Pendle witch trials

The Pendle witch trials of 1612 are among the most famous witch trials in English history, and some of the best recorded of the 17th century. The twelve accused lived in the area around Pendle Hill in Lancashire, and were charged with the murders of ten people by the use of witchcraft. All but two were tried at Lancaster Assizes 17–19 August 1612 along with the Samlesbury witches and others, in what became known as the Lancashire witch trials. One was tried at York Assizes on 27 July 1612, and another died in prison. Of the eleven individuals who went to trial – nine women and two men – ten were found guilty and executed by hanging and one was found not guilty.

The Lancashire witch trials were unusual for England at that time in two respects: the official publication of the trial proceedings by the clerk to the court, Thomas Potts, in his "The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster", and in the number of witches hanged together: ten at Lancaster and one at York. It has been estimated that in all of the English witch trials between the early-15th and late-18th centuries, fewer than 500 witches were executed, so this one series of trials over three days in the summer of 1612 accounts for more than 2% of that total.

Six of the Pendle witches came from one of two families, each headed by a female in her eighties at the time of the trials: Elizabeth Southerns (aka Demdike), her daughter Elizabeth Device, and her grandchildren James and Alizon Device; Anne Whittle (aka Chattox), and her daughter Anne Redferne. The others accused were Jane Bulcock and her son John Bulcock, Alice Nutter, Katherine Hewitt, Alice Gray, and Jennet Preston. The outbreaks of witchcraft in and around Pendle may demonstrate the extent to which people could make a living by posing as witches. Many of the allegations resulted from accusations that members of the Demdike and Chattox families made against each other, perhaps because they were in competition, trying to make a living from healing, begging and extortion.

Religious and political background

The accused witches lived in the area around Pendle Hill, in Lancashire, a county which, at the end of the 16th century, was regarded by the authorities as a wild and lawless region: an area "fabled for its theft, violence and sexual laxity, where the church was honoured without much understanding of its doctrines by the common people". [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=5.] The nearby Cistercian abbey at Whalley had been dissolved by Henry VIII in 1537, a move strongly resisted by the local people, over whose lives the abbey had until then exerted an important influence. Despite the abbey's closure and the execution of its abbot, the people of Pendle remained largely faithful to their Roman Catholic beliefs and openly reverted to Catholicism on Queen Mary's ascent to the throne in 1553. When Mary's half-sister Elizabeth came to the throne in 1558, the Catholic priests once again had to go into hiding, but in remote areas like Pendle they continued to conduct mass in secret. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|pp=8–9.]

On Elizabeth's death in 1603, she was succeeded by James I. A product of the Scottish Reformation, James had taken a great interest in witchcraft, and by the early 1590s, he had become convinced that he was being plotted against by Scottish witches. [Harvnb|Pumfrey|2002|p=23.] After a visit to Denmark, he had attended the trial in 1590 of the North Berwick Witches, who were convicted of using witchcraft to send a storm against the ship that carried James and his wife Anne back home to Scotland. In 1597, he wrote a book, "Daemonologie", instructing his followers that they must denounce and prosecute any supporters or practitioners of witchcraft. James acceded to the English throne in 1603, and one year later a law was enacted calling for the death penalty to be imposed where it was proven that harm had been caused through the use of magic, or corpses had been exhumed for magical purposes. [Harvnb|Martin|2007|p=96.] By the time of the Pendle witch trials though, James' attitude towards witchcraft seems to have become more sceptical, even to the extent of becoming personally involved in investigations to expose discrepancies in the evidence presented against some accused witches. [Harvnb|Pumfrey|2002|pp=23–24.]

