. Lipiţa culture has a Dacian –North Thracian origin  . This North Thracian population was dominated by strong Celtic influences or had simply absorbed Celtic ethnic components . Lipiţa culture has been linked to the Dacian tribe of Costoboci , .
In Roman Dacia, Dacian burial ritual continued under Roman occupation and into the post-Roman period.
The Dacians are generally considered to have been Thracian speakers, representing a cultural continuity from earlier Iron Age communities. Some historians and linguists consider Dacian language to be a dialect of, or the same language as Thracian  . The vocalism and consonantism differentiate the Dacian and the Thracian languages . Others consider that Dacian and Illyrian form regional varieties (dialects) of a common language. (Note: Thracians inhabited modern southern Bulgaria and northern Greece. Illyrians lived in modern Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Croatia.)
The ancient languages of these people had already gone extinct and their cultural influence was highly reduced due to the repeated barbaric invasions of the Balkans by Celts, Huns, Goths, and Sarmatians, accompanied by persistent Hellenization, Romanisation and later Slavicisation. Therefore, in the study of the toponomy of Dacia one must take account of the fact, that some place-names were taken by the Slavs from still unromanised Dacians.
A number of Dacian words are preserved in ancient sources, amounting to about 1150 anthroponyms and 900 toponyms, and in Discorides some of the rich plant lore of the Dacians is preserved along with the names of 42 medicinal plants.
Dacian religion was considered by the classic sources as a key source of authority suggesting to some that Dacia was a predominantly theocratic state led by priest-kings. However, the layout of Dacians capital Sarmizegethusa indicates the possibility of co-rulership with separate high king and high priest  Ancient sources recorded the names of several Dacian high priests (Deceneus, Comosicus and Vezina) and various orders of priests: “god-worshipers”, “smoke-walkers” and “founders” . Both Hellenistic and Oriental influences are discernable in the religious background alongside chthonic and solar motifs 
According to Herodotus History (book 4) account of the story of Zalmoxis (or Zamolxis), the Getae (speaking the same language as the Dacians, according to Strabo) believed in the immortality of the soul, and regarded death as merely a change of country. Their chief priest held a prominent position as the representative of the supreme deity, Zalmoxis, who is called also Gebeleizis by some among them 
Historian and geographer Strabo about the high priest Decaeneus:
"a man who not only had wandered through Egypt, but also had thoroughly learned certain prognostics through which he would pretend to tell the divine will; and within a short time he was set up as god (as I said when relating the story of Zamolxis)"
The Goth Jordanes in his Getica (The origin and deeds of the Goths), gives an account of Dicineus (Deceneus), the highest priest of King Burebista, and considered Dacians a nation related to the Goths.
Besides Zalmoxis, the Dacians believed in other deities such as Gebeleizis god of storm and lightning, (maybe related with Thracian god Zibelthiurdos). He was represented as a handsome man, sometimes wearing a beard. The lightning and thunder were his manifestations. Later Gebeleizis was equated with Zalmoxis as the same god.
Another important deity was Bendis, goddess of the moon and the hunt. By a decree of the oracle of Dodona, which required the Athenians to grant land for a shrine or temple her cult was introduced into Attica by immigrant Thracian residents, and, though Thracian and Athenian processions remained separate, both cult and festival became so popular that in Plato's time (c. 429-13 BCE) its festivities were naturalized as an official ceremonial of the city-state, called the Bendideia.
Known Dacian theonyms include Zalmoxis,Gebeleïzis and Darzalas. Gebeleizis is probably cognate to the Thracian god Zibelthiurdos (also Zbelsurdos, Zibelthurdos), wielder of lightning and thunderbolts. Derzelas (also Darzalas) was a chthonic god of health and human spirit's vitality.
The pagan religion survived longer than in other parts of the empire; Christianity made little headway in Dacia until the fifth century 
Permanent contacts with the Graeco-Roman world brought the use of the Greek and later of the Latin alphabet  It is also certainly not the case that writing with Greek and Latin letters and knowledge of Greek and Latin were known in all the settlements scattered throughout Dacia, but there is no doubt about the existence of such knowledge in some circles of Dacian society.  However, the most revealing discoveries concerning the use of the writing by the Dacians occurred in the citadels on the Sebes mountains . Some groups of letters from the Sarmisegetuza’s blocks might express personal names which can not now be read because the wall is ruined and because it is impossible to restore the original order of the blocks in the wall .
Fragments of pottery with different "inscriptions" with Latin and Greek letters incised before and after firing have been discovered also in the settlement at Ocnita – Valcea  An inscription carries the word Basileus (Βασιλεύς in Greek meaning king) and seems to have written before the vessel was hardened by fire.  Other inscriptions contain the name of the king which was completed by experts in the form of Thiemarcus  and Latin groups of letters (BVR, REB)  The inscription BUR indicates the name of the tribe or union of tribes, the Buridavensi Dacians who lived at Buridava and who were mentioned by Ptolemy in the second century AD under the name of Buridavensioi.
The Dacian gold bracelets depict the cultural and aesthetic sense of the Dacians. They were made from a gold ore mixed with very small quantity of silver using techniques that are considered by archaeologists technologically very advanced for that period of time.
The typical Dacian dress of both men and women can be seen on Trajan's column.
The history of Dacian warfare spans from ca. 10th century BC up to the 2nd century AD in the region defined by Ancient Greek and Latin historians as Dacia. It concerns the armed conflicts of the Dacian tribes and their kingdoms in the Balkans. Apart from conflicts between Dacians and neighboring nations and tribes, numerous wars were recorded among Dacian tribes too.
The weapon most associated with the Dacian forces that fought against Trajan’s army during his invasions in Dacia was the falx, a single-edged scythe-like weapon. The falx was able to inflict horrible wounds on opponents, easily disabling or killing even the heavily armored Roman legionaries that they faced during Dacian wars. This weapon, more so than any other single factor, forced the Roman army to adopt previously unused or modified equipment to suit the conditions on the Dacian battlefield
Troop types and organization
This is a list of several important Dacian individuals or those of partly Dacian origin.
