- Gravitational redshift
In

physics ,light or other forms ofelectromagnetic radiation of a certain wavelength originating from a source placed in a region of stronger gravitational field (and which could be said to have climbed "uphill" out of agravity well ) will be found to be of longer wavelength when received by an observer in a region of weaker gravitational field. If applied to optical wave-lengths this manifests itself as a change in the colour of the light as the wavelength is shifted toward the red (making it less energetic, longer in wavelength, and lower in frequency) part of the spectrum. This effect is calledand other spectral lines found in the light will also be shifted towards the longer wavelength, or "red," end of the spectrum. This shift can be observed along the entire electromagnetic spectrum.gravitation alredshift Light that has passed "downhill" into a region of stronger gravity shows a corresponding "increase" in energy, and is said to be gravitationally "blue"shifted.

**Definition**Redshift is often denoted with the variable $z,$.$z=frac\{lambda\_o-lambda\_e\}\{lambda\_e\}$

Where:

$lambda\_o,$ is the wavelength of the

electromagnetic radiation (photon ) as measured by the observer.$lambda\_e,$ is the wavelength of theelectromagnetic radiation (photon ) when measured at the source of emission.Gravitational redshift, the displacement of light towards the red, can (for the case of a star) be predicted using the formula provided in the theory of

General Relativity "(Albert Einstein : Relativity - Appendix - Appendix III - The Experimental Confirmation of the General Theory of Relativity)":$z\_\{mathit\{approx=frac\{GM\}\{c^2r\}$

where:

$z\_\{mathit\{approx,$ is the displacement of spectral lines due to

gravity as viewed by a far away observer infree space .$G,$ is Newton'sgravitational constant (the variable used by Einstein himself).$M,$ is themass of the body which the light is escaping.$c,$ is thespeed of light .$r,$ is the radius of star emitting the light.GM/r is the gravitational potential at distance r, so the redshift is seen to be directly proportional to the gravitational potential. Using the energy-momentum equation relating energy and wavelength of a photon, the gravitational redshift is equivalent to a loss of energy of the photon.

**History**The gravitational weakening of light from high-gravity stars was predicted by

John Michell in 1783 andPierre-Simon Laplace in 1796, usingIsaac Newton 's concept of light corpuscles (see:emission theory ) and who predicted that some stars would have a gravity so strong that light would not be able to escape. The effect of gravity on light was then explored byJohann Georg von Soldner (1801), who calculated the amount of deflection of a light ray by the sun, arriving at the Newtonian answer which is half the value predicted bygeneral relativity . All of this early work assumed that light could slow down and fall, which was inconsistent with the modern understanding of light waves.Once it became accepted that light is an electromagnetic wave, it was clear that the frequency of light should not change from place to place, since waves from a source with a fixed frequency keep the same frequency everywhere. The only way around this conclusion would be if time itself was altered--- if clocks at different points had different rates.

This was precisely Einstein's conclusion in 1911. He considered an accelerating box, and noted that according to the

special theory of relativity , the clock rate at the bottom of the box was slower than the clock rate at the top. Nowadays, this can be easily shown in accelerated coordinates. The metric tensor in units where the speed of light is one is::$ds^2\; =\; -\; r^2\; dt^2\; +\; dr^2,$

and for an observer at a constant value of r, the rate at which a clock ticks, R(r), is the square root of the time coefficient, R(r)=r. The acceleration at position r is equal to the curvature of the hyperbola at fixed r, and like the curvature of the nested circles in polar coordinates, it is equal to 1/r.

So at a fixed value of g, the fractional rate of change of the clock-rate, the percentage change in the ticking at the top of an accelerating box vs at the bottom, is:

:$\{R(r+dr)\; -\; R(r)\; over\; R\}\; =\; \{drover\; r\}\; =\; g\; dr,$

The rate is faster at larger values of R, away from the apparent direction of acceleration. The rate is zero at r=0, which is the location of the acceleration horizon.

Using the

principle of equivalence , Einstein concluded that the same thing holds in any gravitational field, that the rate of clocks R at different heights was altered according to the gravitational field g. When g is slowly varying, it gives the fractional rate of change of the ticking rate. If the ticking rate is everywhere almost this same, the fractional rate of change is the same as the absolute rate of change, so that::$\{dR\; over\; dx\}\; =\; g\; =\; -\; \{dVover\; dx\},$Since the rate of clocks and the gravitational potential have the same derivative, they are the same up to a constant. The constant is chosen to make the clock rate at infinity equal to 1. Since the gravitational potential is zero at infinity::$R(x)=\; 1\; -\; \{V(x)\; over\; c^2\},$where the speed of light has been restored to make the gravitational potential dimensionless.

The coefficient of the $dt^2$ in the metric tensor is the square of the clock rate, which for small values of the potential is given by keeping only the linear term::$R^2\; =\; 1\; -\; 2V,$

and the full metric tensor is:

:$ds^2\; =\; -\; (\; 1\; -\; \{2V(r)over\; c^2\}\; )c^2\; dt^2\; +\; dx^2\; +\; dy^2\; +\; dz^2$

where again the c's have been restored. This expression is correct in the full theory of general relativity, to lowest order in the gravitational field, and ignoring the variation of the space-space and space-time components of the metric tensor, which only affect fast moving objects.

