- Environmental concerns with electricity generation
Modern technology uses large amounts of electrical power. This is normally generated at
power plants which convert some other kind of energy into electrical power. Each such system has advantages and disadvantages, but many of them pose environmental concerns.
The efficiency of some of these systems can be improved by cogeneration (
combined heat and power) methods. Process steam can be extracted from steam turbines. Waste heat produced by thermalgenerating stations can be used for space heating of nearby buildings. By combining electric power production and heating, less fuel is consumed, thereby reducing the environmental effects compared with separate heat and power systems.
The amount of water usage is often of great concern for electricity generating systems as populations increase and droughts become a concern. Still, according to the
U.S. Geological Survey, thermoelectric power generation accounts for only 3.3 percent of net freshwater consumption with over 80 percent going to irrigation. General numbers for fresh water usage of different power sources are shown below.then
All thermal cycle plants (nuclear, coal, NG, solar thermal) require a great deal of water for
condensing, and the amount of water needed will be reduced with increasing boilertemperatures. Coal, being able to burn at high temperatures is thus more efficient and uses less water, while nuclear is more limited by material constraints and solar is more limited by potency of the energy source.
Thermal cycle plants, however, also have the option of using
salt waterif located on the seacoast. Such a site will not have cooling towers and will be much less limited by environmental concerns of the discharge temperature due to the fact that dumping heat will have very little effect on something with such a comparatively large thermal mass. This will also not deplete the water available for other uses. Nuclear power in Japanfor instance, uses no cooling towers at all because all plants are located on the coast. Also, if dry cooling systems are used, significant water from the water table will not be used. Other, more novel, cooling solutions exist, such as sewage cooling at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
Hydroelectricity's main cause of water usage is both evaporation and seepage into the water table.
Nuclear Energy Institute[http://www.nei.org/filefolder/water_consumption__npps_Nov_2007.pdf factsheet] using EPRI data and other sources.
Most electricity today is generated by burning fossil fuels and producing
steamwhich is then used to drive a steam turbinethat, in turn, drives an electrical generator.
Such systems allow electricity to be generated where it is needed, since fossil fuels can readily be transported. They also take advantage of a large infrastructure designed to support consumer
automobiles. The world's supply of fossil fuels is large, but finite. Exhaustion of low-cost fossil fuels will have significant consequences for energy sources as well as for the manufacture of plastics and many other things. Various estimates have been calculated for exactly when it will be exhausted (see Peak oil). New sources of fossil fuels keep being discovered, although the rate of discovery is slowing while the difficulty of extraction simultaneously increases.
More serious are concerns about the emissions that result from fossil fuel burning. Fossil fuels constitute a significant repository of
carbonburied deep under the ground. Burning them results in the conversion of this carbon to carbon dioxide, which is then released into the atmosphere. This results in an increase in the Earth's levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, which enhances the greenhouse effectand contributes to global warming. The linkage between increased carbon dioxide and global warming is well accepted, though fossil-fuel producers vigorously contest these findings.
Depending on the particular fossil fuel and the method of burning, other emissions may be produced as well.
Ozone, sulfur dioxide, NO2 and other gases are often released, as well as particulate matter. Sulfur and nitrogen oxides contribute to smogand acid rain. In the past, plant owners addressed this problem by building very tall flue gas stacks, so that the pollutants would be diluted in the atmosphere. While this helps reduce local contamination, it does not help at all with global issues.
Fossil fuels, particularly
coal, also contain dilute radioactivematerial, and burning them in very large quantities releases this material into the environment, leading to low levels of local and global radioactive contamination, the levels of which are, ironically, higher than a nuclear power stationas their radioactive contaminants are controlled and stored.
Coal also contains traces of toxic heavy elements such as mercury,
arsenicand others. Mercury vaporized in a power plant's boilermay stay suspended in the atmosphere and circulate around the world. While a substantial inventory of mercury exists in the environment, as other man-made emissions of mercury become better controlled, power plant emissions become a significant fraction of the remaining emissions. Power plant emissions of mercury in the United States are thought to be about 50 tons per year in 2003, and several hundred tons per year in China. Power plant designers can fit equipment to power stations to reduce emissions.
