- Mineralized tissues
Mineralized tissues are biological tissues that incorporate minerals into soft matrices. Typically these tissues form a protective shield or structural support. Bone, mollusc shells, deep sea sponge Euplectella species, radiolarians, diatoms, antler bone, tendon, cartilage, tooth enamel and dentin are some examples where mineralized tissues are found.
These tissues have been finely tuned to enhance their mechanical capabilities over millions of years of evolution. Thus, mineralized tissues have been the subject of many studies since there is a lot to learn from nature as seen from the growing field of biomimetics. The remarkable structural organization and engineering properties makes these tissues desirable candidates for duplication by artificial means. Mineralized tissues inspire miniaturization, adaptability and multifunctionality. While natural materials are made up of a limited number of components, a larger variety of material chemistries can be used to simulate the same properties in engineering applications. However, the success of biomimetics lies in fully grasping the performance and mechanics of these biological hard tissues before swapping the natural components with artificial materials for engineering design.
Mineralized tissues combine stiffness, low weight, strength and toughness due to the presence of minerals (the inorganic part) in soft protein networks and tissues (the organic part). There are approximately 60 different minerals generated through biological processes, but the most common ones are calcium carbonate found in mollusk shells and hydroxyapatite present in teeth and bones. Although one might think that the mineral content of these tissues can make them fragile, studies have shown that mineralized tissues are 1,000 to 10,000 times tougher than the minerals they contain. The secret to this underlying strength is in the organized layering of the tissue. Due to this layering, loads and stresses are transferred throughout several length-scales, from macro to micro to nano, which results in the dissipation of energy within the arrangement. These scales or hierarchical structures are therefore able to distribute damage and resist cracking. Two types of biological tissues have been the target of extensive investigation, namely nacre from mollusk shells and bone, which are both high performance natural composites. Many mechanical and imaging techniques such as nanoindentation and atomic force microscopy are used to characterize these tissues. Although the degree of efficiency of biological hard tissues are yet unmatched by any man-made ceramic composites, some promising new techniques to synthesize them are currently under development.  Not all mineralized tissues develop through normal physiologic processes and are beneficial to the organism. For example, kidney stones contain mineralized tissues that are developed through pathologic processes. Hence, biomineralization is an important process to understand how these diseases occur.
- 1 Evolution
- 2 Hierarchical structure
- 3 Mineral component
- 4 Organic component
- 5 Formation of minerals
- 6 Organic-inorganic interface
- 7 Diseased mineralized tissues
- 8 Bioinspired materials
- 9 The future
- 10 References
- 11 Bibliography
The evolution of mineralized tissues has been puzzling for more than a century. It has been hypothesized that the first mechanism of mammalian tissue mineralization began either in the oral skeleton of conodont or the dermal skeleton of early agnathans. The dermal skeleton is just surface dentin and basal bone, which is sometimes overlaid by enameloid. It is thought that the dermal skeleton eventually became scales, which are homologous to teeth. Teeth were first seen in chondrichthyans and were made from all three components of the dermal skeleton, namely dentin, basal bone and enameloid. The mineralization mechanism of mammalian tissue was later elaborated in actinopterygians and sarcopterygians during bony fish evolution. It is expected that genetic analysis of agnathans will provide more insight into the evolution of mineralized tissues and clarify evidence from early fossil records.
Hierarchical structures are distinct features seen throughout different length scales. To understand how the hierarchical structure of mineralized tissues contributes to their remarkable properties, those for nacre and bone are described below.
Nacre has several hierarchical structural levels.
Some mollusk shells protect themselves from predators by using a two layered system, one of which is nacre. Nacre constitutes the inner layer while the other, outer, layer is made from calcite. The latter is hard and thus prevents any penetration through the shell, but is subject to brittle failure. On the other hand, nacre is softer and can uphold inelastic deformations, which makes it tougher than the hard outer shell. The mineral found in nacre is aragonite, CaCO3, and it occupies 95% vol. Interestingly, nacre is 3000 times tougher than aragonite and this has to do with the other component in nacre, the one that takes up 5% vol., which is the softer organic biopolymers. Furthermore, the nacreous layer also contains some strands of weaker material called growth lines that can deflect cracks.