Using this approximation, Einstein reproduced the incorrect Newtonian value for the deflection of light in 1909. But since a light beam is a fast moving object, the space-space components contribute too. After constructing the full theory of general relativity in 1916, Einstein solved for the space-space components in a

post-Newtonian approximation , and calculated the correct amount of light deflection--- double the Newtonian value. Einstein's prediction was confirmed by many experiments, starting withArthur Eddington 's 1919 solar eclipse expedition.The changing rates of clocks allowed Einstein to conclude that light waves change frequency as they move, and the frequency/energy relationship for photons allowed him to see that this was best interpreted as the effect of the gravitational field on the mass-energy of the photon. To calculate the changes in frequency in a nearly static gravitational field, only the time component of the metric tensor is important, and the lowest order approximation is accurate enough for ordinary stars and planets, which are much bigger than their

Schwartzschild radius .**Important things to stress***The receiving end of the light transmission must be located at a higher

gravitational potential in order for gravitational redshift to be observed. In other words, the observer must be standing "uphill" from the source. If the observer is at a "lower" gravitational potential than the source, a gravitationalblueshift can be observed instead.*Tests done by many universities continue to support the existence of gravitational redshift.Fact|date=February 2007

*Gravitational redshift is not only predicted by

general relativity . Other theories of gravitation require gravitational redshift, although their detailed explanations for why it appears vary.Fact|date=September 2007 (Any theory that includesconservation of energy andmass-energy equivalence must include gravitational redshift.)*Gravitational redshift does not assume the

Schwarzschild metric solution toEinstein's field equation - in which the variable $M;$ cannot represent the mass of any rotating or charged body.**Initial verification**A number of experimenters initially claimed to have identified the effect using astronomical measurements, and the effect was eventually considered to have been finally identified in the spectral lines of the star

Sirius B by W.S. Adams in 1925. However, measurements of the effect before the 1960s have been critiqued by ("e.g.", by C.M. Will), and the effect is now considered to have been definitively verified by the experiments of Pound, Rebka and Snider between 1959 and 1965.The

Pound-Rebka experiment of 1959 measured the gravitational redshift in spectral lines using a terrestrial 57Fe gamma source. This was documented by scientists of the Lyman Laboratory of Physics at Harvard University. A commonly-cited experimental verification is the Pound-Snider experiment of 1965.More information can be seen at

Tests of general relativity .**Application**Gravitational redshift is studied in many areas of astrophysical research.

**Exact Solutions**A table of exact solutions of the

Einstein field equations consists of the following:The more often used exact equation for gravitational redshift applies to the case outside of a non-rotating, uncharged mass which is spherically symmetric. The equation is:

$z=frac\{1\}\{sqrt\{1-left(frac\{2GM\}\{rc^2\}\; ight)-1$, where

* $G,$ is the

gravitational constant ,

* $M,$ is themass of the object creating the gravitational field,

* $r,$ is the radial coordinate of the observer (which is analogous to the classical distance from the center of the object, but is actually a Schwarzschild coordinate), and

* $c,$ is thespeed of light .**Gravitational Redshift vs. Gravitational Time Dilation**When using

special relativity 'srelativistic Doppler relationships to calculate the change in energy and frequency (assuming no complicatingroute-dependent effects such as those caused by theframe-dragging ofrotating black hole s), then the Gravitational redshift andblueshift frequency ratios are the inverse of each other, suggesting that the "seen" frequency-change corresponds to the actual difference in underlying clockrate. Route-dependence due toframe-dragging may come into play, which would invalidate this idea and complicate the process of determining globally-agreed differences in underlying clock rate.While gravitational redshift refers to what is seen,

gravitational time dilation refers to what is deduced to be "really" happening once observational effects are taken into account.**Primary sources***Cite journal

last=Michell, John

year=1784

title=On the means of discovering the distance, magnitude etc. of the fixed stars

journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society

pages = 35-57

url=http://www.relativitybook.com/resources/michell_1783.html*Cite book

last=Laplace, Pierre-Simon

year=1796

title=The system of the world (English translation 1809)

volume=2

pages = 366-368

location=London

publisher=Richard Phillips

url=http://books.google.com/books?id=f7Kv2iFUNJoC*Cite journal

last=Soldner, Johann Georg von

year=1804

title=Ueber die Ablenkung eines Lichtstrahls von seiner geradlinigen Bewegung, durch die Attraktion eines Weltkörpers, an welchem er nahe vorbei geht

journal=Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch

pages =161-172

url=http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Ueber_die_Ablenkung_eines_Lichtstrals_von_seiner_geradlinigen_Bewegung* Albert Einstein, " [

*http://einstein.relativitybook.com/Einstein_gravity.html The effect of gravity on light*] " (1911)* Albert Einstein, "Relativity: the Special and General Theory." [

*http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/5001 (@Project Gutenberg)*] .* R.V. Pound and G.A. Rebka, Jr. "Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance" Phys. Rev. Lett.

**3**439-441 (1959)* R.V. Pound and J.L. Snider "Effect of gravity on gamma radiation" Phys. Rev.

**140 B**788-803 (1965)* R.V. Pound, "Weighing Photons" Classical and Quantum Gravity

**17**2303-2311 (2000)**Notes****ee also***

Tests of general relativity

*Equivalence principle

*Gravitational time dilation

*Redshift

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*