In early 1612, the year of the trials, every justice of the peace (JP) in Lancashire was ordered to compile a list of recusants in their area, those who refused to attend the English Church and to take communion, a criminal offence at that time. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=7.] Roger Nowell of Read Hall, on the edge of Pendle Forest, was the JP for Pendle. It was against this background of seeking out religious nonconformists that, in March 1612, Nowell investigated a complaint made to him by the family of John Law, a pedlar, who claimed to have been injured by witchcraft. [Harvnb|Sharpe|2002|pp=1–2.] Many of those who subsequently became implicated as the investigation progressed did indeed consider themselves to be witches, in the sense of being village healers who practised magic, probably in return for payment, but such men and women were common in 16th-century rural England, an accepted part of village life. [Harvnb|Lumby|2002|p=67.]

It was perhaps difficult for the judges charged with hearing the trials – Sir James Altham and Sir Edward Bromley – to understand King James' attitude towards witchcraft. The king was head of the judiciary, and Bromley was hoping for promotion to a circuit nearer London. Altham was nearing the end of his judicial career, but he had recently been accused of a miscarriage of justice at the York Assizes, which had resulted in a woman being sentenced to death by hanging for witchcraft. The judges may have been uncertain whether the best way to gain the king's favour was by encouraging convictions, or by "sceptically testing the witnesses to destruction". [Harvnb|Pumfrey|2002|p=24.]

Events leading up to the trials

One of the accused, Demdike, had been regarded in the area as a witch for fifty years, and some of the deaths the witches were accused of had happened many years before Roger Nowell started to take an interest in 1612. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=11.] The event that seems to have triggered Nowell's investigation, culminating in the Pendle witch trials, occurred on 21 March 1612.Harvnb|Sharpe|2002|p=1.]

On her way to Trawden Forest, Alizon Device encountered John Law, a pedlar from Halifax, and asked him for some pins. [Harvnb|Bennett|1993|p=9.] Whether she meant to buy them from him as she claimed, and Law refused to undo his pack for such a small transaction, or whether she had no money and was begging for them, as Law's son Abraham claimed, is unclear. However, a few minutes after their encounter, Law suffered a stroke, for which he blamed Alizon. [Harvnb|Swain|2002|p=83.] She appears to have been convinced of her own powers; when Abraham Law took her to visit his father a few days after the incident, she reportedly confessed and asked for his forgiveness. [Harvnb|Bennett|1993|p=10.]

Alizon Device, her mother Elizabeth, and her brother James were summoned to appear before Nowell on 30 March 1612. Alizon confessed that she had sold her soul to the Devil, and that she had told him to lame John Law after he had called her a thief. Her brother, James, stated that his sister had also confessed to bewitching a local child. Elizabeth was more reticent, admitting only that her mother, Demdike, had a mark on her body, something that many, including Nowell, would have regarded as having been left by the Devil after he had sucked her blood. [Harvnb|Bennett|1993|p=11.] When questioned about Anne Whittle (Chattox), the matriarch of the other family reputedly involved in witchcraft in and around Pendle, Alizon perhaps saw an opportunity for revenge. There may have been bad blood between the two families, possibly dating from 1601, when a member of Chattox's family broke into Malkin Tower, the home of the Devices, and stole goods worth about £1, [Harvnb|Swain|2002|p=80.] the equivalent of about £100 as of 2008.citation |title=Currency converter |publisher=The National Archives | url=http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/currency/. Retrieved on 14 June 2008.] Alizon accused Chattox of murdering four men by witchcraft, and of killing her father, John Device, who had died in 1601. She claimed that her father had been so frightened of Old Chattox that he had agreed to give her convert|8|lb|kg|1 of oat meal each year in return for her promise not to hurt his family. The meal was handed over annually until the year before John's death; on his deathbed John claimed that his sickness had been caused by Chattox because they had not paid for protection. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=15.]

