Circulation of elite

Circulation of elite

The Circulation of elite is a theory of regime change described by Italian social scientist Vilfredo Pareto (1848–1923).

Changes of regime, revolutions, and so on occur not when rulers are overthrown from below, but when one elite replaces another. The role of ordinary people in such transformation is not that of initiators or principal actors, but as followers and supporters of one elite or another.

It is a basic axiom for Pareto that people are unequal physically, as well as intellectually and morally. In society as a whole, and in any of its particular strata and groupings, some people are more gifted than others. Those who are most capable in any particular grouping are the elite.

The term elite has no moral or honorific connotations in Pareto's usage. It denotes simply "a class of the people who have the highest indices in their branch of activity." Pareto argues that "It will help if we further divide that [elite] class into two classes: a governing elite, comprising individuals who directly or indirectly play some considerable part in government, and a non- governing elite, comprising the rest." His main discussion focuses on the governing elite.

There is a basic ambiguity in Pareto's treatment of the notion of the elite. In some passages, as in the one quoted above, it would appear that those occupying elite positions are, by definition, the most qualified. But there are many other passages where Pareto asserts that people are assigned elite positions by virtue of being so labeled. That is, men assigned elite positions may not have the requisite capabilities, while others not so labeled may have them.

It would seem that Pareto believed that only in perfectly open societies, those with perfect social mobility, would elite position correlate fully with superior capacity. Only under such conditions would the governing elite, for example, consist of the people most capable of governing. The actual social fact is that obstacles such as inherited wealth, family connections, and the like prevent the free circulation of individuals through the ranks of society, so that those wearing an elite label and those possessing highest capacity tend to diverge to greater or lesser degrees.

Given the likelihood of divergencies between ascribed elite position and actual achievement and capacity, Pareto is a passionate advocate of maximum social mobility and of careers open to all. He saw the danger that elite positions that were once occupied by men of real talent would in the course of time be preempted by men devoid of such talent.

In the beginning, military, religious, and commercial aristocracies and plutocracies . . . must have constituted parts of the governing elite and some- times made up the whole of it. The victorious warrior, the prosperous mer- chant, the opulent plutocrat, were men of such parts, each in his own field, as to be superior to the average individual. Under those circumstances the label corresponded to an actual capacity. But as time goes by, considerable, some- times very considerable, differences arise between the capacity and the label. . . . Aristocracies do not last. . . . History is a graveyard of aristocracies. . . . They decay not in numbers only. They decay also in quality, in the sense that they lose their vigor, that there is a decline in the proportions of the residues which enabled them to win their power and hold it. The governing class is restored not only in numbers, but . . . in quality, by families rising from the lower classes and bringing with them the vigor and the proportions of residues necessary for keeping themselves in power. . . . Potent cause of disturbance in the equilibrium is the accumulation of superior elements in the lower classes and, conversely, of inferior elements in the higher classes.

When governing or nongoverning elites attempt to close themselves to the influx of newer and more capable elements from the underlying population, when the circulation of elites is impeded, social equilibrium is upset and the social order will decay. Pareto argued that if the governing elite does not "find ways to assimilate the exceptional individuals who come to the front in the subject classes," an imbalance is created in the body politic and the body social until this condition is rectified, either through a new opening of channels of mobility or through violent overthrow of an old ineffectual governing elite by a new one that is capable of governing.

Not only are intelligence and aptitudes unequally distributed among the members of society, but the residues as well. Under ordinary circumstances, the "conservative" residues of Class II preponderate in the masses and thus make them submissive. The governing elite, however, if it is to be effective, must consist of individuals who have a strong mixture of both Class I and Class II elements.

A predominance of interests that are primarily industrial and commercial enriches the ruling class in individuals who are shrewd, astute, and well- provided with combination instincts; and divests it of individuals of the sturdy impulsive type. . . . One might guess that if cunning, chicanery, combinations were all there was to government, the dominion of the class in which Class I residues by far predominate would last over a very, very long period. . . . But governing is also a matter of force, and as Class I residues grow stronger and Class II residues weaker, the individuals in power become less and less capable of using force, so that an unstable equilibrium results and revolutions occur. . . . The masses, which are strong in Class II residues, carry them up- wards into the governing class either by gradual infiltration or in sudden spurts through revolutions.

The ideal governing class contains a judicious mixture of lions and foxes, of men capable of decisive and forceful action and of others who are imaginative, innovative, and unscrupulous. When imperfections in the circulation of governing elites prevent the attainment of such judicious mixtures among the governing, regimes either degenerate into hidebound and ossified bureaucracies in- capable of renewal and adaptation, or into weak regimes of squabbling lawyers and rhetoricians incapable of decisive and forceful action. When this happens, the governed will succeed in overthrowing their rulers and new elites will institute a more effective regime.

What applies to political regimes applies to the economic realm as well. In this field, "speculators" are akin to the foxes and "rentiers" to the lions. Speculators and rentiers do not only have different interests but they reflect different temperaments and different residues. Neither is very good at using force, but they both otherwise fall roughly into the same dichotomous classes that explain political fluctuations.

In the speculator group Class I residues predominate, in the rentier group, Class II residues. . . . The two groups perform functions of differing utility in society. The [speculator] group is primarily responsible for change, for economic and social progress. The [rentier] group, instead, is a powerful element in stability, and in many cases counteracts the dangers attending the adventurous capers of the [speculators]. A society in which the [rentiers] almost exclusively predominate remains stationary and, as it were, crystallized. A society in which [the speculators] predominate lacks stability, lives in a state of shaky equilibrium that may be upset by a slight accident from within or from without.

Like in the governing elite where things work best when both residues of Class I and Class II are represented, so in the economic order maximum effectiveness is attained when both rentiers and speculators are present, each providing a balance by checking the excesses of the other. Pareto implies through- out that a judicious mixture in top elites of men with Class I and Class II residues makes for the most stable economic structure, as well as for the most enduring political structure.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Élite américaine — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite bourgeoise — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite canadienne — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite canadienne-française — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite chrétienne — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite conservatrice — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite culturelle — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite européenne — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite française — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Élite internationale — Élite Élite est un substantif de genre féminin, dérivé de l ancien français eslite (du latin eligere qui donnera élu). Étymologiquement, le terme se rattache donc à l idée d élection, non au sens du suffrage mais à celui de l approbation par… …   Wikipédia en Français

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”