- Zalmoxis, a semi-legendary social and religious reformer, eventually deified by the Getae and Dacians and regarded as the only true god.
- Burebista was a king of Dacia between 70 BC - 44 BC who united under his rule Thracians in a large territory, from today's Moravia in the West, to the Southern Bug river (Ukraine) in the East, and from Northern Carpathians to Southern Dionysopolis.The Greeks considered him the first and greatest king of Thrace.
- Decebalus, a king of Dacia ultimately defeated by the forces of Trajan.
- Diegis, was a Dacian chief, general and brother of Decebalus, and his representative at the peace negotiations held with Domitian (89 C.E.).
- Galerius, Roman Emperor who affirmed his Dacian roots to such an extent that "he had avowed himself the enemy of the Roman name; and he proposed that the empire should be called, not the Roman, but the Dacian empire"
- Flavius Aetius, often called "the last of the Romans", Dacian and Roman origin
In 2004, it had been performed a study of mtDNA polymorphism on the skeletal remains of some old Thracian populations from South East of Romania dating from the Bronze Age and Iron Age. MtDNA have been compared with several modern mtDNA sequences from 5 European present-day populations. The results reflect an evident genetic similarity between the old Thracian individuals and the modern populations from SE of Europe . The Thracian individuals have shown informative point mutations in 7np (nucleotide position) the Romanian, Greek and Albanian individuals in 7np, and the Bulgarian individuals in only 5 np out of 12 most informative nucleotide positions presented in the study. As concerns the frequency of point mutations in the 12 nucleotide positions, the Italian individuals show the highest mutation frequency with 12.5%, followed by the Thracian individuals with 8.3%, the Albanian individuals with 7.5 % the Romanian and Greek individuals with 6.25% and the Bulgarian individuals with only 4.6%. Computing the frequency of common point mutations of the present-day European population with the Thracian population has resulted that the Italian (7.9%), the Albanian (6.3%) and the Greek (5.8%) have shown a bias of closer genetic kinship with the Thracian individuals than the Romanian and Bulgarian individuals (only 4.2%). Also, the study concluded that so far it can just supposed that the old Thracian populations would have been able contribute to the foundation of the Romanian modern genetic pool. More mtDNA sequences from Thracian individuals are needed in order to perform a complex objective statistical analysis .
Early Modern usage
- ^ a b Westropp & 2003 104.
- ^ a b c d Strabo 20 AD, VII 3,12.
- ^ Husovská (1998) 13
- ^ Encyclopedia Britannica online, Dacia.
- ^ Millar, Cotton & Rogers 2004, p. 189: Appian's Roman History (Praef. 4/14-15): "the Getae over the Danube, whom they call Dacians".
- ^ a b c d Unesco & Fol 1996, p. 223.
- ^ Nandris & 1976 i.e. Strabo and Trogus Pompeius "Daci quoque suboles Getarum sunt", p. 730.
- ^ a b Crossland 1982, p. 837.
- ^ a b Roesler 1864, p. 89.
- ^ Zumpt 1852, p. 140 & 175.
- ^ a b c d e Van Den Gheyn S.J., Joseph (1885) 170
- ^ Everitt 2010, p. 151.
- ^ Bunbury 1879, p. 150.
- ^ Bunbury 1979, p. 150.
- ^ Oltean 2007, p. 44.
- ^ Bunbury 1979, p. 151.
- ^ a b Riley 2007, p. 107.
- ^ a b Garašanin, Benac (1973) 243
- ^ Dioscorides’s book (known in English by its Latin title De Materia Medica ‘Regarding Medical Materials’) has all the Dacian name of the plants preceded by Δάκοι Dakoi i.e. Δάκοι Dakoi προποδιλα Latin Daci propodila "Dacians propodila"
- ^ Tomaschek (1883) 397
- ^ Parvan & Vulpe R. Vulpe A., p. 158.
- ^ Gibbon (2008) 313 "...Aurelian calls these soldiers Hiberi, Riparienses, Castriani, and Dacisci " conform to "Vopiscus in Historia Augusta XXVI 38"
- ^ Mulvin (2002)59 "...A tombstone inscription from Aquincum reads M. Secundi Genalis domo Cl. Agrip /pina/ negotiat. Dacisco. This is of a second century date and suggests the presence of some Dacian traders in Pannonia..."
- ^ Petolescu 2000, p. 163 "...patri incom[pa-] rabili, decep [to] a Daciscis in bel- loproclio ...".
- ^ Groh & 2000 "...CIL V 3372 inscription at Verona Papirio Marcellino, decepto a Daciscis in bello proelio..", p. 43.
- ^ Kephart & 1949 The Persians knew that the Dahae and the other Massagetae were kin of the inhabitants of Scythia west of the Caspian Sea, p. 28.
- ^ Pliny (the Elder) Rackham, p. 375.
- ^ Chakraberty & 1948 “Dasas or Dasyu of the RigVeda are the Dahae of Avesta, Daci of the Romans, Dakaoi (Hindi Dakku) of the Greeks, p. 34.
- ^ Florov 2001, p. 66.
- ^ a b Papazoglu 1978, p. 434.
- ^ Vraciu 1980, p. 45.
- ^ a b Barbulescu & Nagler 2005, p. 68.
- ^ Lemny & Iorga 1984, p. 210.
- ^ Toynbee 1961, p. 435.
- ^ Crossland 1982, p. 8375.
- ^ a b Tomaschek (1883) 404
- ^ Russu 1967, p. 133.
- ^ a b c Paliga 1999, p. 77.
- ^ Eisler 1951, p. 136.
- ^ Parvan & Vulpe R. Vulpe A., p. 149.
