Gravitational instanton

In mathematical physics and differential geometry, a gravitational instanton is a four-dimensional complete Riemannian manifold satisfying the vacuum Einstein equations. They are so named because they are analogues in quantum theories of gravity of instantons in Yang–Mills theory. In accordance with this analogy with self-dual Yang–Mills instantons, gravitational instantons are usually assumed to look like four dimensional Euclidean space at large distances, and to have self-dual Riemann tensor. Mathematically, this means that they are asymptotically locally Euclidean (or perhaps asymptotically locally flat) hyperkähler 4-manifolds, and in this sense, they are special examples of Einstein manifolds. From a physical point of view, a gravitational instanton is a non-singular solution of the vacuum Einstein equations with "positive-definite", as opposed to Lorentzian, metric.

There are many possible generalizations of the original conception of a gravitational instanton: for example one can allow gravitational instantons to have a nonzero cosmological constant or a Riemann tensor which is not self-dual. One can also relax the boundary condition that the metric is asymptotically Euclidean.

There are many methods for constructing gravitational instantons, including the Gibbons–Hawking Ansatz, twistor theory, and the hyperkähler quotient construction.

Properties

* A four-dimensional Kähler-Einstein manifold has a self-dual Riemann tensor.
* Equivalently, a self-dual gravitational instanton is a four-dimensional complete hyperkähler manifold.
* Gravitational instantons are analogous to self-dual Yang-Mills instantons.

Taxonomy

By specifying the 'boundary conditions', i.e. the asymptotics of the metric 'at infinity' on a noncompact Riemannian manifold, gravitational instantons are divided into a few classes, such as asymptotically locally Euclidean spaces (ALE spaces), asymptotically locally flat spaces (ALF spaces). There also exist ALG spaces whose name is chosen by induction.

Examples

It will be convenient to write the gravitational instanton solutions below using left-invariant 1-forms on the three-sphere S³(viewed as the group Sp(1) or SU(2)). These can be defined in terms of Euler angles by

:$sigma\_1\; =\; sin\; phi\; ,\; d\; heta\; -\; cos\; phi\; sin\; heta\; ,\; d\; phi$:$sigma\_2\; =\; cos\; phi\; ,\; d\; heta\; +\; sin\; phi\; sin\; heta\; ,\; d\; phi$:$sigma\_3\; =\; d\; psi\; +\; cos\; heta\; ,\; d\; phi$

Taub–NUT metric

$ds^2\; =\; frac\{1\}\{4\}\; frac\{r+n\}\{r-n\}\; dr^2\; +\; frac\{r-n\}\{r+n\}\; n^2\; \{sigma\_3\}^2\; +\; frac\{1\}\{4\}(r^2\; -\; n^2)(\{sigma\_1\}^2\; +\; \{sigma\_2\}^2)$

Eguchi–Hanson metric

$ds^2\; =\; left(\; 1\; -\; frac\{a\}\{r^4\}\; ight)\; ^\{-1\}\; dr^2\; +\; frac\{r^2\}\{4\}\; left(\; 1\; -\; frac\{a\}\{r^4\}\; ight)\; \{sigma\_3\}^2\; +\; frac\{r^2\}\{4\}\; (\{sigma\_1\}^2\; +\; \{sigma\_2\}^2).$

where $r\; ge\; a^\{1/4\}$.This metric is smooth everywhere if it has no conical singularity at $r\; ightarrow\; a^\{1/4\}$, $heta\; =\; 0,\; pi$. For $a\; =\; 0$ this happens if $psi$ has a period of $4pi$, which gives a flat metric on R⁴; However for $a\; e\; 0$ this happens if $psi$ has a period of $2pi$.

Asymptotically (i.e., in the limit $r\; ightarrow\; infty$) the metric looks like:$ds^2\; =\; dr^2\; +\; frac\{r^2\}\{4\}\; \{sigma\_3\}^2\; +\; frac\{r^2\}\{4\}\; (\{sigma\_1\}^2\; +\; \{sigma\_2\}^2)$which naively seems as the flat metric on R⁴. However, for $a\; e\; 0$, $psi$ has only half the usual periodicity, as we have seen. Thus the metric is asymptotically R⁴ with the identification $psi$ ~ $psi\; +\; 2pi$, which is a Z₂ subgroup of SO(4), the rotation group of R⁴. Therefore the metric is said to be asymptotically R⁴/Z₂.

There is a transformation to another coordinate system, in which the metric looks like:whereFor some "n" points $mathbf\{x\}\_i$, "i" = 1, 2... n.This gives a multi-center Eguchi–Hanson gravitational instanton, which is again smooth everywhere if the angular coordinates have the usual periodicities (to avoid conical singularities). The asymptotic limit ($r\; ightarrow\; infty$) is equivalent to taking all $mathbf\{x\}\_i$ to zero, and by changing coordinates back to r, $heta$ and $phi$, and redefining $r\; ightarrow\; r/sqrt\{n\}$, we get the asymptotic metric :$ds^2\; =\; dr^2\; +\; frac\{r^2\}\{4\}\; (\{dpsiover\; n\}\; +\; cos\; heta\; dphi)^2\; +\; frac\{r^2\}\{4\}\; [(sigma\_1^L)^2\; +\; (sigma\_2^L)^2]\; .$This is R⁴/Z_n = C²/Z_n, because it is R⁴ with the angular coordinate $psi$ replaced by $psi/n$, which has the wrong periodicity ($4pi/n$ instead of $4pi$). In other words, it is R⁴ identified under $psi$ ~ $psi\; +\; 4pi\; k/n$, or, equivalnetly, C² identified under z_i ~ $e^\{2pi\; i\; k/n\}$ z_i for "i" = 1, 2.

To conclude, the multi-center Eguchi–Hanson geometry is a Kähler Ricci flat geometry which is asymptotically C²/Z_n. According to Yau's theorem this is the only geometry satisfying these properties. Therefore this is also the geometry of a C²/Z_n orbifold in string theory after its conical singularity has been smoothed away by its "blow up" (i.e., deformation) [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9603167] .

Gibbons–Hawking multi-centre metrics

where

$epsilon\; =\; 1$ corresponds to multi-Taub–NUT, $epsilon\; =\; 0$ and $k\; =\; 1$ is flat space, and $epsilon\; =\; 0$ and $k\; =\; 2$ is the Eguchi–Hanson solution (in different coordinates).

See also

* Hyperkähler manifold

References

* Gibbons, G. W.; Hawking, S. W., "Gravitational Multi-instantons". Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978), no. 4, 430--432; see also "Classification of gravitational instanton symmetries". Comm. Math. Phys. 66 (1979), no. 3, 291--310.
* Eguchi, Tohru; Hanson, Andrew J., "Asymptotically flat selfdual solutions to Euclidean gravity". Phys. Lett. B 74 (1978), no. 3, 249--251; see also "Self-dual solutions to Euclidean Gravity". Ann. Physics 120 (1979), no. 1, 82--106 and "Gravitational instantons". Gen. Relativity Gravitation 11 (1979), no. 5, 315--320.
* Kronheimer, P. B., "The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-Kähler quotients". J. Differential Geom. 29 (1989), no. 3, 665--683.