- 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith
The 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith was written by Calvinistic
Baptists in Englandto give a formal expression of the Reformedand Protestant Christianfaith with an obvious Baptist perspective. This confession, like The Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) and the Savoy Declaration(1658), was written by Puritans who were concerned that their particular church organisation reflect what they perceived to be Biblical teaching.
The General and Particular Baptists in England
The creation of the 1689 Confession is linked to Early English Baptist history and the differences between the “General” and “Particular” brands of Baptist belief. In the early 17th century, English Baptists were mainly a loose organisation of churches, rather than an established denomination. With the advent of
Arminianismat around the same time, many Baptist churches adopted the stance that a Christian's salvationwas ultimately contingent upon their own choice. These Baptist churches were considered “General Baptists” due to their belief in a "general atonement" for all men without exception. On the other hand, many Baptists rejected the teaching of Arminianism and asserted that a Christian's salvation was ultimately contingent upon God and his sovereign choice (Grace or Mercy). These Baptists were called “Particular” because they believed that the death of Christand his atonementwas limited only to those whom God had chosen beforehand. The terms "Particular Baptist", "Calvinistic Baptist" and "Reformed Baptist" are essentially synonymous with one another.
While these differences in theology were serious, both General and Particular Baptists suffered overt and covert persecution from the established Church of England. Virtually all Baptists had left the established church because they were convinced that the
Bibledid not support either an episcopal form of church government, nor the role of the Monarch in determining the affairs of the church. Other Puritans at the time, the Presbyterians and Congregationalists, also suffered persecution, but their numerical strength and influence allowed them to escape much of the persecution that Baptists suffered at the time. The assertion by Baptist churches that only adult converts could be Baptized put them at odds not only with the Church of England, but also the Presbyterians and Congregationalists – all of whom supported infant baptism.
The 1644 Confession and the English Civil War
As the 17th century continued, relations between the Puritans and the Monarchy deteriorated. Many Puritan leaders were members of
Parliamentand this tension eventually resulted in civil war, which lasted from 1642 until 1649. King Charles I lost the conflict and was executed, and England entered into a short period of Republicanism. These events are recorded in more detail elsewhere.
With this rise in civil unrest, Particular Baptists took the opportunity to write their own statement of faith. Seven congregations sent representatives to write the document. The purpose of the document was to formally differentiate the beliefs of the Particular Baptists from the General Baptists. This was completed in
1644, and, while not very detailed, was clearly Calvinistic in tone. This was known as “The First Baptist Confession”, and predates the far more well-known Westminster Confession of Faith which was written in 1646. The 1646 Confession differed from the Westminster in two other significant ways. First, it rejected the notion that the law convicted of sin, saying that the terrors of the law were not needed to do what the gospel alone has the power to do. Second, it rejected the notion of eternal generation of the Son. With the demise of the monarchy, the Westminster Confession was officially declared the statement of faith for both the Church of England (Anglican) and Church of Scotland (Presbyterian). The smaller Congregationalists created their own version of the Westminster Confession in 1658 called the Savoy Declaration. The original 1644 Baptist Confession, while similar in theology, was nowhere near as expansive as these two English Confessions, and it became clear that another Baptist confession needed to be written.
Problems after Restoration
After the execution of Charles I, Scottish Presbyterians and English Anglicans and Congregationalists, despite sharing a common theology, were divided over the place of the Monarchy – the former supported it while the latter were opposed to it.
Oliver Cromwell, a Congregationalist, ruled England as "Lord Protector" until his death in 1658. The Monarchy, under Charles II, was restored in 1660. Relations between Scotlandand England, as well as their respective Puritans, continued to be abrasive as laws were passed regulating worship. In 1662, the "Act of Uniformity" made it illegal to use anything but the new Anglican Prayer Book in all Anglican, Presbyterian, Congregationalist and Baptist churches in England. Moreover, the Anglican church had dispensed with the Westminster Confession and had returned to the Thirty-Nine Articlesas their confession of faith.