- ^ Eisler 1951, p. 33.
- ^ Eliade 1995, p. 12.
- ^ Vulpe, Alexandru (2001). "Dacia înainte de romani". In Romanian Academy (in Romanian). Istoria Românilor. 1. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic. pp. 420–421. ISBN 9734503812.
- ^ a b Eliade 1995, p. 11.
- ^ Eisler 1951, p. 137.
- ^ a b c d Eliade 1995, p. 13.
- ^ Jeanmaire 1975, p. 540.
- ^ a b Eisler 1951, p. 144.
- ^ a b c Eliade 1995, p. 15.
- ^ Zambotti 1954, p. 184, fig. 13-14, 16.
- ^ a b Eliade 1995, p. 23.
- ^ Eliade 1995, p. 27.
- ^ Eliade 1986.
- ^ Hoddinott, p. 27.
- ^ Casson, p. 3.
- ^ Mountain & 1998 58.
- ^ Dumitrescu & Boardman 1982, p. 53.
- ^ a b c d e Mountain & 1998 59.
- ^ Parvan & 1926 279.
- ^ Strabo, Jones & Sterrett 1967, p. 28.
- ^ Abramea 1994, p. 17.
- ^ Dio Cassius Volume 3.
- ^ Papazoglu & 1978 67.
- ^ Agrippa comments “Dacia, Getico finiuntur ab oriente desertis Sarmatiae, ab occidente flumine Vistula, a septentrione Oceano, a meridie flumine Histro. Quae patent in longitudine milia passuum CCLXXX, in latitudine qua cogitum est milia passuum CCCLXXXVI”
- ^ Schütte & 1917 109.
- ^ a b Parvan & 1926 221.
- ^ Schütte & 1917 101 and 109.
- ^ Treptow 1996, p. 10.
- ^ Ellis 1861, p. 70.
- ^ Brixhe 2008, p. 72.
- ^ Fisher & 2003 570.
- ^ Rosetti 1982, p. 5.
- ^ a b Peregrine & Ember 2001, p. 215.
- ^ a b c Price 2000, p. 120.
- ^ Renfrew 1990, p. 71.
- ^ Hainsworth & 1982 848.
- ^ Polome (1983) 540
- ^ Georgiev (1960) 39-58
- ^ Crossland & 1982 838.
- ^ Polome & 1982 876.
- ^ a b c Oltean 2007, p. 46.
- ^ Koch J. & Koch J.T. 2007, p. 1471.
- ^ Schütte 1917, p. 88.
- ^ Schütte 1917, p. 89.
- ^ Bennett 1997, p. 47.
- ^ a b c Parvan & 1926 250.
- ^ a b Wilcox (2000)18
- ^ a b Wilcox (2000)24
- ^ a b Parvan & 1926 222-223.
- ^ Ptolemy III.5 and 8
- ^ Barrington Plate 22
- ^ Ruscu & 2004 78.
- ^ Wilcox (2000)27
- ^ MacKenzie & 1986 51.
- ^ MacKendrick 1975, p. 90.
- ^ Millar (1970)
- ^ Bunson & 2002 167.
- ^ Pop & 2000 22.
- ^ Denne Parker & 1958 12 and 19.
- ^ a b Wilkes & 2005 224.
- ^ Ptolemy III.8
- ^ Tacitus G.43
- ^ Oltean 2007, p. 47.
- ^ Parvan & 1926 461-462.
- ^ Heather (2010 p.131)
- Waldman and Mason (2006) p. 184
- Poghirc (1989 p. 302)
- Parvan (1928) p.184 and p.188
- Nandris (1976)p.729
- Oledzki (2000) p.525
- Astarita (1983) p.62
- ^ Heather (2010 p.131)
- ^ a b Hrushevskyi 1997, p. 100.
- ^ Waldman 2006, p. 184.
- ^ Nandris 1976, p. 729.
- ^ a b Hrushevskyi 1997, p. 98.
- ^ a b Shutte 1917, p. 100.
- ^ Parvan & Florescu 1982, p. 135.
- ^ Sir Smith 1856, p. 961.
- ^ Shutte 1917, p. 18.
- ^ Heather 2010, p. 131.
- ^ Tomaschek 1883, p. 407.
- ^ Shutte 1917, p. 143.
- ^ Russu & 1969 pp. 99,116.
- ^ VI, 1 801=ILS 854
- ^ VI, 16, 903
- ^ Russu 1967, p. 161.
- ^ Shutte 1917, p. 101.
- ^ Parvan & Florescu 1982, pp. 142 and 152.
- ^ Goffart (2006) p.205
- Bunson (1995) p.74
- MacKendrick (2000) p.117
- Parvan and Florescu (1982) p.136
- Burns (1991) p.26 and p.27
- Odahl (2004) p.19
- Waldman and Mason (2006) p.19
- Millar (1970)
- ^ Goffart (2006) p.205
- ^ Waldman, Mason & 2006 129.
- ^ Heather & 2010 114.
- ^ Parvan 1926, p. 239.
- ^ Russu 1969, p. 114-115.
- ^ Tomaschek 1883, p. 403.
- ^ Goffart & 2006 205.
- ^ Minns 1913.
- ^ Nixon & Saylor Rodgers 1995, p. 116.
- ^ Clarke & 2003 37.
- ^ "Men make gods in their own image; those of the Ethiopians are black and snub-nosed, those of the Thracians have blue eyes and red hair." Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments, Xenophanes, J. H. Lesher, University of Toronto Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8020-8508-3, p. 90.
- ^ a b c d e Oltean 2007, p. 45.
- ^ Waldman, Mason & 2006 208.
- ^ a b Bury, Cook & 1954 543.
- ^ Oltean 2007, p. 114.
- ^ a b c Dumitrescu & Boardman 1982, p. 166.
- ^ Parvan 1928, p. 35.
- ^ Parvan & Vulpe 1928, p. 49.