The Microscale can be imagined by a three dimensional brick and mortar wall. The bricks would be 0.5 μm thick layers of microscopic aragonite polygonal tablets approximately 5-8 μm in diameter. What holds the bricks together are the mortars and in the case of nacre, it is the 20-30 nm organic material that plays this role. Even though these tablets are usually illustrated as flat sheets, different microscopy techniques have shown that they are wavy in nature with amplitudes as large as half of the tablet’s thickness. This waviness plays an important role in the fracture of nacre as it will progressively lock the tablets when they are pulled apart and induce hardening.
The 30 nm thick interface between the tablets that connects them together and the aragonite grains detected by scanning electron microscopy from which the tablets themselves are made of together represent another structural level. The organic material “gluing” the tablets together is made of proteins and chitin.
To summarize, on the macroscale, the shell, its two layers (nacre and calcite), and weaker strands inside nacre represent three hierarchical structures. On the microscale, the stacked tablet layers and the wavy interface between them are two other hierarchical structures. Lastly, on the nanoscale, the connecting organic material between the tablets as well as the grains from which they are made of is the final sixth hierarchical structure in nacre.
Like nacre and the other mineralized tissues, bone has a hierarchical structure that is also formed by the self assembly of smaller components. The mineral in bone (known as bone mineral) is hydroxyapatite with a lot of carbonate ions, while the organic portion is made mostly of collagen and some other proteins. Different sources report different numbers of hierarchical level in bone, which is a complex biological material. The types of mechanisms that operate at different structural length scales are yet to be properly defined. Five hierarchical structures of bone are presented below.
At scale of several millimetres to centimetre is where compact bone and spongy bone can be seen.
There are two hierarchical structures on the microscale. The first, at a scale of 100 μm to 1 mm, is inside the compact bone where cylindrical units called osteons and small struts can be distinguished. The second hierarchical structure, the ultrasturcture, at a scale of 5 to 10 μm, is the actual structure of the osteons and small struts.
There are also two hierarchical structures on the nanoscale. The first being the structure inside the ultrastructure that are fibrils and extrafibrillar space, at a scale of several hundred nanometres. The second are the elementary components of mineralized tissues at a scale of tens of nanometres. The components are the mineral crystals of hydroxyapatite, cylindrical collagen molecules, organic molecules such as lipids and proteins, and finally water. The hierarchical structure common to all mineralized tissues is the key to their mechanical performance.
The mineral is the inorganic component of mineralized tissues. This constituent is what is what makes the tissues harder and stiffer. Hydroxyapatite, calcium carbonate, silica, calcium oxalate, whitlockite, and monosodium urate are examples of minerals found in biological tissues. In mollusc shells, these minerals are carried to the site of mineralization in vesicles within specialized cells. Although they are in an amorphous mineral phase while inside the vesicles, the mineral destabilizes as it passes out of the cell and crystallizes. In bone, studies have shown that calcium phosphate nucleates within the hole area of the collagen fibrils and then grows in these zones until it occupies the maximum space.
The organic part of mineralized tissues is made of proteins. In bone for example, the organic layer is the protein collagen. The degree of mineral in mineralized tissues varies and the organic component occupies a smaller volume as tissue hardness increases. However, without this organic portion, the biological material would be brittle and break easily. Hence, the organic component of mineralized tissues increases their toughness. Moreover, many proteins are regulators in the mineralization process. They act in the nucleation or inhibition of hydroxyapatite formation. For example, the organic component in nacre is known to restrict the growth of aragonite. Some of the regulatory proteins in mineralized tissues are osteonectin, osteopontin, osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein and dentin phosphophoryn. In nacre, the organic component is porous, which allows the formation of mineral bridges responsible for the growth and order of the nacreous tablets.
