- Frontier Thesis
The Frontier Thesis or Turner Thesis is the conclusion of
Frederick Jackson Turner that the wellsprings ofAmerican exceptionalism and vitality have always been theAmerican frontier , the region betweenurbanized ,civilized society and the untamed wilderness. In the thesis, the frontier created freedom, constantly named as civilization, "breaking the bonds of custom, offering new experiences, [and] calling out new institutions and activities." Turner first announced his thesis in a paper entitled "The Significance of the Frontier in American History ," delivered to theAmerican Historical Association in1893 at theWorld's Columbian Exposition inChicago .Turner set up an evolutionary model (he had studied evolution with a leading geologist), using the time dimension of American history, and the geographical space of the land that became the United States. The first settlers who arrived on the east coast in the 17th century acted and thought like Europeans. They encountered environmental challenges that were different from those they had known in Europe. Most important was the presence of uncultivated arable land (though large tracts were in use as Indian hunting grounds.) They adapted to the new environment in certain ways — the cumulative effect of these adaptations was Americanization. According to Turner, the forging of the unique and rugged American identity had to occur precisely at the juncture between the civilization of settlement and the savagery of wilderness. The dynamic of these oppositional conditions engendered a process by which citizens were made, citizens with the power to tame the wild and upon whom the wild had conferred strength and individuality.
Successive generations moved further inland, shifting the lines of settlement and wilderness, but preserving the essential tension between the two. European characteristics fell by the wayside and the old country's institutions (e.g. established churches, established aristocracies, intrusive government, and class-based land distribution) were increasingly out of place. Every generation moved further west and became more American, more democratic, and as intolerant of hierarchy as they were removed from it. They became more violent, more individualistic, more distrustful of authority, less artistic, less scientific, and more dependent on ad-hoc organizations they formed themselves. In broad terms, the further west, the more American the community.
Turner's thesis quickly became popular among intellectuals. It explained why the American people and American government were so different from Europeans. It sounded an alarming note about the future, since the U.S. Census of 1890 had officially stated that the American frontier had broken up. The idea that the source of America's power and uniqueness was gone was a distressing concept. Many, including historian Theodore Roosevelt, who later became president, believed that the end of the frontier represented the beginning of a new stage in American life and that the United States must expand overseas. For this reason, some see the Turner thesis as the impetus for a new wave in the history of United States imperialism. However, Turner's work, in contrast to Roosevelt's work "The Winning of the West", places greater emphasis on the development of American republicanism than on territorial conquest and the subjugation of the Native Americans.
Ironically, the
Great Plains began losing population during Turner's lifetime, and have continued to do so for the last 80 years. Several hundred thousand square miles now have less than 6 persons per square mile — the density standard Turner used to declare the frontier "closed". Large areas have less than 2 persons per square mile. The number of counties below this "frontier density" increased by 14 between 1980 and 2000. In fact, todayKansas has more "frontier" counties (using Turner's definition) than it did in 1900, and 35 of the 53 counties inNorth Dakota qualify as "frontier". [http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=10194]The Canadian political thinker
Charles Blattberg has developed an interesting contrast between the American frontier process as described by Turner and the notion that, in Canada, settlement is best described as having involved the moving of a "border" from east to west. According to Blattberg, a border assumes a significantly sharper contrast between the civilized and the uncivilized since unlike with a frontier process the civilizing force is not supposed to be shaped by that which it is civilizing. Blattberg criticizes both the frontier and border "civilizing" processes.ee also
*
Frontier
*Manifest destiny
*Frederick Jackson Turner Further reading: Scholarly studies
* [http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/TURNER/ The Frontier In American History] by Frederick Jackson Turner
* [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=94943599 Ray Allen Billington. "The American Frontier" (1958)] 35 page essay on the historiography
* Billington, Ray Allen. "Frederick Jackson Turner: historian, scholar, teacher." (1973), highly detailed scholarly biography.
* Billington, Ray Allen, ed,. "The Frontier Thesis: Valid Interpretation of American History?" (1966); the major attacks and defenses of Turner.
* Billington, Ray Allen. "America's Frontier Heritage" (1984), an analysis of Turner's theories in relation to social sciences and historiography
* [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=106262124 Billington, Ray Allen. "Land of Savagery / Land of Promise: The European Image of the American Frontier in the Nineteenth Century" (1981)]
* Bogue, Allan G. . "Frederick Jackson Turner: Strange Roads Going Down." (1988), highly detailed scholarly biography.
* Brown, David S. "Beyond the Frontier: Midwestern Historians in the American Century." (2009).
* Etulain, Richard W. "Does the Frontier Experience Make America Exceptional?" (1999)
* Etulain, Richard W. "Writing Western History: Essays on Major Western Historians" (2002)
* [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=89052336 Etulain, Richard W. and Gerald D. Nash, eds. "Researching Western History: Topics in the Twentieth Century" (1997)]
* Faragher, John Mack ed. "Rereading Frederick Jackson Turner: "The Significance of the Frontier in American History". (1999)
* Hine, Robert V. and John Mack Faragher. "The American West: A New Interpretive History" (2000), deals with events, not historiography
* Hofstadter, Richard. "The Progressive Historians--Turner, Beard, Parrington." (1979). interpretation of the historiography
* Jensen, Richard. "On Modernizating Frederick Jackson Turner," "Western Historical Quarterly" 11 (1980), 307-20. in JSTOR
* Lamar, Howard R. ed. "The New Encyclopedia of the American West" (1998), 1000+ pages of articles by scholars
* Milner, Clyde A., II ed. "Major Problems in the History of the American West" 2nd ed (1997), primary sources and essays by scholars
* Nichols, Roger L. ed. "American Frontier and Western Issues: An Historiographical Review" (1986) essays by 14 scholars
* Paxson, Frederic, "History of the American Frontier, 1763-1893" (1924)
*Richard Slotkin , "Regeneration through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600-1800" (1973), complex literary reinterpretation of the frontier myth from its origins in Europe to Daniel Boone
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.