- ^ a b c d e Koch & 2005 549.
- ^ Parvan 1926, p. 661.
- ^ a b c d Tomaschek 1883, p. 400-401.
- ^ a b c d e f Taylor 2001, p. 215.
- ^ a b c MacKendrick 2000, p. 50.
- ^ Koch 2005, p. 550.
- ^ a b Letz, Cicaj & Skvarna 2000, p. 14.
- ^ Taylor 1987, p. 130.
- ^ a b Parvan 1928, p. 48.
- ^ Herodotus, Rawlinson G, Rawlinson H, Gardner (1859) 93
- ^ Thomson 1948, p. 399.
- ^ a b Hrushevskyĭ, Poppe & Skorupsky 1997, p. 97.
- ^ a b c Watson & 2004 8.
- ^ Heather & 2006 85.
- ^ Burns & 1991 26-27.
- ^ a b c d Burns & 1991 110-111.
- ^ a b c d e Southern & 2001 325.
- ^ Heather & 2010 128.
- ^ a b Heather & 2010 116.
- ^ Heather & 2010 165.
- ^ Bradley & 2005 38.
- ^ Bradley & 2005 19.
- ^ Barnes 1984, p. 250.
- ^ Elton & Lenski 2005, p. 338.
- ^ Heather & 2010 167.
- ^ Lewis et al. 2008, p. 773
- ^ Berresford Ellis & 1996 61.
- ^ Smith's Dictionary: Curio
- ^ Smith's Dictionary: Lucullus
- ^ Strabo 20 AD, VII 3,13.
- ^ a b Grumeza 2009, p. 54.
- ^ MacKendrick 1975, p. 48.
- ^ Goodman & Sherwood 2002, p. 227.
- ^ Crişan (1978) 118
- ^ Dio LI.26.5
- ^ Dio LI.23.2
- ^ De Imperatoribus Romanis". http://www.roman-emperors.org/assobd.htm#t-inx. Retrieved 2007-11-08. "In the year 88, the Romans resumed the offensive. The Roman troops were now led by the general Tettius Iulianus. The battle took place again at Tapae but this time the Romans defeated the Dacians. For fear of falling into a trap, Iulianus abandoned his plans of conquering Sarmizegetuza and, at the same time, Decebalus asked for peace. At first, Domitian refused this request, but after he was defeated in a war in Pannonia against the Marcomanni (a Germanic tribe), the emperor was obliged to accept the peace."
- ^ Grumeza 2009, p. 15.
- ^ Taylor 1994, p. 404.
- ^ a b c Oltean 2007, pp. 53-54.
- ^ Bennett 1997, p. 97.
- ^ Hooper 2002, p. 434.
- ^ Snooks 1997, p. 154.
- ^ Campbell 2002, p. 144.
- ^ a b Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 205.
- ^ a b MacKendrick, Paul. The Dacian Stones Speak.
- ^ a b Grumeza 2009.
- ^ a b Klepper, Nicolae. Romania: An Illustrated History. [unreliable source?]
- ^ Pop, Ioan Aurel. Romanians and Romania: A Brief History.
- ^ Oltean 2007.
- ^ Köpeczi, Béla; Makkai, László; Mócsy, András; Szász, Zoltán; Barta, Gábor. History of Transylvania - From the Beginnings to 1606.
- ^ Georgescu, Vlad. The Romanians - A History.
- ^ a b Bowman et al. 224.
- ^ Schütte 1917, p. 143.
- ^ Tomaschek (1883) 407
- ^ Siani-Davies P., Siani-Davies M. & Deletant 2006, p. 205.
- ^ Cowan & 2003 5.
- ^ Hazel & 2002 360.
- ^ MacKendrick 2000, p. 161.
- ^ Heather & 2006 159.
- ^ a b c d e Taylor & 2001 214-215.
- ^ Ellis & 1998 229.
- ^ Ellis & 1998 232.
- ^ Applebaum & 1976 91.
- ^ Taylor & 2001 86.
- ^ Millar 1981, p. 279.
- ^ Shchukin & 2006 20.
- ^ Kostrzewski & 1949 230.
- ^ Jażdżewski & 1948 76.
- ^ Shchukin & 1989 306.
- ^ Parvan, Florescu & 1982 547.
- ^ Ellis & 1998 233.
- ^ Tomaschek 1883, p. 401.
- ^ Parvan 1926, p. 648.
- ^ Pares 1939, p. 149.
- ^ Nandris 1976, p. 730.
- ^ Histories by Herodotus Book 4 translated by G. Rawlinson
- ^ Strabo 20 AD, VII 3,11.
- ^ Tomashek,Die Alten Thrakern, II, page 62
- ^ Glodariu 2005, p. 120.
- ^ Tomaschek & 1883 410.
- ^ Paliga & 1994 440.
- ^ BENDIS : Thracian goddess of the moon & hunting ; mythology ; pictures
- ^ Extensive discussion of whether the date is 429 or 413 BCE was reviewed and newly analyzed in Christopher Planeaux, "The Date of Bendis' Entry into Attica" The Classical Journal 96.2 (December 2000:165-192. Planeaux offers a reconstruction of the inscription mentioninmg the first introduction, p
- ^ Fifth-century fragmentary inscriptions that record formal descrees regarding formal aspects of the Bendis cult, are reproduced in Planeaux 2000:170f
- ^ Hdt. 4.94,Their belief in their immortality is as follows: they believe that they do not die, but that one who perishes goes to the deity Salmoxis, or Gebeleïzis, as some of them call him.
