Narmada River
The Narmada [Devanagri: नर्मदा Gujarati: નર્મદા or Nerbudda (Narbada)] is a river in central India and the fifth largest river in the Indian subcontinent. Narmada, a River regime [http://gyandoot.nic.in/dhar_district/geo.html Gyandoot.net - Dhar District - Geography ] ] The source of the Narmada is a small tank called Narmada Kund located on the Below Handia and Nemawar to Hiran fall (the deer's leap), the river is approached by hills from both sides. In this stretch the character of the river is varied. The Omkareshwar island, sacred to the Lord A few kilometres further down near Bareli and the crossing ghat of the Below Makrai, the river flows between Narmada basin The Narmada basin, hemmed between Vindya and Satpuda ranges, extends over an area of 98,796 km². and lies between east longitudes 72 degrees 32' to 81 degrees 45' and north latitudes 21 degrees 20' to 23 degrees 45' lying on the northern extremity of the The basin has five well defined physiographic regions. They are:(1) The upper hilly areas covering the districts of Shahdol, Mandla, Durg, Balaghat and Seoni, (2) The upper plains covering the districts of The valley experiences extremes of hydrometeorological and climatic conditions with the upper catchment having an annual preicipiation in the range of 1000 to 1850 mm and with half or even less than half in its lower regions (650-750mm); the diversity of vegetation from lushgreen in the upper region to dry deciduous teak forest vegetation in the lower rgion is testimony to this feature. The Irrigation Commission (1972) identified the Narmada basin in Madhya Pradesh as drought affected and a large part of North Gujarat, Saurashtra and Kutch as semi-arid or arid scarcity regions on account of extreme unreliability of rainfall, rendering them ‘chronically’ drought prone and subject to serious drinking water problems. Geology The Narmada Valley is a Religious significance The Narmada happens to be one of the most sacred of the five holy rivers of India; the other four being The river has been mentioned by There are many fables about the origin of the Narmada. According to one of them, once Lord Legends also say that for Lord Shiva, the Narmada is also said to have been in love with the Sonabhadra, another river flowing on the Chhota Nagpur plateau. According to the Puranas, the Narmada is also called the Rewa, from its leaping motion (from the root 'rev') through its rocky bed. Important religoius places and Ghats along the course of the river, starting with its origin at Narmadakhund at The importance of this river as most scared is also testified by the fact that the pilgrims perform a holy pilgrimage of a 'parikrama' or circumabulation of the river. The Narmada Parikrama (circumambulation), as it is called, is considered to be a meritorious act that a pilgrim can undertake. Many sadhus (saints) and pilgrims walk on foot from the Arabian Sea at Bharuch in Gujarat, along the river, to the source in Maikal Mountains (Amarkantak hills) in Madhya Pradesh and back along the opposite bank of the river. It is a 2,600 km walk. [ [http://www.mukti4u2.dk/Narmada_river.htm Narmada River ] ] . Important towns of interest in the valley are Jabalpur, Barwani, Hoshangabad, Harda, Narmada Nagar, Omkareshwar, Dewas (Nemavar, Kity, Pipri), Mandla and Maheshwar in Madhya Pradesh, and Raj Pipla and Bharuch in Gujarat. Some places of Historical Interest are Joga Ka Quilla, Chhatri of Baji Rao Peshwa and Bhimbetka, and among the falls are – Dugdhdhara, Dhardi falls, Bheraghat, Dhuandhara, Kapiladhara and Sahastradhara. [ [http://nca.gov.in/nb_place_falls1.htm :::| NCA |:::: Narmada Control Authority ] ] Titbits of the valley In Indian history, The valley is famous for the gorgeous Forests and sanctuaries Teak and India’s best hardwood forests are found in the Narmada River basin and they are much older than the ones in the The lower Narmada River Valley and the surrounding uplands, covering an area of 169,900 km² consists of dry deciduous forests. The ecoregion lies between moister forests to the northeast, southeast, and southwest, which receive greater rainfall from the southeast monsoon, and the drier forests and scrublands of the Deccan to the south and Malwa and Gujarat to the west and northwest. The natural vegetation of the region is a three-tiered forest. Teak (Tectona grandis) is the dominant canopy tree, in association with Coromandel Ebony (Diospyros melanoxylon), Dhaora (Anogeissus latifolia), Lagerstroemia parviflora, Terminalia tomentosa, Lannea coromandelica, Hardwickia binata, and Boswellia serrata. Riparian areas along the regions rivers and streams, which receive year-round water, are home to moist evergreen forests, whose dominant tree species are Terminalia arjuna, Syzygium cumini, Syzygium heyneanum, Salix tetrasperma, Homonoia riparia, and Vitex negundo. The ecoregion is home to 76 species of mammals and to 276 bird species none of which are endemic. According to the World Wildlife Fund, about 30% of the ecoregion is covered in relatively intact vegetation. The ecoregion includes some large blocks of habitat in the Vindhya and Satpura ranges. About 5% of the ecoregion lies within protected areas, including Bandhavgarh, Panna, and Sanjay national parks [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narmada_Valley_dry_deciduous_forests - Narmada Valley dry deciduous forests] . Some of the important national parks and wild life sanctuaries in the valley are the following. One theory is that the area in which the fossils are located, i.e., the Narmada Valley near Mandla, was actually a deep inundation of the sea into peninsular India till the Post- Cambrian