List of NBA Development League yearly standings

List of NBA Development League yearly standings

These are regular season standings and playoff results for the NBA Development League (NBA D-League). The NBA D-League is the official minor league basketball organization owned and run by the National Basketball Association (NBA). The league was formed in 2001 as the National Basketball Development League (NBDL). The league adopted its current name in 2005 to reflect its close affiliation with the NBA.

2001–02

Team W L Win % GB
North Charleston Lowgators 36 20 .643
Greenville Groove 36 20 .643
Columbus Riverdragons 31 25 .554 5
Mobile Revelers 30 26 .536 6
Huntsville Flight 26 30 .464 10
Asheville Altitude 26 30 .464 10
Fayetteville Patriots 21 35 .375 15
Roanoke Dazzle 18 38 .321 18
  Semifinals
(Best-of-3)
NBDL Championship
(Best-of-3)
                 
2  Greenville 2  
3  Columbus 1  
    2  Greenville 2
  1  North Charleston 0
1  North Charleston 2
4  Mobile 1  

2002–03

Team W L Win % GB
Fayetteville Patriots 32 18 .640
North Charleston Lowgators 26 24 .520 6
Mobile Revelers 26 24 .520 6
Roanoke Dazzle 26 24 .520 6
Asheville Altitude 23 27 .460 9
Columbus Riverdragons 23 27 .460 9
Greenville Groove 22 28 .440 10
Huntsville Flight 22 28 .440 10
  Semifinals
(Best-of-3)
NBDL Championship
(Best-of-3)
                 
1  Fayetteville 2  
4  Roanoke 0  
    3  Mobile 2
  1  Fayetteville 1
3  Mobile 2
2  North Charleston 0  

2003–04

Team W L Win % GB
Asheville Altitude 28 18 .609
Charleston Lowgators 27 19 .587 1
Huntsville Flight 24 22 .522 4
Fayetteville Patriots 21 25 .457 7
Roanoke Dazzle 20 26 .435 8
Columbus Riverdragons 18 28 .391 10
  Semifinals NBDL Championship
                 
1  Asheville 116  
4  Fayetteville 111  
    1  Asheville 108
  3  Huntsville 106
3  Huntsville 108
2  Charleston 100  

2004–05

Team W L Win % GB
Columbus Riverdragons 30 16 .625
Asheville Altitude 27 21 .563 3
Huntsville Flight 27 21 .563 3
Roanoke Dazzle 26 22 .542 4
Fayetteville Patriots 17 31 .354 13
Florida Flame 17 31 .354 13
  Semifinals NBDL Championship
                 
1  Columbus 96  
4  Roanoke 89  
    2  Asheville 90
  1  Columbus 67
2  Asheville 90
3  Huntsville 86  

2005–06

Team W L Win % GB
Fort Worth Flyers 28 20 .583
Albuquerque Thunderbirds 26 22 .542 2
Florida Flame 25 23 .521 3
Roanoke Dazzle 25 23 .521 3
Arkansas RimRockers 24 24 .500 4
Austin Toros 24 24 .500 4
Tulsa 66ers 24 24 .500 4
Fayetteville Patriots 16 32 .333 12
  Semifinals D-League Championship
                 
2  Albuquerque 80  
3  Florida 71  
    2  Albuquerque 119
  1  Fort Worth 108
1  Fort Worth 87
4  Roanoke 78  

2006–07

Regular season

Eastern Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Dakota Wizards (1) 33 17 .660 19–6 14–11
x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (2) 30 20 .600 3 17–8 13–12
x-Fort Worth Flyers (3) 21 21 .580 4 18–7 11–14
Tulsa 66ers 21 29 .420 12 12–13 9–14
Austin Toros 21 29 .420 12 11–14 10–15
Arkansas RimRockers 16 34 .320 17 11–14 5–20

Western Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Idaho Stampede (1) 33 17 .660 16–9 17–8
x-Colorado 14ers (2) 28 22 .560 5 16–9 12–13
x-Albuquerque Thunderbirds (3) 24 26 .480 9 14–11 10–15
Los Angeles D-Fenders 23 27 .460 10 13–12 10–15
Anaheim Arsenal 23 27 .460 10 11–14 12–13
Bakersfield Jam 19 31 .380 14 12–13 7–18

Notes

  • x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
  • Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

Three teams with the best regular season records in each division qualified for playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in the first and second rounds, while teams with higher seed holds home-court advantage in the Finals. The division winners received a bye from the first round. The remaining teams faced each other in the first round.