- ^ Harry Thurston Peck, Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (1898),(Zalmoxis) or Zamolxis (Zamolxis). Said to have been so called from the bear's skin (zalmos) in which he was clothed as soon as he was born. He was, according to the story current among the Greeks on the Hellespont, a Getan, who had been a slave to Pythagoras in Samos, but was manumitted, and acquired not only great wealth, but large stores of knowledge from Pythagoras, and from the Egyptians, whom he visited in the course of his travels. He returned among the Getae, introducing the civilization and the religious ideas which he had gained, especially regarding the immortality of the soul. Herodotus, however, suspects that he was an indigenous Getan divinity ( Herod.iv. 95)
- ^ a b Applebaum & 1976 94.
- ^ Glodariu & 1976 101.
- ^ Applebaum & 1976 95.
- ^ Glodariu & 1976 128.
- ^ a b MacKenzie & 1986 67.
- ^ MacKenzie & 1986 26.
- ^ MacKenzie & 1986 66.
- ^ Turnock 1988, p. 42.
- ^ Cunliffe 1994, p. 193.
- ^ Millar & 1981 275.
- ^ Schmitz (2005) 30
- ^ Lactanius, De mortibus persecutorum, IX, 1; XXVII, 9; FHDR: II, 4, 6.
- ^ Jordanes, Getica, 176; Merobaudes, Carmina, iv, 42-43, and Panegyrici, ii, 110-115, 119-120; Gregory of Tours, ii.8; Zosimus, v.36.1; Chronica gallica 452, 100. Cited in Jones, p. 21.
- ^ a b c d e Cardos et al. Kroll, p. 239 & 246.
- Cassius Dio, Cassius Dio (2008). Rome. Volume 3 (of 6). Echo Library. ISBN 978-1406826449.
- Cassius, Dio Cocceianus; Cary, Earnest; Foster, Herbert Baldwin (1968). Dio's Roman history, volume 8. W. Heinemann.
- Pliny (the Elder); Rackham, Harris (1971). Pliny Natural History, Volume 2. Harvard University Press.
- Strabo (ca. 20 AD) (in Ancient Greek). Geographica. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/home.html.
- Strabo; Jones, Horace Leonard; Sterrett, John Robert (1967). The geography of Strabo. Harvard University Press.
- Abramea, Anna P (, 1994). Thrace. Idea Advertising-Marketing. ISBN 9789608560918.
- Applebaum, Shimon (1976). Prolegomena to the study of the second Jewish revolt (A.D. 132-135). British Archaeological Reports.
- Astarita, Maria Laura (1983). Avidio Cassio. Ed. di Storia e Letteratura. ISBN 9788884984123.
- Barnes, Timothy D. (1984). Constantine and Eusebius. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674165311.
- Barbulescu, Mihai; Nagler, Thomas (2005). The History of Transylvania: Until 1541 Coordinator Pop, Ioan Aurel. Romanian Cultural Institute, Cluj-Napoca. ISBN 9789737784001. http://books.google.ca/books?id=96IsAQAAIAAJ&q.
- Berresford Ellis, Peter (1996). Celt and Greek: Celts in the Hellenic World. Constable & Robinson. ISBN 978-0094755802.
- Bennett, Julian (1997). Trajan: Optimus Princeps. Routledge;. ISBN 978-0415165242.
- Bowman, Alan; Cameron, Averil; Garnsey, Peter (2005). The Cambridge Ancient History: Volume 12, The Crisis of Empire, AD 193-337. Cambridge University Press; 2 edition. ISBN 978-0521301992.
- Bradley, Henry (2005). The Goths from the Earliest Times to the End of the Gothic Dominion in Spain (2nd edition -2005) (1st edition1888). Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1417970841.
- Brixhe, Claude (2008). Phrygian in The Ancient Languages of Asia Minor. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 052168496X, 978-0521684965.
- Bunbury, Edward Herbert (1979). A history of ancient geography among the Greeks and Romans: from the earliest ages till the fall of the Roman empire.. London: Humanities Press International, Incorporated. ISBN 9789070265113.
- Bunson, Matthew (1995). A Dictionary of the Roman Empire. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195102338.
- Bunson, Matthew (2002). Roman Empire, Encyclopedia of The, Revised Edition. Fitzhenry & Whiteside; 2nd Revised edition. ISBN 978-0816045624.
- Burns, Thomas S. (1991). A History of the Ostrogoths. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0253206008.
- Chakraberty, Chandra (1948). The prehistory of India: tribal migrations. Vijayakrishna Bros.
- Bury, John Bagnell; Cook, Stanley Arthur; Adcock, Frank E.; Percival Charlesworth, Martin (1954). The Cambridge Ancient History: Rome and the Mediterranean, 218-133 B. C.. Macmillan.
- Cardos, G; Stoian, V; N; A, Comsa; A, Kroll; S, Voss; Rodewald, A (2004). Paleo-mtDNA analysis and population genetic aspects of old Thracian populations from South-East of Romania. Romanian Society of legal medicine. http://www.scribd.com/doc/326027/PaleomtDNA-analysis-and-population-genetic-aspects-of-old-Thracian-populations-from-SouthEast-of-Romania.
- Clarke, John R. (2003). Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans: Visual Representation and Non-Elite Viewers in Italy, 100 B.C.-A.D. 315. University of California Press; 1 edition. ISBN 978-0520219762.
- Conti, Stefano; Scardigli, Barbara; Torchio, Maria Cristina (2007). Geografia e viaggi nell'antichità. Ancona :. ISBN 9788873260905.
- Cowan, Ross (2003). Imperial Roman Legionary AD 161-284. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1841766010.
- Crossland, R.A.; Boardman, John (1982). "Linguistic problems of the Balkan area in the late prehistoric and early Classical period" in The Cambridge Ancient History Volume 3, Part 1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521224963.
- Cunliffe, Barry W. (1994). Rome and Her Empire. Constable. ISBN 009473500X , 978-0094735002.
- Denne Parker, Henry Michael (1958). A history of the Roman world from A.D. 138 to 337. Methuen.