Formation of minerals
Understanding the formation of biological tissues is inevitable in order to properly reconstruct them artificially. Even if questions remain in some aspects and the mechanism of mineralization of many mineralized tissues need yet to be determined, there are some ideas about those of mollusc shell, bone and sea urchin.
The main structural elements involved in the mollusk shell formation process are: a hydrophobic silk gel, aspartic acid rich protein, and a chitin support. The silk gel is part of the protein portion and is mainly composed of glycine and alanine. It is not an ordered structure. The acidic proteins play a role in the configuration of the sheets. The chitin is highly ordered and is the framework of the matrix. The main elements of the overall are:
- The silk gel fills the matrix to be mineralized before the mineralization takes place.
- The highly ordered chitin determines the orientation of the crystals.
- The components of the matrix are spatially distinguishable.
- Amorphous calcium carbonate is the first form of the mineral.
- Once nucleation begins on the matrix, the calcium carbonate turns into crystals.
- While crystals grow, some of the acidic proteins get trapped within them.
In bone, mineralization starts from a heterogeneous solution having calcium and phosphate ions. The mineral nucleates, inside the hole area of the collagen fibrils, as thin layers of calcium phosphate, which then grow to occupy the maximum space available there. The mechanisms of mineral deposition within the organic portion of the bone are still under investigation. Three possible suggestions are that nucleation is either due to the precipitation of calcium phosphate solution, caused by the removal of biological inhibitors or occurs because of the interaction of calcium-binding proteins.
Sea urchin embryo
The sea urchin embryo has been used extensively in developmental biology studies. The larvae form a sophisticated endoskeleton that is made of two spicules. Each of the spicules is a single crystal of mineral calcite. The latter is a result of the transformation of amorphous CaCO3 to a more stable form. Therefore, there are two mineral phases in larval spicule formation.
The mineral-protein interface with its underlying adhesion forces is involved in the toughening properties of mineralized tissues. The interaction in the organic-inorganic interface is important to understand these toughening properties.
At the interface, a very large force (>6-5 nN) is needed to pull the protein molecules away from the aragonite mineral in nacre, despite the fact that the molecular interactions are non-bonded. Some studies perform a finite element model analysis to investigate the behaviour of the interface. A model has shown that during tension, the back stress that is induced during the plastic stretch of the material plays a big role in the hardening of the mineralized tissue. As well, the nanoscale asperities that is on the tablet surfaces provide resistance to interlamellar sliding and so strengthen the material. A surface topology study has shown that progressive tablet locking and hardening, which are needed for spreading large deformations over large volumes, occurred because of the waviness of the tablets.
Diseased mineralized tissues
In vertebrates, mineralized tissues not only develop through normal physiological processes, but can also be involved in pathological processes. Some diseased areas that include the appearance of mineralized tissues include atherosclerotic plaques, tumoral calcinosis, juvenile dermatomyositis, kidney and salivary stones. All physiologic deposits contain the mineral hydroxyapatite or one analogous to it. Imaging techniques such as infrared spectroscopy are used to provide information on the type of mineral phase and changes in mineral and matrix composition involved in the disease. Also, clastic cells are cells that cause mineralized tissue resorption. If there is an unbalance of clastic cell, this will disrupt resorptive activity and cause diseases. One of the studies involving mineralized tissues in dentistry is on the mineral phase of dentin in order to understand its alteration with aging. These alterations lead to “transparent” dentin, which is also called sclerotic. It was shown that a ‘‘dissolution and reprecipitation’’ mechanism reigns the formation of transparent dentin. The causes and cures of these conditions can possibly be found from further studies on the role of the mineralized tissues involved.
The attractive properties of mineralized tissues like nacre and bone have led to the creation of a large number of biomimetic materials. Although improvements can be made, there are several techniques used to mimic these tissues. Some of the current techniques are described here for nacre imitation.