On 2 April 1612, Demdike, Chattox, and Chattox's daughter Anne Redferne, were summoned to appear before Nowell. Both Demdike and Chattox were by then blind and in their eighties, and both provided Nowell with damaging confessions. Demdike claimed that she had given her soul to the Devil 20 years previously, and Chattox that she had given her soul to "a Thing like a Christian man",Harvnb|Bennet|1993|p=15.] on his promise that "she would not lack anything and would get any revenge she desired". Although Anne Redferne made no confession, Demdike said that she had seen her making clay figures. Margaret Crooke, another witness seen by Nowell that day, claimed that her brother had fallen sick and died after having had a disagreement with Redferne, and that he had frequently blamed her for his illness. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|pp=17–19.] Based on the evidence and confessions he had obtained, Nowell committed Demdike, Chattox, Anne Redferne and Alizon Device to Lancaster Gaol, to be tried for "maleficium" – causing harm by witchcraft – at the next assizes. [Harvnb|Bennett|1993|p=16.]

Meeting at Malkin Tower

The committal and subsequent trial of the four women might have been the end of the matter, had it not been for a meeting organised by Elizabeth Device at Malkin Tower, the home of the Demdikes, held on 6 April 1612, Good Friday. To feed the party, James Device stole a neighbour's sheep. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=19.]

Friends and others sympathetic to the family attended, and when word of it reached Roger Nowell, he decided to investigate. On 27 April 1612, an inquiry was held before Nowell and another magistrate, Nicholas Bannister, to determine the purpose of the meeting at Malkin Tower, who had attended, and what had happened there. As a result of the inquiry, eight more people were accused of witchcraft and committed for trial: Elizabeth Device, James Device, Alice Nutter, Katherine Hewitt, John Bulcock, Jane Bulcock, Alice Gray and Jennet Preston. Preston lived across the border in Yorkshire, so she was sent for trial at York Assizes; the others were sent to Lancaster Gaol, to join the four already imprisoned there. [Harvnb|Bennett|1993|p=22.]

Malkin Tower is believed to have been near the village of Newchurch in Pendle, and to have been demolished soon after the trials.Harvnb|Fields|1998|p=60.]

Trials

The Pendle witches were tried in a group that also included the Samlesbury witches, Jane Southworth, Jennet Brierley, and Ellen Brierley, the charges against whom included child murder and cannibalism; Margaret Pearson, the so-called Padiham witch, who was facing her third trial for witchcraft, this time for killing a horse; and Isobel Robey, from Windle, accused of using witchcraft to cause sickness. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=2.]

Some of the accused Pendle witches, such as Alizon Device, seem to have genuinely believed in their guilt. Others protested their innocence to the end. Jennet Preston was the first to be tried, at York Assizes on 27 July 1612, where she was found guilty and subsequently hanged. Nine others – Alizon Device, Elizabeth Device, James Device, Anne Whittle, Anne Redferne, Alice Nutter, Katherine Hewitt, John Bulcock and Jane Bulcock – were found guilty and hanged at Lancaster Moor on 20 August 1612. Elizabeth Southerns died while awaiting trial. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=23.] Only one of the accused, Alice Gray, was found not guilty.

York Assizes, 27 July 1612

Jennet Preston lived in Gisburn, in Yorkshire, so she was sent to York Assizes for trial. Her judges were Sir James Altham and Sir Edward Bromley. Preston was accused of murdering Thomas Lister by witchcraft, to which she pleaded not guilty. She had already appeared before Bromley in 1611, charged with murdering a child by witchcraft, but had been found not guilty. The most damning evidence given against her was that when she had been taken to see Lister's body, the corpse "bled fresh bloud presently, in the presence of all that were there present" after she touched it. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=179.] According to a statement made to Nowell by James Device on 27 April, Jennet had attended the Malkin Tower meeting to seek help with Lister's murder.Harvnb|Lumby|2002|p=60.] She was found guilty, and sentenced to death by hanging. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=177.]