Tertiary age, about 40 million years ago. This means that Narmada was a very short river which terminated in the inland sea above Mandla, and that the recession of the sea caused geological disturbances,which created the present rift valley through which the Narmada River and Tapti River flow in their present journey to the Arabian Sea. All this, however, is speculation and conjecture because it is only recently that an interest has developed in the fossils of Mandla and detailed scientific studies are still wanting. Apart from the above national parks, there are also a number of natural preserves such as the Amarkantak, the In compliance of the Environmental Action Plan for the Anthropological sites The sprawling caves of Bhimbetka owes its name to the characters of the longest epic in the world, the Narmada river development (NRD) The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential, as much as 33.21 MAF (41,000 M.cum) of average annual flow (more than 90% of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June – September), which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi, Beas and the Sutlej rivers, which feed the Indus basin. The 75% dependable flow is 28 MAF (34,537 MCM) [http://nca.gov.in/rti_index.html] . Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946, this huge potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying the much needed succor to the drought stricken people of the valley, both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat. Since then plans have been evolved, debated, finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal, agitated by NGos. The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects are not halted. Early background and dispute [Winning the future by B.G.Varghese. (1994).ISBN 81-220-0357-5] Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence, when Central Waterways, Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa, Bargi, Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of reports. The reports were ready by 1963. A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16 sites with a potential of 1300 MW. While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of Kutch, but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat states and Gujarat’s intent to rise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, created a dispute between the states. This resulted in an impasse in the implementation of the agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat, Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit sharing among the states; with MP refusing to ratify the agreements. To break the logjam, a high level Committee was appointed by the Govt. of India in September 1964. In 1965, the Committee prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the Navgam dam in Gujarat. It provided irrigation priority over power; irrigation of 2,630 km² in MP, 400 km² in Maharashtra, 1,850 km² in Gujarat and 4,000 km² in Tribunal award ( [http://www.sscac.gov.in/NWDT.pdf] .After ten years of deliberations, the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave its award in December 1979. The NWDT, considering the development of the water resources of the basin as a whole, gave its award, allocating share of Water (after accepting the mutually agreed settlement among the four party states, in 1974, on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam) and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project. The Tribunal’s final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million acre feet at 75% dependability and allocated it to the four states, as in Table below, including share of power benefits. It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28 million acre feet. The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL convert|460|ft|m with a maximum water level of EL feet. The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at convert|300|ft|m. The cost sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases from the Narmada Sagar dam by M.P was also spelt out. The resettlement and rehabilitation package was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic monuments, places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence. The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state – Rajastahn – has been allocated a share of Narmada Waters, for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Go ahead for the projectsThe work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were undertaken for project designing and with The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar Sarovar (21 irrigation, 5 hydropower, and 4 multipurpose), some 135 medium dams, and over three minor dams in M.P along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share of 18.25 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award). In addition to power generation and irrigation within the basin, water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for multipurpose trans-basin diversions to: Son and Tons basins in eastern MP, drought prone areas of Saurashtra, Kutch, northern mainland in Gujarat, and southern Rajasthan. Irrigation benefits to the extent of about 40,000 to 50,000 km² (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of 2,600 MW were also envisaged. Thus, the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation networks. Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing, however, the height of dam, benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious difficulties in implementation, particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river). Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal Award and allowed the construction to proceed, subject to conditions. The Court introduced a mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement "pari-passu" with the raising of the height of the dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states. The court’s decision referred in this document, given in the year 2000, after 7 years of deliberations, has paved the way for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits. Some of the court’s decisions [http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=17165 - Judgement of the Supreme Court of India 2000] are essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics), to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject. "*When such projects are undertaken and hundreds of crores of public money is spent, individual or organisations in the garb of PIL cannot be permitted to challenge the policy decision taken after a lapse of time. It is against the national interest and contrary to the established principles of law that decisions to undertake developmental projects are permitted to be challenged after a number of years during which period public money has been spent in the execution of the project." "*Having failed in its attempt to stall the project the petitioner has resorted to court proceedings by filing this writ petition long after the environmental clearance was given and construction started. The pleas relating to height of the dam and the extent of submergence, environment studies and clearance, hydrology, seismicity and other issues, except implementation of relief and rehabilitation, cannot be permitted to be raised at this belated stage." "*It is the Relief and Rehabilitation measures that this Court is really concerned with and the petition in regard to the other issues raised is highly belated." "*The cost and benefit of the project were examined by the World Bank in 1990 and the following passage speaks for itself:" "*The argument in favour of the Sardar Sarovar Project is that the benefits are so large that they substantially outweigh the costs of the immediate human and environmental disruption. Without the dam, the long term costs for people would be much greater and lack of an income source for future generations would put increasing pressure on the environment. If the waters of the Narmada river continue to flow to the sea unused there appears to be no alternative to escalating human deprivation, particularly in the dry areas of Gujarat. The project has the potential to feed as many as 20 million people, provide domestic and industrial water for about 30 million, employ about 1 million, and provide valuable peak electric power in an area with high unmet power demand (farm pumps often get only a few hours power per day). In addition, recent research shows substantial economic multiplier effects (investment and employment triggered by development) from irrigation development. Set against the futures of about 70,000 project affected people, even without the multiplier effect, the ratio of beneficiaries to affected persons is well over 100:1." "*The Morse Committee was constituted, as already noted, by the World Bank. Its recommendations were forwarded to the World Bank. Apart from the Criticism of this report from other quarters, the World Bank itself did not accept this report as is evident from its press release dated 22 June 1992 where it was, inter-alia, stated as follows:" "*The Morse Commission provided a draft of its report to the Bank for management comments several weeks prior to the final release of the document. About two weeks before this release, the commission provided a draft of its findings and recommendations. The final version of the report is the sole responsibility of its authors; the report was not cleared by the World Bank." "*On resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R), Bank management agrees with the description of the R&R situation in each of the three states and with the report's conclusions about the shortcomings in the preparation and appraisal of the project's R&R aspects. We also agree that work should have been done earlier on the issue of people affected by the canal in Gujarat." "*On environment, bank management agrees with the independent review on the need for a more effective central management in the Narmada Basin on environment impact studies and mitigation programmes. Management also agrees on the need to accelerate work on estuary studies and health matters in Gujarat." "*The Government of India vide its letter dated 7 August 1992 from the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests did not accept the report and commented adversely on it." "*In view of the above, we do not propose, while considering the petitioners contentions, to place any reliance on the report of Morse Committee." "*Again all these contentions were based on the Morse Committee Report which the World Bank and the Union of India had already rejected." "*Apart from the fact that we are not convinced that construction of the dam will result in there being an adverse ecological impact there is no reason to conclude that the Environmental Sub-group is not functioning effectively. The group which is headed by the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests is a high powered body whose work cannot be belittled merely onthe basis of conjectures or surmises." "*The Environment Sub-group under the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India will consider and give, at each stage of the construction of the dam, environment clearance before further construction beyond 90 meters can be undertaken." "*Even though