Alabama gubernatorial election, 2002

Alabama gubernatorial election, 2002

The Alabama gubernatorial election of 2002 was held as part of Alabama's State General Election on Tuesday November 5, 2002. The race pitted incumbent Don Siegelman (D) against Representative Bob Riley (R) and Libertarian candidate John Sophocleus.

The result was nearly a dead tie between Siegelman and Riley. The certified results showed Riley with 672,225 votes to Siegelman's 669,105 (a difference of 3,120 votes, or 0.23% of the 1,367,053 votes cast). Sophocleus garnered 23,272 votes, and 2,451 votes were for write-in candidates.

Primary Contests

Both of the principal contestants in the general election campaign faced primary opponents whose opposition turned out to be less than expected. The primaries were held on June 4, 2002. Siegelman won the Democratic nomination without a runoff, garnering 74% of the vote over a field that included Charles Bishop, the Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries. Riley took the GOP nomination without a runoff, taking 73% against a Republican primary field that included Lieutenant Governor Steve Windom, and Tim James, the son of former Governor Fob James. ["Siegelman vs. Riley: Governor, Congressman Win Party Contests Handily," "The Birmingham News", June 5, 2002, p. 1A]

General Election Campaign

The closeness of the general election contest was reflected in its intensity and fervor.

At one point in the campaign, a clash erupted between the two principal campaigns over disclosure of the identities of large contributors to the Riley campaign. President George W. Bush appeared in Alabama at a July event, and a private reception with a $50,000 admission was held to benefit the Riley campaign. Riley's campaign initially refused to identify the donors attending the event. Later, under pressure from the Siegelman campaign, Riley called on the national Republican Party, which had hosted the event, to release the names of donors. ["Riley Doesn't Report VIP Donor List," "The Birmingham News", September 25, 2002, p. 1A] The Riley campaign was subjected to editorial criticism when the voluminous reports released made it difficult to trace the sources of donations from the event to Riley. [Editorial: "Once Again, Voters Lose Money Game," "The Birmingham News", September 29, 2002, p. 8A]

During the campaign, actor and National Rifle Association president Charlton Heston came to Alabama to campaign for Republican congressional candidates. While in the state, Heston released a written statement endorsing Siegelman, despite the fact that Riley had made a point of being seen in public with Heston. Spokesmen for both Riley and the Alabama Republican Party issued statements insinuating that Siegelman had taken advantage of Heston's recently-diagnosed Alzheimer's disease to secure the endorsement. After a firestorm of criticism from the NRA and editorial pages, the Republican spokesmen apologized to Heston, but not to Siegelman. [Editorial: "Siegelman, Too," "The Montgomery Advertiser", September 26, 2002, p. A6]

Riley received the endorsements of "The Birmingham News", [Editorial: "Our Endorsements," "The Birmingham News", November 3, 2002, p. B2 ] the "Mobile Press-Register", the Business Council of Alabama, and the Auburn University Trustee Improvement PAC, an alumni group which opposed Siegelman's choices for trustees at the school. ["Auburn Group Endorses Riley," "The Anniston Star", October 22, 2002, p. A1] Besides the NRA endorsement, Siegelman was endorsed by "The Montgomery Advertiser", "The Anniston Star", "The Tuscaloosa News", various labor groups, the Alabama State Employees Association, ["Siegelman Touts Emphasis on Education, New Industry," "The Birmingham News", November 5, 2002, p. 1A (listing endorsements for both candidates)] and by executive secretary Paul Hubbert of the Alabama Education Association, although the Association itself remained officially neutral. ["Siegelman Endorsed by Hubbert," "The Birmingham News", October 19, 2002, p. 12A]

The campaign set new spending records for an Alabama gubernatorial race. Even before the final weeks of the campaign, the candidates had raised over $17,000,000. Riley, who raised and spent over twice the sum Siegelman raised, was primarily backed by business groups and insurance companies. Siegelman received substantial contributions from labor groups and affiliates of the Alabama Education Association. Both candidates were the beneficiaries of national party funding, and contributions from political action committees made donations to both candidates difficult to trace. ["Siegelman, Riley Raise Record $17 Million," "The Birmingham News", September 24, 2002, p. 1A]

Polls taken in the final days of the campaign reflected the eventual close outcome. ["Poll Shows Governor's Race Even," "The Montgomery Advertiser", October 24, 2002, p. B3]

