Aeroacoustics

Aeroacoustics

Aeroacoustics is a branch of acoustics that studies noise generation via either turbulent fluid motion or aerodynamic forces interacting with surfaces. Noise generation can also be associated with periodically varying flows. Although no complete scientific theory of the generation of noise by aerodynamic flows has been established, most practical aeroacoustic analysis relies upon the so-called "Acoustic Analogy", whereby the governing equations of motion of the fluid are coerced into a form reminiscent of the wave equation of "classical" (i.e. linear) acoustics. The most common and a widely-used of the latter is "Lighthill's aeroacoustic analogy"Fact|date=June 2008. It was proposed by James Lighthill in the 1950s M. J. Lighthill, "On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. I. General Theory," "Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A" 211 (1952) pp. 564-587.] M. J. Lighthill, "On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. II. Turbulence as a Source of Sound," "Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A" 222 (1954) pp. 1-32.] when noise generation associated with the jet engine was beginning to be placed under scientific scrutiny. Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) is the application of numerical methods and computers to find approximate solutions of the governing equations for specific (and likely complicated) aeroacoustic problems.

Lighthill's equation

Lighthill rearranged the Navier–Stokes equations, which govern the flow of a compressible viscous fluid, into an inhomogeneous wave equation, thereby making an analogy between fluid mechanics and acoustics.

The first equation of interest is the conservation of mass equation, which reads

:frac{partial ho}{partial t} + ablacdotleft( homathbf{v} ight)=frac{D ho}{D t} + ho ablacdotmathbf{v}= 0,

where ho and mathbf{v} represent the density and velocity of the fluid, which depend on space and time, and D/Dt is the substantial derivative.

Next is the conservation of momentum equation, which is given by

:{ ho}frac{partial mathbf{v{partial t}+{ ho(mathbf{v}cdot abla)mathbf{v = - abla p+ ablacdotsigma,

where p is the thermodynamic pressure, and sigma is the viscous (or traceless) part of the stress tensor.

Now, multiplying the conservation of mass equation by mathbf{v} and adding it to the conservation of momentum equation gives

:frac{partial}{partial t}left( homathbf{v} ight) + ablacdot( homathbf{v}otimesmathbf{v}) = - abla p + ablacdotsigma.

Note that mathbf{v}otimesmathbf{v} is a tensor (see also tensor product). Differentiating the conservation of mass equation with respect to time, taking the divergence of the conservation of momentum equation and subtracting the latter from the former, we arrive at

:frac{partial^2 ho}{partial t^2} - abla^2 p + ablacdot ablacdotsigma = ablacdot ablacdot( homathbf{v}otimesmathbf{v}).

Subtracting c_0^2 abla^2 ho, where c_0 is the speed of sound in the medium in its equilibrium (or quiescent) state, from both sides of the last equation and rearranging it results in

:frac{partial^2 ho}{partial t^2}-c^2_0 abla^2 ho = ablacdotleft [ ablacdot( homathbf{v}otimesmathbf{v})- ablacdotsigma + abla p-c^2_0 abla ho ight] ,

which is equivalent to

:frac{partial^2 ho}{partial t^2}-c^2_0 abla^2 ho=( ablaotimes abla) :left [ homathbf{v}otimesmathbf{v} - sigma + (p-c^2_0 ho)mathbb{I} ight] ,where mathbb{I} is the identity tensor, and : denotes the (double) tensor contraction operator.

The above equation is the celebrated Lighthill equation of aeroacoustics. It is a wave equation with a source term on the right-hand side, i.e. an inhomogeneous wave equation. The argument of the "double-divergence operator" on the right-hand side of last equation, i.e. homathbf{v}otimesmathbf{v}-sigma+(p-c^2_0 ho)mathbb{I}, is the so-called "Lighthill turbulence stress tensor for the acoustic field", and it is commonly denoted by T.