- Dumitrescu, Vlad; Boardman, John; Hammond, N. G. L; Sollberger, E (1982). The prehistory of Romania from the earliest times to 1000 BC in The Cambridge Ancient History: The Prehistory of the Balkans, the Middle East and the Aegean World, Tenth to Eighth Centuries BC. Cambridge University Press; 2 edition. ISBN 978-0521224963.
- Eisler, Robert (1951). Man into wolf: an anthropological interpretation of sadism, masochism, and lycanthropy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. ASIN B0000CI25D. http://books.google.com/books?id=fD5AAAAAIAAJ.
- Eliade, Mircea (1986). Zalmoxis, the vanishing God: comparative studies in the religions and folklore of Dacia and Eastern Europe. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226203859. http://books.google.com/books?id=HyehAAAACAAJ.
- Eliade, Mircea (1995). Ivănescu, Maria; Ivănescu, Cezar. eds (in Romanian). De la Zalmoxis la Genghis-Han: studii comparative despre religiile și folclorul Daciei și Europei Orientale [From Zalmoxis to Genghis Khan: comparative studies in the religions and folklore of Dacia and Eastern Europe] (Based on the translation from French of De Zalmoxis à Gengis-Khan, Payot, Paris, 1970 ed.). București, Romania: Humanitas. ISBN 9732805544. http://books.google.com/books?id=o8coAAAAYAAJ.
- Elton, Hugh; Lenski, Noel Emmanuel (2005). ‘’Warfare and the Military’’ in ‘’ The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine ‘’. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521818384.
- Ellis, L. (1998). ‘Terra deserta’: population, politics, and the [de]colonization of Dacia. World archaeology. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415198097.
- Ellis, Robert (1861). The Armenian origin of the Etruscans. Parker, Son and Bourn, West Strand London.
- Everitt, Anthony (2010). Hadrian and the Triumph of Rome. Random House Trade. ISBN 978-0812978148.
- Fisher, Iancu (2003). Les substrats et leur influence sur les langues romanes: la Romania du Sud-Est / Substrate und ihre Wirkung auf die romanischen Sprachen: Sudostromania in Romanische Sprachgeschichte. Mouton De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3110146943.
- Florov, Irina (2001). The 3000-year-old hat: New connections with Old Europe : the Thraco-Phrygian world. Golden Vine Publishers. ISBN 978-0968848708.
- Unesco, Author; Fol, Alexander (1996). History of Humanity: From Seventh Century B.C. to the Seventh Century A.D. Bernan Assoc. ISBN 978-9231028120.
- Glodariu, Ioan (1976). Dacian trade with the Hellenistic and Roman world. British Archaeological Reports. ISBN 0904531406, 978-0904531404.
- Glodariu, Ioan; Pop, Ioan Aurel; Nagler, Thomas (2005). ‘’The history and civilization of the Dacians’’ in The history of Transylvania Until 1541’’. Romanian Cultural Institute, Cluj Napoca. ISBN 9789737784001.
- Goffart, Walter A. (2006). Barbarian Tides: The Migration Age and the Later Roman Empire. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0812239393.
- Grumeza, Ion (2009). Dacia: Land of Transylvania, Cornerstone of Ancient Eastern Europe. Hamilton Books. ISBN 0761844651. http://books.google.com/books?id=07-RjGQajw0C. [unreliable source?]
- Gibbon, Edward (2008). The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol. I. Cosimo Classics. ISBN 978-1605201207.
- Garašanin, Milutin V.; Benac, Alojz (1973) (in French). Actes du VIIIe congrès international des sciences préhistoriques. International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences.
- Goodman, Martin; Sherwood, Jane (2002). The Roman World 44 BC–AD 180. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-40861-2.
- Hazel, John (2002). Who's Who in the Roman World. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-42599-2.
- Husovská Ludmilá (1998) “Slovakia: walking through centuries of cities and towns”, Priroda
- Jażdżewski, Konrad (1948). Atlas to the prehistory of the Slavs. Lodzkie Tow Naukowe, Poland.
- ’ Hainsworth, J.B. (1982). ‘The relationships of the ancient languages of the Balkan in The Cambridge Ancient History, By John Boardman, 2nd Edition, Volume 3, Part 1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521224963.
- Jeanmaire, Henri (1975) (in French). Couroi et courètes. New York: Arno Press. ISBN 0405070012. http://books.google.com/books?id=vQLcSAAACAAJ.
- Heather, Peter (2006). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195159547.
- Heather, Peter (2010). Empires and Barbarians: Migration, Development, and the Birth of Europe. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199735600.
- Kephart, Calvin (1949). Sanskrit: its origin, composition, and diffusion. Shenandoah Pub. House.
- Koch, John T (2005). ‘’Dacians and Celts’’ in Celtic culture: a historical encyclopedia, Volume 1,. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1851094400.
- Kostrzewski, Józef (1949). Les origines de la civilisation polonaise. Press University of France.
- Lemny, Stefan; Iorga, Nicolae (1984). Vasile Pârvan. Editura Eminescu.
- MacKenzie, Andrew (1986). Archaeology in Romania: the mystery of the Roman occupation. Robert Hale Ltd,. ISBN 0709027249.
- MacKendrick, Paul Lachlan (1975). The Dacian Stones Speak. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 60–61. ISBN 0-8078-1226-9. http://books.google.com/books?id=Lwt5Li_q2asC&pg=PA60.
- MacKendrick, Paul Lachlan (2000). The Dacian Stones Speak. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0807849392.
- Millar, Fergus; Cotton, Hannah M.; Rogers, Guy M. (2004). Rome, the Greek World, and the East, Volume 2: Government, Society, and Culture in the Roman Empire. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0807855201.
- Millar, Fergus (1981). Roman Empire and Its Neighbours. Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd; 2nd illustrated edition. ISBN 978-0715614525.
- Minns, Ellis Hovell (2011 (1st ed 1913)). Scythians and Greeks: a survey of ancient history and archaeology on the north coast of the Euxine from the Danube to the Caucasus. Cambridge University press. ISBN 9781108024877.
