Conditional sentence (Canada)

Conditional sentence (Canada)

A conditional sentence is a non-custodial punishment for crime in Canada.

Contents

Description

Conditional refers to rules the offender must follow in order to remain out of prison, which are similar to when one is on parole. Conditional sentences should not apply in certain cases, such as the infamous case of Canadian R. v. Rego, where a thief committed a terrible henous and grossly negligent (and indeed reckless) act against his former employer. This case law is frequently cited in criminology courses that are trying to examine sentencing principles.


These are most often treatment for drug or alcohol abuse, curfews, and community service.[1] Offenders who breach their conditions or re-offend must complete their sentence in prison.

To receive a conditional sentence, the sentencing judge must be satisfied that the offender does not pose a danger to the community. This allows less serious offenders to remain in their communities or at home. The largest percentage of conditional sentences are for property crime.[1] By law, a conditional sentence must be less than two years in duration; they have an average length of eight months.[1], and the offence that the offender was convicted of cannot be punishable by a minimum sentence of imprisonment.

Conditional sentences were introduced in 1995 as a response to perceived over-incarceration, especially among aboriginal Canadians.[2]

Administration

Conditional sentences are administed by provincial probation and parole services. The accused must be supervised by a probation officer and regularly attend meetings.

Breach of a Conditional Sentence

An accused person may be arrested without warrant where a peace officer believes on reasonable grounds that the accused has failed to comply with a condition or by warrant. An accused arrested for an alleged breach will be detained in custody pending a hearing to determine whether a breach occurred. The accused may apply for bail pending the hearing. However, under subsection 515(6) the accused bears the onus. Upon the earliest of the accused being arrested for an alleged breach or upon the issuance of a warrant, the conditional sentence stops running. At a breach hearing the Crown bears the onus to prove a breach on a balance of probabilities. If the court finds that a breach occurred, the accused bears to onus to justify the continuation of the conditional sentence. The court may do one of three things: take no action, order that the accused serve a portion of the conditional sentence in custody, or terminate the conditional sentence and order that the accused serve the remainder of the conditional sentence in custody.

Remission

A conditional sentence is a carceral sentence. However, the accused is ineligible for remission. Typically accused persons sentenced to custody are given a one day reduction for every two days served provided the accused is of good behaviour and follows the institutional rules (see sec. 6 of the Prisons and Reformatories Act). This results in the vast majority of accused persons serving two thirds of their sentence. Therefore, where the conditions of the conditional sentence resemble incarceration (e.g. a conditional requiring the accused person to reside in a secure psychiatric hospital), the conditional sentence may actually be more harsh than a carceral sentence (i.e. a two year conditional sentence which is effectively served in an institution is equivalent to a three year prison sentence since a person sentenced to three years would be eligible for mandatory release after two thirds of the sentence).

Controversy

Conditional sentences are controversial among some Canadians as being too lenient. For example, Mothers Against Drunk Driving have argued that they should not be available to persons convicted of impaired driving.[3]

Former justice minster Vic Toews, then justice critic for the Conservative Party of Canada, has also criticized them, saying that Canada needs to "get the drug men and the gunmen off the streets and get rid of conditional sentences."[2] In 2008, Stephen Harper noted that in Saskatchewan 39 per cent of criminals sentenced to house arrest were sent back to jail for breaching their conditions.[4] In addition, thousands convicted of crimes of violence, including homicides and sexual assaults have been given conditional sentences.[5]

Proponents of conditional sentences, however, have noted that the courts must not give a conditional sentence if it believes the offender will endanger the community. Furthermore, only a minority of offenders breech their conditions or reoffend, and that conditional sentencing saves taxpayers over $50,000 per inmate each year.[2]

See also

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Conditional sentence — For the non custodial punishment for a crime in Canada, see conditional sentence (Canada). In grammar, conditional sentences are sentences discussing factual implications or hypothetical situations and their consequences. Languages use a variety… …   Wikipedia

  • Criminal sentencing in Canada — This article is about criminal sentencing in Canada. For a world wide view, see sentence (law). In Canada, a judge sentences a person after they have been found guilty of a crime (which is not the same as being convicted of the crime).[1] After a …   Wikipedia

  • Conditional discharge — A conditional discharge is a sentence passed by a court whereby the defendant is not punished provided he or she complies with certain conditions. An absolute discharge is unconditional: in some jurisdictions, where no conditions are imposed at… …   Wikipedia

  • Conditional preservation of the saints — The Five Articles of Remonstrance Conditional election Unlimited atonement Total depravity …   Wikipedia

  • 2004 in Canada — yearbox in?=in Canada cp=20th Century c=21st century cf=22nd century yp1=2001 yp2=2002 yp3=2003 year=2004 ya1=2005 ya2=2006 ya3=2007 dp3=1970s dp2=1980s dp1=1990s d=2000s dn1=2010s dn2=2020s dn3=2030sIncumbentsEventsJanuary* January 1: Montreal… …   Wikipedia

  • Upper Canada College — Infobox Education in Canada motto = Palmam qui meruit ferat motto translation = Whoever hath deserved it let him bear the palm established = 1829 type = Independent affiliation = None endowment = $43,274,134 CAD [ [http://www.cra… …   Wikipedia

  • History of Upper Canada College — The history of Upper Canada College (UCC), located in Toronto, Ontario, began with its founding in 1829. Contents 1 Founding 2 University control 3 Move 4 World Wars …   Wikipedia

  • 2005 in Canada — Years in Canada: 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Centuries: 20th Century · 21st century · 22nd century Decades: 1970s 1980s  …   Wikipedia

  • January 2005 in Canada — NOTOC January 2005 : January February March April May June July August September October November DecemberEvents in Canada This page deals with current events in Canada, of interest to Canada and/or involving Canadians. January 28, 2005*The… …   Wikipedia

  • Child pornography laws in Canada — forbid the production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. Contents 1 Visual representations 2 Written depictions 3 Dynamic aspects of the Internet 4 …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”