Lancaster Assizes, 17–19 August 1612

All of the other accused lived in Lancashire, so they were sent to Lancaster Assizes for trial, where the judges were once again Altham and Bromley. The prosecutor was local magistrate Roger Nowell, who had been responsible for collecting the various statements and confessions from the accused. Nine-year-old Jennet Device was a key witness for the prosecution, something that would not have been permitted in many other 17th-century criminal trials. However, King James had made a case for suspending the normal rules of evidence for witchcraft trials in his "Daemonologie". [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=28.] As well as identifying those who had attended the Malkin Tower meeting, Jennet also gave evidence against her mother, brother, and sister.

;17 AugustAnne Whittle (Chattox) was accused of the murder of Robert Nutter. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=34.] She pleaded not guilty, but the confession she had made to Roger Nowell was read out in court, and evidence against her was presented by James Robinson, who had lived with the Chattox family 20 years earlier. He claimed to remember that Nutter had accused Chattox of turning his beer sour, and that she was commonly believed to be a witch. Chattox broke down and admitted her guilt, calling on God for forgiveness and the judges to be merciful to her daughter, Anne Redferne. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|pp=27–28.]

Elizabeth Device was charged with the murders of James Robinson, John Robinson and, together with Alice Nutter and Demdike, the murder of Henry Mitton. Potts records that "this odious witch"Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=55.] suffered from a facial deformity resulting in her left eye being set lower than her right. The main witness against Device was her daughter, Jennet, who was about nine years old. When Jennet was asked to stand up and give evidence against her mother, Elizabeth began to scream and curse her daughter, forcing the judges to have her removed from the courtroom before the evidence could be heard. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=52.] Jennet was placed on a table and stated that she believed her mother had been a witch for three or four years. She also said her mother had a familiar called Ball, who appeared in the shape of a brown dog. Jennet claimed to have witnessed conversations between Ball and her mother, in which Ball had been asked to help with various murders. James Device also gave evidence against his mother, saying he had seen her making a clay figure of one of her victims, John Robinson.Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=29.] Elizabeth Device was found guilty.

James Device pleaded not guilty to the murders by witchcraft of Anne Townley and John Duckworth. However he, like Chattox, had earlier made a confession to Nowell, which was read out in court. That, and the evidence presented against him by his sister Jennet, who said that she had seen her brother asking a black dog he had conjured up to help him kill Townley, was sufficient to persuade the jury to find him guilty. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=65.] [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=70.]

;18 AugustThe trials of the three Samlesbury witches were heard before Anne Redferne's first appearance in court, late in the afternoon, charged with the murder of Robert Nutter. The evidence against her was considered unsatisfactory, and she was acquitted. [Harvnb|Bennett|1993|p=27.]

;19 AugustAnne Redferne was not so fortunate the following day, when she faced her second trial for the murder of Robert Nutter's father, Christopher, to which she pleaded not guilty. Demdikes's statement to Nowell, which accused Anne of having made clay figures of the Nutter family, was read out in court. Witnesses were called to testify that Anne was a witch "more dangerous than her Mother".Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=33.] However, she refused to admit her guilt to the end, and had given no evidence against any others of the accused. [Harvnb|Bennett|1993|pp=27–28.] Anne Redferne was found guilty. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=108.]

Jane Bulcock and her son John Bulcock, both from Newchurch in Pendle, were accused and found guilty of the murder by witchcraft of Jennet Deane.Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=131.] Both denied that they had attended the meeting at Malkin Tower, but Jennet Device identified Jane as having been one of those present, and John as having turned the spit to roast the stolen sheep, the centrepiece of the Good Friday meeting at the Demdike's home.Harvnb|Bennett|1993|p=29.]

Alice Nutter was unusual among the accused in being comparatively wealthy, the widow of a tenant yeoman farmer. She made no statement either before or during her trial, except to enter her plea of not guilty to the charge of murdering Henry Mitton by witchcraft. The prosecution alleged that she, together with Demdike and Elizabeth Device, had caused Mitton's death after he had refused to give Demdike a penny she had begged from him. The only evidence against Alice seems to have been that James Device claimed Demdike had told him of the murder, and Jennet Device in her statement said that Alice had been present at the Malkin Tower meeting. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=34.] Alice may have called in on the meeting at Malkin Tower on her way to a secret (and illegal) Good Friday Catholic service, and refused to speak for fear of incriminating her fellow Catholics. Many of the Nutter family were Catholics, and two had been executed as Jesuit priests, one in 1584 and the other in 1600. Alice Nutter was found guilty. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=116.]