there has been substantial compliance with the conditions imposed under the environment clearance the NCA and the Environment Sub-group will continue to monitor and ensure that all steps are taken not only to protect but to restore and improve the environment." "*The Grievances Redressal Authorities will be at liberty, in case the need arises, to issue appropriate directions to the respective States for due implementation of the R&R programmes and in case of non implementation of its directions, the GRAs will be at liberty to approach the Review Committee for appropriate orders." "*Every endeavour shall be made to see that the project is completed as expeditiously as possible." The above Supreme Court judgement was by two of a three judge panel. The third judge, S.P.Bharucha, dissented with the two judges' verdict [http://www.cscsarchive.org/MediaArchive/medialaw.nsf/(docid)/6375077F478D5FA5E5256BD40013C846 - Minority Judgement] Justice Bharucha stated that "...Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation, involving a large percentage of tribals, loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity, enormous environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are still not available there could be but one conclusion, that the project(s) are not ready for approval..." The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the *Dam’s spillway discharging capacity (3.07 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world *With 1133 m³/s (40,000 ft³/s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75,000 km length of distribution system including field channel, the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world. *The project aims at supplying 3571,000 m³/day of drinking water (2900,000 m³/day for domestic consumption & 671,000 m³/day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages & 135 towns in Gujarat, which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water. Also, the project aims to provide drinking water facilities to a population of about 1,371,000 in 1107 villages & two towns in Jallore & Barmer districts of Rajasthan. *Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated – being 1.65% of CCA against an average of 4 to 5% of other major irrigation projects. All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006 and are in operation. All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation.The dam has attained a height of EL.121.92 m i.e. the crest level of the spillway. The gates are yet to be erected to attain the FRL of EL 138.68 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R & R up to that elevation. Top level of dam to be attained is EL 146.50 m. The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km. Water has been let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs. Further construction is in progress. The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m under orders of the High Court, Jabalpur from R&R consideration. All the units of the powerhouse have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each commenced from Jan 2004. [http://nca.gov.in/forms_pdf/isp_report.pdf -Status report] .The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance stage of implementation. Other completed and under construction projectsExisting irrigation projects in the Narmada are the 1) Matiyari (1992), 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988), 3) Barna (1978), 4) Tawa (1992-93), 5) Sukta (1984) all in Madhya Pradesh, and Karjan project in Gujarat. Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion, 2) Kolar, 3) Man, 4) Omkareshwar multipurpose (520 MW – commissioned in Nov. 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW) A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under implementation, as conceived under the overall Master Plan. Navigation along the river The river is presently partially navigable in the estuary reach around Bharuch but the river has never been a transport artery. The idea for inland navigation emanated with NWDT giving its award for the two main dams – the Sardar Sarovar in Gujarat 180 km from the coast and the Narmada Sagar in Madhaya Pradesh - the two dams separated by a river distance of about 900 km, and the plans to build two other dams in between on the main stem of the river. A feasibility study has been carried out for navigating the Narmada from the sea up to Hoshangabad – a distance of 639 km – or even up to Jabalpur a further distance of 309 km upstream. The main challenge in these studies is the arrangements to be planned to negotiate the Maheswar, Indira Sagar, Omkareswar, and Sardar Sarovar projects. As such, the navigation option is still open and probably can only be pursued after all the above dams are completed and other implications examined. As Varghese states, “The notion of seeing barge–trains plying the river up to Hoshangabad or Jabalpur is not far-fetched. They could become major inland ports” Gallery Photos of some of the dams and other connected structures in the Narmada basin. References Also read 1. Narmada Waters Dispute Tribunal Award (NWDTA) 2. Reports of Irrigation Commission, 1972 See also * http://www.narmada.org
* http://nvda.nic.in/TriAward.htm)
* http://www.sscac.gov.in/NWDT.pdf
* http://www.nhdcindia.com/Frm_FeaturesMaster.aspx -Narmada Hydro Development Corporation
* http://www.sardarsarovardam.org/ -S ardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited
* http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=17165 - Judgement of the Supreme Court of India
* http://www.mukti4u2.dk/Narmada_river.htm- Narmada River where the Shiva Lingams originate
* http://www.mridul.co.nr