Large scale “model materials”
The large scale model of materials is based on the fact that crack deflection is an important toughening mechanism of nacre. This deflection happens because of the weak interfaces between the aragonite tiles. Systems on the macroscopic scales are used to imitate these week interfaces with layered composite ceramic tablets that are held together by weak interface “glue”. Hence, these large scale models can overcome the brittleness of ceramics. Since other mechanisms like tablet locking and damage spreading also play a role in the toughness of nacre, other models assemblies inspired by the waviness of microstructure of nacre have also been devised on the large scale.
Ice Templation is a new method that uses the physics of ice formation to develop a layered-hybrid material. In this system, ceramic particles in a concentrated suspension are frozen using carefully controlled freezing kinetics. As a result, a homogeneous, porous scaffold can be made, which is then filled with a second organic or inorganic phase to build dense layered composites.
Layer-by-layer deposition is a technique that as suggested by its name consists of a layer-by-layer assembly to make multilayered composites like nacre. Some examples of efforts in this direction include alternating layers of hard and soft components of TiN/Pt with an ion beam system. The composites made by this sequential deposition technique do not have a segmented layered microstructure. Thus, sequential adsorption has been proposed to overcome this limitation and consists of repeatedly adsorbing electrolytes and rinsing the tablets, which results in multilayers.
Thin film deposition: microfabricated structures
Thin film deposition focuses on reproducing the cross-lamellar microstructure of conch instead of mimicking the layered structure of nacre using micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS). Among mollusk shells, the conch shell has the highest degree of structural organization. The mineral aragonite and organic matrix are replaced by polysilicon and photoresist. The MEMS technology repeatedly deposits a thin silicon film. The interfaces are etched by reactive ion etching and then filled with photoresist. There are three films deposited consecutively. Although the MEMS technology is expensive and more time consuming, there is a high degree of control over the morphology and large numbers of specimens can be made.
The method of self assembly tries to reproduce not only the properties, but also the processing of bioceramics. In this process, raw materials readily available in nature are used to achieve stringent control of nucleation and growth. This nucleation occurs on a synthetic surface with some success. The technique occurs at low temperature and in an aqueous environment. Self-assembling films form templates that effect the nucleation of ceramic phases. The downside with this technique is its inability to form a segmented layered microstructure. Segmentation is an important property of nacre used for crack deflection of the ceramic phase without fracturing it. As a consequence, this technique does not mimic microstructural characteristics of nacre beyond the layered organic/inorganic layered structure and requires further investigation.
The various studies have increased progress towards understanding mineralized tissues. However, it is still unclear which micro/nanostructural features are essential to the material performance of these tissues. Also constitutive laws along various loading paths of the materials are currently unavailable. For nacre, the role of some nanograins and mineral bridges requires further studies to be fully defined. Successful biomimecking of mollusk shells will depend will on gaining further knowledge of all these factors, especially the selection of influential materials in the performance of mineralized tissues. Also the final technique used for artificial reproduction must be both cost effective and scalable industrially.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Espinosa, H. D.; Rim, J. E.; Barthelat, F.; Buehler, M. J. (2009). "Merger of structure and material in nacre and bone – Perspectives on de novo biomimetic materials". Progress in Materials Science 54 (8): 1059–1100. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.05.001.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Barthelat, F. (2007). "Biomimetics for next generation materials". Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences 365 (1861): 2907–2919. Bibcode 2007RSPTA.365.2907B. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.0006. PMID 17855221.
- ^ a b c d e Boskey, A.; Mendelsohn, R. (2005). "Infrared spectroscopic characterization of mineralized tissues". Vibrational Spectroscopy 38 (1–2): 107–114. doi:10.1016/j.vibspec.2005.02.015. PMC 1459415. PMID 16691288. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1459415.
- ^ a b Glimcher, M. (1959). "Molecular Biology of Mineralized Tissues with Particular Reference to Bone". Reviews of Modern Physics 31: 359. Bibcode 1959RvMP...31..359G. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.31.359.