  First round
(April 17–18)
Second round
(April 20–21)
D-League Championship
(April 29)
                           
        
  1  Dakota 115  
Eastern Division
    2  Sioux Falls 113  
2  Sioux Falls 128
  3  Forth Worth 105  
    E1  Dakota 129*
  W2  Colorado 121
          
        
1  Idaho 91
Western Division
    2  Colorado 94*  
2  Colorado 130
  3  Albuquerque 100  

Notes

  • The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
  • An asterisk (*) denotes overtime period(s).
  • Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
  • Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

April 29, 2007 Recap Colorado 14ers 121, Dakota Wizards 129 OT  Bismarck Civic Center, Bismarck, North Dakota
Attendance: 5,224
Pts: Eugene Jeter 30 Pts: Darius Rice 52

2007–08

Regular season

Central Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Dakota Wizards (3) 29 21 .580 18–7 11–14
x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (6) 28 22 .560 1 19–6 9–16
Iowa Energy 22 28 .440 7 13–12 9–16
Fort Wayne Mad Ants 17 33 .340 12 12–13 5–20

Southwest Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Austin Toros (2) 30 20 .600 19–6 11–14
x-Colorado 14ers (5) 29 21 .580 1 17–8 12–13
Tulsa 66ers 26 24 .520 4 14–11 12–13
Albuquerque Thunderbirds 22 28 .440 8 14–11 8–17
Rio Grande Valley Vipers 21 29 .420 9 16–9 5–20

Western Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Idaho Stampede (1) 36 14 .720 21–4 15–10
x-Los Angeles D-Fenders (4) 32 18 .640 4 19–6 13–12
Utah Flash 24 26 .480 12 14–11 10–15
Anaheim Arsenal 23 27 .460 13 14–11 9–16
Bakersfield Jam 11 39 .220 25 9–16 2–23

Notes

  • x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
  • Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The three division winners, along with the next three teams with the best regular season records regardless of division, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format for the first two rounds and best-of-three format for the finals. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The three division winners were seeded from 1 to 3 based on their regular season records, while the remaining teams were seeded from 4 to 6 based on their regular season records. The two division winners with the best regular season records received a bye from the first round. The remaining division winners faced the lowest seeded teams, while the two remaining teams faced each other.


  First round
(April 15)
Second round
(April 19–20)
D-League Championship
(April 21–25)
                           
        
  1  Idaho* 1  
    4  Los Angeles 0  
4  Los Angeles 1
  5  Colorado 0  
    1  Idaho* 2
  2  Austin* 1
          
        
2  Austin* 1
    6  Sioux Falls 0  
3  Dakota* 0
  6  Sioux Falls 1  

Notes

  • The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
  • The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
  • The division winners are marked by an asterisk (*).
  • Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
  • Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

