- Chomsky normal form
where A, B and C are nonterminal symbols, α is a terminal symbol (a symbol that represents a constant value), S is the start symbol, and ε is the empty string. Also, neither B nor C may be the start symbol.
Every grammar in Chomsky normal form is context-free, and conversely, every context-free grammar can be transformed into an equivalent one which is in Chomsky normal form. Several algorithms for performing such a transformation are known. Transformations are described in most textbooks on automata theory, such as (Hopcroft and Ullman, 1979). As pointed out by Lange and Leiß, the drawback of these transformations is that they can lead to an undesirable bloat in grammar size. Using | G | to denote the size of the original grammar G, the size blow-up in the worst case may range from | G | 2 to 22 | G | , depending on the transformation algorithm used (Lange and Leiß, 2009).
Another way to define Chomsky normal form (e.g., Hopcroft and Ullman 1979, and Hopcroft et al. 2006) is:
A formal grammar is in Chomsky reduced form if all of its production rules are of the form:
where A, B and C are nonterminal symbols, and α is a terminal symbol. When using this definition, B or C may be the start symbol.
Converting a grammar to Chomsky Normal Form
- Introduce S0
- Introduce a new start variable, S0 and a new rule where S is the previous start variable.
- Eliminate all rules
- rules are rules of the form where and where V is the CFG's variable alphabet.
- Remove every rule with on its right hand side (RHS). For each rule with A in its RHS, add a set of new rules consisting of the different possible combinations of A replaced or not replaced with . If a rule has A as a singleton on its RHS, add a new rule unless R has already been removed through this process. For example, examine the following grammar G:
- G has one epsilon rule. When the is removed, we get the following:
- Notice that we have to account for all possibilities of and so we actually end up adding 3 rules.
- Eliminate all unit rules
- After all the rules have been removed, you can begin removing unit rules, or rules whose RHS contains one variable and no terminals (which is inconsistent with CNF.)
- To remove
- add rule unless this is a unit rule which has already been removed.
- Clean up remaining rules that are not in Chomsky normal form.
- Replace with where Ai are new variables.
- If , replace ui in above rules with some new variable vi and add rule .
- John E. Hopcroft, Rajeev Motwani, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, 3rd Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2006. ISBN 0-321-45536-3. (See subsection 7.1.5, page 272.)
- John E. Hopcroft and Jeffrey D. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading Massachusetts, 1979. ISBN 0-201-02988-X. (See chapter 4.)
- Michael Sipser (1997). Introduction to the Theory of Computation. PWS Publishing. ISBN 0-534-94728-X. (Pages 98–101 of section 2.1: context-free grammars. Page 156.)
- John Martin (2003). Introduction to Languages and the Theory of Computation. McGraw Hill. ISBN 0-07-232200-4. (Pages 237–240 of section 6.6: simplified forms and normal forms.)
- Michael A. Harrison (1978). Introduction to Formal Language Theory. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0201029550. (Pages 103–106.)
- Lange, Martin and Leiß, Hans. To CNF or not to CNF? An Efficient Yet Presentable Version of the CYK Algorithm. Informatica Didactica 8, 2009. ((pdf)
- Cole, Richard. Converting CFGs to CNF (Chomsky Normal Form), October 17, 2007. (pdf)
- Sipser, Michael. Introduction to the Theory of Computation, 2nd edition.[[Category:Noam Chomsky|Normal Form, Chomsky}}
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.