Three-domain system

The three-domain system is a biological classification introduced by Carl Woese in 1990, [cite journal | author = Woese C, Kandler O, Wheelis M | title = Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. | url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/87/12/4576 | journal = Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A | volume = 87 | issue = 12 | pages = 4576–9 | year = 1990 | pmid = 2112744 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576] that divides cellular life forms into archaea, bacteria, and eukaryote domains. In particular, it emphasizes the separation of prokaryotes into two groups, originally called "Eubacteria" and "Archaebacteria". Woese argued that, on the basis of differences in 16S rRNA genes, these two groups and the eukaryotes each arose separately from an ancestor with poorly developed genetic machinery, often called a progenote. To reflect these primary lines of descent, he treated each as a domain, divided into several different kingdoms.

__TOC__

Classification

Although the three-domain system was quickly adopted by most molecular systematists, biologists like Ernst Mayr criticized him for over-emphasizing the uniqueness of the archaebacteria and ignoring strong genetic similarities between the groups. [cite journal
last=Mayer
first=Ernst
author-link=Ernst Mayer
publication-date=August 18, 1998
date=May 26, 1998
year=1998
title=Two empires or three?
periodical=Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
volume=95
issue=17
pages=9720–9723
url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/17/9720
pmid=9707542
doi=10.1073/pnas.95.17.9720
journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences] Subsequent studies have confirmed that the archaea are unusual in the composition of their cell membrane and structure of their flagella. Other significant differences include archaeal systems for DNA replication and transcription which bear distinct similarity to those found in eukaryotes. For instance, archaeal RNA polymerase consists of up to 14 subunits, whereas most bacterial RNA polymerases have only 4 subunits. Analysis of these subunits suggests that they are more closely related to those found in eukaryotes. Also, the archaea produce a number of DNA-binding proteins with similarity to eukaryotic histones.

Nevertheless, a minority viewpoint suggests retaining the older two-empire system (Prokaryota and Eukaryota) and using the word "bacterium" in its earlier meaning of "prokaryote".

Which system is preferable depends partly on the relationships of the organisms in question. Although the progenote hypothesis is discredited, molecular trees tend to group living things into the three domains, with the eukaryotes placed beside or within the Archaea and the eubacteria forming a separate branch. However, it has been suggested this is an artifact of long branch attraction and that the root may instead belong among the eubacteria, in which case many eubacterial lines diverged before the archaebacteria did.

See also

* Phylogenetic tree
* Taxonomy
* Two-empire system
* Five-kingdom system
* Monera

References