- Battle of Bosworth Field
Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=Battle of Bosworth Field
Wars of the Roses
August 22, 1485
place=In the area of
Market Bosworthin Leicestershire, England
result=Decisive Lancastrian victory
Richard III of England†
commander2=Earl of Richmond
Earl of Oxford
Philibert de Chandée
strength1=6,000 [Richard III had 15,500 men, but Lord Stanley with 4,000 and his brother, Sir William Stanley with 2,500 betrayed him, and Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland with 3,000 did not join the king.]
casualties1=no reliable sources
casualties2=no reliable sourcesThe Battle of Bosworth or Bosworth Field (
22 August, 1485[the Gregorian/current calendar date is August 31, 1485] ) was Lancastrian Henry Tudor's defeat of Yorkist Richard III, ending the Plantagenetdynasty to begin a new Tudor dynasty. Historically, the battle is considered to have marked the end of the Wars of the Roses, although further battles were fought in the years that followed as Yorkist pretenders unsuccessfully fought to reclaim the crown. The battle was perhaps the last significant Medieval battle. Also, Richard III was the last English monarch to have been killed in battle.
After avoiding Viscount Lovell's fleet sent by the king to stop him, Henry Tudor landed at
Milford Havenon 7 Augustwith a small force — consisting mainly of French and Breton mercenaries — in an attempt to claim the throne of England. Richard III had fought similar battles with Lancastrian usurpers in the past, and though Henry did not have his opponent's militaryexperience, he was accompanied by his uncle, Jasper Tudor, 1st Earl of Pembroke (later 1st Duke of Bedford) and John de Vere, 13th Earl of Oxford, each a seasoned soldier. Henry gathered supporters in the course of his journey through his father's native Wales, and by the time he arrived in the Midlands, he had amassed an army of an estimated 5,000 men. The King, by contrast, could command nearly 8,000. The decisive factor in the battle was to be the conduct of the Stanley brothers — Sir William Stanley and Thomas Stanley, 2nd Baron Stanley, the latter being Henry's stepfather. Richard had good cause to distrust them, but was dependent on their continued loyalty. Henry Percy, 4th Earl of Northumberland, with Lord Stanley and Sir William Stanley and their troops, watched the beginning of the engagement as the rest of Richard's army fought Henry's French mercenaries and loyal exiles. The Stanleys seem to have taken up a position some distance away from the two main armies. This was because Richard had taken Thomas Stanley's son and would kill him if he helped Henry. So the Stanley brothers waited until Henry was in a position where he would definitely win with their help. However if Henry was being destroyed by Richard they could help him and get Thomas' son back.
Like most medieval battles, the events at Bosworth are difficult to interpret coherently or with great confidence. Many (if not all) of the details below are contested and are far from certain.
Ambion Hillfirst where he organized his troops into three divisions on the hill. His troops were well-rested going into the battle, while Henry's men had trouble lining up on the rough ground below; it is unclear why. Richard might then have charged, slaughtering the disorganized Lancastrians, but he missed his chance. When Henry finally was ready, his men used cannonand arrows to force Richard to come down from his hilltop. When Richard did, he called for the Earl of Northumberland, who commanded the right wing of his army, to join in with fresh forces. But Percy refused, holding his forces back from action. There is some evidence that the difficult, wooded ground and narrow frontage of the Yorkist position prevented Northumberland from bringing his force up quickly, but it is far more likely that the Earl's dilatoriness was a calculated move. Although he was captured on the day, he was soon released and confirmed in all his titles and lands by the new King Henry VII, only to be murdered in a minor riot four years later. But it was the decision of the Stanleys, waiting nearby, that tipped the battle's outcome in favour of Henry.
John Howard, 1st Duke of Norfolk, was slain, and the waiting armies of Lords Stanley and Northumberland still did not commit to any side. Richard was probably certain of treachery and his close staff counselled withdrawal. It was at this moment that Henry Tudor, also uncertain of the outcome, left the main body of his army and moved towards Lord Stanley, possibly to appeal to him in person. Upon seeing this, Richard attempted a charge against Henry's group. In the attack, Richard and his household hacked down Henry's small bodyguard of knights and even killed Henry's standard bearer, William Brandon, but at the moment Richard was within sight of Henry, Sir William Stanley's army chose to come to Tudor's rescue. They threw themselves into the fray surrounding Richard and the men of his Household, overwhelming them. In the fighting, Richard's own standard bearer, Sir Percival Thirwall, had both of his legs hewn away, possibly by a poleaxe or a hand-and-a-half sword. He did not let the banner fall, but instead held onto it until he was killed by one of the many retainers under Sir William Stanley joining the battle.
Richard himself was rumoured to have been killed by the poleaxe of a Welshman, [Bennett p 117ff] and even sources of a hostile slant (notably
Polydore Virgil) agree that he died fighting bravely. [Kendall p 407] Richard III (Duke of Gloucester) was the last king of England to die in battle. Richard III was the only English king with a strongly northern association and powerbase, and the last of the Plantagenetkings. His body was taken ignominiously by the victors to Leicester, where it was paraded, battered and naked, through the streets, and was accidentally crushed against the parapet of a bridge over the River Soar. Richard's remains were eventually buried in the church which later became the city's cathedral, although legend has it that they were exhumed and thrown in the Soar. His probable resting place is thought to be under a Tesco's car park near the former site of the church of Greyfriars.