- ^ The Biomimetic Materials Laboratory
- ^ Barthelat, F.; Espinosa, H. D. (2007). "An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fracture of Nacre–Mother of Pearl". Experimental Mechanics 47 (3): 311. doi:10.1007/s11340-007-9040-1.
- ^ a b Barthelat, F. ��O.; Li, C. M.; Comi, C.; Espinosa, H. D. (2006). "Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance". Journal of Materials Research 21 (8): 1977. Bibcode 2006JMatR..21.1977B. doi:10.1557/JMR.2006.0239.
- ^ a b c Fratzl, P.; Fratzl-Zelman, N.; Klaushofer, K.; Vogl, G.; Koller, K. (1991). "Nucleation and growth of mineral crystals in bone studied by small-angle X-ray scattering". Calcified Tissue International 48 (6): 407. doi:10.1007/BF02556454. PMID 2070275.
- ^ Nalla, R.; Kruzic, J.; Ritchie, R. (2004). "On the origin of the toughness of mineralized tissue: microcracking or crack bridging?". Bone 34 (5): 790–798. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.001. PMID 15121010.
- ^ Oyen, M. (2006). "Nanoindentation hardness of mineralized tissues". Journal of biomechanics 39 (14): 2699–2702. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.011. PMID 16253265.
- ^ "A new technique for imaging Mineralized Fibrils on Bovine Trabecular Bone Fracture Surfaces by Atomic Force Microscopy" (PDF). http://hansmalab.physics.ucsb.edu/pdf/321%20-%20Kindt,%20J.K._MRSProc._2005.pdf. Retrieved 2010-08-14.
- ^ Kawasaki, K.; Suzuki, T.; Weiss, K. (2004). "Genetic basis for the evolution of vertebrate mineralized tissue". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (31): 11356–11361. Bibcode 2004PNAS..10111356K. doi:10.1073/pnas.0404279101. PMC 509207. PMID 15272073. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=509207.
- ^ a b c d e Barthelat, F.; Tang, H.; Zavattieri, P.; Li, C.; Espinosa, H. (2007). "On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: A key feature in the material hierarchical structure". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 55 (2): 306. Bibcode 2007JMPSo..55..306B. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2006.07.007.
- ^ a b c d e f Hellmich, C.; Ulm, F. J. (2002). "Micromechanical Model for Ultrastructural Stiffness of Mineralized Tissues". Journal of Engineering Mechanics 128: 898. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:8(898).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Addadi, L.; Joester, D.; Nudelman, F.; Weiner, S. (2006). "Mollusk shell formation: a source of new concepts for understanding biomineralization processes". Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 12 (4): 980–987. doi:10.1002/chem.200500980. PMID 16315200.
- ^ Currey, J.; Brear, K.; Zioupos, P. (2004). "Notch sensitivity of mammalian mineralized tissues in impact". Proceedings. Biological sciences / the Royal Society 271 (1538): 517–522. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2634. PMC 1691617. PMID 15129962. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1691617.
- ^ a b Meyers, M.; Lin, A.; Chen, P.; Muyco, J. (2008). "Mechanical strength of abalone nacre: role of the soft organic layer". Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 1 (1): 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.03.001. PMID 19627773.
- ^ "Nucleation and inhibition of hydroxyapatite formation by mineralized tissue proteins" (PDF). http://www.biochemj.org/bj/317/0059/3170059.pdf. Retrieved 2010-08-14.
- ^ Beniash, E.; Aizenberg, J.; Addadi, L.; Weiner, S. (1997). "Amorphous calcium carbonate transforms into calcite during sea urchin larval spicule growth". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 264 (1380): 461. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0066.
- ^ a b Mohanty, B.; Katti, K.; Katti, D. (2008). "Experimental investigation of nanomechanics of the mineral-protein interface in nacre". Mechanics Research Communications 35: 17. doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2007.09.006.
- ^ a b Tang, H.; Barthelat, F.; Espinosa, H. (2007). "An elasto-viscoplastic interface model for investigating the constitutive behavior of nacre". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 55 (7): 1410. Bibcode 2007JMPSo..55.1410T. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2006.12.009.