Katherine Hewitt (aka Mould-Heeles) was charged and found guilty of the murder of Anne Foulds. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=124.] She was the wife of a clothier from Colne, [Harvnb|Swain|2002|p=75.] and had attended the meeting at Malkin Tower with Alice Grey. According to the evidence given by James Device, both Hewitt and Grey told the others at that meeting that they had killed a child from Colne, Anne Foulds. Jennet Device also picked Katherine out of a line-up, and confirmed her attendance at the Malkin Tower meeting. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=36]

Alice Gray was accused with Katherine Hewitt of the murder of Anne Foulds. Potts does not provide an account of Alice Gray's trial, simply recording her as one of the Salmesbury witches – which she was not, as she was one of those identified as having been at the Malkin Tower meeting – and naming her in the list of those found not guilty.Harvnb|Davies|1971|pp=29, 167.]

Alizon Device, whose encounter with John Law had triggered the events leading up to the trials, was charged with causing harm by witchcraft. Uniquely among the accused, Alizon was confronted in court by her alleged victim, John Law. She seems to have genuinely believed in her own guilt; when Law was brought into court Alizon fell to her knees in tears and confessed. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=37.] She was found guilty. [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=139.]

"The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster"

Thomas Potts, the clerk to the Lancaster Assizes, wrote the account of the trials of the Lancaster witches, making them some of the most famous and best recorded witch trials of the 17th century. Potts was instructed to write his account by the trial judges, Sir James Altham and Sir Edward Bromley. He completed the work on 16 November 1612, and submitted it to the judges for review. Bromley revised and corrected the manuscript before its publication in 1613, declaring it to be "truly reported" and "fit and worthie to be published". [Harvnb|Davies|1971|p=xli.]

Historian Stephen Pumfrey has suggested that Bromley and Altham worked closely with Potts in the writing of "The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster" "to manipulate the extraordinary records into an account that would protect and advance their careers". [Harvnb|Pumfrey|2002|p=32.] Potts' book has been called the "clearest example of an account [of a witch trial] obviously published to display the shining efficiency and justice of the legal system". [Harvnb|Gibson|2002|p=53.] Although written as an apparently verbatim account, Potts was not writing a report of what was actually said at the trials; instead, he was reflecting what had happened.Harvnb|Gibson|2002|p=48.]

In the early 17th-century English legal process, all indictments were initially submitted to a grand jury, whose job was to decide whether there was a "prima facie" case against the accused. Once a batch of indictments had been found, then that group of prisoners was taken into the courtroom to be tried by the petty jury, the forerunner of the modern jury. The accused witches would not have been tried separately as Potts' account suggests, but in groups. [Harvnb|Gibson|2002|pp=48–49.] Researcher Marion Gibson has suggested that "Potts and other pamphleteers have a different understanding of truthful reporting from modern scholars, subjugating what really happened to what ought to have happened." Nevertheless, Potts "seems to give a generally trustworthy, though not comprehensive, account of an Assize witchcraft trial, provided that the reader is constantly aware of his use of written material instead of verbatim reports". [Harvnb|Gibson|2002|p=50.]

Modern interpretation

It has been estimated that in all of the English witch trials between the early-15th and late-18th centuries, fewer than 500 witches were executed, so this one series of trials over three days in the summer of 1612 accounts for more than 2% of that total. [Harvnb|Sharpe|2002|p=3.] Court records show that Lancashire was unusual in the north of England for the frequency of its witch trials. Neighbouring Cheshire, for instance, also suffered from economic problems and religious activists, but there only 47 individuals were indicted for causing harm by witchcraft between 1589 and 1675, of whom 11 were found guilty. [Harvnb|Sharpe|2002|p=10.]

