Science of Value

Science of Value

The science of value, or value science, is a creation of philosopher Robert S. Hartman, which attempts to formally elucidate value theory using both formal and symbolic logic. The fundamental principle, which functions as an axiom, and can be stated in symbolic logic, is that "a thing is good insofar as it exemplies its concept." This means, according to Hartman, that the good thing has a name, that the name has a meaning defined by a set of properties, and that the thing possess all of the properties in the set. A thing is bad if it does not fulfill its definition. A car, by definition, has brakes. A car which accelerates when the brakes are applied is a bad car, since a car by definition must have brakes. A horse, if we called it a car, would be an even worse car, with fewer of the properties of a car. He introduces three basic dimensions of value, "systemic", "extrinsic" and "intrinsic", each with their own cardinality for sets of properties; finite, aleph_0 and aleph_1. In practice, the terms "good" and "bad" apply to finite sets of properties, since this is the only case where there is a ratio between the total number of desired properties and the number of such properties possessed by some object being valued. (In the case where the number of properties is countably infinite, the "extrinsic" dimension of value, the "exposition" as well as the mere definition of a specific concept is taken into consideration. Perfection is to Systemic Value what Goodness is to Extrinsic Value and what Uniqueness is to Intrinsic Value.}

Hartman quantifies this notion by the principle that "each property of the thing is worth as much as each other property, depending on the level of abstraction." ("The Structure of Value", page 204.) Hence, if a thing has "n" properties, each of them—if on the same level of abstraction—is proportionally worth "n"-1. In other words, a car having brakes or having a gas cap are weighted equally so far as their value goes, so long as both are a part of one's definition of one's personal concept of a "car." Since a gas cap is not normally a part of a car's definition, it would be given no weight. Headlights could be weighed twice, once or not at all depending on how headlights appear in the description of a car. Given a finite set of "n" properties, a thing is "good" if it is perceived to have all of the properties, "fair" if it has more than n/2 of them, "average" if n/2 of them, and "bad" if it has fewer than n/2.

Hartman goes on to consider infinite sets of properties. Hartman claims that "according to a theorem of transfinite mathematics, any collection of material objects is at most denumerably infinite" ("The Structure of Value", page 117.) This is not, in fact, a theorem of mathematics, though it would follow from certain assumptions on the nature of the physical universe which cosmologists typically make. Starting from the claim that a person can eventually think of a countable infinity of things, Hartman concludes "the intension of man is a denumerably infinite set of predicates; which means that man, according to this first definition, is appropriately to be measured by a denumerable infinity". It is reasonable to assume that we also have a countable infinity of levels of thought, and that therefore we can think of a countable infinity of things using a countable infinity of thought levels, giving us the cardinality of the continuum of thoughts. Hartman believes the generalized continuum hypothesis is true, and therefore claims the "intension of man" consists of aleph_1 elements. This is the cardinality, in Hartman's system, of "intrinsic value".

Further combinations are possible, leading to larger uncountable infinities; and Hartman also introduces the reciprocals of aleph numbers, which play no role in ordinary mathematics, but which Hartman employs as a sort of infinitesimal proportion, and which he contends goes to zero in the limit as the uncountable cardinals become larger. In Hartman's calculus, a Dear John letter ("we will always be friends") has axiological value frac{1}{aleph_2}, whereas other disvalues such as commercializing the birth of the inspired founder of a religion (e.g., Christ); or making the mistake of taking a metaphor literally; would do slightly better, with a value of frac{1}{aleph_1}.

Evaluation of Hartman's work

Hartman invented the Hartman Value Profile, which is however not a description of what "is" valuable, but a test to determine what people regard as valuable. It measures concept-formation and decision-making capacity. A Hartman festshrift ("Values and Valuation") appeared a few years after his death. Some critics would claim that most of the articles in it are not by Hartman supporters. Hartman is out of the mainstream of value philosophy, and is not today regarded as significant among those "philosophers" who fear (wrongly) that they would be out of work since his goal is to usher value theory out of philosophy and into science. Almost all philosophers would dispute the idea that the number of properties of a thing can in any meaningful way be enumerated, which is something Hartman never said was necessary, and thus they are committing the Straw Man Fallacy when they dispute him on that. A standard argument against enumeration is that new properties can be defined in terms of old ones. Philosophers speak of the "problem of organic value" as a result of the observation that the value of a whole does not seem to be a mere sum of the value of its parts—which again is something Hartman never claimed. Adding more features, even if each seems to be a good one, can sometimes lead to the overall value going down. In this way we get overengineered software or the kind of DVD remote control which has too many buttons on it. Hartman holds that "the name sets the norm" so he would rejoin that a "Remote with too many buttons" is a disvalue.