- ^ Porter, A.; Nalla, R.; Minor, A.; Jinschek, J.; Kisielowski, C.; Radmilovic, V.; Kinney, J.; Tomsia, A. et al. (2005). "A transmission electron microscopy study of mineralization in age-induced transparent dentin". Biomaterials 26 (36): 7650–7660. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.059. PMID 16005961.
- Li T.S., Cutress T.W., Pearce E.I., and G.E. Coote (1996). "Effects of Arsenic or/and Fluoride on Mineralized rate Tissues". Fluoride 29 (3): 156–162. http://www.fluorideresearch.org/293/files/FJ1996_v29_n3_p156-162.pdf.
- T.G. Bromage (1991). "Issues related to mineralized tissue biology in human evolutionary research". Human Evolution 6 (12): 165–174. doi:10.1007/BF02435617.
- Neuendorf R.E., Saiz E., Pearce E.I., Tomsia A.P., and R.O. Ritchie (2008). "Adhesion between biodegradable polymers and hydroxyapatite: Relevance to synthetic bone-like materials and tissue engineering scaffolds". Acta Biomaterialia 4 (5): 1288–1296. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.006. PMID 18485842. http://www.lbl.gov/ritchie/Library/PDF/bio_adhesion.pdf.
- Kruzic J.J., and R.O. Ritchie (2007). "Fatigue of mineralized tissues: Cortical bone and dentin". Mechanical Behavior of biomedical Materials I: 3–17. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.04.002. http://www.lbl.gov/ritchie/Library/PDF/minfatigue.pdf.
- Belcherab A.M., Hansmad P.K., Stuckyac G.D., and D.E. Morsebe (1998). "First steps in harnessing the potential of biomineralization as a route to new high-performance composite materials" (abstract). Acta Materialia 46 (3): 733–736. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00253-X.
- Jäger I., and P. Fratzl (2000). "Mineralized Collagen Fibrils: A Mechanical Model with a Staggered Arrangement of Mineral Particles". Biophysical 79 (4): 1737–1746. Bibcode 2000BpJ....79.1737J. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76426-5.
- Fantner G.E., Hassenkam T., Kindt J.H., Weaver J.C., Birkedal H., Pechenik L., Cutroni J.A., Cidade G.A.G., Stucky G.D., Morse D.E., and P.K. Hansma (2005). "Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture". Nature Materials 4 (8): 612–616. doi:10.1038/nmat1428. PMID 16025123.
- Yao W., Cheng Z., Koester K.J., Ager J.W., Balooch M., Pham A., Chefo S., Busse C., Ritchie R.O., and N.E. Lane (2007). "The degree of bone mineralization is maintained with single intravenous bisphosphonates in aged estrogen-deficient rats and is a strong predictor of bone strength". Bone 41 (5): 804–812. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.06.021. PMID 17825637. http://www.lbl.gov/ritchie/Library/PDF/bone_estrogen.pdf.
- Nakamura H.K., Chiou W.-A., Saruwatari L., Aita H., and T. Ogawa (2005). "The Microstructure of Mineralized Tissue on Titanium Implant Interface". Microscopy and Microanalysis 11: 184–185. doi:10.1017/S143192760550833X.
- U. Ripamonti (2003). "Sculpturing the architecture of mineralized tissues: soluble, insoluble and geometric signals". European Cells and Materials 5: 29–30. http://m.ecmjournal.org/journal/supplements/vol005supp02/pdf/vol005supp02a21.pdf.
- M.H. Shamos (1965). "The Origin of Bioelectric Effects in Mineralized Tissues". Dental Research 44 (6): 1114–1115. doi:10.1177/00220345650440060901. PMID 5216237.
- J. Currey (2001). "Biomaterials: Sacrificial bonds heal bone". Nature 414 (6865): 699. doi:10.1038/414699a.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.