Pendle was part of the parish of Whalley, an area covering convert|180|sqmi|km2|, too large to be effective in preaching and teaching the doctrines of the Church of England: both the survival of Catholicism and the upsurge of witchcraft in Lancashire have been attributed to its over-stretched parochial structure. Until its dissolution, the spiritual needs of the people of Pendle and surrounding districts had been served by nearby Whalley Abbey, but its closure in 1537 left a moral vacuum. [Harvnb|Mullett|2002|pp=88–89.]

Many of the allegations made in the Pendle witch trials resulted from members of the Demdike and Chattox families making accusations against each other. Historian John Swain has said that the outbreaks of witchcraft in and around Pendle demonstrate the extent to which people could make a living either by posing as a witch, or by accusing or threatening to accuse others of being a witch. [Harvnb|Swain|2002|p=83.] Although it is implicit in much of the literature on witchcraft that the accused were victims, often mentally or physically abnormal, for some at least, it may have been a trade like any other, albeit one with significant risks. [Harvnb|Swain|2002|p=85.] There may have been bad blood between the Demdike and Chattox families because they were in competition with each other, trying to make a living from healing, begging and extortion. [Harvnb|Swain|2002|p=80.] The Demdikes are believed to have lived close to Newchurch in Pendle, and the Chattox family about convert|2|mi away, near the village of Fence.

Aftermath and legacy

Altham continued with his judicial career until his death in 1617, and Bromley achieved his desired promotion to the Midlands Circuit in 1616. Potts was given the keepership of Skalme Park by James in 1615, to breed and train the king's hounds. In 1618, he was given responsibility for "collecting the forfeitures on the laws concerning sewers, for twenty-one years". [Harvnb|Sharpe|2002|p=38.] Having played her part in the deaths of her mother, brother and sister, Jennet Device may eventually have found herself accused of witchcraft as well. A woman with that name was listed in a group of 20 tried at Lancaster Assizes on 24 March 1634, although it cannot be certain that it was the same Jennet Device.Harvnb|Findlay|2002|pp=146–148] The charge against her was the murder of Isabel Nutter, William Nutter's wife. [Harvnb|Hasted|1993|p=42.] In that series of trials the chief prosecution witness was a ten-year-old boy, Edmund Robinson. All but one of the accused were found guilty, but the judges refused to pass death sentences, deciding instead to refer the case to the king, Charles I. Under cross-examination in London, Robinson admitted that he had fabricated his evidence, but even though four of the accused were eventually pardoned, [Harvnb|Findlay|2002|p=151.] they all remained incarcerated in Lancaster Gaol, where it is likely that they died. An official record dated 22 August 1636 lists Jennet Device as one of those still held in the prison. [Harvnb|Ewen|2003|p=251.]

These later Lancashire witchcraft trials were the subject of a contemporary play written by Thomas Heywood and Richard Brome, "The Late Lancashire Witches".Harvnb|Findlay|2002|p=46.] More recently another play, "Cold Light Singing", based on the story of the Pendle witches, has been touring the UK since 2004. [citation |title=Previous Shows |publisher=Function Factory Theatre |url=http://www.functionfactorytheatre.co.uk/3.html. Retrieved on 28 April 2008.]

William Harrison Ainsworth, a Victorian novelist considered in his day the equal of Dickens, wrote a romanticised account of the Pendle witches in 1849. His "The Lancashire Witches" is the only one of his 40 novels never to have been out of print.Harvnb|Richards|2002|p=166.] Pendle Hill, which dominates the landscape of the area, continues to be associated with witchcraft, and hosts a hilltop gathering every Halloween. [citation |title=Pendle Hill |publisher=skiptonweb.co.uk|url=http://www.skiptonweb.co.uk/tourist/nearby_attractions/pendlehill.htm. Retrieved on 29 April 2008.] In 2004, the television show "Most Haunted" produced a Halloween Special on the Pendle Witches and the hauntings surrounding Pendle Hill.