Baldwin County Controversy

Riley's victory was controversial, and caused many commentators to recall the Florida election recount of 2000. [ [http://www.al.com/opinion/mobileregister/cartoons/110702_crowe.jpgEditorial Cartoon: "Mobile Press-Register", November 7, 2002] ] [ [http://www.al.com/opinion/birminghamnews/cartoons/110702_stantis.jpgEditorial Cartoon: "The Birmingham News", November 7, 2002] ] Initial returns showed Riley narrowly losing to Siegelman. Siegelman gave a victory speech on election night, and the Associated Press initially declared him the winner. ["Two Men Act like Winners," "The Birmingham News", November 7, 2002, p. 1A] However, Republican officials in Baldwin County - one of the few counties where all of the county officers in charge of elections were Republicans - conducted a recount and retabulation of that county's votes after midnight, and after Democratic Party observers had gone home for the night. ["Baldwin in Eye of Ballot Storm," "The Birmingham News", November 7, 2002, p. 1A] This violated Alabama law, which requires that counting of ballots take place in the presence of the designated observers of a party or candidate. [ [http://alisdb.legislature.state.al.us/acas/CodeOfAlabama/1975/17-8-7.htm Alabama Code § 17-8-7] ] [ [http://alisdb.legislature.state.al.us/acas/CodeOfAlabama/1975/17-9-29.htm Alabama Code § 17-9-29] ] Approximately 6,000 votes initially credited to Siegelman were either removed from the total or reassigned to Riley in the recount, turning the statewide result in Riley's favor. ["Riley Claims Win," "The Montgomery Advertiser", November 7, 2002, p. A1] Local Republican officials claimed the earlier returns were the result of a "computer glitch." ["Post-Election Alabama Is Seeing Double," "The Washington Post", November 8, 2002, p. A10] Democratic requests to repeat the recount with Democratic observers present were rejected by Alabama courts and then-Attorney General William H. Pryor, Jr. Siegelman and his supporters complained that these judges (and Pryor) were either elected as Republicans or appointed by Republican presidents. ["Attorney General Stops Recount Move," "The Birmingham News", November 9, 2002, p. 1A] After over a week of fights in courtrooms and in the media, Siegelman, on November 18, 2002, made a televised address, saying that, "I've decided that a prolonged election controversy would hurt Alabama, would hurt the very people that we worked so hard to help," and abandoned his efforts to secure a recount of the Baldwin County vote, allowing Riley to take office. ["Siegelman Concedes: Recount Efforts Abandoned," "The Birmingham News", November 19, 2002, p. 1A]

In response to the allegation of a "computer glitch," Siegelman later stated: " [N] ow one would expect that if there was some kind of computer glitch or some kind of computer programming error, that it might have affected more than one race, but it further raised suspicions about vote stealing when the votes came back and they were certified, and the only person who lost votes was Don Siegelman, the Democrat, and the only person who gained votes was Bob Riley, the Republican." [ [http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5209 "Siegelman speaks!" at democracyfornewhampshire.com] ]

A number of analyses of the competing claims were undertaken at the time, with conflicting results. In one such study, Auburn University political scientist James H. Gundlach concluded that a detailed analysis of the returns, compared with 1998 results and returns from undisputed counties, "strongly suggests a systematic manipulation of the voting results." [ James H. Gundlach, "A Statistical Analysis of Possible Electronic Ballot Stuffing: The Case of the Baldwin County, Alabama Governor’s Race in 2002" (Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Alabama Political Science Association, Troy, Alabama, April 11, 2003) ] The Gundlach study also suggested a mechanism by which this could have been effected, and proposed a conclusion that Siegelman won. An earlier analysis reported by the Associated Press, using a less sophisticated comparison of gubernatorial and legislative returns, was claimed to indicate that the revised returns were more accurate, and that Riley probably won. [ [http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/2002-11-07-siegelman_x.htm "USA Today", November 7, 2002] ] The Gundlach paper offers a refutation of the conclusions of the Associated Press study.

Largely as a result of this controversy, ["Vote Dispute Prompts Reform Calls," "The Montgomery Advertiser", November 21, 2002, p. A1] the Alabama Legislature later amended the election code to provide for automatic, supervised recounts in close races. [ [http://alisdb.legislature.state.al.us/acas/CodeOfAlabama/1975/17-16-20.htm Alabama Code § 17-16-20] ] Riley took office in January 2003.

Election results

Election box candidate with party link
party = Republican Party (US)
candidate = Bob Riley
votes = 672,225
percentage = 49.2
change = +7.1
Election box candidate with party link
party = Democratic Party (US)
candidate = Don Siegelman (incumbent)
votes = 669,105
percentage = 49.0
change = -8.9
Election box candidate with party link
party = Libertarian Party (US)
candidate = John Sophocleus
votes = 23,272
percentage = 1.7
change = +1.7
Election box candidate
party =
candidate = Write-ins
votes = 2,451
percentage = 0.2
change =
Election box majority
votes = 3,120
percentage = 0.2
change = -16.5
Election box turnout
votes = 1,367,053
percentage =
change =
Election box gain with party link
winner = Republican Party (US)
loser = Democratic Party (US)
swing =

References

Note on references: Unfortunately, many of the sources cited above (as added in May 2008) are not available from free online sources. "The Birmingham News", the "Mobile Press-Register", "The Montgomery Advertiser", and "The Anniston Star" have online archives on a fee basis. The Birmingham and Mobile newspaper archives may be accessed via [http://www.al.com/ www.al.com,] while archives of "The Anniston Star" can be accessed at [http://nl.newsbank.com/sites/ansb/ www.annistonstar.com] . Archived articles of "The Montgomery Advertiser" may be purchased at [http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?s_site=montgomeryadvertiser&p_product=MGAB&p_theme=gannett&p_action=keyword www.montgomeryadvertiser.com] Archived articles from all of these newspapers are also available to subscribers, or on a per-document fee basis, on [http://web2.westlaw.com/signon/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW8.05&vr=2.0&bhcp=1 Westlaw] and [http://www.lexis.com/ Lexis-Nexis] .

External links

* [http://www.sos.state.al.us/Elections/2002/ElectionInfo2002.aspx 2002 Election information] at sos.state.al.us
* [http://www.sos.state.al.us/Downloads/dl3.aspx?trgturl=election/2002/AL-2002-General-Certification.pdf&trgtfile=AL-2002-General-Certification.pdf Certified election results] at sos.state.al.us

ee also


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”