- Mountain, Harry (1998). The Celtic Encyclopedia. Universal Publishers. ISBN 978-1581128901.
- Mulvin, Lynda (2002). Late Roman Villas in the Danube-Balkan Region. British Archaeological Reports. ISBN 978-1841714448.
- Nandris, John; Friesinger, Herwig; Kerchler, Helga; Pittioni, Richard; Mitscha-Märheim, Herbert (1976). The Dacian Iron Age A Comment in a European Context in Festschrift für Richard Pittioni zum siebzigsten Geburtstag. Wien : Deuticke ; Horn : Berger. ISBN 9783700544203.
- Niessen, James P. (2004). Eastern Europe: An Introduction to the People, Lands, and Culture. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1576078006.
- Nixon, C.E.V.; Saylor Rodgers, Barbara (1995). In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyric Latini. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520083264.
- Oltean, Ioana Adina (2007). Dacia: landscape, colonisation and romanisation. Routledge. ISBN 0415412528. http://books.google.com/books?id=wgvH2j7dWuEC.
- Otto, Karl-Heinz (2000). Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift, Volume 41, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
- Paliga, Sorin (2006). Etymological Lexicon of the Indigenous (Thracian) Elements in Romanian. Fundatia Evenimentul. ISBN 9738792002.
- Papazoglu, Fanula (1978). The Central Balkan Tribes in Pre-Roman Times:Triballi, Autariatae, Dardanians, Scordisci, & Moesians, translated by Mary Stansfield-Popovic. John Benjamins North America, Incorporated. ISBN 9789025607937.
- Petolescu, Constantin C (2000). Inscriptions de la Dacie romaine : inscriptions externes concernant l'histoire de la Dacie (Ier-IIIe siècles).. Enciclopedica. ISBN 9789734501823.
- Peregrine, Peter N.; Ember, Melvin (2001). Encyclopedia of Prehistory Volume 4: Europe. Springer. ISBN 978-0306462580.
- Pittioni, Richard; Kerchler, Helga; Friesinger, Herwig; Mitscha-Märheim, Herbert (1976). Festschrift für Richard Pittioni zum siebzigsten Geburtstag, Archaeologia Austriaca : Beiheft. Wien, Deuticke, Horn, Berger,. ISBN 9783700544203.
- Poghirc, Cicerone (1989). Thracians and Mycenaeans: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Thracology Rotterdam 1984. Brill Academic Pub. ISBN 978-9004088641.
- Price, Glanville (2000). Encyclopedia of the Languages of Europe. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0631220398.
- Parvan, Vasile; Vulpe A., Alexandru; Vulpe R., Radu (2002). Dacia. Editura 100+1 Gramar. ISBN 9789735913618.
- Parvan, Vasile; Florescu, Radu (1982). Getica. Editura Meridiane.
- Parvan, Vasile (1928). Dacia. The Cambridge University Press.
- Parvan, Vasile (1926). Getica. Cvltvra naţională, Bucvreşti.
- Paliga, Sorin (1999). Thracian and pre-Thracian studies: linguistic papers published between 1986 and 1996. Sorin Paliga.
- Parvan, Vasile (1926). ‘’Getica. Cvltvra naţională, Bucvreşti.
- Pares, Bernard Sir; Seton-Watso, Robert William; Williams, Harold; Brooke Jopson, Norman (1939). ‘’The Slavonic and East European review: a survey of the peoples of eastern Europe, their history, economics, philology and literature, Volumes 18-19’’. W.S. Manely & Son Ltd.,.
- Polome, Edgar C. (1983). Linguistic situation in the western provinces in Sprache Und Literatur (Sprachen Und Schriften). Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3110095258.
- Polome, Edgar C. (1982). ‘’ Balkan Languages (Illyrian, Thracian and Daco-Moesian) in The Cambridge Ancient History, By John Boardman, 2nd Edition, Volume 3, Part 1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521224963.
- Pop, Ioan Aurel (2000). ‘’ Romanians and Romania: A Brief History’’. East European Monographs. ISBN 978-0880334402.
- Renfrew, Colin (1990). Archaeology and Language, The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521386753.
- Roesler, Robert E. (1864). Das vorromische Dacien. Academy, Wien, XLV.
- Rosetti, A. (1982). La linguistique Balkanique in Revue roumaine de linguistique , volume 27. Editions de l’Academie de la RSR.
- Ruscu, D. (2004). The supposed extermination of the Dacians: the literary tradition in ‘’Roman Dacia: The Making Of A Provincial Society’’ edited by William S. Hanson and I. P. Haynes. Journal of Roman Archaeology. ISBN 1887829563, 978-1887829564.
- Russu, I. Iosif (1969) (in German). "Die Sprache der Thrako-Daker" ('Thraco-Dacian language'). Editura Stiintifica.
- Russu, I. Iosif (1967) (in Romanian). "Limba Traco-Dacilor" ('Thraco-Dacian language'). Editura Stiintifica.
- Schütte, Gudmund (1917). Ptolemy's maps of northern Europe: a reconstruction of the prototypes. H. Hagerup.
- Shchukin, Mark (1989). Rome and the barbarians in central and eastern Europe: 1st century B.C.-1st century A.D.. British Archaeological Reports.
- Shchukin, Mark; Kazanski, Michel; Sharov, Oleg (2006). Des les goths aux huns: le nord de la mer Noire au Bas-Empire et a l'époque des grandes migrations. British Archaeological Reports. ISBN 978-1841717562.
- Schmitz, Michael (2005). The Dacian threat, 101-106 AD. Armidale, N.S.W. : Caeros Publishing. ISBN 9780975844502, 0975844504.
- Skvarna, Dusan; Cicaj, Viliam; Letz, Robert (2000). Slovak History: Chronology & Lexicon. Bolchazy-Carducci. ISBN 0865164444, 978-0865164444.