From a mathematician's point of view, much of Hartman's work in "The Structure of Value" is rather novel and does not use conventional mathematical methodology, nor axiomatic reasoning, however he later employed the mathematics of topological Hausdorff sets, interpreting them as a model for the value-structure of metaphors,in a paper on Aesthetics. Hartman, following Georg Cantor, uses infinite cardinalities. He posits—as stipulated definitions—the reciprocals of transfinite cardinal numbers. These, together with the algebraic Laws of Exponents, enables him to construct what is today known as The Calculus of Values. He does not in the STRUCTURE book clearly explain how he calculates the value of such items as Christmas shopping in terms of this calculus, although he does explain it in his paper "The Measurement of Value." While inverses of infinite quantities ("infinitesimals") exist in certain systems of numbers, such as hyperreal numbers and surreal numbers, these are not reciprocals of cardinal numbers.

Hartman supporters counter that it is not necessary for properties to be actually enumerated, only that they exist and can correspond bijectively (one-to-one). The attributes in the meaning of a concept only "consist" as stipulations; they don't exist. Questions regarding the actual existence of an exemplar of a concept belong to ontology. Intensional attributes can resemble, but are not identical to, the properties perceived by the five senses. Attributes are names of properties. When, even partially, the properties of a thing match the attributes of that thing in the mind of the one making the judgment, the thing will be said to have "value." When they completely correspond, the thing will be called "good." These are basic ideas in value science.

References

Hartman, Robert S., "The Structure of Value: Foundations of Scientific Axiology", Southern Illinois University Press, 1967

Hartman, Robert S., "Application of the Science of Axiology," Ch. IX in Rem B. Edwards and John W. Davis, eds., Forms of Value and Valuation: Theory and Applications. Lanham, Md., University Press of America, 1991

Hartman, Robert S., "Freedom to Live," (Arthur R. Ellis, editor), Atlanta: Rodopi Editions, Value Inquiry Book Series, 1984, reissued 1994

Hartman, Robert S., "Axiometric Structure of Intrinsic Value", "Journal of Value Inquiry" (Summer, 1974; v.8, no. 2, pp. 88-101

Katz, Marvin C., "Sciences of Man and Social Ethics", Boston, 1969, esp. pp. 9-45, 101-123.

Davis, John William, ed, "Value and Valuation: Axiological Studies in Honor of Robert S. Hartman", The University of Tennessee Press, 1972

External links

* [http://www.hartmaninstitute.org/html/Research_topics.htm Hartman Institute]
* [http://www.sixadvisors.com ] Six Advisors - What is Formal Axiology? In Table of Contents, click on "the science"
* [http://www.axiometrics.net Axiometrics International, Incorporated--30 years of applied research]
* [http://cfaam.org Center for Applied AxioMetrics--15 years of assessment application] Applications to Cognitive Psychology
* [How intangible values can actually be measured -http://www.hartmaninstitute.org/html/MeasurementOfValue.htm]
* [http://www.valueinsights.com/axiology.html Value Insights-What is Value Science?]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Consciousness Science, Society, Value, and Yoga — (CONSSAVY) is a sub project of the Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture, a 80+ volume national project on Indian science and civilization under the general editorship of Professor D. P. Chattopadhyaya. The series also… …   Wikipedia

  • Value (economics) — Economics …   Wikipedia

  • Value (computer science) — In computer science, a value is a sequence of bits that is interpreted according to some data type. It is possible for the same sequence of bits to have different values, depending on the type used to interpret its meaning. For instance, the… …   Wikipedia

  • Value theory — encompasses a range of approaches to understanding how, why and to what degree people should value things; whether the thing is a person, idea, object, or anything else. This investigation began in ancient philosophy, where it is called axiology… …   Wikipedia

  • Science as a Vocation — ( Wissenschaft als Beruf ) is the text of a lecture given in 1918 at Munich University by Max Weber, a German economist and sociologist. The original version was published in German, but various translations to English exist.In Science as a… …   Wikipedia

  • Value of information — (VoI) in decision analysis is the amount a decision maker would be willing to pay for information prior to making a decision. imilar termsVoI is sometimes distinguished into value of perfect information, also called value of clairvoyance (VoC),… …   Wikipedia

  • Science and technology in the People's Republic of China — has been growing rapidly. As China develops and becomes more connected to the global economy, the government has placed a stronger emphasis on science and technology as an integral part of the socio economic development of the country. This has… …   Wikipedia

  • Value — may refer to: *Value (mathematics), the value of a variable in mathematics. *Value (philosophy), the degree of importance, including the value independent on subjective valuations by any individual *Value (personal and cultural), the principles,… …   Wikipedia

  • Science and the Church — • Dicsusses the relationship between the two subjects Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Science and the Church     Science and the Church      …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • Science of Survival — is a book published in 1951 by L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Dianetics and Scientology. The title of Science of Survival alludes to Science and Sanity , a highly popular work by Alfred Korzybski, the founder of general semantics. Hubbard… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”