Using Einstein notation, Lighthill’s equation can be written as

:frac{partial^2 ho}{partial t^2}-c^2_0 abla^2 ho=frac{partial^2T_{ij{partial x_i partial x_j},quad (*)

where

:T_{ij}= ho v_i v_j - sigma_{ij} + (p- c^2_0 ho)delta_{ij},

and delta_{ij} is the Kronecker delta. Each of the acoustic source terms, i.e. terms in T_{ij}, may play a significant role in the generation of noise depending upon flow conditions considered.

In practice, it is customary to neglect the effects viscosity of the fluid, i.e. one takes sigma=0, because it is generally accepted that the effects of the latter on noise generation, in most situations, are orders of magnitude smaller than those due to the other terms. Lighthill provides an in-depth discussion of this matter.

In aeroacoustic studies, both theoretical and computational efforts are made to solve for the acoustic source terms in Lighthill's equation in order to make statements regarding the relevant aerodynamic noise generation mechanisms present.

Finally, it is important to realize that Lighthill's equation is exact in the sense that no approximations of any kind have been made in its derivation.

Related model equations

In their classical text on fluid mechanics, Landau and LifshitzL. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, "Fluid Mechanics" 2ed., Course of Theoretical Physics vol. 6, Butterworth-Heinemann (1987) §75.] derive an aeroacoustic equation analogous to Lighthill's (i.e., an equation for sound generated by "turbulent" fluid motion) but for the incompressible flow of an inviscid fluid. The inhomogeneous wave equation that they obtain is for the "pressure" p rather than for the density ho of the fluid. Furthermore, unlike Lighthill's equation, Landau and Lifshitz's equation is not exact; it is an approximation.

If one is to allow for approximations to be made, a simpler way (without necessarily assuming the fluid is incompressible) to obtain an approximation to Lighthill's equation is to assume that p-p_0=c_0^2( ho- ho_0), where ho_0 and p_0 are the (characteristic) density and pressure of the fluid in its equilibrium state. Then, upon substitution the assumed relation between pressure and density into (*) , we obtain the equation

:frac{1}{c_0^2}frac{partial^2 p}{partial t^2}- abla^2p=frac{partial^2 ilde{T}_{ij{partial x_i partial x_j},quad ext{where}quad ilde{T}_{ij} = ho v_i v_j.

And for the case when the fluid is indeed incompressible, i.e. ho= ho_0 (for some positive constant ho_0) everywhere, then we obtain exactly the equation given in Landau and Lifshitz , namely

:frac{1}{c_0^2}frac{partial^2 p}{partial t^2}- abla^2p= ho_0frac{partial^2hat{T}_{ij{partial x_i partial x_j},quad ext{where}quadhat{T}_{ij} = v_i v_j.

A similar approximation [in the context of equation (*),] , namely Tapprox ho_0hat T, is suggested by Lighthill [see Eq. (7) in the latter paper] .

Of course, one might wonder whether we are justified in assuming that p-p_0=c_0^2( ho- ho_0). The answer is in affirmative, if the flow satisfies certain basic assumptions. In particular, if ho ll ho_0 and p ll p_0, then the assumed relation follows directly from the "linear" theory of sound waves (see, e.g., the linearized Euler equations and the acoustic wave equation). In fact, the approximate relation between p and ho that we assumed is just a linear approximation to the generic barotropic equation of state of the fluid.

However, even after the above deliberations, it is still not clear whether one is justified in using an inherently "linear" relation to simplify a "nonlinear" wave equation. Nevertheless, it is a very common practice in nonlinear acoustics as the textbooks on the subject show: e.g., Naugolnykh and Ostrovsky [K. Naugolnykh and L. Ostrovsky, "Nonlinear Wave Processes in Acoustics", Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics vol. 9, Cambridge University Press (1998) chap. 1.] and Hamilton and Morfey [M. F. Hamilton and C. L. Morfey, "Model Equations," "Nonlinear Acoustics", eds. M. F. Hamilton and D. T. Blackstock, Academic Press (1998) chap. 3.] .

