Bretwalda, also Brytenwalda, Bretenanwealda, is an Anglo-Saxon term, the first record of which comes from the late ninth century "
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle". It is applied in that chronicle to some of the rulers of Anglo-Saxon kingdoms from the fifth century onwards who had achieved overlordship over some or all the other Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. It is unclear if the word really dates back to the fifth century, or is a ninth century invention. The Mercian kings, who were overlords from the seventh to the ninth centuries, are not accorded the title of Bretwalda by the chronicle—which fact is usually assigned to anti-Mercian bias by its authors. Whether they used it themselves is again uncertain, though in many cases their power was even greater than those listed by the chronicle.
The term also appears in a charter of Æthelstan, king of the English. It appears in several variant forms ("brytenwalda", "bretenanwealda", &c.), and means most probably "lord of the Britons" or "lord of Britain"; for although the derivation of the word is uncertain, its earlier syllable seems to be cognate with the words Briton and Britannia; but Kemble derives Bretwalda from the Old English word "breotan", to distribute, and translates it "widely ruling."cite book|last=Kemble |first=John Mitchell |authorlink=John Mitchell Kemble |title=The Saxons in England. A History of the English Commonwealth till the Period of the Norman Conquest |year=1876 |publisher=Bernard Quaritch |location=London]
Listed by Bede and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
Aelle of Sussex( 488–c. 514)
*(break in sequence)
Ceawlin of Wessex( 560–91, died 593)
Æthelberht of Kent( 591– 616)
Rædwald of East Anglia( 616–27)
*Edwin of Deira (
Oswald of Bernicia( 633–41)
*Oswy of Northumbria (
641–58, died 670)
Wulfhere of Mercia( 658- 675)
Æthelred of Mercia( 675- 704, died 716)
*Cœnred of Mercia (
704- 709, died ?)
Ceolred of Mercia( 709- 716)
Ceolwald of Mercia( 716)
Ethelbald of Mercia( 716- 757, proclaimed "King of Britain" 746)
*Beornred of Mercia (
757, died ?)
Offa of Mercia( 757- 796, proclaimed "King of the English" 774)
*Egfrith of Mercia (
*Cœnwulf of Mercia (
796- 821, proclaimed "Emperor")
*Ceolwulf of Mercia (
821- 823, died ?)
Beornwulf of Mercia( 823- 826)
Ludeca of Mercia( 826- 827)
Wiglaf of Mercia( 827- 829, died 840)
Listed only by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
Egbert of Wessex( 829–39)
The first recorded use of the term comes from a West Saxon Chronicle of the late 9th century applying the term to Ecgberht, who was King of Wessex from 802-839. The chronicler also wrote down the names of seven kings
Bedehad listed in his " Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum" in 731.
There is no evidence that the term bretwalda was a title that had any practical use, or even any existence before the ninth-century chronicler.
Bedewrote in Latinand never used the term, and his list of kings holding "imperium" should be treated with great caution, not least in that he overlooks kings such as Pendaof Merciawho clearly held some kind of dominance in their time. Similarly, in his list of Bretwaldas, the West Saxon chronicler ignores Mercian kings such as Offa. It is unlikely that there was a succession and defined duties, and it is doubtful whether the term Bretwalda is anything more than a later simplification of a complex structure of kingship. Problems arise when historians take the term and infer from it something that was not there.
Bretwalda is, therefore, a highly problematic term, and one which, if anything, was merely the attempt by a West Saxon chronicler to make some claim of West Saxon kings to the whole of
Great Britain. This shows that the concept of the unity of Britain was at least recognised in the period, whatever was meant by the term. Quite possibly it was only a survival of a Roman concept of "Britain"; it is significant that, while the hyperbolic inscriptions on coins and titles in chartersoften include the title "rex Britanniae", when England was actually unified the title used was "rex Angulsaxonum", king of the Anglo-Saxons.
For some time the existence of the word Bretwalda in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, which was based in part on the list given by
Bedein his "Historia Ecclesiastica", led historians to think that there was perhaps a "title" held by overlords of Great Britain. This was particularly attractive as it would lay the foundations for the establishment of an "English" monarchy. The twentieth-centuryhistorian Frank Stentonsays of the Anglo-Saxon chronicler that "his inaccuracy is more than compensated by his preservation of the English title applied to these outstanding kings." [F.M. Stenton, "Anglo-Saxon England", 3rd edition, (Oxford: University Press, 1971), pp.34–5] He goes on to argue that the term Bretwalda "falls into line with the other evidence which points to the Germanic origin of the earliest English institutions."
Over the later twentieth century this assumption was increasingly challenged. In 1991, Steven Fanning argued, "It is unlikely that the term ever existed as a title or was in common usage in Anglo-Saxon England." [Steven Fanning, “Bede, Imperium, and the Bretwaldas,” "Speculum" 66, no. 1 (1991): 24.] The fact that Bede never mentioned a special title for the kings in his list implies that he was unaware of one. [Steven Fanning, “Bede, Imperium, and the Bretwaldas,” Speculum 66, no. 1 (1991): 23.] In 1995
Simon Keyneswrote, "if Bede's concept of the Southumbrian overlord, and the chronicler's concept of the 'Bretwalda', are to be regarded as artificial constructs, which have no validity outside the context of the literary works in which they appear, we are released from the assumptions about political development which they seem to involve...we might ask whether kings in the eighth and ninth centuries were quite so obsessed with the establishment of a pan-Southumbrian state." [Simon Keynes, 'England, 700–900' in "The New Cambridge Medieval History, II, c.700-c.900". ed. R. McKitterick, (Cambridge: University Press, 1995), p.39]
Thus, more recent interpretations view the bretwaldaship as a complex concept. It is now recognized as an important indicator of how a ninth-century chronicler interpreted history and tried to insert the West Saxon kings, who were rapidly expanding their power at the time, into that history.
What did exist was a complex array of dominance and subservience. Examples such as a king granting land with charters in another kingdom, are a sure sign of such a relationship. When a king held sway over a larger kingdom, such as a Mercian ruler over
East Anglia, the relationship would have been more equal than in the case of a larger kingdom exercising overlordship over a smaller one, as in the case of Merciaand Hwicce. Mercia was arguably the most powerful Anglo-Saxon kingdom for much of the late seventh and eighth centuries, though Mercian kings are missed out of the two main "lists". For Bede, Mercia was a traditional enemy of his native Northumbria, and he saw powerful Mercian kings such as Penda(a pagan) as standing in the way of the conversion of the Anglo-Saxons, and so does not include them in his list, even though it is evident that Penda held a considerable degree of power. Similarly, powerful Mercia kings such as Offa are missed out of the West Saxon Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, which sought to demonstrate the legitimacy of the West Saxon kings to rule over other Anglo-Saxon peoples.
*Simon Keynes, 'Bretwalda', in "The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England", ed. Michael Lapidge et al, (Oxford, 1999)
*D.P. Kirby, "The Making of Early England", (London, 1967)
*P. Wormald, 'Bede, the "Bretwaldas" and the Origins of the "Gens Anglorum"', "Ideal and Reality in Frankish and Anglo-Saxon Society", ed. P. Wormald et al, (Oxford, 1983)
Kings of the Isle of Wight
Kings of East Anglia
*Kings of Essex
*Kings of Kent
*Kings of Sussex
*Kings of Wessex
*Kings of Mercia
*Kings of Northumbria
*Mythical pre-Saxon Kings of Britain
*Historical Kings of the Britons (contemporaries with Anglo-Saxon kings)
List of English monarchs(to 1707)
List of British monarchs(since 1707)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.