- Solta, Georg Renatus (1980). Berücksichtigung des Substrats und des Balkanlateinischen. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
- Southern, Pat (2001). ‘’ The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantin. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-45159-5.
- Taylor, Timothy (2001). Northeastern European Iron Age pages 210-221 and East Central European Iron Age pages 79-90’'. Springer Published in conjunction with the Human Relations Area Files. ISBN 978-0306462580.
- Tomaschek, Wilhelm (1883) (in French). Les Restes de la langue dace. Belgium: Le Museon.
- Thomson, James Oliver (1948). History of Ancient Geography. Biblo-Moser. ISBN 978-0819601438.
- Toynbee, Arnold Joseph (1961). A study of history: Volume 2. Oxford University Press,.
- Treptow, Kurt W (1996). A History of Romania. Polygon. ISBN 9780880333450.
- Turnock, David (1988). The Making of Eastern Europe: From the Earliest Times to 1815. Routledge. ISBN 0415012678 , 978-0415012676.
- Van Den Gheyn, Joseph (1885) (in French). Les populations Danubiennes. Revue des questions scientifiques Volume 17-18.
- Vladimir, Groh (1964). Mnema. Univerzita J.E. Purkyně v Brně. Filozofická fakulta.
- Vraciu, Ariton (1980). Limba daco-geţilor. Ed. Facla.
- Waldman, Carl; Mason, Catherine (2006). Encyclopedia of European Peoples, 2-Volume Set. Facts on File. ISBN 978-0816049646.
- Watson, Alaric (2004). ‘’ Aurelian and the Third Century’’. Routledge; 1 edition. ISBN 978-0415301879.
- Westropp, Hodder M. (2003). Handbook of Egyptian, Greek, Etruscan and Roman Archeology. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-0766177338.
- Wilcox, Peter and Embleton, Gerry (1982) Rome's Enemies: Germanics and Dacians (Men at Arms Series, 129)
- Wilkes, John (2005). Provinces and Frontiers in The Cambridge Ancient History: Volume 12, The Crisis of Empire, AD 193-337 edited by Alan Bowman, Averil Cameron, Peter Garnsey , second edition. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521301992.
- Zambotti, Pia Laviosa (1954) (in Italian). I Balcani e l'Italia nella Preistoria. Como.
- Zumpt, Karl Gottlob; Zumpt, August Wilhelm (1852). Eclogae ex Q. Horatii Flacci poematibus page 140 and page 175 by Horace. Philadelphia: Blanchard and Lea.
- Chronicle of the Roman Emperors by Chris Scarre, 1995
- The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire by Edward N. Luttwak, 1976
- A History of Rome to A.D. 565 by Boak & Sinnigen, 1965
Dacia topics Dacian tribes:Aedi · Albocense · Anartes · Apuli · Artakioi · Biephi · Biessoi · Buri · Carpi · Cauci · Ciaginsi · Clariae · Costoboci · Cotini · Crobidae · Daci · Getae · Moesi · Osi · Peukini · Piephigi · Potulatense · Predasense · Rhadacense · Saldense · Scaugdae · Sense · Suci · Terizi · Teurisci · Trixae · Tyragetae · Troglodytae Dacian kings: Culture and civilisation: Wars with the
Roman Dacia:Dacia Traiana · Moesia · Scythia Minor · Dacia Aureliana · Diocese of Dacia · Dacia Mediterranea · Dacia Ripensis · Trajan (Bridge · Column) · Towns and cities · Castra · Limes (Alutanus · Moesiae · Porolissensis · Sarmatiae · Transalutanus · Trajan's Wall · Brazda lui Novac) · Language (Thraco-Roman · Eastern Romance substratum) Research on Dacia: WikiProject • Commons • Dacian fortresses, settlements, Roman castra, limes from Romania: Google Maps • Google Earth
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Free Dacians — The Free Dacians were the Dacians whose territory was not conquered by the Roman Empire, in the regions of Eastern Wallachia, Moldavia, Crişana and Northern Transylvania … Wikipedia
Dacia — This article is about a historic region in Central Europe. For the Romanian automobile maker, see Automobile Dacia. For other uses, see Dacia (disambiguation). See also: Dacians and Dacian language Dacian Kingdom independent kingdom … Wikipedia
Origin of the Romanians — History of Romania This article is part of a series Prehistory … Wikipedia
Dacian language — Dacian Spoken in Romania, northern Bulgaria, eastern Serbia; also (possibly): Moldova, SW Ukraine, eastern Hungary, southern Bulgaria, northern Greece, European Turkey, NW Anatolia (Turkey) Extinct probably by the 6th century AD … Wikipedia
Getae — Not to be confused with getai. The Getae (Greek: Γέται, singular Γέτης) was the name given by the Greeks to several Thracian tribes that occupied the regions south of the Lower Danube, in what is today northern Bulgaria, and north of the Lower… … Wikipedia
Dacian bracelets — Dacian gold bracelet, dated to 1st century BC – 1st century AD, from Sarmizegetusa Romania  … Wikipedia
Dacian warfare — Tropaeum Traiani depicting a soldier armed with a falx The history of Dacian warfare spans from c. 10th century BC up to the 2nd century AD in the region defined by Ancient Greek and Latin historians as Dacia. It concerns the armed conflicts of… … Wikipedia
Dacian Draco — as from Trajan s Column The Dacian Draco was the standard and ensign of troops of the ancient Eastern European Dacian people, which can be seen in the hands of the soldiers of Decebalus in several scenes depicted on Trajan s Column in Rome, Italy … Wikipedia
Thraco-Roman — History of Romania This article is part of a series Prehistory … Wikipedia
List of Dacian names — Contents 1 Anthroponyms 2 Toponyms 2.1 Hydronyms 3 See also 4 Notes … Wikipedia