The battle proved to be decisive in ending the long-running civil wars later to be known as the
Wars of the Roses, although the last battle was fought at Stoke two years later, 1487.
Henry Tudor was crowned as King Henry VII, marking the beginning of the 118-year reign of the
Tudor dynastyin England. He immediately sought to backdate his administration to a date prior to the battle of Bosworth Field in order to attaint for treasonmen who had fought for the former King Richard III.
Henry Tudor was in fact outlawed and barred from his own inheritance, and was under
Attainderwhen he seized the English Throne in 1485. His coronationconveniently nullified the attainder. Following this, Parliament made the declaration that any who had opposed King Henry at Bosworth were to be considered traitors.
The supposed battlefield site, now open to the public with a visitor centre, is close to
Sutton Cheneyand Market Bosworthin Leicestershire.
The actual site of the battle has been the topic of often contentious debate among professional and amateur historians. For several years after the event the battle was called the Battle of Redemore and it was some time before the more famous name was used. This has led to the theory that the battle was "not" fought on Ambion Hill but on a reedy moor in the same area. An assault against a hill, as detailed in the official signage at the battlefield, can be discounted. Battles during the latter half of the Wars of the Roses had become more mobile in nature with commanders proving able to manoeuvre their hosts. People have long been researching to try to discover the actual site of this battle, work which has continued in the first decade of the 21st century. The lack of details and sometimes contradictory information in contemporary and near-contemporary sources makes both the chronology and location of the fighting extremely difficult to identify.
A compelling case is made for situating the battle closer to the villages of
Dadlingtonand Stoke Golding, [http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=132935&command=displayContent&sourceNode=132702&contentPK=18741187&folderPk=77465&pNodeId=132393] although most are agreed that Richard's encampment the night before the battle was indeed on Ambion Hill. If the hill played a role in the battle it is likely it was as an elevated platform for Richard's artillery. A visit to the modern site would suggest the surrounding countryside would be wide enough to support a medieval battle although the geography of the site in the fifteenth century remains harder to interpret. Another school of thought is that the battle actually took place at Merevale, just above Atherstonein Warwickshire; certainly reparations were made by the king to Atherstone after the battle. However, it is possible that the damages done were caused by troop movements or bivouacking by Tudor's men. Certainly the establishment of a chantryat Dadlington by the early sixteenth century for fallen men from the battle suggests the bulk of the fighting would have taken place in the vicinity. The suggestion (made by Michael K. Jones, the leading proponent of the Merevale relocation) that the dead were carted along the Roman road from the Merevale area to be buried at Dadlington is, perhaps, the weakest point of this thesis. What little is known of medieval battlefield burial practices (Towton, Visby) suggests that grave pits were dug "in situ" and that the bodies were packed together quite densely. Richer men were more likely to be taken away for interment in family tombs or to nearby religious establishments. Given the condition of the battlefield dead, the proximity to consecrated ground at Merevale (if the fighting took place nearby) and that it was late August makes the transportation of the bulk of the fallen in carts seem most unlikely.
The battle is a key setting in
Shakespeare's "Richard III", and much of the mythology surrounding the battle seems to derive from inventions of Shakespeare for dramatic license, which were otherwise unrecorded.
The battle is also the setting for the very first episode of "
Blackadder", in which Richard III is victorious in the battle but is mistakenly decapitated by his great-nephew Prince Edmund (played by Rowan Atkinson) in defence of his horse, which the king attempts to borrow whilst Blackadder is urinating in nearby bushes. Looking at the decapitated head, Blackadder says, in realisation, "Oh my God, it's Uncle Richard!" Science fictionauthor Andre Nortonexamined the counterfactual question, 'What if Richard had won the Battle of Bosworth?'. In her " Crossroads of Time" (1962), Richard is able to get to Henry and kill him in combat, therefore winning the field. Once secure on his throne, he further develops skills of government that are the subject of perennial debate between Ricardianand Tudor dynastyadvocates in late 15th centuryEnglish history.
Depictions in film
* "Richard III
* Bennett, Michael: "The Battle of Bosworth", Aland Sutton Publishing, 1985, ISBN 0 86299 053 X
* Foss, Peter J.: "The Field of Redemore: The Battle of Bosworth, 1485." , Rosalba Press, 1980 (perhaps the most definitive study of all.)
* Gravett, Christopher : "Bosworth 1485", Last Charge of the Plantagenets; Osprey Campaign Series #66, Osprey Publishing, 1999
* Jones, Michael K.: "Bosworth 1485", Tempus Publishing, 2002. [http://www.r3.org/bosworth/texts/jones.html]
* Kendall, Paul M.: "Richard the Third" George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London 1955 ISBN 3-7667-0520-2 (German translation)
* [http://www.leics.gov.uk/country_parks_bosworth Bosworth Battlefield visitor info]
* [http://www.r3.org/bosworth/ Richard III Society, American Branch] with maps, photos, articles presenting several competing theories situating the battle
* [http://www.wars-of-the-roses.com/content/battles/bosworth_field.htm The Battle of Bosworth]
* [http://richard111.com/roll_call_of_the_battle_of_boswo.htm Bosworth Roll Call] Officers there on the day.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.