According to Environment Canada:
"The electricity sector is unique among industrial sectors in its very large contribution to emissions associated with nearly all air issues. Electricity generation produces a large share of Canadian nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide emissions, which contribute to smog and acid rain and the formation of fine particulate matter. It is the largest uncontrolled industrial source of mercury emissions in Canada. Fossil fuel-fired electric power plants also emit carbon dioxide, which may contribute to climate change. In addition, the sector has significant impacts on water and habitat and species. In particular, hydro dams and transmission lines have significant effects on water and biodiversity." [cite web|url=http://www.ec.gc.ca/cleanair-airpur/Electricity-WSDC4D330A-1_En.htm|title=Electricity Generation|accessdate=2007-03-23]
Coal mining practices in the United States have also included strip mining and removing mountain tops. Mill tailings are left out bare and have been leached into local rivers and resulted in most or all of the rivers in coal producing areas to run red year round with sulfuric acid that kills all life in the rivers.
Nuclear power plants do not burn fossil fuels and so do not directly emit carbon dioxide; because of the high energy yield of nuclear fuels, the carbon dioxide emitted during mining, enrichment, fabrication and transport of fuel is small when compared with the carbon dioxide emitted by fossil fuels of similar energy yield.
A large nuclear power plant may reject waste heat to a natural body of water; this can result in undesirable increase of the water temperature with adverse effect on aquatic life.
Emission of radioactivity from a nuclear plant is controlled by regulations. Abnormal operation may result in release of radioactive material on scales ranging from minor to severe; although these scenarios are very rare.
Mining of uranium ore can disrupt the environment around the mine. Disposal of spent fuel is controversial, with many proposed long-term storage schemes under intense review and criticism. Diversion of fresh or spent fuel to weapons production presents a risk of
nuclear proliferation. Finally, the structure of the reactor itself becomes radioactive and will require decades of storage before it can be economically dismantled and in turn disposed of as waste.
In regions such as the
Bay of Fundywith very large tidal swings, tidal power plants can be built to extract electrical power from the tidal motion.
Tidal power is also renewable, in the sense that it will continue for as long as the
Moonorbits the Earth. However, it has environmental problems similar to those of hydroelectric power. A tidal power plant usually requires a large dam, which can endanger ecosystems by restricting the motion of marine animals. Perhaps more seriously, a tidal power plant reduces or increases the tidal swing, which can severely disrupt ecosystems which depend on being periodically covered by water; resulting changes in fisheries or shellfish beds may result in adverse economic effects. Certain proposed tidal power plants in the Bay of Fundywould increase the tidal swing by an estimated 50 cm as far south as the coast of Maine(where the tidal swing is not particularly large now).
Electrical power can be generated by burning anything which will combust. Some electrical power is generated by burning crops which are grown specifically for the purpose. Usually this is done by fermenting plant matter to produce
ethanol, which is then burned. This may also be done by allowing organic matter to decay, producing biogas, which is then burned. Also, when burned, wood is a form of biomass fuel.
Burning biomass produces many of the same emissions as burning fossil fuels. However, growing biomass captures carbon dioxide out of the air, so that the net contribution to global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels is lessened.
The process of growing biomass is subject to the same environmental concerns as any kind of
agriculture. It uses a large amount of land, and fertilizers and pesticides may be necessary for cost-effective growth. Biomass that is produced as a by-product of agriculture shows some promise, but most such biomass is currently being used, for plowing back into the soil as fertilizer if nothing else.
Wind power harnesses mechanical energy from the constant flow of air over the surface of the earth. Wind power stations generally consist of
wind farms, fields of wind turbines in locations with relatively high winds. A primary publicity issue regarding wind turbines are their older predecessors, such as the turbines located in Altamont Pass, California. These older, smaller, wind turbines are rather noisy and densely located, making them very unattractive to the local population. The turbines need constant maintenance, and result in bird deaths due to their high number of revolutions per minute. The downwind side of the turbine does disrupt local low-level winds. Modern large wind turbines have mitigated these concerns, and have become a commercially important energy source. Many homeowners in areas with high winds and expensive electricity set up small windmills to reduce their electric bills.
A modern wind farm, when installed on agricultural land, has one of the lowest environmental impacts of all energy sources: [http://www.sustainabilitycentre.com.au/WindPowersStrength.pdf Why Australia needs wind power] ]
* It occupies less land area per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity generated than any other renewable energy conversion system, apart from rooftop solar energy,Fact|date=May 2008 and is compatible with grazing and crops.
* It generates the energy used in its construction within just months of operation.
* Greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution produced by its construction are small and declining. There are no emissions or pollution produced by its operation.