In modern times, the witches have become the inspiration for Pendle's tourism and heritage industries, with local shops selling a variety of witch-motif gifts. Moorhouse's produces a beer called Pendle Witches Brew, and there is a convert|45|mi|adj=on long footpath called the Pendle Witch Trail, running from the Pendle Witch Heritage Centre to Lancaster Castle, where the accused witches were held before their trial. A bus route run by Burnley & Pendle has been branded "The Witch Way", with some of the vehicles operating on it named after the witches in the trial. [citation |title=The Witch Way |publisher=Burnley & Pendle |url=http://www.thewitchway.co.uk/|accessdate=6 September 2008.]

ee also

*North Berwick witch trials
*Bideford witch trial
*Cunning folk

References

;Notes

;Bibliography
*citation |first=Walter |last=Bennett |title=The Pendle Witches |publisher=Lancashire County Council Library and Leisure Committee |place=Lancaster |year=1976 |oclc=60013737 .
*citation |first=Peter |last=Davies |title=The Trial of the Lancaster Witches |publisher=Frederick Muller |place=London |year=1971 |origyear=1929 |isbn=978-0584109214 .:Facsimile reprint of Davies' 1929 book, containing the text of the "The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster" by Potts, Thomas (1613).
*citation |last=Ewen |first=Cecil L'Estrange |title=Witchcraft and Demonism |year=2003 |publisher=Kessinger |isbn=978-0766128965
*citation |last=Fields |first=Kenneth | title= Lancashire Magic and Mystery: Secrets of the Red Rose County |date=1998 |place= Wilmslow |publisher=Sigma |isbn=9781850586067 .
*citation |last=Findlay |first=Alison |chapter= Sexual and spiritual politics in the events of 1633–1634 and The Late Lancashire Witches |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title=The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place=Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=146–165 .
*citation |last=Gibson |first=Marion |contribution=Thomas Potts's Dusty Memory: Reconstructing Justice in "The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches" |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title=The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place=Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=42–57 .
*citation |first=Rachel A. C. |last=Hasted |title=The Pendle Witch Trial 1612 |place=Preston |publisher=Lancashire County Books |year=1993 |isbn=978-1871236231 .
*citation |last=Lumby |first=Jonathan |contribution='Those to whom evil is done': family dynamics in the Pendle witch trials |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title= The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place=Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=58–69 .
*citation |last=Martin |first=Lois |title=The History of Witchcraft |publisher=Pocket Essentials |place=Harpenden |year=2007 |isbn= 9781904048770 .
*citation |last=Mullett |first=Stephen |contribution=The Reformation in the Parish of Whalley |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title= The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place=Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=88–104 .
*citation |last=Niell|first=Robert |publication-date=1951 |title=Mist Over Pendle |isbn=0 09 035790 6
*citation |last=Pumfrey |first=Stephen |contribution=Potts, plots and politics: James I's "Daemonologie" and "The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches" |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title=The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place= Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=22–41 .
*citation |last=Richards |first=Jeffrey |contribution=The 'Lancashire novelist' and the Lancashire witches |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title=The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place=Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=166–187 .
*citation |last=Sharpe |first=James |contribution=The Lancaster witches in historical context |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title=The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place=Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=1–18 .
*citation |last=Swain |first=John |contribution=Witchcraft, economy and society in the forest of Pendle |editor-last=Poole |editor-first=Robert |title=The Lancashire Witches: Histories and Stories |place=Manchester |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0719062049 |pages=73–87 .

External links

*gutenberg|no=25929|name=Daemonologie (1597)
*gutenberg|no=15493|name=The Lancashire Witches (1849)
*gutenberg|no=18253|name=The Wonderfull Discoverie of Witches in the Countie of Lancaster (1613)