April 21, 2008 Recap
Boxscore
Idaho Stampede 89, Austin Toros 95    Austin Convention Center, Austin, Texas
Attendance: 2,299
Referees:
  • #56 Haywoode Workman
  • #15 Eric Dalen
  • #34 Kevin Cutler
Scoring by quarter: 26–14, 18–28, 17–26, 28–27
Pts: Cory Violette 20
Rebs: Cory Violette 14
Asts: Randy Livingston 9
Pts: Justin Bowen 25
Rebs: Darvin Ham 13
Asts: Andre Barrett 7
April 24, 2008 Recap
Boxscore
Austin Toros 89, Idaho Stampede 90    Qwest Arena, Boise, Idaho
Attendance: 3,659
Referees:
  • #30 Curtis Blair
  • #55 Marat Kogut
  • #58 Josh Tiven
Scoring by quarter: 33–27, 12–22, 29–23, 15–18
Pts: Andre Barrett 27
Rebs: Ian Mahinmi 12
Asts: Andre Barrett 8
Pts: Cory Violette 19
Rebs: Jason Ellis 16
Asts: Luke Jackson 7
April 25, 2008 Recap
Boxscore
Austin Toros 101, Idaho Stampede 108    Qwest Arena, Boise, Idaho
Attendance: 4,124
Referees:
  • #30 Curtis Blair
  • #15 Eric Dalen
  • #55 Marat Kogut
Scoring by quarter: 22–29, 24–26, 23–26, 32–27
Pts: Andre Barrett 29
Rebs: Ian Mahinmi 15
Asts: Barrett, Ham, Johnson, Mahinmi 2 each
Pts: Mike Taylor 27
Rebs: Ellis, Violette 14 each
Asts: Luke Jackson 10
Idaho wins series, 2–1

2008–09

Regular season

Central Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Iowa Energy (3) 28 22 .560 17–8 11–14
x-Dakota Wizards (6) 27 23 .540 1 16–9 11–14
x-Erie BayHawks (7) 27 23 .540 1 16–9 11–14
Sioux Falls Skyforce 25 25 .500 3 13–12 12–13
Fort Wayne Mad Ants 19 31 .380 9 11–14 8–17

Southwest Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Colorado 14ers (1) 34 16 .680 20–5 14–11
x-Austin Toros (4) 32 18 .640 2 17–8 15–10
Albuquerque Thunderbirds 24 26 .480 10 15–10 9–16
Rio Grande Valley Vipers 21 29 .420 13 12–13 9–16
Tulsa 66ers 15 35 .300 19 8–17 7–18

Western Division

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Utah Flash (2) 32 18 .640 17–8 15–10
x-Idaho Stampede (5) 31 19 .620 1 20–5 11–14
x-Bakersfield Jam (8) 26 24 .520 6 16–9 10–15
Reno Bighorns 25 25 .500 7 18–7 7–18
Los Angeles D-Fenders 19 31 .380 13 11–14 8–17
Anaheim Arsenal 15 35 .300 17 9–16 6–19

Notes

  • x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
  • Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The three division winners, along with the next five teams with the best regular season records regardless of division, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format for the first two rounds and best-of-three format for the finals. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The three division winners were seeded from 1 to 3 based on their regular season records, while the remaining teams were seeded from 4 to 8 based on their regular season records. The three division winners had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the three division winners .

  First round
(April 14–16)
Second round
(April 18–20)
Finals
(April 22–24)
                           
  1  Colorado* 1  
7  Erie 0  
  1  Colorado* 1  
  4  Austin 0  
4  Austin 1
  5  Idaho 0  
    1  Colorado* 2
  2  Utah* 0
  2  Utah* 1  
8  Bakersfield 0  
  2  Utah* 1
  6  Dakota 0  
3  Iowa* 0
  6  Dakota 1  

Notes

  • The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
  • The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
  • The division winners are marked by an asterisk (*).
  • Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
  • Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

April 22, 2009 Recap
Boxscore
Colorado 14ers 136, Utah Flash 131 OT  McKay Events Center, Orem, Utah
Attendance: 4,058
Referees:
  • #52 James Williams
  • #51 Kane Fitzgerald
  • #58 Josh Tiven
Scoring by quarter: 36–23, 42–38, 23–33, 21–28, OT: 14–9
Pts: Sonny Weems 28
Rebs: Josh Davis 8
Asts: Eddie Gill 8
Pts: Ronald Dupree 37
Rebs: J. R. Giddens 17
Asts: Dupree, Giddens, Kruger 4 each
April 24, 2009 Recap
Boxscore
Utah Flash 104, Colorado 14ers 123    Broomfield Event Center, Broomfield, Colorado
Attendance: 3,059
Referees:
  • #34 Kevin Cutler
  • #36 Brent Barnaky
  • #55 Marat Kogut
Scoring by quarter: 24–26, 35–26, 27–36, 18–35
Pts: Almond, Kruger 18 each
Rebs: J. R. Giddens 15
Asts: Giddens, Kruger 5 each
Pts: Sonny Weems 25
Rebs: Dabbert, Davis, Gilder 7 each
Asts: Sonny Weems 7
Colorado wins series, 2–0