* Modern wind turbines rotate so slowly (in terms of revolutions per minute) that they are rarely a hazard to birds.
Modern wind turbines emit as about as much sound power as a heavy truck (lorry) travelling along a highway. Fact|date=May 2008 Although they appear to rotate slowly the tip speed is about 75m/s (170mph) and it is the blade passing through the air at this speed that generates most of the sound.
The National Audubon Society and other environmental groups consider large scale wind farms envoronmentally unsound and question whether their contribution is outweighed by their destruction of thousands of wild birds. [http://www.ncpa.org/studies/renew/renew2d.html why kill all the birds] ]
Landscape and heritage issues may be a significant issue for certain wind farms. However, when appropriate planning procedures are followed, the heritage and landscape risks should be minimal. Some people may still object to wind farms, perhaps on the grounds of aesthetics, but their concerns should be weighed against the need to address the threats posed by climate change and the opinions of the broader community. [http://www.tai.org.au/documents/dp_fulltext/DP91.pdf Wind FarmsThe facts and the fallacies]
Geothermal energy is the heat of the Earth, which can betapped into to produce electricity in power plants.Warm water produced from geothermal sources can be used for industry, agriculture, bathing and cleansing. Where underground steam sources can be tapped, the steam is used to run a steam turbine. Geothermal steam sources have a finite life as underground water is depleted. Arrangements that circulate surface water through rock formations to produce hot water or steam are, on a human-relevant time scale, renewable.
While a geothermal power plant does not burn any fuel, it will still have emissions due to substances other than steam which come up from the geothermal wells. These may include
hydrogen sulfide, and carbon dioxide. Some geothermal steam sources entrain non-soluble minerals that must be removed from the steam before it is used for generation; this material must be properly disposed. Any (closed cycle) steam power plant requires cooling water for condensors; diversion of cooling water from natural sources, and its increased temperature when returned to streams or lakes, may have a significant impact on local ecosystems.
Currently solar photovoltaic power is used primarily in Germany and Spain (where the Governments offer financial incentives) (but Washington state also provides financial incentives) and in areas with an abundant amount of sun. Solar photovoltaic power works by converting the sun's radiation into DC power by use of
photovoltaiccells. This power can then be converted into the more common AC power.
Solar photovoltaic power offers a viable alternative to fossils fuels for its cleanliness and supply, although at a high production cost. Future technology improvements are expected to bring this cost down to a more competitive range.
Its negative impact on the environment lies in the creation of the solar cells (which are made of primarily silicon and the extraction of this silicon requires the use of fossil fuels) and the storage of the energy (which usually requires Lead-Acid batteries). It should be noted that solar power carries an upfront cost to the environment via production, but offers clean energy throughout the lifespan of the solar cell.
Solar thermalenergy is a technology that generates heat by concentrating sunlight with large mirrors and converts this heat into electricity in a classical turbine.
Negawatt power refers to investment to reduce electricity consumption rather than investing to increase supply capacity. In this way investing in Negawatts can be considered as an alternative to a new power station and the costs and environmental concerns can be compared.
Negawatt investment alternatives to reduce consumption by improving efficiency include:
* Providing customers with energy efficient lamps - low environmental impact
* Improved thermal insulation and airtightness for buildings - low environmental impact
* Replacing older industrial plant - low environmental impact. Can have a positive impact due to reduced emissions.
Negawatt investment alternatives to reduce peak electrical load by time shifting demand include;
Storage heaters - older systems had asbestos. Newer systems have low environmental impact.
Demand responsecontrol systems where the electricity board can control certain customer loads - minimal environmental impact
Thermal storagesystems such as Ice storage systems to make ice during the night and store it to use it for air conditioning during the day - minimal environmental impact
Pumped storage hydroelectricity- Can have a significant environmental impact - see hydroelectricity.
Grid energy storagetechnologies - impact varies.Note that time shifting does not reduce total energy consumed or system efficiency however it can be used to avoid the need to build a new power station to cope with a peak load.
Flue gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion
Flue gas stacks
Flue gas desulfurization
Fossil fuel power plant
Scientific opinion on climate change
List of countries by electricity production from renewable source
Eugene Green Energy Standard
* [http://abc.net.au/4corners/special_eds/20050822/ Who's Afraid Of Nuclear Power?] - ABC Australia - 4 Corners - International Nuclear Energy Policy Histories, Trends & Debates
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.