References

External links

* M. J. Lighthill, "On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. I. General Theory," "Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A" 211 (1952) pp. 564-587. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0080-4630(19520320)211%3A1107%3C564%3AOSGAIG%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7 This article on JSTOR] .
* M. J. Lighthill, "On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. II. Turbulence as a Source of Sound," "Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A" 222 (1954) pp. 1-32. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0080-4630(19540223)222%3A1148%3C1%3AOSGAIT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2 This article on JSTOR] .
* L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, "Fluid Mechanics" 2ed., Course of Theoretical Physics vol. 6, Butterworth-Heinemann (1987) §75. ISBN 0750627670, [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0750627670/ Preview from Amazon] .
* K. Naugolnykh and L. Ostrovsky, "Nonlinear Wave Processes in Acoustics", Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics vol. 9, Cambridge University Press (1998) chap. 1. ISBN 052139984X, [http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN052139984X Preview from Google] .
* M. F. Hamilton and C. L. Morfey, "Model Equations," "Nonlinear Acoustics", eds. M. F. Hamilton and D. T. Blackstock, Academic Press (1998) chap. 3. ISBN 0123218608, [http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0123218608 Preview from Google] .
* [http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/ncpa/aeroacoustics/ Aeroacoustics at the University of Mississippi]
* [http://www.mech.kuleuven.be/mod/aeroacoustics/ Aeroacoustics at the University of Leuven]
* [http://www.multi-science.co.uk/aeroacou.htm International Journal of Aeroacoustics]
* [http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/microbus/cese/aeroex.html Examples in Aeroacoustics from NASA]

See also

*Acoustic theory
*Computational Aeroacoustics


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Computational Aeroacoustics — While the discipline of Aeroacoustics is definitely dated back to the first publication of Sir James Lighthill[1][2] in the early 1950s, the origin of Computational Aeroacoustics can only very likely be dated back to the middle of the 1980s.… …   Wikipedia

  • James Lighthill — Michael James Lighthill Born 23 January 1924(19 …   Wikipedia

  • Acoustic analogy — Acoustic analogies are applied mostly in numerical aeroacoustics to reduce aeroacoustic sound sources to simple emitter types. They are therefore often also referred to as aeroacoustic analogies.In general, aeroacoustic analogies are derived from …   Wikipedia

  • Aeroakustik-Windkanal — Durch elektrische Geräusche am Antrieb und aerodynamische Geräusche in der Luftführung und am Gebläse ist der Geräuschpegel in Windkanälen recht hoch, wenn nicht geräuschmindernde Maßnahmen ergriffen werden. Daher werden für aeroakustische… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics — Type Professional Organization Founded January 31, 1963 Origins Merger of the American Rocket Society and the Institute of Aerospace Sciences …   Wikipedia

  • John Ffowcs Williams — Professor John (Shôn) Eirwyn Ffowcs Williams BSc PhD Hon DSc Soton MA ScD Cantab FREng is Emeritus Rank Professor of Engineering at the University of Cambridge and a former Master of Emmanuel College, Cambridge (1996 2002).Prof. Ffowcs Williams… …   Wikipedia

  • M. Yousuff Hussaini — Mohammad Yousuff Hussaini is an Indian born American applied mathematician. He is the Sir James Lighthill Professor of Mathematics and Computational Science Engineering at the Florida State University, United States. Hussaini is also the holder… …   Wikipedia

  • Acoustic theory — is the field relating to mathematical description of sound waves. It is derived from fluid dynamics. See acoustics for the engineering approach.The propagation of sound waves in a fluid (such as air) can be modeled by an equation of motion… …   Wikipedia

  • CAA — may refer to:Organizations*Canadian Automobile Association, non profit federation of nine clubs across Canada, providing roadside assistance services *Canadian Avalanche Association, a non profit organization that promotes avalanche awareness and …   Wikipedia

  • CFM International CFM56 — CFM56 …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”