2009–10

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Iowa Energy (1) 37 13 .740 19–6 18–7
x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (4) 32 18 .640 5 20–5 12–13
x-Dakota Wizards (5) 29 21 .580 8 21–4 8–17
Maine Red Claws 27 23 .540 10 16–9 11–14
Fort Wayne Mad Ants 22 28 .440 15 13–12 9–16
Erie BayHawks 21 29 .420 16 10–15 11–14
Springfield Armor 7 43 .140 30 7–18 0–25

Western Conference

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (2) 34 16 .680 21–4 13–12
x-Austin Toros (3) 32 18 .640 2 18–7 14–11
x-Reno Bighorns (6) 28 22 .560 6 15–10 13–12
x-Utah Flash (7) 28 22 .560 6 14–11 14–11
x-Tulsa 66ers (8) 27 23 .540 7 16–9 11–14
Idaho Stampede 25 25 .500 9 15–10 11–14
Albuquerque Thunderbirds 18 32 .360 16 13–12 5–20
Bakersfield Jam 17 33 .340 17 10–15 7–18
Los Angeles D-Fenders 16 34 .320 18 9–16 7–18

Notes

  • x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
  • Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The Eastern and Western Conference winners, along with the next six teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds.

  First round
(April 7–13)
Second round
(April 16–21)
Finals
(April 25–27)
                           
  1  Iowa* 2  
7  Utah 1  
  1  Iowa* 1  
  8  Tulsa 2  
4  Sioux Falls 1
  8  Tulsa 2  
    8  Tulsa 0
  2  Rio Grande Valley* 2
  2  Rio Grande Valley* 2  
6  Reno 1  
  2  Rio Grande Valley* 2
  3  Austin 1  
3  Austin 2
  5  Dakota 1  

Notes

  • The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
  • The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
  • The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*).
  • Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
  • Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

April 25, 2010 Recap
Boxscore
Rio Grande Valley Vipers 124, Tulsa 66ers 107    Tulsa Convention Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Attendance: 5,453
Referees:
  • #58 Josh Tiven
  • #14 Nick Buchert
  • #52 James Williams
Scoring by quarter: 27–27, 34–32, 33–21, 30–27
Pts: Mike Harris 24
Rebs: Will Conroy 16
Asts: Will Conroy 11
Pts: Larry Owens 21
Rebs: Latavious Williams 13
Asts: Wink Adams 7
April 27, 2010 Recap
Boxscore
Tulsa 66ers 91, Rio Grande Valley Vipers 94    State Farm Arena, Hidalgo, Texas
Attendance: 6,198
Referees:
  • #34 Kevin Cutler
  • #36 Brent Barnaky
  • #33 J. T. Orr
Scoring by quarter: 22–24, 21–18, 24–22, 24–30
Pts: Larry Owens 25
Rebs: Latavious Williams 8
Asts: Wink Adams 8
Pts: Mike Harris 26
Rebs: Mike Harris 16
Asts: Antonio Anderson 9
Rio Grande Valley wins series, 2–0

2010–11

Regular season

Eastern Conference

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Iowa Energy (1) 37 13 .740 21–4 16–9
x-Erie BayHawks (5) 32 18 .640 5 18–7 14–11
Fort Wayne Mad Ants 24 26 .480 13 16–9 8–17
Dakota Wizards 19 31 .380 18 11–14 8–17
Maine Red Claws 18 32 .360 19 14–11 4–21
Springfield Armor 13 37 .260 24 7–18 6–19
Sioux Falls Skyforce 10 40 .200 27 6–19 4–21