The 1677 Confession
The result was that, with the restoration of the Monarchy, English Baptists everywhere were suffering persecution for their faith. In 1677 a much larger group of Particular Baptists met together for the purpose of creating a more detailed confession of faith. The process was modeled on the Westminster Confession, which was being used by many Particular Baptist churches despite the differences in church government and mode of baptism.
The 1677 document differed from the Westminster and Savoy confessions in two important ways. Firstly, it had to define the power of the Baptist association (denomination) in its relation to individual congregations. Secondly, and most importantly from a Baptist perspective, it made clear their adherence to Believer's Baptism over and against Infant Baptism. In the latter case, it was their adherence to their view of scripture that resulted in this belief, rather than any historical link with the
Anabaptistmovement that arose soon after the Protestant Reformation.
Persecution and secrecy kept the 1677 document from being officially endorsed by Particular Baptists, though it was obvious that many Baptist church leaders were able to make its contents known to church members.
The Toleration Act of 1689
1689, "The Toleration Act" was passed, which enabled religious freedom and plurality to co-exist alongside the established churches in England and Scotland. This official reprieve resulted in representatives from over 100 Particular Baptist churches to meet together in Londonfrom 3- 11 Julyto discuss and endorse the 1677 document. Despite the fact that the document was written in 1677, the official preface to the document has ensured that it would be known as the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith.
Historical effects of the 1689 Confession
The 1689 Confession, alongside the Westminster Confession and Savoy Declaration, are considered to be the most important Reformed Confessions made in the English-speaking world. There is no doubt that the 1689 confession relied heavily upon the work already done in writing the two other confessions, but this is not to understate its importance and influence in Baptist churches specifically, and Reformed and Calvinistic churches generally, since that point.
Particular Baptists were quick to develop churches in colonial America, and in 1707 the Philadelphia Baptist Association was formed. This association formally adopted the 1689 confession in 1742 after years of tacit endorsement by individual churches and congregational members. With the addition of two chapters (on the singing of psalms and the laying on of hands), it was retitled "The Philadelphia Confession of Faith". [http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/phila.htm] Further Calvinistic Baptist church associations formed in the mid-late 18th century and adopted the confession as “The Baptist Confession”.
Second Great Awakeningin America, Particular Baptists and other Calvinistic expressions of Protestant Christianity came under sustained attack from evangelists such as Charles Grandison Finneyand theologians such as Nathaniel William Taylor. Many Particular Baptists retreated into Hyper-Calvinism, despite the fact that the 1689 confession does not espouse or support such extremes in Reformed theology.
The 1689 confession remains, to this day, a very important document for all
Reformed Baptistchurches internationally, allowing them to have an historical confession of faith.
* [http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/bcof.htm The Baptist Confession of Faith 1689 - With slight revisions by C. H. Spurgeon ]
* [http://www.ccel.org/creeds/bcf/bcf.htm Original text of the 1689 Confession]
* [http://sgbc.faithweb.com/1689.htm Revised 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith]
* [http://www.grbc.net/about_us/1689.php The 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith with Extended Scriptural Footnotes]
* [http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/bc1644.htm Original text of the 1644 Confession]
* [http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/phila.htm The Philadelphia Confession] - identical to the Second London Confession of Faith (1689), except that chapters 23 and 31 have been added (with other chapters appropriately renumbered). This confession was first issued by the Philadelphia Association in 1742.
* [http://www.founders.org/FJ18/editorial_fr.html Baptist History Out of Focus – Why has the Southern Baptist Church forgotten its Calvinistic influences?]
* [http://www.orlandograce.org/reformedchurch.html The History of Reformed Baptists – Orlando Grace Church]
* [http://www.reformedbaptistfellowship.org Reformed Baptist Fellowship] - a network of Reformed Baptist churches
* [http://www.baptisthistory.org.uk/ Baptist Historical Society (UK)]
* [http://www.strictbaptisthistory.org.uk/ Strict Baptist Historical Society (UK)]
* [http://www.newcovenanttheology.com Gospel Conviction as a true NCT doctrine]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.