Western Conference

Team W L PCT GB Home Road
x-Reno Bighorns (2) 34 16 .680 20–5 14–11
x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (3) 33 17 .660 1 17–8 16–9
x-Tulsa 66ers (4) 33 17 .660 1 17–8 16–9
x-Bakersfield Jam (6) 29 21 .580 5 17–8 12–13
x-Utah Flash (7) 28 22 .560 6 16–9 12–13
x-Texas Legends (8) 24 26 .480 10 15–10 9–16
Idaho Stampede 24 26 .480 10 12–13 12–13
Austin Toros 22 28 .440 12 13–12 9–16
New Mexico Thunderbirds 20 30 .400 14 13–12 7–18

Notes

  • x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
  • Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.

Playoffs

The Eastern and Western Conference winners, along with the next six teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds.

  First round
(April 6–14)
Second round
(April 15–20)
Finals
(April 24–29)
                           
  1  Iowa* 2  
7  Utah 1  
  1  Iowa* 2  
  4  Tulsa 0  
4  Tulsa 2
  8  Texas 0  
    1  Iowa* 2
  3  Rio Grande Valley 1
  2  Reno* 2  
5  Erie 1  
  2  Reno* 0
  3  Rio Grande Valley 2  
3  Rio Grande Valley 2
  6  Bakersfield 1  

Notes

  • The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
  • The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
  • The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*).
  • Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
  • Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.

Finals

April 24, 2011
8:00 p.m. ET
Recap
Boxscore
Iowa Energy 123, Rio Grande Valley Vipers 106    State Farm Arena, Hidalgo, Texas
Attendance: 4,096
Referees:
  • #40 J. T. Orr
  • #32 Tre Maddox
  • #43 Kevin Scott
Scoring by quarter: 28–37, 31–26, 29–9, 35–34
Pts: Curtis Stinson 29
Rebs: Curtis Stinson 10
Asts: Hannah, Stinson 10 each
Pts: Mouhammad Faye 22
Rebs: Mouhammad Faye 9
Asts: Terrel Harris 6
April 27, 2011
8:00 p.m. ET
Recap
Boxscore
Rio Grande Valley Vipers 141, Iowa Energy 122    Wells Fargo Arena, Des Moines, Iowa
Attendance: 14,036
Referees:
  • #17 Scott Twardoski
  • #31 Karl Lane
  • #12 Scott Bolnick
Scoring by quarter: 27–29, 38–34, 41–24, 35–35
Pts: Jerel McNeal 37
Rebs: Mouhammad Faye 12
Asts: Jerel McNeal 8
Pts: Moses Ehambe 33
Rebs: Curtis Stinson 10
Asts: Curtis Stinson 12
April 29, 2011
8:00 p.m. ET
Recap
Boxscore
Rio Grande Valley Vipers 111, Iowa Energy 119    Wells Fargo Arena, Des Moines, Iowa
Attendance: 9,054
Referees:
  • #31 Karl Lane
  • #32 Tre Maddox
  • #40 J. T. Orr
Scoring by quarter: 39–34, 22–28, 27–19, 23–38
Pts: Jerel McNeal 29
Rebs: Jerel McNeal 11
Asts: Jerel McNeal 6
Pts: Stefhon Hannah 31
Rebs: Stanley Robinson 11
Asts: Curtis Stinson 4
Iowa wins series, 2–1

2011–12

References

General

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • NBA Development League — (NBA D League) NBA Development League logo Sport Basketball Founded 2001 Inaugural season 200 …   Wikipedia

  • basketball — /bas kit bawl , bah skit /, n. 1. a game played by two teams of usually five players each on a rectangular court having a raised basket or goal at each end, points being scored by tossing the ball through the opponent s basket. 2. the round,… …   Universalium

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”